Evaluating the Diagnostic Role of ACR-TIRADS and Bethesda Classifications in Thyroid Nodules Highlighted by Cyto-Histopathological Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (ACR-TIRADS) and the Bethesda system for reporting cytopathology (TBSRCP) classifications for identifying or ruling out thyroid malignancy in relation to the gold standard (post-surgical pathology). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 573 patients with single or multiple thyroid nodules. Patients were evaluated using the TIRADS and the TBSRCP classification. The data from a cohort of patients who underwent surgery (77/573, 13.4%) were correlated with post-operative pathology and the relevant clinical features of the patients. RESULTS: Of 573 patients, 545 (95.1%) were euthyroid, 24 (4.1%) were hypothyroid, and 4 (0.8%) were hyperthyroid; 419 (73.1%) had benign nodules (Bethesda II), 115 (20.1%) had intermediate (Bethesda III, IV), and 39 (6.8%) had Bethesda V and VI nodules. Four-hundred twenty (73.3%) patients were categorized as TIRADS 2,3, and 153 (26.7%) were categorized as TIRADS 4,5. The Bethesda and TIRADS classifications concorded significantly in thyroid nodule diagnosis (K=14.9%, P<0.001).Thyroid malignancy was significantly associated with microcalcification and interrupted halo, while benign nodules were significantly associated with macrocalcification and complete halo type (P=0.041, P=0.005, respectively). The TBSRCP could significantly detect malignant thyroid nodules with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 64.1%, 98.1%, 85.0%, and 94.1%, respectively (K=88.2%, P<0.001), while the respective values for the TIRADS classification were 63.5%, 76.0%, 84.6%, and 50.0% (K=34.8%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The TIRADS and TBSRCP are essential primary steps for evaluating thyroid nodules and both are complimentary. Hence, each patient with thyroid nodules should be evaluated by both approaches before opting for surgery. Highly suspicious TIRADS categories TR4 and TR5 need further evaluation by fine needle aspiration cytology.

The Role of Different Inflammatory Indices in the Diagnosis of COVID-19.

AIM: To assess the role of different inflammatory indices in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), derived NLR (dNLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte, platelet ratio (NLPR), systemic inflammation index (SII), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CRP/L) were assessed in 88 COVID-19 patients compared to 41 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The NLR, PLR, NLPR, SIRI, and CRP/L were significantly increased, while LMR was significantly decreased in COVID-19 patients compared to the control group (P = 0.008, 0.011, <0.001, 0.032, 0.002 and P < 0.001; respectively). The AUC for the assessed indices was LMR (0.738, P = 0.008), NLPR (0.721, P < 0.001), CRP/L (0.692, P = 0.002), NLR (0.649, P < 0.001), PLR (0.643, P = 0.011), SIRI (0.623, P = 0.032), dNLR (0.590, P = 0.111), SII (0.571, P = 0.207), and AISI (0.567, P-0.244). Multivariate analysis showed that NLPR >0.011 (OR: 38.751, P = 0.014), and CRP/L >7.6 (OR: 7.604, P = 0.022) are possible independent diagnostic factors for COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: NLPR and CRP/L could be potential independent diagnostic factors for COVID-19 infection.

Obesity and Waist Circumference are Possible Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: Correlation with Different Ultrasonography Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer; however, there are no clear mechanisms explaining the association between obesity and risk of thyroid cancer (TC). METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study including 184 patients with benign thyroid nodules (BN) and 19 patients with TC. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist/hip (W/H) ratio were assessed and correlated to relevant clinico-pathological features of the patients, different ultra-sonographic (U/S) criteria and risk of malignancy. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in BMI, WC and W/H ratio in TC patients compared to BN group (P=0.001, 0.011 and 0.003). Increased BMI, WC and HC were associated significantly with solid nodules (P<0.05). WC increased in hypoechoic (103.1±15.4cm) and heterogeneous (103.8±16.7cm) nodules, compared to isoechoic (97.3±15.5cm) and hyperechoic (96.1±10cm) nodules (P=0.046). It also increased with lymph nodes enlargement (P=0.04). There was a significant association between WC and TIRADS classification (P=0.032), as it increased with TR4b (118.5 ± 12.9 cm) and TR5 (117.3 ± 13.9 cm) compared to TR2 (114.1 ± 15.7 cm, P=0.025 and 0.008, respectively). WC is an independent predictor for TC [OR: 1.092, CI: 1.020-1.170, P=0.012]. It achieved sensitivity, specificity and AUC (71.4%, 68.7% and 0.750; respectively), at a cutoff value of 108.5 cm (P=0.003), and when combined with BMI at a cutoff value of 32.59 (77.8% and 68.4%, respectively, AUC: 0.780, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Central adiposity is strongly associated with the risk of TC. WC is more superior to BMI when correlated with TIRADS classification and also is an independent predictor for TC.

The Role of Vitamin D, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor and Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 in the Progression of Thyroid Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer (TC) is a common malignant tumor, however the role of total vitamin D: 25(OH)D, Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) in the development of TC is still unclear. AIM: To assess the roles of 25(OH)D, PDGF and IGF-1 in the progression of thyroid diseases. METHODS: The serum levels of 25(OH)D, PDGF and IGF-1 were assessed in 70 patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), 60 patients with benign thyroid nodules (BN) compared to 60 normal controls (NC) using ELISA technique. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the serum level of 25(OH)D in TC patients compared to NC (P<0.001) and BN patients (P=0.006). There was a significant increase in the serum levels of PDGF and IGF-1 in TC patients (P<0.001), and BN patients (P<0.001) compared to NC, while there were no significant differences between TC and BN (P=0.087, and 0.258; respectively). PDGF correlated significantly with IGF-1 (r=0.412, P<0.001), TSH (r=0.146, P=0.045), and inversely correlated with 25(OH)D (r= -0.156, P=0.013) and FT4 (r=-0.178, P=0.014). There was a significant inverse correlation between the serum levels of IGF-1 and FT4 (r=-0.172, P=0.017). Sensitivity and specificity for assessment of TC patients were (65.7% and 58.3%, P= 0.001) for 25(OH)D, (65.7% and 58.3%, P=0.021) for IGF-1, and (68.6% and 61.7%, P=0.006) for PDGF. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum 25(OH)D (OR=0.578, 95%CI= 0.426-0.783), IGF-1 (OR=1.019, 95%CI= 1.010-1.029) and PDGF (OR=1.007, 95%CI= 1.004-1.009) were considered independent risk factors for thyroid cancer (P<0.001, for all). CONCLUSION: 25(OH) D, IGF-1 and PDGF are significantly different in TC and BN cases compared to control. They have an important role in the progression of TC. However, these data should be validated on a larger sample size.
.