Induction of labor, and physiological and psychological stress responses as expressed by salivary cortisol: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To describe patterns of physiological and psychological stress during induced labor and their correlation to obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included 167 women, with low-risk, singleton pregnancies, who delivered at term, at a tertiary academic center from 2015 through 2018. Among them, 72 (43%) underwent induction and 95 (57%) had spontaneous labor onset. Physiological stress was evaluated by salivary cortisol measurements and emotional stress by questionnaires (visual analogue stress scale 0-10) during latent phase, active phase and full dilation stages of labor, as well as 2 min and 2 h postpartum. Cord blood cortisol and pH were obtained. Stress patterns were compared between parturients who did or did not undergo induction. Modes of delivery, labor and delivery complications, and early neonatal outcomes were compared. Mothers completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: Induced women had lower cortisol concentrations during the latent phase compared to spontaneous onset of labor (p = 0.003), with no differences during active (p = 0.237), full dilation (0.668), 2 min and 2 h after delivery (p = 0.666). Stress scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were similar between groups. Cord cortisol (p = 0.294), 1-min Apgar score ≤ 7 (p = 0.502) and 5-min Apgar score ≤ 7 (p = 0.37) were similar. All had cord pH > 7. CONCLUSIONS: Induction does not increase stress during labor. Moreover, it might have a positive effect on reducing cortisol during the latent phase. These findings might reassure women who are concerned about induction of labor.

Physiological and psychological stress responses to labor and delivery as expressed by salivary cortisol: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Labor is considered a stressful event, yet no study has described the course of stress measured by cortisol during labor and postpartum. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe the patterns of physiological and psychological stress during labor as measured by salivary cortisol concentrations and stress questionnaires and their correlation to obstetric and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational study included 167 women with low-risk, singleton, term deliveries at a tertiary academic center. Physiological stress was evaluated by salivary cortisol measurements and emotional stress by questionnaire (stress scale ranging from 0 to 10) during the latent phase, active phase, and full dilation stages of labor as well as 2 minutes, 2 hours, and 24 hours after delivery. Cord blood cortisol and pH were also obtained. Modes of delivery, complications during labor and delivery, and early neonatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Salivary cortisol concentrations increased gradually from latent phase to active phase. The maximum increase was observed within 2 minutes of the delivery (from an average of 1.06 µg/dL to 1.67 µg/dL; 57% increase). Within 2 hours after delivery, cortisol decreased and reached a nongravid concentration after 24 hours (0.16 µg/dL). Cortisol concentrations during labor and up to 2 hours postpartum were above the average concentration of nongravid women (0.5 µg/dL). Women with epidural anesthesia had lower cortisol concentrations at complete dilation (P = .026) and 2 hours postpartum (P = .016) compared with women without epidural. Psychological stress peaked during latent and full dilation phases (mean 4.56 and 4.29, respectively). Maximum decrease from 4.29 to 2.04 (52%) occurred immediately postpartum. Cord cortisol was higher among women delivered by vacuum extraction compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (17 ± 2 vs 11 ± 3.8, P = .03). CONCLUSION: This study reveals the course of cortisol concentrations during labor for low-risk pregnancies, with maximum increase immediately postpartum. Subjective stress levels decreased over the course of labor. Salivary cortisol portrays stress during labor and may be used as a reference to evaluate complicated pregnancies and to evaluate the role of cortisol during these deliveries.

Does stress affect IVF outcomes? A prospective study of physiological and psychological stress in women undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of physiological and psychological stress on fertility outcomes for women undergoing IVF? DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of 72 patients undergoing IVF in 2017 and 2018. Physiological stress was assessed by salivary cortisol measurements: (i) pretreatment, when the patient received the IVF protocol; (ii) before oocyte retrieval (follicular cortisol was also measured); and (iii) before embryo transfer. Emotional stress was evaluated at each assessment with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and a 1-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, referred to as the 'Stress Scale'. Correlations between cortisol concentrations, psychological stress and IVF outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Salivary cortisol concentrations increased by 28% from pretreatment phase (0.46 ± 0.28 µg/dl) to maximum concentration on oocyte retrieval day (0.59 ± 0.29 µg/dl, P = 0.029) and then decreased by 29% on embryo transfer day (0.42 ± 0.23 µg/dl, P = 0.0162). On embryo transfer day, cortisol among women in their first cycle was higher than women who underwent more than one treatment (P = 0.024). Stress Scale score increased by 39% from pretreatment to a maximum score on oocyte retrieval day and then decreased by 12% on embryo transfer day. Salivary cortisol and Stress Scale were not related to subsequent embryo transfer, fertilization rate, embryo quality or clinical pregnancy rate. Follicular cortisol concentration was positively correlated with fertilization rate (r = 0.4, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: It can be cautiously concluded that physiological and psychological stress do not negatively affect IVF outcomes. Moreover, high follicular cortisol concentrations might have positive effects on pregnancy rates.