Chronic ataluren (PTC124) treatment of nonsense mutation cystic fibrosis.

In a subset of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), nonsense mutations (premature stop codons) disrupt production of full-length, functional CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Ataluren (PTC124) allows ribosomal readthrough of premature stop codons in mRNA. We evaluated drug activity and safety in patients with nonsense mutation CF who took ataluren three times daily (morning, midday and evening) for 12 weeks at either a lower dose (4, 4 and 8 mg·kg(-1)) or higher dose (10, 10 and 20 mg·kg(-1)). The study enrolled 19 patients (10 males and nine females aged 19-57 yrs; dose: lower 12, higher seven) with a classic CF phenotype, at least one CFTR nonsense mutation allele, and an abnormal nasal total chloride transport. Both ataluren doses were similarly active, improving total chloride transport with a combined mean change of -5.4 mV (p<0.001), and on-treatment responses (at least -5 mV improvement) and hyperpolarisations (values more electrically negative than -5 mV) in 61% (p<0.001) and 56% (p = 0.002) of patients. CFTR function was greater with time and was accompanied by trends toward improvements in pulmonary function and CF-related coughing. Adverse clinical and laboratory findings were uncommon and usually mild. Chronic ataluren administration produced time-dependent improvements in CFTR activity and clinical parameters with generally good tolerability.

Irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer: a new survival standard.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). This demonstrated activity of irinotecan as effective second-line therapy for colorectal cancer led to evaluation of combination irinotecan/5-FU/LV as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic disease. The results of two prospective phase III randomized, controlled, multicenter, multinational clinical trials in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer served as the basis for U.S. and European approval of irinotecan/5-FU/LV for this indication. An overview of the findings of these two pivotal studies provides insights regarding the application of this new combination in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV, either alone, or with concurrent irinotecan. The study conducted primarily in North America (study 1), employed bolus 5-FU/LV schedules, while the study performed primarily in Europe (study 2), employed infusional 5-FU/LV regimens. Major endpoints included tumor response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP), overall survival, quality of life, and safety. RESULTS: In study 1, the respective confirmed response rates for irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV were 39% and 21% (p <.001); median TTPs were 7.0 months and 4.3 months, respectively (p =.004). In study 2, response rates for irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV alone were 35% and 22% (p =.005); median TTPs were 6.7 months and 4.4 months, respectively (p <.001). Survival time increased significantly with irinotecan/5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV alone in both studies (study 1: median 14.8 months versus 12.6 months, p =.042; study 2: median 17.4 months versus 14.1 months, p =.032). The combined analysis of the data from the two studies showed median survivals of 15.9 months versus 13.3 months, favoring the irinotecan-containing combinations (stratified-by-study p =.003). Patients in study 1 had a 36% lower risk of tumor progression and a 20% lower risk of death with the irinotecan combination than with 5-FU/LV alone; comparable risk reduction values in study 2 were 42% and 23%. While grade 3 diarrhea and vomiting were more common with irinotecan/5-FU/LV, grade 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and mucositis were less common with irinotecan/5-FU/LV than with the Mayo Clinic 5-FU/LV regimen. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan/5-FU/LV is superior to 5-FU/LV alone as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, offering consistently improved tumor control and prolonged survival. Irinotecan-based combination therapy sets a new survival standard for the treatment of this life-threatening disease.

Phase I trial of the combination of irinotecan, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicities, and dose suitable for phase II/III trials of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled to this multicenter, phase I study. The initial regimen was paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2)/3 h, followed by carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 over 30 minutes on day 1, and CPT-11 starting at 40 mg/m(2) over 90 minutes, days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in three of seven patients. The regimen was amended, with doses reduced to paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)/3 h, carboplatin AUC 5 and CPT-11 at 40 mg/m(2), all on day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of CPT-11 proceeded to 80 mg/m(2) then 125 mg/m(2) before dose-limiting toxicities were experienced. Subsequent patients received an intermediate CPT-11 dose of 100 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for safety, and 31 were assessable for tumor response. The primary first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity observed during all cycles was neutropenia (16 patients [50%], with six [19%] developing neutropenic fever). Objective tumor response was observed in 39% (12/31, 95% confidence interval, 22% to 58%). The median time to tumor progression was 6.8 months, median survival 11.0 months, and 1-year survival probability 0.46. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 100 mg/m(2), paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), and carboplatin AUC 5 given every 3 weeks can be safely administered in patients with advanced NSCLC. Neutropenia and diarrhea are the dose-limiting toxicities. The combination shows appreciable activity, and survival data are favorable.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) in triplet combinations in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a review and report of a phase I/II trial.

The objectives of this phase I/II trial were to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities, and the dose suitable for phase II/III trials of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Seventy-three patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled in this multicenter, phase I/II study. The initial regimen was paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 over 3 hours, followed by carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 over 30 minutes on day 1 and CPT-11 starting at 40 mg/m2 over 90 minutes on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in three of the original seven patients. The regimen was amended with doses reduced to paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours, carboplatin AUC = 5, and CPT-11 at 40 mg/m2, all on day 1 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of CPT-11 proceeded to 80 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 before dose-limiting toxicities were experienced. Subsequent patients received an intermediate CPT-11 dose of 100 mg/m2. Doses suitable for phase II study were determined to be paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours, carboplatin AUC = 5, and CPT-11 100 mg/m2. The pri-mary first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhea. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity observed during all cycles was neutropenia. On the phase I portion of the study, objective tumor response was observed in 39% (12 of 31, 95% confidence interval: 22%-58%). The median time to tumor progression was 6.8 months, median survival was 11.0 months, and 1-year survival probability was 0.46. These data were confirmed in the phase II portion with a 30% objective response rate, median time to progression of 5.6 months, median survival of 12.5 months, and a 1-year survival probability of 0.50. In conclusion, CPT-11 100 mg/m2, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, and carboplatin AUC = 5 given every 3 weeks can be safely administered in patients with advanced NSCLC. Neutropenia and diarrhea are the dose-limiting toxicities. The combination shows appreciable activity, and survival data are favorable, warranting further study of this regimen. A review of other irinotecan-containing triplet combinations is presented.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.

OBJECTIVES: This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) when administered on a once-every-2-week schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered to successive cohorts of patients at progressively increasing starting doses ranging from 125 to 350 mg/m2. The MTD and DLTs were determined both for CPT-11 alone and for CPT-11 followed by filgrastim (G-CSF). Plasma samples were obtained during the first 24 hours after initial dosing to determine the total concentrations (lactone + carboxylate forms) of CPT-11; of the active metabolite SN-38; and of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). RESULTS: Neutropenic fever was the DLT for CPT-11 at the 300 mg/m2 dose level. When G-CSF was added, dose escalation beyond 350 mg/m2 could not be achieved due to grade 2-3 toxicities that prevented on-time retreatment with CPT-11. Severe, late diarrhea was uncommon on this schedule. Peak plasma concentrations of SN-38 and SN-38G were approximately 2.5% and 4.2% of the corresponding peak plasma concentration for CPT-II, respectively The harmonic mean terminal half-lives for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were 7.1 hours, 13.4 hours, and 12.7 hours, respectively. No predictive correlation was observed between CPT-11 or SN-38 peak concentration or AUC and first-cycle diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, or vomiting. Across the range of doses studied, mean CPT-11 clearance was 14.0 +/- 4.0 l/h/m2 and volume of distribution was 146 +/- 45.9 l/m2. CONCLUSIONS: When administered every two weeks, the recommended phase II starting dose of CPT-11 is 250 mg/m2 when given alone and 300 mg/m2 when supported by G-CSF. This every-two-week regimen offers a tolerable and active alternative to weekly or every-three-week single-agent CPT-11 therapy.

Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The combination of fluorouracil and leucovorin has until recently been standard therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer that is refractory to treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin. In a multicenter trial, we compared a combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin with bolus doses of fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. A third group of patients received irinotecan alone. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously), fluorouracil (500 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus), and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) weekly for four weeks every six weeks; fluorouracil (425 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) and leucovorin (20 mg per square meter as an intravenous bolus) daily for five consecutive days every four weeks; or irinotecan alone (125 mg per square meter intravenously) weekly for four weeks every six weeks. End points included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 683 patients, 231 were assigned to receive irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin; 226 to receive fluorouracil and leucovorin; and 226 to receive irinotecan alone. In an intention-to-treat analysis, as compared with treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin, treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 7.0 vs. 4.3 months; P=0.004), a higher rate of confirmed response (39 percent vs. 21 percent, P<0.001), and longer overall survival (median, 14.8 vs. 12.6 months; P=0.04). Results for irinotecan alone were similar to those for fluorouracil and leucovorin. Grade 3 (severe) diarrhea was more common during treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin than during treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin, but the incidence of grade 4 (life-threatening) diarrhea was similar in the two groups (<8 percent). Grade 3 or 4 mucositis, grade 4 neutropenia, and neutropenic fever were less frequent during treatment with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Adding irinotecan to the regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin did not compromise the quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly treatment with irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin is superior to a widely used regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) using a once-every-three-week dosing schedule for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancy.

A Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolites when given on a once-every-3-week schedule. Thirty-four patients with advanced refractory solid malignancies were treated with CPT-11 (240-340 mg/m2) administered as a 90-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without prior abdominal/pelvic (AP) radiotherapy. Gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) and hematological toxicity (leukopenia and neutropenia) were dose-limiting side effects. Other common toxicities included anorexia, asthenia, and acute cholinergic symptoms (abdominal cramps, diaphoresis, and lacrimation). For patients with no prior AP radiation therapy, the MTD was determined to be 320 mg/m2, whereas those with prior AP radiation therapy had a MTD of 290 mg/m2. Dose-proportional increases in the mean area under the concentration-time curves for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were not observed over the narrow dose range studied. Mean values of terminal phase half-life, clearance, terminal phase volume of distribution, and steady-state volume of distribution for CPT-11 were 12.4 +/- 1.8 h, 13.0 +/- 3.8 liters/h/m2, 234 +/- 83 liters/m2, and 123 +/- 38 liters/m2, respectively. The pharmacodynamic analyses indicated the strongest correlation to be between SN-38 area under the concentration-time curves and neutropenia (p = 0.60; P = 0.001). A total of five responses (one complete response and four partial responses) were observed in the cohort of 32 patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. In conclusion, gastrointestinal toxicity and hematological toxicity were the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11 when administered as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. In this trial, the recommended Phase II starting dose for patients with no prior AP radiation therapy was found to be 320 mg/m2; for patients with prior AP radiation, the recommended Phase II starting dose was 290 mg/m2. This once-every-3-week schedule has been incorporated into a Phase I trial of CPT-11 combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin.

Effects of treatment with clindamycin hydrochloride on progression of canine periodontal disease after ultrasonic scaling.

This study was conducted to determine the benefit, if any, of combining antibiotic therapy with ultrasonic scaling, root planing, and polishing (USRP) over USRP alone as determined by improvements in plaque index, gingival index, and pocket depth measurements. Thirty dogs with signs of periodontal disease were randomly assigned to the USRP-only treatment group or to the USRP-antibiotic treatment group. USRP was performed on all dogs on study day 0. In addition, dogs in the USRP-antibiotic treatment group received clindamycin hydrochloride (Antirobe, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) dosed at 2.5 mg/lb body weight (BW) twice a day beginning on day 0 and continuing 8 days. Followup visits occurred 2, 6, 13, and 25 weeks after the start of the study. Treatment differences were compared using a mixed model analysis for repeated measures. This analysis indicated that the clindamycin regimen, after USRP, had a significant effect on plaque and pocket depth measures of periodontal disease but not on gingivitis. For plaque, average index scores for the treatment group were lower at all follow-up visits with significant differences at 2 and 6 weeks after cleaning. The antibiotic treatment group also maintained a significantly smaller average pocket depth, representing a 15% postcleaning reduction for the clindamycin group versus a 3% reduction in the control group.

Phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A secondary objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, SN-38. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with repeated 4-week courses comprising CPT-11 (60 mg/m(2)) administered on days 1, 8, and 15, and a single dose of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) after CPT-11 administration on day 1. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, including 33 men and 19 women. The median age was 61 years (range, 29 to 79 years). Southwest Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 12 patients, 1 in 32 patients, and 2 in eight patients. Eleven and 41 patients had stage IIIB and IV disease, respectively. Objective responses occurred in 28.8% of patients (15 of 52; 95% confidence interval, 16.5% to 41.2%). The median survival duration was 9.9 months (range, 1.6 to 30.8 months). The 1-year survival rate was 37%. Grade 3/4 adverse events consisted primarily of nausea (32. 7% ) or vomiting (13.5%), late-onset diarrhea (17.3%), and neutropenia (46.1%). The study design led to preferential modification of CPT-11 doses, resulting in CPT-11 dose attenuations to < or = 40 mg/m(2) in the majority of patients (31 of 52; 60%), whereas dose reductions of cisplatin were uncommon. CPT-11 pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable to those reported previously in single-agent studies. CONCLUSION: CPT-11/cisplatin is an active combination regimen with manageable toxicity in the therapy of stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Future studies should be designed with schedules and dose modification provisions that avoid unnecessary CPT-11 dose reductions to exploit more directly the therapeutic synergy of these agents.

Irinotecan therapy in adults with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) in the treatment of adults with progressive, persistent, or recurrent malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive or recurrent malignant gliomas were enrolled onto this study between October 1996 and August 1997. CPT-11 was given as a 90-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion at a dose of 125 mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest, which comprised one course. Plasma concentrations of CPT-11 and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were determined in a subset of patients. RESULTS: All 60 patients who enrolled (36 males and 24 females) were treated with CPT-11 and all were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. Pharmacokinetic data were available in 32 patients. Nine patients (15%; 95% confidence interval, 6% to 24%) had a confirmed partial response, and 33 patients (55%) achieved stable disease lasting more than two courses (12 weeks). Toxicity observed during the study was limited to infrequent neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G area under the plasma concentration-time curves through infinite time values in these patients were approximately 40%, 25%, and 25%, respectively, of those determined previously in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer not receiving antiepileptics or chronic dexamethasone treatment. CONCLUSION: Response results document that CPT-11, given with a standard starting dose and treatment schedule, has activity in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. However, the low incidence of severe toxicity and low plasma concentrations of CPT-11 and SN-38 achieved in this patient population suggest that concurrent treatment with anticonvulsants and dexamethasone enhances drug clearance.

A multicenter, phase II trial of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, Phase II trial was performed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. METHODS: CPT-11 was given as a 90-minute intravenous infusion in repeated 6-week (42-day) courses comprising weekly treatment for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every second course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were entered into the trial. The first 64 patients received a starting dose of 125 mg/m2. An additional 102 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 100 mg/m2 to determine whether a reduction in the starting dose would result in lower toxicity without sacrificing efficacy. Objective responses to CPT-11 were observed in 18 patients (1 complete response and 17 partial responses) (response rate [RR] = 10.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-15.6%). An additional 67 patients (40.4%) had stable disease as their best response. At the 125 mg/m2 starting dose, the RR was 14.1% (9 of 64 patients; 95% CI, 5.5-22.6%). Among patients given a starting dose of 100 mg/m2, the RR was 8.8% (9 of 102 patients; 95% CI, 3.3-14.3%). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-36.8 months). The most frequently observed Grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal events (i.e., diarrhea [27.1%], nausea [15.1%], emesis [9.6%], abdominal cramping [22.2%], and neutropenia [19.9%]). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of Grade 3/4 toxicities between the 125 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2 starting dose levels except for Grade 3/4 emesis (21.9% vs. 2%; P < 0.001). Patients age > or = 65 years were twice as likely (38.6% vs. 18.8%; P < 0.008) to develop Grade 3/4 diarrhea compared with younger patients when all courses of therapy were evaluated. However, older age did not significantly predict for a higher incidence of first-course diarrhea (25.0% vs. 14.7%; P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 can induce tumor regression in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that has progressed during or shortly after 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Gastrointestinal events and neutropenia were the most common serious toxicities. Given the trend toward a higher response rate without substantially greater toxicity, 125 mg/m2 has been selected as the preferred starting dose for further studies. Careful attention to appropriate CPT-11 dose modification and early intervention with loperamide may be especially important in elderly patients.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of orally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 solution for intravenous (IV) use was mixed with CranGrape juice (Ocean Spray, Lakeville-Middleboro, MA) and administered orally once per day for 5 days every 3 weeks to 28 patients. Starting dosages ranged from 20 to 100 mg/m2/d. RESULTS: Grade 4 delayed diarrhea was the DLT at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage in patients younger than 65 years of age and at the 66 mg/m2/d dosage in patients 65 or older. The other most clinically significant toxicity of oral CPT-11 was neutropenia. A linear relationship was found between dose, peak plasma concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 lactone, implying no saturation in the conversion of irinotecan to SN-38. The mean metabolic ratio ([AUC(SN-38 total) + AUC(SN-38G total)]/AUC(CPT-11 total)) was 0.7 to 0.8, which suggests that oral dosing results in presystemic conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38. An average of 72% of SN-38 was maintained in the lactone form during the first 24 hours after drug administration. One patient with previously treated colorectal cancer and liver metastases who received oral CPT-11 at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage achieved a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: The MTD and recommended phase II dosage for oral CPT-11 is 66 mg/m2/d in patients younger than 65 years of age and 50 mg/m2/d in patients 65 or older, administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. The DLT of diarrhea is similar to that observed with IV administration of CPT-11. The biologic activity and favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics make oral administration of CPT-11 an attractive option for further clinical development.

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: In vitro synergy between cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported. We designed a combination schedule of these agents to maximize the potential for synergistic interaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To maximize the opportunity for synergy, we divided the cisplatin into four consecutive weekly treatments, followed by a 2-week rest. Each dose of cisplatin was immediately followed by a dose of irinotecan. The dose of cisplatin was fixed at 30 mg/m2/wk. The initial irinotecan dose was 50 mg/m2/wk and this was escalated by 30% increments in successive cohorts of three to six patients to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 35 patients with solid tumors enrolled onto this trial, 30 were assessable for toxicity and response. The MTD for this regimen was 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 50 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in previously treated patients and 30 mg/m2/wk of cisplatin plus 65 mg/m2/wk of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) encountered in this trial. Diarrhea was infrequent and rarely dose-limiting. Seven of 30 assessable patients achieved a partial response. No alteration in irinotecan, SN-38, or SN-38G pharmacokinetics resulted from the administration of cisplatin with irinotecan. CONCLUSION: The administration of cisplatin and irinotecan on this weekly schedule provides a practical and well-tolerated regimen that has the potential to maximize any clinical synergy between the two agents. Evidence of substantial clinical activity was seen in this phase I study.

Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate irinotecan (CPT-11; Yakult Honsha, Tokyo, Japan) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed following fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with irinotecan 125 to 150 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every week for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. Forty-eight patients were entered onto the study and all were assessable for toxicity. Forty-three patients completed one full course of therapy and were assessable for response. RESULTS: One complete and nine partial responses were observed (response rate, 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 36%). The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2 to 13). The median survival time was 10.4 months and the 1-year survival rate was 46% (95% CI, 39% to 53%). Grade 4 diarrhea occurred in four of the first nine patients (44%) treated on this study at the 150-mg/m2 dose level. The study was amended to reduce the starting dose of irinotecan to 125 mg/m2. At this dose, nine of 39 patients (23%) developed grade 4 diarrhea. Aggressive administration of loperamide also reduced the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in eight of 48 patients (17%), but was associated with bacteremia and sepsis in only case. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan has significant single-agent activity against colorectal cancer that has progressed during or shortly after treatment with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. The incidence of severe diarrhea is reduced by using a starting dose of irinotecan 125 mg/m2 and by initiating loperamide at the earliest signs of diarrhea. These results warrant further clinical evaluation to define the role of irinotecan in the treatment of individuals with colorectal cancer.

Phase I study of adozelesin (U-73,975) in patients with solid tumors.

During a phase I clinical and pharmacologic trial, 26 patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with increasing doses of adozelesin by brief intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Overall, adozelesin was well tolerated. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, mainly thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild, with fatigue (36%), local reaction at the infusion site (24%), nausea or vomiting (20%) and hypersensitivity reaction (16%) being the most common adverse effects. There were no objective clinical responses. The maximally tolerated dose on this schedule was 188 micrograms/m2 with the recommended phase II starting dose being 150 micrograms/m2 on an every 3 week schedule. Adozelesin merits broad investigation at the phase II level.

Role of cyclooxygenase products of arachidonic acid metabolism in Ascaris antigen-induced bronchoconstriction in sensitized dogs.

The pharmacologic modulation of Ascaris allergen-induced bronchoconstriction was investigated in beagle dogs sensitized by experimental infection with Ascaris suum ova. Ascaris-induced increases in total lung resistance (RL) and falls in dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were unaffected by pretreatment with an antihistamine (pyrilamine) given alone but were significantly attenuated (P less than .05) by the cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibitor, indomethacin. The combination of pyrilamine and indomethacin also produced a significant (P less than .01) inhibition of Ascaris-induced bronchoconstriction, greater than that produced by indomethacin given alone but the difference between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant. The combination of an antihistamine, the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin and the leukotriene synthesis inhibitor, U-60,257, almost completely abolished Ascaris-induced bronchoconstriction (91% inhibition of Cdyn changes; 93% inhibition of RL changes). The inhibition was significantly greater than that produced by cyclooxygenase inhibition alone. The leukotriene synthesis inhibitor piriprost (U-60,257) given alone or in combination with pyrilamine produced no inhibition of Ascaris-induced changes in RL or Cdyn. The leukotriene antagonist FPL55712 or the thromboxane synthase inhibitor U-63,557A also showed little or no activity in this model, whereas the thromboxane receptor antagonist AH23848 produced a marked inhibition of Ascaris-induced bronchoconstriction. We conclude that Ascaris-induced bronchoconstriction is mediated primarily by cyclooxygenase products of arachidonic acid metabolism. The role of histamine and lipoxygenase products can only be revealed during an effective cyclooxygenase blockade.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of acivicin in Ommaya reservoir-bearing rhesus monkeys.

Acivicin was administered iv to rhesus monkeys bearing Ommaya reservoirs, and serial blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected and analyzed to determine the time course of drug concentrations in these body fluids. After iv doses of 4 or 20 mg/kg (50 or 250 mg/m2), acivicin plasma concentrations demonstrated a rapid initial decline (distribution phase), and then declined exponentially with a terminal (elimination phase) half-life of 3--4 hrs. CSF concentrations increased over a period of 2--2.5 hrs, reaching peak values of 2.0--2.7 micrograms/ml at 20 mg/kg and 0.3--0.5 microgram/ml at 4 mg/kg; thereafter, CSF levels declined in parallel with plasma, with a CSF/plasma concentration ratio of 0.10--0.17. A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model gave a close fit of predicted and observed plasma and CSF concentration data. Significant and predictable CSF penetration by iv administered acivicin in monkeys is consistent with observation of CNS side effects in patients in the phase I clinical trial and suggests that acivicin should be evaluated in the treatment of CNS malignancies and metastases.

The efficient use of NONLIN for unbalanced multiple dose data.

One of the uses of pharmacokinetic modeling is the fitting and prediction of blood levels after multiple dosing. The equations that govern this process are readily available for the case of equally spaced dosing intervals. For unequally spaced intervals, some rather inefficient methods have been suggested for use with NONLIN (1). This article shows how to implement parameter estimation and fitting of such data by means of NONLIN by summing the appropriate single-dose equations.