An apparent lack of synergy between degradative enzymes against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Enzymes combat bacterial infections by degrading biomolecules to disperse Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Commercial enzyme mixtures, like cellulase and pepsin, show concentration-dependent dispersion, but low concentrations lack synergy. Only the sequential addition of pepsin followed by Arthrobacter luteus zymolyase 20T displays synergy, effectively dispersing biofilms. Purified zymolyase 100T outperforms zymolyase 20T but lacks synergy with pepsin. This study underscores the complexity of enzymatic biofilm dispersal, highlighting the need for tailored approaches based on enzyme properties and biofilm composition.

An apparent lack of synergy between degradative enzymes against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

The use of enzymes represents an approach to combat bacterial infections by degrading extracellular biomolecules to disperse Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Commercial enzyme preparations, including cellulase, amylase, pectinase, zymolyase, and pepsin, exhibit concentration-dependent dispersion of S. aureus biofilms. Here, we report that low concentrations of these enzymes generally lack synergy when combined or added together sequentially to biofilms. Only the addition of a protease (pepsin) followed by a commercial mixture of degradative enzymes from Arthrobacter luteus (zymolyase 20T), demonstrated synergy and was effective at dispersing S. aureus biofilms. A more purified mixture of Arthrobacter luteus enzymes (zymolyase 100T) showed improved dispersal of S. aureus biofilms compared to zymolyase 20T but lacked synergy with pepsin. This study emphasizes the complexity of enzymatic biofilm dispersal and the need for tailored approaches based on the properties of degradative enzymes and biofilm composition.

Fungal Glycoside Hydrolases Display Unique Specificities for Polysaccharides and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Commercially available cellulases and amylases can disperse the pathogenic bacteria embedded in biofilms. This suggests that polysaccharide-degrading enzymes would be useful as antibacterial therapies to aid the treatment of biofilm-associated bacteria, e.g., in chronic wounds. Using a published enzyme library, we explored the capacity of 76 diverse recombinant glycoside hydrolases to disperse Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Four of the 76 recombinant glycoside hydrolases digested purified cellulose, amylose, or pectin. However, these enzymes did not disperse biofilms, indicating that anti-biofilm activity is not general to all glycoside hydrolases and that biofilm activity cannot be predicted from the activity on pure substrates. Only one of the 76 recombinant enzymes was detectably active in biofilm dispersion, an α-xylosidase from Aspergillus nidulans. An α-xylosidase cloned subsequently from Aspergillus thermomutatus likewise demonstrated antibiofilm activity, suggesting that α-xylosidases, in general, can disperse Staphylococcus biofilms. Surprisingly, neither of the two ß-xylosidases in the library degraded biofilms. Commercial preparations of amylase and cellulase that are known to be effective in the dispersion of Staphylococcus biofilms were also analyzed. The commercial cellulase contained contaminating proteins with multiple enzymes exhibiting biofilm-dispersing activity. Successfully prospecting for additional antibiofilm enzymes may thus require large libraries and may benefit from purified enzymes. The complexity of biofilms and the diversity of glycoside hydrolases continue to make it difficult to predict or understand the enzymes that could have future therapeutic applications.