RESUMO
Background: During extensive outbreaks of infectious diseases, people who are impacted, particularly the subgroups of the community who are at an increased risk of mental health problems, may experience increased stress and mental health difficulties. University students are one such susceptible population and are prone to experiencing high levels of stress as compared with the general population. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing perceived stress and identifying its associated factors among university students in Ethiopia during the late stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among university students in Ethiopia from 30 May to 30 June 2021. Students were asked to fill out an online survey on Google Forms that included consent, sociodemographic information, the UCLA-8 Loneliness Scale, the standard validated stress scale (PSS-10) questionnaire, and the three-item Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3) to assess social support. The collected data were exported to SPSS 26. Descriptive and analytical statistics were carried out. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to find associated factors, and variables with a p-value of 0.05 were considered statistically significant variables. Results: A total of 426 university students were included in the survey, among whom 268 (62.9%) were male participants. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 37 years. Health-related departments accounted for 37.1% of the participants, while non-health-related departments accounted for 62.9%. The prevalence of stress was 18.3% in the study population. In this study, extreme susceptibility to COVID-19, sleeping problems, poor self-efficacy to prevent COVID-19, and loneliness were significantly associated with perceived stress. Conclusion: Stress was prevalent among university students in Ethiopia during the late stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Extreme susceptibility to COVID-19, sleeping problems, poor self-efficacy, and loneliness were identified as factors for stress. Therefore, we suggest that universities should provide opportunities for safe social connection, counseling, and guidance for students.
RESUMO
Background: Since the beginning of the pandemic, scientists and researchers are highly engaged in the discovery and production of vaccines and specific treatments for COVID-19. In China, the National Health Commission has declared the use of herbal medicine combined with Western medicine as a treatment for COVID-19 and has issued many guidelines on herbal medicine-related therapies. Ethiopians have a variety of medicinal herbs to treat various viral diseases. Hence, this study aimed to assess the perception of the respondent towards COVID-19 related symptoms and traditional medicine practice for their management. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was done among 423 patients and patient attendants at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from August 6 to 27, 2021. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and the data were entered into Epi Info 7 and then analyzed with SPSS 20. The association between the independent and dependent variables was explained using chi-square test. Results: A total of 423 respondents participated in the study; 414 (97.9%) participants heard about COVID-19 and responded correctly to the chief clinical symptoms. Fever is the most perceived symptom, reported by 378 (91.3) respondents, and the least reported symptom was loss of taste and smell by 30 (7.2%) respondents. This study showed that home remedies were practiced by 323 of the total respondents, and herbal medicines were the second most and practiced by 316 respondents. Monthly income and perceived knowledge about chief symptoms were statistically significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the use of complementary and alternative medicine for the management of COVID-19 related symptoms. Conclusion: This study found that most of the respondents have knowledge about the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and the traditional medicine is being practiced by most of the study participants as a management for COVID-19 and related symptoms.
RESUMO
AIMS: Inappropriate polypharmacy poses risks of adverse drug events, high healthcare costs and mortality. Deprescribing could minimise inappropriate polypharmacy and the consequences thereof. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare providers' (HCPs') attitudes toward and experiences with deprescribing practice in Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted an institution-based cross-sectional survey among HCPs at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. We used a validated questionnaire developed by Linsky et al. The tool included questions that explore medication characteristics, current patient clinical factors, predictions of future health states, patients' resources to manage their own health and education and experience. One-way ANOVA was used to test the association between sociodemographic variables and their perception of deprescribing decisions. RESULTS: Of 85 HCPs approached, about 82 HCPs completed the survey, giving a response rate of 96.5%. Most of the participants (n = 73, 89%) have scored less than 1.5 points showing they are reluctant to proactively deprescribe. Physicians seem to be affected by the significant physical health conditions (mean = 1.68) and clinical endpoint like blood pressure (mean = 1.5) to make deprescribing decisions. According to the post hoc analysis of one-way ANOVA, clinical pharmacists seemed to have a better attitude toward deprescribing decisions compared with physicians (P = .025). CONCLUSION: HCPs' decision to discontinue a medication could be multifactorial. Physicians could be influenced by physical health condition and clinical endpoints for deprescribing decision. Future studies should emphasise on barriers and facilitators to deprescribing practice specific to the context in Ethiopia.
