Area under the curve: Comparing the value of factor VIII replacement therapies in haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: In factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis for haemophilia A, cost comparisons have used price per international unit (IU) based on the once reasonable assumption of equivalent outcome per IU. Now, with several extended half-life (EHL) products available, new outcome-oriented ways to compare products are needed. Area under the curve (AUC) quantifies FVIII levels over time after infusion providing comparable data. AIM: To develop a decision analytical model for making indirect comparisons of FVIII replacement products based on AUC. METHODS: A literature search identified 11 crossover studies with relevant pharmacokinetic data. A common comparator FVIII level curve was calculated using pooled data from selected studies. Absolute curves for other products were estimated based on relative differences to the common comparator (% difference vs the anchor). Three scenarios were investigated: (1) Kogenate® versus Kovaltry® and Jivi® ; (2) Advate® versus Elocta® , NovoEight® , Kovaltry, Adynovate® , Afstyla® , and ReFacto® ; and (3) Jivi versus Elocta, Adynovate, and Kogenate. Sensitivity analyses investigated effects of assay type and dose. RESULTS: In scenario 1, Jivi (+50%) and Kovaltry (+14%) showed larger AUCs versus Kogenate. In scenario 2, EHL products, Elocta and Adynovate, had the largest AUC (+64% and +58%, respectively) versus Advate. Compared with all other products in scenario 3, Jivi had the largest AUC by +13%-28%. CONCLUSION: This analysis concludes that EHL products differ in relative AUC, have a larger AUC compared with standard half-life, and thus, different FVIII levels over time after infusion. This model may aid decision makers in the absence of head-to-head data.

Cost of unintended pregnancy in Sweden - a possibility to lower costs by increasing LARC usage.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the cost of unintended pregnancy (UP) in Sweden and savings generated by a switch of 5% of women from short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) and other methods to long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). STUDY DESIGN: We constructed an economic model to estimate the number and costs of UPs and contraceptive use over a 1-year period. The population consisted of all women aged 15-44years requiring reversible contraception and at risk of UP. UPs could result in birth, spontaneous abortion, induced abortion, and ectopic pregnancy. The model included costs incurred by the healthcare payer or out-of-pocket expenses by women, and indirect costs, i.e., foregone wages from time away from work. RESULTS: We estimated 73,989 unintended pregnancies yearly, amounting to costs of almost €158 million. A 5% switch from non-LARCs to LARCs would generate more than 3500 fewer UPs yearly with savings of nearly €7.7 million. The majority of these savings would arise from reduced costs for UPs. CONCLUSIONS: UPs are costly for society and women. A small change in the proportion of women using the most effective methods generates substantial cost savings due to fewer UPs and thus fewer abortions. A switch in 5% of women using non-LARCs could prevent more than 3500 UPs yearly, generating savings of more than SEK 70 million (€7.7 million) or of 2.4% of costs for UPs.

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Fresolimumab in Patients With Steroid-Resistant Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (SR-FSGS) is a common glomerulopathy associated with nephrotic range proteinuria. Treatment goals are reduction in proteinuria, which can delay end-stage renal disease. METHODS: Patients with SR-FSGS were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fresolimumab, a monoclonal anti-transforming growth factor-ß antibody, at 1 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg for 112 days, followed double-blind for 252 days (NCT01665391). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving partial (50% reduction) or complete (< 300 mg/g Cr) remission of proteinuria. RESULTS: Of 36 enrolled patients, 10, 14, and 12 patients received placebo, fresolimumab 1 mg/kg, and fresolimumab 4 mg/kg, respectively. The baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were 63 ml/min/1.73 m2 and 6190 mg/g, respectively. The study was closed before reaching its target of 88 randomized patients. None of the prespecified efficacy endpoints for proteinuria reduction were achieved; however, at day 112, the mean percent change in urinary protein/creatinine ratio (a secondary efficacy endpoint) was -18.5% (P = 0.008), +10.5% (P = 0.52), and +9.0% (P = 0.91) in patients treated with fresolimumab 1 mg/kg, fresolimumab 4 mg/kg, and placebo, respectively. There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in the placebo group compared to either of the fresolimumab-treated arms up to day 252. DISCUSSION: The study was underpowered and did not meet the primary or secondary endpoints. However, fresolimumab was well tolerated and is appropriate for continued evaluation in larger studies with adequate power.

Converting to doxercalciferol capsules from intravenous paricalcitol or doxercalciferol.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the 2 studies presented in this article was to determine the clinically appropriate dose of doxercalciferol capsules that is required to maintain similar intact parathyroid hormone control when converting from intravenous (IV) paricalcitol or doxercalciferol. DESIGN: Both studies were multicenter, open-label, randomized designs comprising the following 3 periods: a screening period, a 5-week run-in period, and a 5-week treatment period. SETTING: Dialysis centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis 3 times weekly for a minimum of 6 months and with recent intact parathyroid hormone measurements between 15.9 and 63.7 pmol/L (150 to 600 pg/mL) were included. INTERVENTION: After a 5-week fixed-dose IV paricalcitol or doxercalciferol run-in period, subjects were randomized to doxercalciferol capsules for the 5-week treatment period. Conversion factors for the paricalcitol study were 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 times the current paricalcitol dose. Conversion factors for the doxercalciferol study were 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 times the current doxercalciferol injection dose. RESULTS: The predicted conversion factor for paricalcitol injection to doxercalciferol capsules was 0.92, whereas the factor for doxercalciferol injection to doxercalciferol capsules was 1.49. No statistically significant changes in serum calcium and phosphorus levels were found in either study. The nature of adverse events was consistent with the administration of an active vitamin D therapy to patients with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis. CONCLUSION: The studies demonstrate patients on dialysis can be safely and effectively converted from IV paricalcitol or doxercalciferol to oral doxercalciferol.