Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(1): 85-93, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34217851

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of vaginal dinoprostone administration before office hysteroscopy (OH) in nulliparous women. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 180 nulliparous women undergoing diagnostic OH. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly allocated the women to long-interval or short-interval dinoprostone groups: three mg dinoprostone was administered vaginally 12 hours before OH in the long-interval group and 3 hours before OH in the short-interval group. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was pain during OH measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 = no pain; 100 = worst pain imaginable). The secondary outcomes were ease of hysteroscope passage, patient satisfaction score, and drug-related adverse effects. The patients in the long-interval dinoprostone group had lower pain scores during OH (p <.001). Contrarily, pain scores 30 minutes after the procedure were similar in both groups (p = .1). The patient satisfaction score was higher and clinicians found hysteroscope passage through the cervical canal easier and quicker in the long-interval dinoprostone group than in the short-interval group (p <.001, p = .003, and p <.001, respectively). Side effects were comparable in both study groups. CONCLUSION: Vaginal dinoprostone administered 12 hours before OH was more effective than that administered 3 hours before OH in reducing pain during OH in nulliparous women, with easier hysteroscope insertion, shorter procedure duration, and higher patient satisfaction score.


Assuntos
Misoprostol , Ocitócicos , Administração Intravaginal , Dinoprostona , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Histeroscopia/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Gravidez
2.
J Food Biochem ; 44(9): e13392, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32691869

RESUMO

This study investigates the protective effect of Egyptian acacia pod extracts against overdose of paracetamol-induced liver damage. Egyptian acacia green and brown pods were extracted by mixture of ethanol 80%: HCl (6 M) (99:1 v/v). In extracts of green and brown pods, total phenolic content in hydrolyzed ethyl acetate fraction (HEF) at pH 4, was 649.89 and 712.14 mg GAE/g while antioxidant activity was 95.55% and 97.35%, both being the highest than any fraction. HEF (pH 4) in brown pods was analyzed by HPLC, there were 22 phenolic compounds rich in ethyl vanillin about 227 mg/g and 11 flavonoids rich in catechin 48.70 mg/g. A biological experiment was conducted using HEF (pH4) in brown pods against overdose of paracetamol in albino rats induced to hepatotoxicity. Thirty rats were divided into five groups; a control group, a paracetamol group, and the other three received paracetamol plus silymarin or two doses of HEF. Animals were received paracetamol and treated with either silymarin or HEF showed reduced levels of liver (ALT, AST, and ALP) and kidney (urea, creatinine, and uric acid) markers compared with the control group as well as reduction of oxidative stress and increment antioxidant enzyme activity in liver tissue when compared with the paracetamol group. It could be concluded that both HEF and silymarin are considerably high hepatoprotector against paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in rats due to their strong antioxidant activity. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Both HEF and silymarin improved liver functions and exerted strong antioxidant activities. This antioxidant activity would have a positive effect against oxidative liver damage caused by parcetamol. Thus, it may be concluded that the liver plasma membranes were protected and the regenerative and reparative capacity of liver by phenolic compound in HEF treatment. The study demonstrated the HEF hepatoprotective activity and recommends using Egyptian acacia pods for treatment of liver disorders.


Assuntos
Acacia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Acetaminofen/toxicidade , Animais , Antioxidantes/farmacologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/prevenção & controle , Egito , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Ratos
3.
Fertil Steril ; 111(3): 553-561.e4, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30611553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the evidence on the most effective medications for the relief of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion-related pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Patients undergoing IUD insertion who received different medications for pain relief versus those who received placebo. INTERVENTION(S): Electronic search in the following bibliographic databases: Medline via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ScienceDirect. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score during tenaculum placement, IUD insertion, and 5 to 20 minutes after insertion, the score of easiness of insertion and the need for additional analgesics. RESULT(S): The present review included 38 RCTs (n = 6,314 patients). The network meta-analysis showed that lidocaine-prilocaine cream (genital mucosal application) statistically significantly reduced pain at tenaculum placement compared with placebo (mean difference -2.38; 95% confidence interval, -4.07 to -0.68). In the ranking probability order, lidocaine-prilocaine cream ranked the highest in reducing the pain at tenaculum placement, followed by lidocaine (paracervical). Similarly, lidocaine-prilocaine cream ranked as the highest treatment in pain reduction during IUD insertion, followed by lidocaine (paracervical). CONCLUSION(S): Lidocaine-prilocaine cream is the most effective medication that can be used for IUD insertion-related pain. Other medications are not effective.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anticoncepção/instrumentação , Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Combinação Lidocaína e Prilocaína/administração & dosagem , Dor/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravaginal , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anticoncepção/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Combinação Lidocaína e Prilocaína/efeitos adversos , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 395(6): 625-32, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20358380

RESUMO

AIM: Hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic liver are characterized by early recurrence and poor survival. In this study, we analyzed several factors affecting both survival and recurrence after hepatic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1995 to April 2007, 550 patients underwent hepatic resections, of which, 175 patients had HCC in cirrhotic liver in Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Egypt. There were 131 males (74.9%) and 44 females (25.1%) with a mean age of 54.8 +/- 9.2 years (ranges from 26 to 75 years). RESULTS: Most of our patients were in Child's Pugh class A (86.9%). Major hepatic resection was done for 65 patients (37.1%), segmentectomy was done for 62 patients (35.4%), and localized resection was done for 48 patients (27.4%). Hospital mortality occurred in 16 (9.1%) patients, while hospital morbidity occurred in 40% of patients. The 1, 3, and 5 years survival were 68.6%, 29.6%, and 10.7%, respectively. The prognostic factors affecting recurrence were multifactorial, and the univariate analysis showed that multifocality of the tumor (p = 0.006), capsule (p = 0.001), staging (p = 0.001), blood transfusion (p = 0.02), infiltration of the cut margin (p = 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.006), and lymph nodes infiltration (p = 0.014) affect the recurrence rate, while with multivariate analysis, only cut margin was significantly affecting the recurrence (p = 0.026). Also, factors that significantly predicted survival were preoperative serum albumin (p = 0.005), tumor differentiation (p = 0.008), staging (p = 0.001), tumor's capsule (p = 0.001), cut margin (p = 0.031), vascular invasion (p = 0.049), and operative blood transfusion (p = 0.001). However, tumor differentiation (p = 0.048) was the only independent factor on multivariate analysis affecting long-term survival. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the prognostic factors after resection for recurrence and survival are different and multifactorial. However, resection of HCC in cirrhotic liver with preserved liver function is the treatment of choice in the present time and can be done with favorable results.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicações , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Feminino , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA