Biomarker-Driven Developments in the Context of the New Regulatory Framework for Companion Diagnostics in the European Union.

The new In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR) introduces important changes in the EU legal framework for companion diagnostics (CDx), including a new risk-based classification system for in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs), a first legal definition for CDx and enhanced involvement of notified bodies in the conformity assessment and certification process of CDx. The IVDR also establishes an important link between the assessment of a CDx and the corresponding medicinal product by requiring the notified body to seek a scientific opinion from the medicines regulator on the suitability of the CDx for use with the concerned medicinal product(s) before issuing an IVD certificate. Whereas the IVDR aims at establishing a robust regulatory framework for IVDs, it is also associated with several challenges, such as insufficient capacity of notified bodies and readiness of manufacturers. To ensure timely access for patients to essential IVDs, a progressive roll-out for this new legislation has been introduced. In addition, the new consultation process for CDx requires increased collaboration and alignment of assessments performed by the different stakeholders involved in this process. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and notified bodies are currently building experience based on the first CDx consultation procedures that have been submitted from January 2022 onward. In the current article, we describe the new European regulatory framework for certification of CDx and highlight several challenges for medicine and CDx co-development. In addition, we briefly touch upon the interplay between the Clinical Trial Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 (CTR) and the IVDR.

[Checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy]. / Checkpointinhibitoren in der Tumortherapie.

In recent years, a breakthrough in tumor therapy was achieved with the development of checkpoint inhibitors. Checkpoint inhibitors activate the immune defense against tumors by overcoming the inhibitory effect of specific cell surface proteins acting as control points, the so-called checkpoints. This article provides an overview of the mode of action of approved checkpoint inhibitors and the status of current clinical development.The previously approved checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies directed against the checkpoints CTLA­4 and PD-1/PD-L1, are used in various tumor entities (including lung, kidney, and urothelial carcinoma; head and neck cancer; melanoma; and Hodgkin lymphoma). For the first time, long-term survival has been achieved in some of these patients with advanced tumors. Unfortunately, this efficacy can be observed only in a small proportion of the treated patients, depending on the tumor indication. Improved efficacy is envisioned by patient selection via predictive biomarkers and the development of combination therapies. Mandatory testing of the expression level of the predictive PD-L1 biomarker is already required in some indications to select patients with an enhanced benefit/risk relationship.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene in migraine--an association study.

We report a case-control study with 251 unrelated migraine patients and 192 unrelated healthy controls to evaluate an association between the polymorphisms of the 5-HT transporter (5-HTT) gene rs2066713 and rs1979572 and different migraine phenotypes. We found a genetic association for the A allele of rs1979572 for migraine with aura (MA) especially in women as well as a significant lower prevalence for MA for carrier of the A allele of rs2066713 in women. These findings support previous results suggesting that the 5-HTT gene is involved in the polygenic etiology of MA. These data further suggest that women are more likely to be clinically affected by mutations in the 5-HTT gene than men.

Association between migraine and the G1246A polymorphism in the hypocretin receptor 2 gene.

BACKGROUND: The hypocretin receptor 2 (HCRTR2) G1246A polymorphism has been associated with the risk for cluster headache. Since the hypothalamic hypocretin/orexin system projects throughout the nervous system and affects multiple vegetative functions including generation of rhythmicity, vasomotion, autonomic symptoms as well as modulation of nociception, it may also be linked with migraine. OBJECTIVE: We thus sought to evaluate whether the HCRTR2 G1246A polymorphism is associated with the risk for migraine. METHODS: We prospectively established a cohort of 146 unrelated patients with migraine. The control group consisted of 279 healthy volunteers. We genotyped patients and controls for the HCRTR2 G1246A polymorphism and examined an association with presence or absence of migraine. RESULTS: Genotype and allele frequencies were not significantly different between migraine patients and controls (genotype distribution: chi(2)= 4.13, 2 df, P= .13; allele distribution: chi(2)= 0.9, 1 df, P= .34). CONCLUSION: Our study does not support a major contribution of the HCRTR2 G1246A polymorphism to the pathogenesis of migraine in contrast to its effects in cluster headache.