Insight on Pediatric Burn Morbidity and Mortality at a Tertiary Indian Burn Care Center: A Case For Burn Prevention.

Pediatric burns pose a significant health burden in LMICs. Despite efforts to address burn prevention and management, morbidity and mortality rates remain high, particularly among children. Understanding pediatric burn epidemiology and predictors of clinical outcomes is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies and improving patient-care. This retrospective cohort study analyzed pediatric burn patients admitted to a tertiary burn-center in India, between March-2022 and December-2023. Demographic date, burn characteristics, treatments, complications and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis, including logistic and linear regression, was conducted to identify predictors of mortality, sepsis, and hospital stay length. Among 332 pediatric burn patients, median age was 3 years, with a male predominance. Scald burns were the most common, followed by electrical and flame burns. Median total body surface area burned was 20%, with upper and lower extremities most affected. The incidence of electrical burns increased with age and was associated with a longer length of stay. Mortality rate was 14.2%, with age >10 years, male gender, and TBSA >30% predicting mortality. Complications like sepsis significantly increased mortality risk, while deep burns were associated with longer hospital stays. This study underscores importance of targeted prevention efforts and specialized care. Scald burns among young children highlight the need for safer cooking practices, while the high incidence of electrical burns in older children suggests age-specific education interventions are necessary. Predictors of mortality identified can guide risk assessment and resource allocation, emphasizing the importance of infection control and wound management strategies in improving outcomes.

Transportation and equipment needs for emergency medical services development in low- and middle-income countries.

Prehospital emergency medical services play a vital role in reducing mortality and disease burden in low- and middle-income countries. However, the availability of adequate prehospital emergency care remains a significant challenge in many resource-limited communities, with over 91% of the African population lacking access to sufficient emergency medical services. This commentary aims to highlight the critical components of transportation infrastructure and medical supply chain challenges for emergency medical service development and propose potential solutions for future study. Transportation is a key factor influencing prehospital mortality, yet many low- and middle-income countries face issues related to timely prehospital transportation, with patients often relying on family members or private vehicles for transportation, leading to delays in reaching healthcare facilities due to poor road infrastructure. Dysfunctional and inadequate vehicles are also common barriers to timely care. Response times and transport times often exceed high-income standards, with some rural areas experiencing total prehospital time, defined as the time of injury to arrival at definitive care, exceeding 24 hours. To address these transportation challenges, some low- and middle-income countries have developed tier-1 emergency medical services programs that use existing transportation infrastructure and involve lay first responders using motorized and non-motorized vehicles. These programs prioritize rapid transportation over advanced on-scene intervention, potentially providing faster response times. A combination of tier-1 and tier-2 emergency medical services systems, as seen in some successful examples, allows for early on-scene guidance and resource allocation. In addition to transportation, the availability of medical equipment is crucial for effective prehospital interventions, particularly in tier-2 systems. However, low- and middle-income countries often face shortages of even basic supplies, limiting the scope of care that emergency medical services personnel can provide. Developing tier-2 emergency medical services upon a foundation of tier-1 prehospital care utilizing sustainable local supply chains and common household items for basic care can help alleviate these equipment challenges. The integration of tier-1 and tier-2 systems may offer a promising solution to address resource limitations and improve timely access to emergency care in low- and middle-income countries. Further research and investment are required to explore and implement these solutions, ultimately reducing mortality and enhancing healthcare services in resource-limited communities.

The emergency burden in low and middle-income countries.

Injuries are the greatest single cause of surgical disease globally, disproportionately affecting low and middle-income countries and representing 10% of global mortality and 32% greater annual mortality than HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria combined. Road traffic injuries are the single greatest contributor to the global injury burden and the leading cause of death for young people aged 5 to 29 years. In May 2023, the 76th World Health Assembly resolved that emergency, critical, and operative care services are an integral part of a comprehensive national primary health care approach and foundational for health systems to effectively address emergencies. However, robust trauma systems and emergency medical services are lacking in low and middle-income countries to adequately address the prehospital injury burden in systematic and financially sustainable approaches, despite the disproportionate burden faced. Replicating formal Tier 2 emergency medical services (staffed by professional emergency responders within well-defined jurisdictions using dedicated vehicles and equipment) from high-income countries has failed, and the World Health Organization recommends Tier 1 systems (community bystander-driven prehospital care by provided by lay first responders) as the first step toward formal emergency medical services in these same settings. The Global Prehospital Consortium has identified 7 priority areas as a framework for future emergency medical services development, forming the basis for the remaining articles in this series, spanning infrastructure and operations, communication, education/training, impact evaluation, financing, governance/legal, and transportation/equipment.

Education and training of prehospital first responders in low- and middle-income countries.

Prehospital emergency medical services play a vital role in providing essential emergency medical and trauma care. However, in many low- and middle-income countries, there is a significant lack of adequate emergency medical services coverage, a problem compounded by a profound deficit of first responder training programs. The African Federation of Emergency Medicine classifies prehospital emergency care into 2 categories: tier-1, which includes laypersons, and tier-2, consisting of professionals equipped with dispatch capabilities. Both tier-1 and tier-2 first responders require protocolized training, integration, and coordination to varying degrees, with tier-1 programs focusing primarily on immediate stabilization and hospital transportation and tier-2 programs dedicating increased focus toward formal dispatch and advanced life support interventions. Training for both tiers of emergency medical services typically involves in-person didactic lectures with practical skills sessions. However, the content of these courses is highly context-dependent, and there is no international consensus regarding pedagogical methods or curriculum content for first responder training in low- and middle-income countries. Similarly, there is a lack of consensus in monitoring and evaluating training programs, including assessment methods, passing scores, and certification requirements. Although many programs use knowledge or skills acquisition testing, the content and depth of these examinations vary greatly, and long-term follow-up reporting is limited. As such, the educational landscape of both tier-1 and tier-2 emergency medical services in low- and middle-income countries remains highly varied and often faces a dual challenge of lacking clear international guidelines while still maintaining local appropriateness. Modular curricula developed in conjunction with standardized needs assessments, accompanied by the adoption of the training of trainers model, may present a pathway for local adaptability by leveraging local community members to inform and proliferate training. Although there have been notable improvements in prehospital training programs in resource-limited settings during the past 3 decades, challenges related to maintaining fidelity in monitoring and evaluation, expanding programs within resource constraints, and adapting to specific contexts continue to offer opportunities for further development in the future.

Leveraging transportation providers to deploy lay first responder (LFR) programs in three sub-Saharan African countries without formal emergency medical services: Evaluating longitudinal impact and cost-effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION: In 2019, the World Health Assembly declared emergency care essential to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Few sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have developed robust approaches to sustainably deliver emergency medical services (EMS) at scale, as high-income country models are financially impractical. Innovative reassessment of EMS delivery in resource-limited settings is necessary as timely emergency care access can substantially reduce mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed the Lay First Responder (LFR) program by training 1,291 pre-existing motorcycle taxi drivers, a predominant form of short-distance transport in sub-Saharan Africa, to provide trauma care and transport for road traffic injuries. Three pilot programs were launched in staggered fashion between 2016 and 2019 in West, Central, and East Africa and a 5.5 h curriculum was iteratively developed to train first responders. Longitudinal data on patient impact (patient demographics, injury characteristics, and treatment rendered), emergency care knowledge acquisition/retention, and social/financial effects of LFR training were collected and pooled across three sites for collective analysis. Novel cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated based on prospective cost data from each site. Previously projected aggregate disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) addressable by LFRs were used to inform cost-effectiveness ratios($USD cost per DALY averted). Cost-effectiveness ratios were then compared against African per capita gross domestic product (GDP), following WHOCHOICE guidelines, which state ratios less than GDP per capita are "very cost-effective." RESULTS: In 2,171 total patient encounters across all three pilot sites, LFRs most frequently provided hemorrhage control in 61 % of patient encounters and patient transport by motorcycle in 98.5 %. Median pre-/post-test scores improved by 34.1 percentage points (39.5% vs.73.6 %, p < 0.0001) with significant knowledge retention at six months. 75 % of initial participants remain voluntarily involved 3 years post-course, reporting increased local stature and customer acquisition(income 32.0 % greater than non-trained counterparts). Locally sourced first-aid materials cost $6.54USD/participant. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated cost per DALY averted=$51.65USD. CONCLUSION: LFR training is highly cost-effective according to WHOCHOICE guidelines and expands emergency care access. The LFR program may be an alternative approach to formal ambulance-reliant EMS that are cost-prohibitive in resource-limited, sub-Saharan African settings. A novel social/financial mechanism appears to incentivize long-term voluntary LFR involvement, which may sustain programs in resource-limited settings.

Prehospital hemorrhage management in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) account for 90% of deaths due to injury, largely due to hemorrhage. The increased hemorrhage mortality burden in LMICs is exacerbated by absent or ineffective prehospital care. Hemorrhage management (HM) is an essential component of prehospital care in LMICs, yet current practices for prehospital HM and outcomes from first responder HM training have yet to be summarized. METHODS: This review describes the current literature on prehospital HM and the impact of first responder HM training in LMICs. Articles published between January 2000 and January 2023 were identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned first responder training programs delivering prehospital care for HM. Relevant articles were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Of the initial 994 articles, 20 met inclusion criteria representing 16 countries. Studies included randomized control trials, cohort studies, case control studies, reviews, and epidemiological studies. Basic HM curricula were found in 15 studies and advanced HM curricula were found in six studies. Traumatic hemorrhage was indicated in 17 studies while obstetric hemorrhage was indicated in three studies. First responders indicated HM use in 55%-76% of encounters, the most frequent skill they reported using. Mean improvements in HM knowledge acquisition post-course ranged from 23 to 58 percentage points following training for pressure and elevation, gauze application, and tourniquet application. CONCLUSIONS: Our study summarizes the current literature on prehospital HM in LMICs pertaining to epidemiology, interventions, and outcomes. HM resources should be a priority for further development.

Evaluating a digital hybrid training-of-trainers (TOT) approach for lay first responder trauma education in urban Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are the largest contributor to the global burden of injury, and in 2016 were among the five leading causes of global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). In regions with limited emergency medical services (EMS), training lay first responders (LFRs) has been shown to increase availability of prehospital care for RTIs, but sustainable mechanisms to scale these programs remain unstudied. METHODS: Using a training of trainers (TOT) model, a 5.5-h LFR training program was launched in Lagos, Nigeria. The course was taught in a hybrid fashion with primary didactics using videoconferencing software and practical breakout sessions in-person concurrently. Thirty TOTs proceeded to train 350 transportation providers as LFRs over one month. A 23-question, pre- and post-assessment was administered digitally to assess knowledge acquisition. Participants responded to a five-point Likert survey assessing instruction quality and post-course confidence. RESULTS: TOTs scored a median of 56.5 % (IQR:43.5 %,71.7 %) and 91.3 % (IQR:88.0 %,95.7 %) on the pre- and post-assessments, respectively, with bleeding control scores increasing most (+69.4 %). LFR course trainees scored a median of 34.8 % (IQR: 26.0 %, 43.5 %) and 73.9 % (IQR: 65.2 %, 82.6 %) on the pre- and post-assessments respectively, with airway and breathing increasing the most (+48.6 %). All score increases were statistically significant with p < 0.001. All 30 TOT trainers instructed at least one training session after their initial session. LFR participants' rated confidence in first aid skills went from 3/5 (IQR 3, 4) pre-course to 5/5 (IQR:5,5) post-course, and in emergency transportation it went from 4/5 (IQR:3, 4) to 5/5 (IQR:5, 5), (p < 0.001). LFR course participants rated the quality of education content and TOT instructors to be 5/5 (IQR:5,5). 144 responders provided emergency care in the six-months following training for a total of 351 interventions. Active responders provided a median of 2 (IQR:1,3) interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that a digital hybrid instruction for first responder trainers in low- and middle-income countries has been investigated. Our findings demonstrate negligible attrition, high educational quality ratings, equally effective knowledge acquisition to that of prior in-person courses, and high post-training skill usage. Future work will examine the cost-effectiveness of the training of LFRs and the effect of LFRs on trauma outcomes.

Evaluating feasibility of a novel mobile emergency medical dispatch tool for lay first responder prehospital response coordination in Sierra Leone: A simulation-based study.

INTRODUCTION: The global injury burden, driven by road traffic injuries, disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, which lack robust emergency medical services (EMS) to address injury. The WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step toward formal EMS development. Emergency medical dispatch (EMD) systems are the recognized next step but whether small groups of LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch infrastructure can efficiently respond to geographically-dispersed emergencies in a timely fashion and the quality of prehospital care provided is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We piloted an EMD system utilizing a mobile phone application in Sierra Leone. Ten LFRs were randomly selected from a pool of 61 highly-active LFRs trained in 2019 and recruited to participate in an emergency simulation-based study. Ten simulation scenarios were created matching proportions of injury conditions across 1,850 previous incidents (June-December 2019). Fifty total simulations were launched in randomized order over 3 months, randomized along 10 km of highway in Makeni. Replicating real-world conditions, highly-active LFR participants were blinded to randomized dispatch timing/scenario to assess response time and skill performance under direct observation with a checklist using standardized patient actors. We used novel cost data tracked during EMD pilot implementation to inform the calculation of a new cost-effectiveness ratio ($USD cost per disability-adjusted life year averted (DALY)) for LFR programs equipped with dispatch, following WHOCHOICE guidelines, which state cost-effectiveness ratios less than gross domestic product (GDP) per capita are considered "very cost-effective." RESULTS: Median total response interval (notification to arrival) was 5 min 39 s (IQR:0:03:51, 0:09:18). LFRs initially trained with a 5-hour curriculum and refresher training provide high-quality prehospital care during simulated emergencies. Median first aid skill checklist completion was 89% (IQR: 78%, 90%). Cost-effectiveness equals $179.02USD per DALY averted per 100,000 people, less than Sierra Leonean GDP per capita ($484.52USD). CONCLUSION: LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch demonstrate appropriate response times and effective basic initial management of simulated emergencies. Training smaller cohorts of highly-active LFRs equipped with mobile dispatch appears highly cost-effective and may be a feasible model to facilitate efficient dispatch to expand emergency coverage while conserving valuable training resources in resource-limited settings.

Prehospital Airway Management for Trauma Patients by First Responders in Six Sub-Saharan African Countries and Five Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

The global injury burden disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is exacerbated by a lack of robust emergency medical services. Though airway management (AM) is an essential component of prehospital emergency care, the current standard of prehospital AM training and resources for first responders in LMICs is unknown. This scoping review includes articles published between January 2000 and June 2021, identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned programs training formal or informal prehospital first responders. Included articles were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Relevant characteristics were extracted by multiple authors to assess prehospital AM training. Of the initial 713 articles, 17 met inclusion criteria, representing 11 countries. Basic AM curricula were found in 11 studies and advanced AM curricula were found in nine studies. 35.3% (n = 6) of first responder programs provided no equipment to basic life support (BLS) AM training participants, reporting a median cost of $7.00USD per responder trained. Median frequency of prehospital AM intervention was reported in 31.0% (IQR: 6.0, 50.0) of patient encounters (advanced life support trainees: 12.1%, BLS trainees: 32.0%). In three studies, adverse event frequencies during intubation occurred with a median frequency of 22.0% (IQR: 21.0, 22.0). The training deficit in advanced AM interventions in LMICs suggests BLS AM courses should be prioritized, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Prehospital AM resources are sparse and should be a priority for future development.

Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Non-inferiority trial. OBJECTIVE: Limited cervical spinal (c-spine) immobilization in resource-limited settings of LMICs suggests alternatives are necessary for patients with traumatic injuries. We propose a novel method of c-spine immobilization using folded towels. SETTING: Washington University in St. Louis. METHODS: Using non-inferiority trial design, thirty healthy patients (median age = 22) were enrolled to test the efficacy of folded towels in comparison with rigid cervical collars, foam neck braces, and no immobilization. We measured cervical range of motion (CROM) in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions. A weighted composite score (CS) was generated to compare immobilization methods. A preserved fraction of 75% was determined for non-inferiority, corresponding to the difference between the median values for CROM between control (no immobilization) and c-collar states. RESULTS: C-collars reduce median CROM in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions by an average of -36.83° seated (-17.75° supine) vs. no immobilization. Folded towels and foam neck braces reduced CROM by -27° seated (-16.75° supine) and -14.25° seated (-9.5° supine), respectively. Compared to a 25% non-inferiority margin (permitting an average 9.21° of cervical movement across six cardinal directions), the CS determined folded towels are non-inferior (CSseated = 0.89, CSsupine = 0.47). Foam neck braces are inferior (CSseated = 2.35, CSsupine = 2.10). CS > 1 surpassed the non-inferiority margin and were deemed inferior. CONCLUSIONS: Folded towels are a non-inferior means of immobilizing c-spine in extension and rotation, but not flexion, vs. c-collars. We propose folded towels could be trialed in combination with backboards to deliver affordable and effective prehospital TSCI management in resource-limited settings.

Identifying a 'super-responder' phenomenon in three African countries: Implications for prehospital emergency care training.

BACKGROUND: Few countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have robust emergency medical services (EMS). The WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step toward EMS development while Disease Control Priorities (DCP) suggests training 0.5%-1% of a population for adequate emergency catchment. After launching three LFR programs in Africa, this study investigated subsequent skill usage and conducted demographic analyses to inform future recruitment of high-responding LFRs. METHODS: Demographic characteristics and individual LFR intervention frequencies were collected from a pooled sample of 887 of 1,291 total LFRs (68.7%) trained across programs launched in a staggered fashion between 2016-2019 in Uganda, Chad, and Sierra Leone. A Kruskal-Wallis Rank-Sum test assessed between-group differences among demographics in each location. Spearman's r was used to determine the relationship between response frequency and LFR characteristics. RESULTS: Most LFRs trained did not use skills post-training (median LFR interventions=0.0 interventions/year [IQR:0.0,5.0]). Right-skewed intervention frequency distributions demonstrate high-responding outlier responder groups do exist in all locations (p<0.0001). Median LFR interventions of the top quartile of these active LFRs ("super-responders") was 26.0 interventions/year (IQR:16.7,35.0). "Super-responders" witnessed more road traffic injuries (RTIs) prior to training (p=0.033). LFRs who never responded were significantly younger (p=0.0020). Significant correlations were demonstrated between pooled RTIs witnessed and intervention frequency (r=0.13, p=0.032) and age and intervention frequency in Sierra Leone (r=-0.15, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Current DCP-recommended training of 0.5-1% of a given population for adequate emergency catchment may be an inefficient means of building emergency care capacity. Recruiting "super-responders" with select characteristics may achieve similar coverage while conserving valuable training resources in resource-limited African settings.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lay First Responders Addressing Road Traffic Injury in Sub-Saharan Africa.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of training lay first responders (LFRs) to address road traffic injury (RTI) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as the first step toward formal emergency medical services (EMS) development. MATERIALS/METHODS: Cost data from five LFR programs launched between 2008 and 2019 in SSA was collected for LFR cost estimation, including three prospective collections from our group. We systematically reviewed literature and projected aggregate disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from RTI in SSA that are addressable by LFRs to inform cost-effectiveness ratios ($USD cost per DALY averted). Cost-effectiveness ratios were then compared against African per capita gross domestic product (GDP) to determine the cost-effectiveness of LFRs addressing RTIs in SSA, following WHO-CHOICE guidelines, which state cost-effectiveness ratios less than GDP per capita are considered "very cost-effective." RESULTS: Average annual cost per LFR trained across five programs was calculated to be 16.32USD (training=4.04USD, supplies=12.28USD). Following WHO and Disease Control Priorities recommendations for adequate emergency catchment, initial training of 750 LFRs per 100,000 people would cost 12,239.47USD with projected total annual DALYs averted equal to 227.7 per 100,000. Cost per DALY averted would therefore be 53.75USD with appropriate LFR availability, less than sub-Saharan African GDP per capita (1,585.40USD) and the lowest sub-Saharan African GDP per capita (Burundi, 261.20USD). CONCLUSION: Following WHO-CHOICE guidelines, training LFRs can be a highly cost-effective means to address RTI morbidity and mortality across sub-Saharan Africa. With EMS unavailable for 91.3% of the African population, training LFRs can be an affordable first step toward formal EMS development.

Prehospital care for traumatic spinal cord injury by first responders in 8 sub-Saharan African countries and 6 other low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) constitutes a considerable portion of the global injury burden, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Prehospital care can address TSCI morbidity and mortality, but emergency medical services are lacking in LMICs. The current standard of prehospital care for TSCI in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs is unknown. METHODS: This review sought to describe the state of training and resources for prehospital TSCI management in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs. Articles published between 1 January 1995 and 1 March 2020 were identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned first responder training programs delivering prehospital care for TSCI. Two reviewers assessed full texts meeting inclusion criteria for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and extracted relevant characteristics to assess trends in the state of prehospital TSCI care in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs. RESULTS: Of an initial 482 articles identified, 23 met inclusion criteria, of which ten were set in Africa, representing eight countries. C-spine immobilization precautions for suspected TSCI patients is the most prevalent prehospital TSCI intervention for and is in every LMIC first responder program reviewed, except one. Numerous first responder programs providing TSCI care operate without C-collar access (n = 13) and few teach full spinal immobilization (n = 5). Rapid transport is most frequently reported as the key mortality-reducing factor (n = 11). Despite more studies conducted in the Southeast Asia/Middle East (n = 13), prehospital TSCI studies in Africa are more geographically diverse, but responder courses are shorter, produce fewer professional responders, and have limited C-collar availability. DISCUSSION: Deficits in training and resources to manage TSCI highlights the need for large prospective trials evaluating alternative C-spine immobilization methods for TCSI that are more readily available across diverse LMIC environments and the importance of understanding resource variability to sustainably improve prehospital TSCI care.

Evaluating a Novel Prehospital Emergency Trauma Care Assessment Tool (PETCAT) for Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Sierra Leone.

BACKGROUND: WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step toward formal emergency medical services development, yet no tool exists to evaluate LFR programs. METHODS: We developed Prehospital Emergency Trauma Care Assessment Tool (PETCAT), a seven-question survey administered to first-line hospital-based healthcare providers, to independently assess LFR prehospital intervention frequency and quality. PETCAT surveys were administered one month pre-LFR program launch (June 2019) in Makeni, Sierra Leone and again 14 months post-launch (August 2020). Using a difference-in-differences approach, PETCAT was also administered in a control city (Kenema) with no LFR training intervention during the study period at the same intervals to control for secular trends. PETCAT measured change in both the experimental and control locations. Cronbach's alpha, point bi-serial correlation, and inter-rater reliability using Cohen's Kappa assessed PETCAT reliability. RESULTS: PETCAT administration to 90 first-line, hospital-based healthcare providers found baseline prehospital intervention were rare in Makeni and Kenema prior to LFR program launch (1.2/10 vs. 1.8/10). Fourteen months post-LFR program implementation, PETCAT demonstrated prehospital interventions increased in Makeni with LFRs (5.2/10, p < 0.0001) and not in Kenema (1.2/10) by an adjusted difference of + 4.6 points/10 (p < 0.0001) ("never/rarely" to "half the time"), indicating negligible change due to secular trends. PETCAT demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.93, Cohen's K = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: PETCAT measures changes in rates of prehospital care delivery by LFRs in a resource-limited African setting and may serve as a robust tool for independent EMS quality assessment.

Exploring the factors motivating continued Lay First Responder participation in Uganda: a mixed-methods, 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The WHO recommends training lay first responders (LFRs) as the first step towards establishing emergency medical services (EMS) in low-income and middle-income countries. Understanding social and financial benefits associated with responder involvement is essential for LFR programme continuity and may inform sustainable development. METHODS: A mixed-methods follow-up study was conducted in July 2019 with 239 motorcycle taxi drivers, including 115 (75%) of 154 initial participants in a Ugandan LFR course from July 2016, to evaluate LFR training on participants. Semi-structured interviews and surveys were administered to samples of initial participants to assess social and economic implications of training, and non-trained motorcycle taxi drivers to gauge interest in LFR training. Themes were determined on a per-question basis and coded by extracting keywords from each response until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Three years post-course, initial participants reported new knowledge and skills, the ability to help others, and confidence gain as the main benefits motivating continued programme involvement. Participant outlook was unanimously positive and 96.5% (111/115) of initial participants surveyed used skills since training. Many reported sensing an identity change, now identifying as first responders in addition to motorcycle taxi drivers. Drivers reported they believe this led to greater respect from the Ugandan public and a prevailing belief that they are responsible transportation providers, increasing subsequent customer acquisition. Motorcycle taxi drivers who participated in the course reported a median weekly income value that is 24.39% higher than non-trained motorcycle taxi counterparts (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A simultaneous delivery of sustained social and perceived financial benefits to LFRs are likely to motivate continued voluntary participation. These benefits appear to be a potential mechanism that may be leveraged to contribute to the sustainability of future LFR programmes to deliver basic prehospital emergency care in resource-limited settings.

Evaluation of a Lay First Responder Program in Sierra Leone as a Scalable Model for Prehospital Trauma Care.

INTRODUCTION: Few countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have robust emergency medical services (EMS). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends scaling-up lay first responder programs as the first step toward formal EMS development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We trained and equipped 4,529 lay first responders (LFRs) between June-December 2019 in Bombali District, Sierra Leone, with a 5-hour hands-on, contextually-adapted prehospital trauma course to cover 535,000 people. Instructors trained 1,029 LFRs and 50 local trainers in a training-of-trainers (TOT) model, who then trained an additional 3,500 LFRs. A validated, 23-question pre-/post-test measured knowledge improvement, while six- and nine-month follow-up tests measured knowledge retention. Incident reports tracked patient encounters to assess longitudinal impact. RESULTS: Median pre-/post-test scores improved by 43.5 percentage points (34.8% vs. 78.3%, p<0.0001). Knowledge retention was assessed at six months, with median score dropping to 60.9%, while at nine months, median score dropped to 43.5%. Lay first responders participating in courses led by TOT trainers had a pre-/post-test median score improvement of 30.4 percentage points (21.7% vs. 52.2%, p<0.0001). LFRs treated 1,850 patients over six months, most frequently utilizing hemorrhage control skills in 61.2% of encounters (1,133/1,850). The plurality of patients were young adult males (36.8%) and 48.7% of encounters were motorcycle injury-related. CONCLUSION: A 5-hour first responder course targeting laypeople demonstrates significant emergency care knowledge improvement and retention. By training networks of transportation providers, lay first responder programs represent a robust and scalable prehospital emergency care alternative for low-resource settings.

Developing a Lay First Responder Program in Chad: A 12-Month Follow-Up Evaluation of a Rural Prehospital Emergency Care Program.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO; Geneva, Switzerland) recommends lay first responder (LFR) programs as a first step toward establishing formal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to address injury. There is a scarcity of research investigating LFR program development in predominantly rural settings of LMICs. STUDY OBJECTIVE: A pilot LFR program was launched and assessed over 12 months to investigate the feasibility of leveraging pre-existing transportation providers to scale up prehospital emergency care in rural, low-resource settings of LMICs. METHODS: An LFR program was established in rural Chad to evaluate curriculum efficacy, using a validated 15-question pre-/post-test to measure participant knowledge improvement. Pre-/post-test score distributions were compared using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. For test evaluation, each pre-test question was mapped to its corresponding post-test analog and compared using McNemar's Chi-Squared Test to examine knowledge acquisition on a by-question basis. Longitudinal prehospital care was evaluated with incident reports, while program cost was tracked using a one-way sensitivity analysis. Qualitative follow-up surveys and semi-interviews were conducted at 12 months, with initial participants and randomly sampled motorcycle taxi drivers, and used a constructivist grounded theory approach to understand the factors motivating continued voluntary participation to inform future program continuity. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist was used to guide design, analysis, and reporting the qualitative results. RESULTS: A total of 108 motorcycle taxi participants demonstrated significant knowledge improvement (P <.001) across three of four curricular categories: scene safety, airway and breathing, and bleeding control. Lay first responders treated 71 patients over six months, encountering five deaths, and provided patient transport in 82% of encounters. Lay first responders reported an average confidence score of 8.53/10 (n = 38). In qualitative follow-up surveys and semi-structured interviews, the ability to care for the injured, new knowledge/skills, and the resultant gain in social status and customer acquisition motivated continued involvement as LFRs. Ninety-six percent of untrained, randomly sampled motorcycle taxi drivers reported they would be willing to pay to participate in future training courses. CONCLUSION: Lay first responder programs appear feasible and cost-effective in rural LMIC settings. Participants demonstrate significant knowledge acquisition, and after 12 months of providing emergency care, report sustained voluntary participation due to social and financial benefits, suggesting sustainability and scalability of LFR programs in low-resource settings.

Designing and implementing a practical prehospital emergency trauma care curriculum for lay first responders in Guatemala.

BACKGROUND: Injury disproportionately affects low-income and middle-income countries, yet robust emergency medical services are often lacking to effectively address the prehospital injury burden. A half-day prehospital emergency trauma care curriculum was designed for first responders and piloted in the Sacatepéquez, Chimaltenango, and Escuintla departments in Guatemala. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty-four law enforcement personnel, firefighters, and civilians volunteered to participate in a 5-hour emergency care course teaching scene safety, triage, airway management, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, fracture management, and victim transport. A validated 26-question pretest/post-test study instrument was contextually adapted and used to measure overall test performance, the primary study outcome, as well as test performance stratified by occupation, the secondary study outcome. Pretest/post-test score distributions were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For test evaluation, knowledge acquisition on a by-question and by-category basis was examined using McNemar's χ² test, whereas item difficulty indices used frequency-of-distribution tests and item discrimination indices used point biserial correlation. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-seven participants qualified for inclusion. Participant mean pretest versus post-test scores improved 24 percentage points after course completion (43% vs 68%, p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha yielded values of 0.86 (pretest) and 0.94 (post-test), suggesting testing instrument reliability. Between-group analyses demonstrated law enforcement and civilian participants improved more than firefighters (p<0.001). Performance on 23 of 26 questions improved significantly. All test questions except one showed an increase in their PPDI. DISCUSSION: A 1-day, contextually adapted, 5-hour course targeting laypeople demonstrates significant improvements in emergency care knowledge. Future investigations of similar curricula should be trialed in alternate low-resource settings with increased civilian participation to evaluate efficacy and replicability as adequate substitutes for longer courses. This study suggests future courses teaching emergency care for lay first responders may be reduced to 5 hours duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.