Mixed uremic osteodystrophy: an ill-described common bone pathology in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) starts early and progresses with further loss of kidney function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). There are four distinct types of ROD based on undecalcified bone biopsy results. Adynamic bone disease and osteomalacia are the predominant forms of low bone turnover, while hyperparathyroid bone disease and mixed uremic osteodystrophy (MUO) are typically associated with high bone turnover. MUO is a prevalent but poorly described pathology that demonstrates evidence of osteomalacia on top of the high bone formation/resorption. The prevalence of MUO ranges from 5 to 63% among different studies. The pathogenesis of MUO is multi-factorial. Altered phosphate homeostasis, hypocalcemia, vitamin D deficiency, increased FGF-23, interleukins 1 and 6, TNF-α, amyloid, and heavy metal accumulation are the main inducers of MUO. The clinical findings of MUO are usually non-specific. The use of non-invasive testing such as bone turnover markers and imaging techniques might help to suspect MUO. However, it is usually impossible to precisely diagnose this condition without performing bone biopsy. The principal management of MUO is to control the maladaptive hyperparathyroidism along with correcting any nutritional mineral deficiencies that may induce mineralization defect. MUO is a common but still poorly understood bone pathology category; it demonstrates the complexity and difficulty in understanding ROD. A large prospective bone biopsy-based studies are needed for better identification as proper diagnosis and management would improve the outcome of patients with MUO.

Is Adynamic Bone Always a Disease? Lessons from Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) is a common complication of end-stage kidney disease that often starts early with loss of kidney function, and it is considered an integral part in management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Adynamic bone (ADB) is characterized by suppressed bone formation, low cellularity, and thin osteoid seams. There is accumulating evidence supporting increasing prevalence of ADB, particularly in early CKD. Contemporarily, it is not very clear whether it represents a true disease, an adaptive mechanism to prevent bone resorption, or just a transitional stage. Several co-players are incriminated in its pathogenesis, such as age, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, uremic milieu, and iatrogenic factors. In the present review, we will discuss the up-to-date knowledge of the ADB and focus on its impact on bone health, fracture risk, vascular calcification, and long-term survival. Moreover, we will emphasize the proper preventive and management strategies of ADB that are pivotal issues in managing patients with CKD. It is still unclear whether ADB is always a pathologic condition or whether it can represent an adaptive process to suppress bone resorption and further bone loss. In this article, we tried to discuss this hard topic based on the available limited information in patients with CKD. More studies are needed to be able to clearly address this frequent ROD finding.

Low Turnover Renal Osteodystrophy With Abnormal Bone Quality and Vascular Calcification in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate CKD.

Introduction: Limited information is available on renal osteodystrophy (ROD) and vascular calcification (VC) during early chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study was designed to evaluate ROD and VC in 32 patients with CKD stages II to IV. Methods: Patients underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS), thoracic computed tomography for VC scoring using the Agatston method, and anterior iliac crest bone biopsy for mineralized bone histology, histomorphometry, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Classical and novel bone markers were determined in the blood. Results: Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 44 ± 16 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Of the patients, 84% had low bone turnover. In Whites, eGFR correlated negatively with the turnover parameter activation frequency (Ac.f) (r -0.48, P = 0.019) and with parameters of bone formation. Most patients had VC (>80%) which correlated positively with levels of phosphorus, c-terminal fibroblast growth factor-23, and activin. Aortic calcifications (ACs) correlated negatively with bone formation rate (BFR) and Ac.f (rho -0.62, -0.61, P < 0.001). TBS correlated negatively with coronary calcification (rho -0.42, P = 0.019) and AC (rho -0.57, P = 0.001). These relationships remained after adjustment of age. The mineral-to-matrix ratio, an FTIR metric reflecting bone quality, was negatively related to Ac.f and positively related to AC. Conclusion: Low bone turnover and VC are predominant in early stages of CKD. This is the first study demonstrating mineral abnormalities indicating reduced bone quality in these stages of CKD.

Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases.

Fragility fracture is a worldwide problem and a main cause of disability and impaired quality of life. It is primarily caused by osteoporosis, characterized by impaired bone quantity and or quality. Proper diagnosis of osteoporosis is essential for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporosis can be primary in postmenopausal women because of estrogen deficiency. Secondary forms of osteoporosis are not uncommon in both men and women. Most systemic illnesses and organ dysfunction can lead to osteoporosis. The kidney plays a crucial role in maintaining physiological bone homeostasis by controlling minerals, electrolytes, acid-base, vitamin D and parathyroid function. Chronic kidney disease with its uremic milieu disturbs this balance, leading to renal osteodystrophy. Diabetes mellitus represents the most common secondary cause of osteoporosis. Thyroid and parathyroid disorders can dysregulate the osteoblast/osteoclast functions. Gastrointestinal disorders, malnutrition and malabsorption can result in mineral and vitamin D deficiencies and bone loss. Patients with chronic liver disease have a higher risk of fracture due to hepatic osteodystrophy. Proinflammatory cytokines in infectious, autoimmune, and hematological disorders can stimulate osteoclastogenesis, leading to osteoporosis. Moreover, drug-induced osteoporosis is not uncommon. In this review, we focus on causes, pathogenesis, and management of secondary osteoporosis.

Characteristics and outcomes of prisoners hospitalized due to COVID-19 disease.

BACKGROUND: Correctional facilities have faced unique challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. A COVID-19 outbreak was reported in the Federal Medical Center (FMC) in Lexington, Kentucky, a prison for inmates requiring medical and mental care. The main objective of this study was to examine clinical characteristics and outcomes of prisoners vs. non-prisoners admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did a retrospective, comparative cohort study of 86 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to the University of Kentucky hospital between March 1 and June 1, 2020. Among these, 37 patients were inmates from a single local FMC and 49 were non-inmates. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of the cohort was 59.1 (14.5) years, 68.6% were male and 61.6% white. All inmates were men. No significant differences in age or race were observed between inmates and non-inmates. Hypertension (81%), obesity (62%), COPD/asthma (43%), diabetes (41%), coronary artery diseases (38%), and chronic kidney disease (22%) were among the most common comorbidities prevalent in inmates. Inmates had overall higher serum creatinine and C-reactive protein, more proteinuria, and lower platelet counts at the time of hospital admission when compared to non-inmates. Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was more frequent in inmates (68 vs. 38% in non-inmates, p = 0.008). Overall, patients who developed AKI had higher acuity of illness with more requirement of ICU care and mechanical ventilation. Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) was provided to 12.8% of patients. Inpatient mortality occurred in 15.1% of patients and was not different in inmates vs. non-inmates (13.5 vs. 16.3%, p = 0.862). All survivors became independent of KRT, and ~ 1 of 10 survivors had a reduction of eGFR ≥ 25% from baseline by the time of discharge, which was more frequent in inmates vs. non-inmates, 15.6 vs. 2.4%, p = 0.042, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inmates represent a vulnerable population with prevalent comorbidity and susceptibility to COVID-19. When compared to non-inmates with COVID-19, inmates exhibited higher incidence of AKI and, for survivors, less kidney recovery by the time of hospital discharge. Surveillance of long-term sequela of COVID-19 is warranted in this susceptible inmate population.

Bone Quality in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions - Part II.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, which is due not only to low bone volume and mass but also poor microarchitecture and tissue quality. The pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions detailed, herein, are potential approaches to improve bone health in CKD patients. Various medications build up bone mass but also affect bone tissue quality. Antiresorptive therapies strikingly reduce bone turnover; however, they can impair bone mineralization and negatively affect the ability to repair bone microdamage and cause an increase in bone brittleness. On the other hand, some osteoporosis therapies may cause a redistribution of bone structure that may improve bone strength without noticeable effect on BMD. This may explain why some drugs can affect fracture risk disproportionately to changes in BMD. SUMMARY: An accurate detection of the underlying bone abnormalities in CKD patients, including bone quantity and quality abnormalities, helps in institution of appropriate management strategies. Here in this part II, we are focusing on advancements in bone therapeutics that are anticipated to improve bone health and decrease mortality in CKD patients. KEY MESSAGES: Therapeutic interventions to improve bone health can potentially advance life span. Emphasis should be given to the impact of various therapeutic interventions on bone quality.

Bone Quality in CKD Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions - Part I.

BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence that patients with CKD have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Bone fragility is not only influenced by low bone volume and mass but also by poor microarchitecture and tissue quality. More emphasis has been given to the quantitative rather than qualitative assessment of bone health, both in general population and CKD patients. Although bone mineral density (BMD) is a very useful clinical tool in assessing bone strength, it may underestimate the fracture risk in CKD patients. Serum and urinary bone biomarkers have been found to be reflective of bone activities and predictive of fractures independently of BMD in CKD patients. Bone quality and fracture risk in CKD patients can be better assessed by utilizing new technologies such as trabecular bone score and high-resolution imaging studies. Additionally, invasive assessments such as bone histology and micro-indentation are useful counterparts in the evaluation of bone quality. SUMMARY: A precise diagnosis of the underlying skeletal abnormalities in CKD patients is crucial to prevent further bone loss and fractures. We must consider bone quantity and quality abnormalities for management of CKD patients. Here in this part I, we are focusing on advances in bone quality diagnostics that are expected to help in proper understanding of the bone health in CKD patients. KEY MESSAGES: Assessment of bone quality and quantity in CKD patients is essential. Both noninvasive and invasive techniques for the assessment of bone quality are available.

Effect of amphotericin B-deoxycholate (Fungizone) on the mitochondria of Wistar rats' renal proximal tubules cells.

Amphotericin B-deoxycholate (Fungizone [FZ]) is a widely used potent antimycotic drug in spite of its nephrotoxic effect via different mechanisms. The effect of FZ on renal cell bioenergetics is not clear. The current study evaluated the effect of FZ on the bioenergetics of albino rats' isolated renal proximal tubule cells (PTCs). The cytotoxic effect of FZ on the isolated renal cells was assessed by MTT and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays. The effect of FZ on the PTCs uptake (OAT1 and OCT2) and efflux (P-gp and MRP2) transporters was evaluated. Then, the effect of FZ on mitochondria was assessed by studying complexes I-IV activities, lactate assay, oxygen consumption rates (OCR), and western blotting for all mitochondrial complexes. Moreover, the effect of FZ on mitochondrial membrane fluidity (MMF) and fatty acids composition was evaluated. Additionally, the protective effect of coenzyme q10 was studied. Outcomes showed that FZ was cytotoxic to the PTCs in a concentration and time-dependent patterns. FZ significantly inhibited the studied uptake and efflux tubular transporters with inhibition of the mitochondrial complexes activities and parallel increase in lactate production and decrease in OCRs. Finally, FZ significantly reduced the expression of all mitochondrial complexes in addition to significant increase in MMF and MMFA concentration. Coenzyme Q10 was found to significantly decrease FZ-induced cytotoxicity and transporters impairment in the PTC. FZ significantly inhibits bioenergetics of PTC, which may stimulate the cascade of cell death and clinical nephrotoxicity.

The 2018 Banff Working Group classification of definitive polyomavirus nephropathy: A multicenter validation study in the modern era.

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) remained inadequately classified until 2018 when the Banff Working Group published a new 3-tier morphologic classification scheme derived from in-depth statistical analysis of a large multinational patient cohort. Here we report a multicenter "modern-era" validation study that included 99 patients with definitive PVN transplanted post January 1, 2009 and followed the original 2018 study design. Results validate the PVN classification, that is, the 3 PVN disease classes predicted clinical presentation, allograft function, and outcome independent of therapeutic intervention. PVN class 1 compared to classes 2 and 3 was diagnosed earlier (16.9 weeks posttransplant [median], P = .004), and showed significantly better function at 24 months postindex biopsy (serum creatinine 1.75 mg/dl, geometric mean, vs class 2: P = .037, vs class 3: P = .013). Class 1 presented during long-term follow-up with a low graft failure rate: 5% class 1, vs 30% class 2, vs 50% class 3 (P = .009). Persistent PVN was associated with an increased risk for graft failure (and functional decline in class 2 at 24 months postdiagnosis; serum creatinine with persistence: 2.48 mg/dL vs 1.65 with clearance, geometric means, P = .018). In conclusion, we validate the 2018 Banff Working Group PVN classification that provides significant clinical information and enhances comparative data analysis.

Pathogenesis and management of vascular calcification in CKD and dialysis patients.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a predisposition to develop vascular calcification due to dysregulated homeostatic mechanisms, which lead to an imbalance in the circulatory promoters and inhibitors of vascular calcification, leading to a net calcification stress. These factors promote ectopic calcification and induce vascular smooth muscle cells to undergo osteogenic differentiation and actively calcify the vascular media. The article summarizes clinically relevant pathogenic mechanisms of vascular calcification in patients with CKD and in dialysis patients and summarizes novel therapeutic interventions. In addition to the management of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, patients with CKD-mineral and bone disorder need close attention in the management of the mineral metabolism to prevent adverse effects on the bone and vascular compartments. This article reviews current evidence and therapeutic guidelines in the management of mineral metabolism in CKD and dialysis.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, Treatment, and Overall Impact of BK Viremia on Kidney Transplantation.

BK viremia (BKV) is a recognized and potentially serious problem in renal transplantation. The risk factors and the impact of BKV on renal allograft and patient survival are controversial. This study reports an 8-year, single-center experience on the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of BKV in kidney transplant recipients. This is a retrospective analysis of all patients who received a kidney transplant at the University of Kentucky and had BK viral titers available from 2009 to 2017. BKV was defined by a polymerase chain reaction viral load of ≥ 10,000 copies per mL. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data generated during routine outpatient follow up and inpatients records were collected. Independent risk factors for BKV were determined using uni- and multivariate analysis. Graft and patient survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the severity of polyomavirus nephropathy on biopsy was scored using the Banff 2017 classification. We identified 122 BK positive (19%) and 527 BK negative (81%) patients. BKV developed after a median of 115 days (range, 80-249 days) following kidney transplantation. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival was 97%, 75%, and 33% in the BKV group and 96%, 85%, and 71% in the BK negative group, respectively. Likewise, the 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 98%, 84%, and 52% in the BKV group and 98%, 92%, and 84% in the BK negative group. Male sex, age at transplantation, maintenance steroids, and alemtuzumab induction were associated with developing BKV in the multivariate analysis. We concluded that BKV is not uncommon after renal transplantation. The determinants for BKV are male sex, older transplant recipients, and maintenance steroids. BKV adversely affected graft and patient survival. A unified approach for BKV and polyomavirus nephropathy treatment is needed.

Long-term outcomes and management considerations after parathyroidectomy in the dialysis patient.

Parathyroidectomy (PTX) remains an important intervention for dialysis patients with poorly controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), though there are only retrospective and observational data that show a mortality benefit to this procedure. Potential consequences that we seek to avoid after PTX include persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism, and parathyroid insufficiency. There is considerable subjectivity in defining and diagnosing these conditions, given that we poorly understand the optimal PTH targets (particularly post PTX) needed to maintain bone and vascular health. While lowering PTH after PTX decreases bone turnover, long-term changes in bone activity have been poorly explored. High turnover bone disease, usually present at the time a PTX is considered, often swings to a state of low turnover in the setting of sufficiently low PTH levels. It remains unclear if all low bone turnover equate with disease. However, such changes in bone turnover appear to predispose to vascular calcification, with positive calcium balance after PTX being a potential contributor. We know little of how the post-PTX state resets calcium balance, how calcium and VDRA requirements change or what kind of adjustments are needed to avoid calcium loading. The current consensus cautions against excessive reduction of PTH although there is insufficient evidence-based guidance regarding the management of chronic kidney disease - mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD) parameters in the post-PTX state. This article aims to compile existing research, provide an overview of current practice with regard to PTX and post-PTX chronic management. It highlights gaps and controversies and aims to re-orient the focus to clinically relevant contemporary priorities in CKD-MBD management after PTX.

Impact of Recent Clinical Trials on Nephrology Practice: Are We in a Stagnant Era?

BACKGROUND: Although renal replacement therapy prevents death from uremia, survival among patients with acute and chronic kidney diseases (CKD) remains an imperative concern. The expected life span of US dialysis patients 60-64 years of age is approximately 4.5 years; this is similar to that of patients with lung cancer. Despite substantial progress in many medical specialties over the past decades (e.g., notable reductions in myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality rates in the general population), survival among dialysis patients has not improved significantly over the same period. A few decades ago, HIV infection and AIDS were pretty much a death sentence. Because of progress in HIV treatment, now it can be controlled with a daily pill, and ongoing research is pushing treatment even further and controls the virus with longer-acting treatment. A cure is no longer impossible for HIV and other viral infections such as hepatitis B and C and many malignancies, but so far there is no cure for CKD. SUMMARY: Billions of dollars have been spent on kidney disease research in the past decades, with no tangible progress in clinical practice. The challenges of improving the quantity and quality of trials in nephrology are enormous. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in nephrology is lower than that in other medical subspecialties, and most of the big RCTs in nephrology yield negative results. Nephrology studies evaluating hard clinical endpoints or surrogate endpoints are scarce. KEY MESSAGE: Herein we discuss the slow progress in nephrology research that has impacted clinical practice over the last couple of decades and highlight the major obstacles, challenges, and potential solutions.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen and calculated panel reactive antibody on BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience and literature review.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) on BK virus activation as evidenced by BK viremia (BKV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our institution, 649 kidney transplant patients were screened for BKV from 2009 to 2017. Patients were considered to have BKV if they had >10 000 copies/mL of BK DNA in their blood. Donor and recipient HLA and cPRA, demographic, clinical and laboratory data, as well as immunosuppressive medications were collected. RESULTS: We identified 122 BK positive and 527 BK negative patients. Only 25% of the patients had cPRA of 20% or more, and 64% had more than three HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, male gender, age, and maintenance of steroid therapy significantly increased the risk of BKV (P = 0.005, 0.005 and <0.001, respectively). The degree of cPRA and the individual HLA allele and HLA allele matching did not significantly affect BKV. CONCLUSION: Neither the degree of HLA mismatching nor cPRA appears to affect BKV. Moreover, no specific HLA allele, HLA allele matching, or cPRA were associated with BKV.