Pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship interventions in patients with COVID-19: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly infectious disease that can be treated with antivirals in addition to other antimicrobials in cases of secondary or concomitant infections. This creates potential for antimicrobials misuse, which increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Pharmacists are known to undertake prominent roles in combatting AMR. AIM: The aim of this review was to characterize pharmacist-driven interventions that have been performed in patients with COVID-19 globally and describe their impact on antimicrobial use. METHOD: We followed the Joanna Briggs Institutes manual framework for scoping reviews in our study. Studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions performed by pharmacists in COVID-19 patients were included. Articles that did not report outcomes or did not mention pharmacists in the intervention were excluded. Restrictions included English-only articles from inception date until June 2022. Articles were searched from four databases. RESULTS: Eleven publications were included in the review. The most common AMS intervention was pharmacist-driven interventions reported in 63.2% of all studies, followed by guideline development and application (26.3%), and medication supply coordination (10.5%), respectively. The outcomes of the interventions were difficult to compare but showed a reduction in antimicrobial use and prevention of adverse drug reactions with a relatively high acceptance rate from physicians. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists played an important role in performing AMS-related interventions in COVID-19 patients and helped in the fight against the worsening of AMR during the pandemic. The impact of pharmacist-driven AMS interventions in patients with COVID-19 seemed to be positive and improved outcomes related to antimicrobial use.

Contraindicated drug-drug interactions associated with oral antimicrobial agents prescribed in the ambulatory care setting in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial agents are commonly used in ambulatory care settings. Our objective was to examine national-level patterns of contraindications between oral antibacterial or antifungal agents and patients' other oral medications in the US ambulatory care setting. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included multiple year pooled data (2003-2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS Outpatient Department). Visits by adults (age ≥18 years) in ambulatory settings in the United States who were prescribed oral antibacterial or antifungal agents were evaluated for potential drug-drug interaction (DDI) contraindications. Findings with relative standard error >30% or unweighted sample size <30 were not reported because these were deemed unreliable estimates. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2011, there were 1 235 000 outpatient visits (proportion = 0.52%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.74) in which a patient was prescribed an antimicrobial agent associated with a contraindicated DDI. The most prevalent antimicrobials with contraindicated combination among outpatients were simultaneous use of macrolide-containing products (erythromycin or clarithromycin) with statin medication-containing products (simvastatin or lovastatin) (841 864 visits, proportion = 1.91%; 95% CI, 0.96-2.86). The next most common combination was use of fluoroquinolones with antiarrhythmic agents (amiodarone, sotalol, quinidine or procainamide) (365 622 visits, proportion = 0.19%; 95% CI, 0.06-0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Providers should be aware of potential contraindicated DDIs when prescribing antibiotics, especially macrolides and fluoroquinolones.

Oral Vancomycin Monotherapy Versus Combination Therapy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Uncomplicated Clostridium difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and CDI recurrence due to their suppressed immune systems and antibiotic exposure. A combination of metronidazole and oral vancomycin is often prescribed for SOT recipients with uncomplicated CDI despite any clinical practice guidelines supporting the need for combination therapy. This study aims to compare the CDI recurrence rates of metronidazole/vancomycin combination therapy to oral vancomycin monotherapy in SOT recipients after a first episode of uncomplicated CDI. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated SOT recipients diagnosed with uncomplicated CDI who were treated with vancomycin monotherapy or vancomycin/metronidazole combination therapy. The primary endpoint was CDI recurrence defined as a second CDI episode within 8 weeks of completing index CDI therapy. The secondary endpoints were time between the end of CDI therapy and recurrence, length of total hospitalization after the index CDI, and length of hospitalization after index CDI diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (25%) of 61 subjects experienced CDI recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in CDI recurrence rate between the vancomycin monotherapy group and combination therapy group (23% versus 27%, respectively; P = .715). The median total length of hospitalization between the vancomycin monotherapy and combination therapy groups was statistically significant (9 versus 14 days, respectively; P = .047). DISCUSSION: There was no difference found in recurrence rate between oral vancomycin monotherapy versus combination therapy. The study result weakens the practice of prescribing combination therapy for uncomplicated CDI in SOT recipients.