Is quadratus lumborum block combined with low dose-spinal anesthesia an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia in high-risk patients has many complications and needs long preoperative preparations and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) as an alternative to general anesthesia for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the urology department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals in Cairo, Egypt, from January 2021 to January 2022. The study included 60 patients of ASA ll-lll scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All patients received low-dose spinal anesthesia (5 mg bupivacaine) and QLB (QL1-QL2-QL3) approaches. The primary observation parameter was the efficacy of this technique as an alternative to general anesthesia. The secondary parameters measured were evaluation of need for intraoperative narcotics, postoperative pain score (VAS), and patients satisfaction as assessed using a 5-point Likert Scale. RESULTS: None of the patients was given general anesthesia, and intraoperative sedation was given to nineteen patients (32.2%). No hemodynamic changes were observed in all patients. There was a significant correlation between the use of intraoperative sedation and stone site, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay. Pain intensity on VAS at rest and movement was low until the 24th postoperative hour. Patient satisfaction score was 3, 4, and 5 in 1 (1.7%), 4 (6.7%), and 55 (91.6%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combined low-dose spinal anesthesia with quadratus lumborum block is an effective alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing PCNL procedures with good postoperative analgesia. Patients with lower calyceal punctures have a lower incidence of intraoperative sedation requirements.

Aesthetic and functional outcomes of thinned anterolateral thigh flap in reconstruction of complex wounds of the upper limb.

We studied outcomes of reconstruction of complex upper limb wounds using thinned anterolateral thigh flaps. There were 18 patients with a mean age of 27.5 years. The mean thickness of the flap before and after thinning was 23 mm and 5 mm, respectively. Two patients had partial tip necrosis that was treated conservatively. Aesthetic and functional evaluations were performed using a 5-point Likert scale, QuickDASH score, passive range of motion and power grip at 12 months after surgery. The study showed good results in the aesthetic evaluation by a panel of plastic surgeons (mean score: 19.7) and patient self-assessment (mean score: 18.1). There was a significant correlation between the total scores of the panel and the patients. The mean QuickDASH score was 21, with a high percentage in the middle category 'had a problem but working'. The thinned anterolateral thigh flap is versatile and safe in upper limb reconstruction with good aesthetic and functional results.Level of evidence: IV.

Microbial cellulose dressing compared with silver sulphadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The current treatment for partial thickness burns at the trial site is silver sulphadiazine, as it minimises bacterial colonisation of wounds. Its deleterious effect on wound healing, together with the need for repeated, often painful, procedures, has brought about the search for a better treatment. Microbial cellulose has shown promising results that avoid these disadvantages. The aim of this study was therefore to compare microbial cellulose with silver sulphadiazine as a dressing for partial thickness burns. METHOD: All patients who presented with partial thickness (superficial and deep dermal) burns from October 2014 to October 2016 were screened for this randomised clinical trial. Twenty patients were included in each group: the cellulose group was treated with microbial cellulose sheets and the control group with silver sulphadiazine cream 10mg/g. The wound was evaluated every third day. Pain was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale during and after each procedure. Other variables recorded were age, sex, percentage total body surface area burned (TBSA%), clinical signs of infection, time for epithelialisation and hospital stay. Linear multivariable regression was used to analyse the significance of differences between the treatment groups by adjusting for the size and depth of the burn, and the patient's age. RESULTS: Median TBSA% was 9% (IQR 5.5-12.5). The median number of dressing changes was 1 (IQR 1-2) in the cellulose group, which was lower than that in the control group (median 9.5, IQR 6-16) (p<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the group treated with microbial cellulose spent 6.3 (95% CI 0.2-12.5) fewer days in hospital (p=0.04), had a mean score that was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5-4.3) points lower during wound care (p<0.001), and 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) afterwards (p<0.001). Epithelialisation was quicker, but not significantly so. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the microbial cellulose dressing is a better first choice for treatment of partial thickness burns than silver sulphadiazine cream. Fewer dressings of the wound were done and, combined with the low pain scores, this is good for both the patients and the health care system. The differences in randomisation of the area of burns is, however, a concern that needs to be included in the interpretation of the results.