A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bedtime sublingual cyclobenzaprine (TNX-102 SL) in military-related posttraumatic stress disorder.

Sleep disturbances in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are a potential target for improving PTSD severity with pharmacotherapy. TNX-102 SL is a bedtime sublingual formulation of cyclobenzaprine with potent binding and antagonist activity at 5-HT2A, α1-adrenergic, H1 histaminergic, and M1 muscarinic receptors, which play roles in the pharmacological management of sleep disturbances. This Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of TNX-102 SL in patients with military-related PTSD. Early and sustained improvements in sleep were associated with TNX-102 SL treatment by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance scale and Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) "sleep disturbance" item, establishing a sleep quality benefit. Primary analysis comparing change from baseline in CAPS-5 total severity between TNX-102 SL and placebo at week 12 was not significant; however, week 4 was associated with an improvement. Secondary analyses showed TNX-102 SL treatment was associated with benefits on the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement at week 4 and the Patient Global Impression of Change at week 12. Time since trauma exposure was a discriminator of CAPS-5 treatment response in the subgroup ≤ 9 years since the index event. This study provides preliminary evidence that TNX-102 SL is well-tolerated and may promote recovery from PTSD by addressing sleep-related symptoms.

Randomized clinical trial of bedtime sublingual cyclobenzaprine (TNX-102 SL) in military-related PTSD and the role of sleep quality in treatment response.

Effective posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) pharmacotherapy is needed. This 12-week randomized multicenter trial evaluated efficacy and safety of TNX-102 SL, a bedtime sublingual formulation of cyclobenzaprine, in patients with military-related PTSD randomized to TNX-102 SL 2.8 mg or 5.6 mg, or placebo. Primary analysis comparing change from baseline in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale-5 score between 2.8 mg (n=90) and placebo (n=92) was not significant. Secondary analysis of 5.6 mg (n=49) vs placebo demonstrated a mean difference of -4.5 units, p=.05, or, accounting for missing data by multiple imputation, -5.0 units, p=.03. Clinician Global Impression - Improvement responder rate was greater in 5.6 mg than placebo (p=0.04), as was mean functional improvement in Sheehan Disability Scale social domain (p=.03) and trended in work domain (p=.05). Post-hoc analyses showed early sleep improvement predicted improvement in PTSD after 12 weeks for TNX-102 SL (p<.01), not for placebo. Most common administration site reaction in TNX-102 SL groups was oral hypoaesthesia (5.6 mg, 36%; 2.8 mg, 39%; placebo, 2%), while most common systemic adverse event was somnolence (5.6 mg, 16%; 2.8 mg, 12%; placebo, 6%). This provides preliminary evidence that TNX-102 SL 5.6 mg reduces PTSD symptoms, improves sleep and psychosocial function, and is well tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02277704.

Denufosol: a review of studies with inhaled P2Y(2) agonists that led to Phase 3.

Among the most promising of the new therapies being developed for the treatment of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) are those targeted at increasing mucosal hydration on the surface of the airways. One of these therapies, P2Y(2) receptor agonists, bypasses the defective CFTR chloride channel, and activates an alternative chloride channel. This activation results in an increase in airway surface epithelial hydration, and through these actions and effects on cilia beat frequency, increases mucociliary clearance. The pharmacology of P2Y(2) agonists has been confirmed in several preclinical and clinical studies. Denufosol tetrasodium is a novel second-generation, metabolically stable, selective P2Y(2) receptor agonist currently in Phase 3 clinical development. In radiolabelled deposition studies of P2Y(2) agonists in healthy non-smokers and smokers, approximately 7mg of a 40-mg nebulizer (PARI LC Star) load was deposited in the lungs. In a pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers, very limited systemic exposure was observed when doses of 200mg of denufosol were nebulized. Thus, it appears that high concentrations of denufosol can be achieved in the airways with very low systemic absorption. Denufosol has been generally well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients with CF. The most common adverse events were in the respiratory system, with cough having the highest frequency. Doses of 20-60mg have been evaluated in Phase 2 trials of up to 28 days duration, and superiority relative to placebo on FEV1 has been observed in patients with relatively normal lung function (FEV1 greater than or equal to 75% of predicted). The first Phase 3 trial is a comparison of denufosol 60mg and placebo in 350 patients with CF with FEV1 at study entry greater than or equal to 75% of predicted.

Phase 2 randomized safety and efficacy trial of nebulized denufosol tetrasodium in cystic fibrosis.

RATIONALE: Denufosol tetrasodium is a selective P2Y(2) agonist that enhances mucosal hydration and mucus clearance by activating Cl(-) secretion and inhibiting epithelial Na(+) transport through a non-cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mechanism in the lung. OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and efficacy of 28 days of treatment with denufosol compared with placebo in patients with mild cystic fibrosis. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 28-day, phase 2 clinical trial of denufosol tetrasodium inhalation solution (20, 40, or 60 mg) versus placebo (normal saline). Patients with screening FEV(1) >or= 75% of predicted normal value and not treated with inhaled antibiotics for the past 30 days were randomized to receive one of three doses of denufosol or placebo administered three times daily. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were randomized and received the study drug, 94% completed the study, and 98% were compliant with dosing. All treatments were generally well tolerated, with no dose-response trends observed with respect to safety parameters. The most common adverse event was cough (52% of placebo patients and 47% of denufosol patients). Five patients discontinued early due to adverse events, two on placebo and three on denufosol. Denufosol patients (pooling active doses) had significantly higher changes from baseline in FEV(1) (P = 0.006), FEF(25%-75%) (P = 0.008), FVC (P = 0.022), and FEV(1)/FVC (P = 0.047) than placebo patients at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Denufosol administered three times daily for 28 days appeared to be safe and well tolerated in this population with mild cystic fibrosis and provided preliminary evidence of potential benefit in lung function.

Safety and tolerability of denufosol tetrasodium inhalation solution, a novel P2Y2 receptor agonist: results of a phase 1/phase 2 multicenter study in mild to moderate cystic fibrosis.

Denufosol tetrasodium (INS37217) is a selective P2Y(2) agonist that stimulates ciliary beat frequency and Cl(-) secretion in normal and cystic fibrosis (CF) airway epithelia, and is being investigated as an inhaled treatment for CF. The Cl(-) secretory response is mediated via a non-CFTR pathway, and the driving force for Cl(-) secretion is enhanced by the effect of P2Y(2) activation to also inhibit epithelial Na(+) transport. Denufosol is metabolically more stable and better tolerated, and may enhance mucociliary clearance for a longer period of time than previously investigated P2Y(2) agonists. The goal of this phase 1/phase 2 study was to assess the safety and tolerability of single and repeated doses of aerosolized denufosol in subjects with CF. The study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparison of ascending single doses of denufosol (10, 20, 40, and 60 mg, administered by inhalation via the Pari LC Star nebulizer) vs. placebo (normal saline), followed by a comparison of twice-daily administration of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of denufosol or placebo for 5 days. Thirty-seven adult (18 years of age or older) and 24 pediatric (5-17 years of age) subjects with CF were evaluated in five cohorts. Subjects were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive either denufosol or placebo within each cohort. The percent of subjects experiencing adverse events was similar between the denufosol and placebo groups. The most common adverse event in subjects receiving denufosol was chest tightness in adult subjects (39%) and cough in pediatric subjects (56%). Three (7%) subjects receiving denufosol and one (7%) subject receiving placebo experienced a serious adverse event. Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) profiles following dosing were similar across treatment groups, with some acute, reversible decline seen in both groups, most notably in subjects with lower lung function at baseline. In conclusion, doses up to 60 mg of denufosol inhalation solution were well-tolerated in most subjects. Some intolerability was noted among subjects with lower baseline lung function. Based on the results of this phase 1/phase 2 study, the Therapeutics Development Network (TDN) of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., recently completed a multicenter, 28-day, phase 2 safety and efficacy clinical trial of denufosol inhalation solution in CF subjects with mild lung disease.

Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methods.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Missing information is inevitable in longitudinal studies, and can result in biased estimates and a loss of power. One approach to this problem is to impute the missing data to yield a more complete data set. Our goal was to compare the performance of 14 methods of imputing missing data on depression, weight, cognitive functioning, and self-rated health in a longitudinal cohort of older adults. METHODS: We identified situations where a person had a known value following one or more missing values, and treated the known value as a "missing value." This "missing value" was imputed using each method and compared to the observed value. Methods were compared on the root mean square error, mean absolute deviation, bias, and relative variance of the estimates. RESULTS: Most imputation methods were biased toward estimating the "missing value" as too healthy, and most estimates had a variance that was too low. Imputed values based on a person's values before and after the "missing value" were superior to other methods, followed by imputations based on a person's values before the "missing value." Imputations that used no information specific to the person, such as using the sample mean, had the worst performance. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in longitudinal studies where the overall trend is for worse health over time and where missing data can be assumed to be primarily related to worse health, missing data in a longitudinal sequence should be imputed from the available longitudinal data for that person.