[Minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine after traumatic injuries]. / Minimal-invasive dorsale und ventrale Stabilisierung der thorakolumbalen Wirbelsäule bei traumatischen Verletzungen.

Injuries of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common fractures of the spine due to their anatomical position and load. Common classification systems differentiate between stable and unstable injuries and thus also between operative and conservative therapy. The majority of injuries can be treated conservatively; however, unstable injuries require surgical treatment for a variety of reasons. In the grey area between stable and unstable injuries, a clinical decision based on clinical experience is necessary in order to select the best treatment. A wide variety of parameters must be included and a change in strategy from conservative to operative may also be necessary. Posterior instrumentation is the most common procedure; purely anterior stabilization is rarely used. The length of the instrumentation/spondylodesis depends on bone quality, age of the patient, and fracture. The decision as to whether anterior operative treatment should be performed depends on fracture morphology, success of reduction, and the resulting stability. The open surgical procedure is increasingly being replaced by minimally invasive procedures in posterior and anterior techniques but can be an advantage in complex injuries (B and C injuries according to AO). Hybrid procedures are also possible. This also applies to the treatment of osteoporotic fractures, since a clear assignment between traumatic and osteoporotic cause is not always easy and possible. This article describes the principles, the possible indications, and limitations of minimally invasive posterior and anterior stabilization.

Establishing an Interdisciplinary Compulsory Elective Subject 'Spine' in the Curriculum of the University Study Course of Human Medicine.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Back pain and pathologies of the spine are among the main reasons why people consult a doctor, both general practitioners and paediatricians, as well as, specifically, orthopaedists, surgeons, and neurosurgeons. This involvement of different faculties calls for a high degree of interdisciplinary co-operation. In order to mediate these aspects of spine-specific diagnostics, therapy, and research to students during their studies and to promote up-and-coming specialists, the compulsory elective subject 'Spine' was established. MATERIAL AND METHODS From the winter semester of 2013 to the winter semester of 2014, the compulsory elective subject 'Spine' was offered to interested students in the 7th semester of their studies of human medicine. The maximum number of participants per course was 16. Each course lasted four weeks. The subjects taught covered the fields of degeneration, deformities, and destruction in the specialist disciplines of orthopaedics, traumatology, neurosurgery, and rehabilitation medicine. In addition, orthopaedic technology and the local musculoskeletal and biomechanical research institute were integrated into the course. Various teaching methods were applied, including problem oriented learning, seminars, observation or consultation, and internship. At the end, the course was evaluated with regard to subjective learning success, knowledge gain, satisfaction, and interdisciplinarity. Participants were compared with all students of the semester employing an objectively structured clinical examination (OSCE). RESULTS Forty-eight students took part in the compulsory elective subject 'Spine'. The compulsory elective subject was given a positive rating in all fields. In the learning success control, all of the students had good to very good results. Students attending the elective subject performed significantly better in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (p ≤ 0.001). The compulsory elective course continues to be offered in the curriculum with a slightly altered schedule. CONCLUSIONS In view of the high prevalence of patients with back pain and its associated importance in terms of healthcare policy and social relevance, our experience leads us to recommend the general integration of such a compulsory elective subject in the study of human medicine. Key words:elective subject, spine, students, spinal disorders.

[Surgical treatment of adult spinal deformities]. / Operative Behandlung adulter spinaler Deformitäten.

BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is mostly a progressive disease which usually leads to chronic pain. Due to increased prevalence in older people many patients suffer from comorbidities, which make conservative and surgical treatment even more complex. OBJECTIVE: This article provides an overview on the current conservative and surgical treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An extensive literature search was carried out via Medline plus an additional evaluation of the authors' personal experiences was performed. RESULTS: The current conservative and surgical treatments are outlined and potential risk factors and predictors which may lead to inferior clinical outcome are discussed. CONCLUSION: Patients for whom even conservative treatment leads to success should be identified earlier and better. The surgical treatment ranges from minimally invasive decompression to multilevel fusions. Complications in large corrective interventions can be substantial but if the indications are correctly assessed, such complex surgical treatment has excellent clinical results in terms of pain and quality of life.

[Operative treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine]. / Operative Versorgung degenerativer Erkrankungen der Lendenwirbelsäule.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine and associated lower back pain represent a major epidemiological and health-related economic challenge. A distinction is made between specific and unspecific lower back pain. In specific lower back pain lumbar disc herniation and spinal canal stenosis with or without associated segment instability are among the most frequent pathologies. Diverse conservative and operative strategies for treatment of these diseases are available. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to present an overview of current data and an evidence-based assessment of the possible forms of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An extensive literature search was carried out via Medline plus an additional evaluation of the authors' personal experiences. RESULTS: Conservative and surgical treatment represent efficient treatment options for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation shows slight advantages compared to conservative treatment consisting of faster recovery of neurological deficits and a faster restitution of pain control. Surgical decompression is superior to conservative measures for the treatment of spinal canal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. In this scenario conservative treatment represents an important supporting measure for surgical treatment in order to improve the mobility of patients and the outcome of surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: The treatment of specific lower back pain due to degenerative lumbar pathologies represents an interdisciplinary challenge, requiring both conservative and surgical treatment strategies in a synergistic treatment concept in order to achieve the best results for patients.

[Operative treatment of the degenerative cervical spine]. / Operative Versorgung der degenerativen Halswirbelsäule.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative alterations of the cervical spine often entail disc herniations and stenoses of the spinal canal and/or neural foramen. Mediolateral or lateral compression of nerve roots causes cervical radiculopathy, which is an indication for surgery in cases of significant motor deficits or refractory pain. Median canal encroachment may result in compression of the spinal cord and cervical myelopathy. Its natural history is typically characterized by episodic deterioration, so that surgical decompression is indicated in cases of clear myelopathic signs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present article is to outline the operative options for patients with cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Furthermore, we describe the operative complications and the outcome in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this manuscript a systematic PubMed search was carried out, the papers were systematically analyzed for the best evidence and this was combined with the authors' experience. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Depending on the cervical pathology, the most prevalent surgical options for radiculopathy include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical arthroplasty or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Cervical myelopathy may be decompressed by ACDF, corpectomy or posterior approaches like laminectomy plus instrumented fusion or laminoplasty. The outcome depends on the cervical pathology and the type of operation. Overall, in long-term follow-up studies the results of all surgical techniques on the cervical spine are generally considered to be very good, although specific patient characteristics are more suited for a particular approach.