Concentration of High-Cost Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Health care costs are disproportionately concentrated among a small number of patients. We sought to identify variables associated with high-cost patients and high hospital concentration of high-cost patients and to examine associations with short-term outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 170,577 patients who underwent HNCA surgery in 2001-2011. High-cost patients were defined as patients whose costs of care were in the top decile, and high-concentration hospitals were defined as those whose percentage of high-cost patients was in the top decile. METHODS: Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations between cost and patient and hospital variables, postoperative complications, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Costs associated with high-cost patients were 4.47-fold greater than the remaining 90% of patients. High-concentration hospitals treated 36% of all high-cost patients. High-cost patients were more likely to be non-white (OR = 2.08 [1.45-2.97]), have oral cavity cancer (OR = 1.21 [1.05-1.39]), advanced comorbidity (OR = 1.53 [1.31-1.77]), Medicaid (OR = 1.93 [1.62-2.31]) or self-pay payor status (OR = 1.72 [1.38-2.14]), income>50th percentile (OR = 1.25 [1.05-1.51]), undergo major procedures (OR = 3.52 [3.07-4.05]) and have non-routine discharge (OR = 7.50 [6.01-9.35]). High-concentration hospitals were more likely to be teaching hospitals (OR = 3.14 [1.64-6.05]) and less likely to be urban (OR = 0.20 [0.04-0.93]). After controlling for all other variables, high-cost patients were associated with an increased odds of mortality (OR = 8.00 [5.89-10.85]) and postoperative complications (OR = 5.88 [5.18-6.68]). High-concentration hospitals were associated with an increased odds of postoperative complications (OR = 1.31 [1.08-1.61]) but were not associated with increased mortality (OR = 0.98 [0.67-1.44]). CONCLUSIONS: High-cost HNCA surgical patients are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, and are disproportionately concentrated at teaching hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Allergy History and Immunotherapy Response in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the association between patient-reported allergy history and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) response in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical records on baseline age, sex, allergy history, human papillomavirus status, T-stage, N-stage, smoking status, and survival for patients with and without an allergy history. The primary outcome was ICI response defined as complete or partial response by the RECIST criteria. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare rates and odds of ICI response. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare survival between groups. RESULTS: Our study included 52 patients with an allergy history and 36 patients without an allergy history. The groups were similar in age, sex, HPV status, smoking status, and T- and N-stage. Patients with an allergy history (17/52, 32.1%) had a greater ICI response rate than patients without allergy history (4/36, 11.1%) (P = .02). After adjusting for HPV, patients with allergies had 3.93 (1.19-13.00) times increased odds of ICI response compared to patients without allergies. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 and 4.2 months for patients with and without an allergy history respectively (log-rank, P = .04). The median overall survival was 25.0 and 11.1 months for patients with and without an allergy history respectively (log-rank, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported allergy history was associated with ICI response in patients with RMHNSCC, underscoring the potential clinical utility of allergy history in estimating ICI response.

Impact of comorbidities on outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer undergoing immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of pre-existing comorbidities on immunotherapy response, overall and progression-free survival, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients treated with immunotherapy were identified and stratified into comorbidity absent or present (CCI < 1 and CCI ≥ 1, respectively) cohorts, and clinical outcomes were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: Patients with no comorbidities had longer overall survival (aHR = 2.74, 95% CI [1.18, 6.40], p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (aHR = 2.07, 95% CI [1.03, 4.16], p = 0.04) and a higher tumor response rate (32% in CCI < 1 vs. 14% in CC ≥ 1, p = 0.05). Risk for irAEs was higher in the comorbidity absent group (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comorbidity should be considered as a significant prognostic factor in clinical decision-making for patients with advanced HNC undergoing immunotherapy.

Targeted Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Evidence is lacking from randomized clinical trials of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of targeted hypoglossal nerve stimulation (THN) of the proximal hypoglossal nerve in patients with OSA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial (THN3) was conducted at 20 centers and included 138 patients with moderate to severe OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 20 to 65 events per hour and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or less. The trial was conducted from May 2015 through June 2018. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through January 2023. Intervention: Implant with THN system; randomized 2:1 to activation at month 1 (treatment) or month 4 (control). All received 11 months of THN with follow-up at months 12 and 15, respectively. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary effectiveness end points comprised AHI and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) responder rates (RRs). Treatment responses at months 4 and 12/15 were defined as a 50% or greater reduction in AHI to 20 or less per hour and an ODI decrease of 25% or greater. Coprimary end points comprised (1) month 4 AHI and ODI RR in the treatment greater than the control group and (2) month 12/15 AHI and ODI RR in the entire cohort exceeding 50%. Secondary end points included sleep apnea severity (AHI and ODI) and patient-reported outcomes (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale). Results: Among 138 participants, the mean (SD) age was 56 (9) years, and 19 (13.8%) were women. Month 4 THN RRs were substantially greater in those in the treatment vs control group (AHI, 52.3% vs 19.6%; ODI, 62.5% vs 41.3%, respectively) with treatment-control standardized mean differences of 0.725 (95% CI, 0.360-1.163) and 0.434 (95% CI, 0.070-0.843) for AHI and ODI RRs, respectively. Months 12/15 RRs were 42.5% and 60.4% for AHI and ODI, respectively. Improvements in AHI, ODI, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores were all clinically meaningful (medium to large effect size). Two serious adverse events and 100 nonserious related adverse events were observed from the implant procedure or study protocol. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that THN demonstrated improvements in sleep apnea, sleepiness, and quality of life in patients with OSAs over an extended AHI and body mass index range without prior knowledge of pharyngeal collapse pattern. Clinically meaningful improvements in AHI and patient-reported responses compared favorably with those of distal hypoglossal nerve stimulation trials, although clinically meaningful differences were not definitive for ODI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02263859.

Surgeon Volume and Laryngectomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between surgeon volume and operative morbidity and mortality for laryngectomy. DATA SOURCES: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 45,156 patients who underwent laryngectomy procedures for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer between 2001 and 2011. Hospital and surgeon laryngectomy volume were modeled as categorical variables. METHODS: Relationships between hospital and surgeon volume and mortality, surgical complications, and acute medical complications were examined using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Higher-volume surgeons were more likely to operate at large, teaching, nonprofit hospitals and were more likely to treat patients who were white, had private insurance, hypopharyngeal cancer, low comorbidity, admitted electively, and to perform partial laryngectomy, concurrent neck dissection, and flap reconstruction. Surgeons treating more than 5 cases per year were associated with lower odds of medical and surgical complications, with a greater reduction in the odds of complications with increasing surgical volume. Surgeons in the top volume quintile (>9 cases/year) were associated with a decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.09 [0.01-0.74]), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 0.58 [0.45-0.74]), and acute medical complications (OR = 0.49 [0.37-0.64]). Surgeon volume accounted for 95% of the effect of hospital volume on mortality and 16%-47% of the effect of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: There is a strong volume-outcome relationship for laryngectomy, with reduced mortality and morbidity associated with higher surgeon and higher hospital volumes. Observed associations between hospital volume and operative morbidity and mortality are mediated by surgeon volume, suggesting that surgeon volume is an important component of the favorable outcomes of high-volume hospital care. Laryngoscope, 133:834-840, 2023.

Node Count as a Quality Indicator in Surgically Treated Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: A yield of ≥18 nodes from neck dissection has been shown to be associated with improved locoregional recurrence rates and survival. We sought to determine factors associated with lymph node yields below this threshold. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent neck dissection as part of definitive surgical treatment for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2015 and December 2018 at an academic tertiary referral center was performed. Patients with a history of prior radiation or neck dissection were excluded. RESULTS: There were 412 neck dissections performed in 323 patients. Specimens containing <18 nodes decreased from 16.2% in 2015-2016 to 7.4% of neck dissections in 2017-2018. The proportion of neck dissections removing <3 levels decreased from 9.1% of neck dissections in 2015-2016 to 4.0% in 2017-2018. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that dissection of ≥3 levels (OR = 0.2 [0.1-0.4]) and neck dissection in 2017-2018 compared to 2015-2016 (OR = 0.4 [0.2-0.8]) were significantly associated with a lower odds of <18 nodes. Stage, site, race, sex, human papillomavirus status, positive nodes, surgeon volume, and pathologist volume were not associated with neck dissection specimens with <18 nodes, after controlling for all other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Increased recognition of the importance of node count as a quality indicator, and the extent of neck dissection is associated with increased nodal yield from neck dissection. These data suggest that node count can be used as a quality measure of neck dissection for mucosal SCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2160-2165, 2023.

Peri-Operative Pain and Opioid Use in Opioid-Naïve Patients Following Inpatient Head and Neck Surgery.

Pain management is an important consideration for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients as they are at an increased risk of developing chronic opioid use, which can negatively impact both quality of life and survival outcomes. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate pain, opioid use and opioid prescriptions following HNC surgery. Participants included patients undergoing resection of a head and neck tumor from 2019-2020 at a single academic center with a length of admission (LOA) of at least 24 h. Exclusion criteria were a history of chronic pain, substance-use disorder, inability to tolerate multimodal analgesia or a significant post-operative complication. Subjects were compared by primary surgical site: Neck (neck dissection, thyroidectomy or parotidectomy), Mucosal (resection of tumor of upper aerodigestive tract, excluding oropharynx), Oropharyngeal (OP) and Free flap (FF). Average daily pain and total daily opioid consumption (as morphine milligram equivalents, MME) and quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge were compared. A total of 216 patients met criteria. Pain severity and daily opioid consumption were comparable across groups on post-operative day 1, but both metrics were significantly greater in the OP group on the day prior to discharge (DpDC) (5.6 (1.9-8.6), p < 0.05; 49 ± 44 MME/day, p < 0.01). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge was associated with opioid consumption on the DpDC only in the Mucosal and FF groups, which had longer LOA (6-7 days) than the Neck and OP groups (1 day, p < 0.001). Overall, 65% of patients required at least one dose of an opioid on the DpDC, yet 76% of patients received a prescription for an opioid medication at discharge. A longer LOA (aOR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.48) were negatively associated with receiving an opioid prescription at the time of discharge despite no opioid use on the DpDC, respectively. HNC patients, particularly those with shorter LOA, may be prescribed opioids in excess of their post-operative needs, highlighting the need the for improved pain management algorithms in this patient population. Future work aims to use prospective surveys to better define post-operative and outpatient pain and opioid requirements following HNC surgery.

Tumor Histological Grade and Immunotherapy Response in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: Tumor histological factors that predict immunotherapy response in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are not well defined. Objective: To investigate the association between tumor grade and immunotherapy response in patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal HNSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of 60 patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal HNSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Johns Hopkins Hospital between July 1, 2015, and January 22, 2020, were reviewed. Exposures: High-grade tumors (HGTs) vs low-grade tumors (LGTs) in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with LGTs (well differentiated and moderately differentiated) and those with HGTs (poorly differentiated). The main outcome was a clinically beneficial immunotherapy response, defined as complete response or partial response. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to calculate odds ratios for each variable's association with immunotherapy response. Survival differences were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: The 60 patients (35 with HGTs and 25 with LGTs) had a mean (SD) age of 64.6 (8.88) years; 51 were male (85%); and 38 were current or former smokers (63%). The oropharynx was the most common primary tumor site both in patients with HGTs (22 of 35; 63%) and those with LGTs (12 of 25; 48%). Bivariate analysis showed the proportion of patients having a beneficial response to immunotherapy was greater for patients with HGTs (12 of 35; 34.3%) than those with LGTs (2 of 25, 8.0%) (difference, 26.3%; 95% CI, 7.3%-45.3%). Upon multivariable analysis, patients with HGTs had 5.35-fold increased odds (95% CI, 1.04-27.37) of having a clinically beneficial response to immunotherapy. Among patients with available tumor genomic profiling data, the mean tumor mutational burden was greater for patients with HGTs (mean [SD], 8.6 [5.4] mut/Mb; n = 8) than patients with LGTs (mean [SD], 3.6 [1.1] mut/Mb; n = 4) (difference = 5.0 mut/Mb; 95% CI -1.4 to 11.4 mut/Mb; Cohen d = 1.2). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, tumor grade was independently associated with immunotherapy response in patients with recurrent or metastatic mucosal HNSCC. These findings highlight the potential role of tumor grade in predicting immunotherapy response in mucosal HNSCC.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022.

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.