RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The ultimate answer to the question whether minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) represents the optimal perfusion technique in contemporary clinical practice remains elusive. The present study is a real-world study that focuses on specific perfusion-related clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery that could potentially be favourably affected by MiECC and thereby influence the future clinical practice. METHODS: The MiECS study is an international, multi-centre, two-arm randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing elective or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or combined procedure (CABG + AVR) using extracorporeal circulation will be randomized to MiECC or contemporary conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (cCPB). Use of optimized conventional circuits as controls is acceptable. The study design includes a range of features to prevent bias and is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05487612). RESULTS: The primary outcome is a composite of postoperative serious adverse events that could be related to perfusion technique occurring up to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include use of blood products, ICU and hospital length of stay (30 days) as well as health-related quality of life (30 and 90 days). CONCLUSIONS: The MiECS trial has been designed to overcome perceived limitation of previous trials of MiECC. Results of the proposed study could affect current perfusion practice towards advancement of patient care.
RESUMO
Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) and perioperative myocardial injury are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Both are diagnosed by a perioperative increase in troponin, yet there is controversy if MINS is a genuine myocardial insult. We applied postoperative cardiovascular magnetic resonance T2 mapping techniques to visualise acute myocardial injury (i.e. oedema) in six patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who underwent aortic surgery. The burden of myocardial oedema was substantially higher in four patients with elevated troponin qualifying for MINS, compared with patients without MINS. The data and images suggest that MINS represents genuine myocardial injury.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are common sedatives in intensive care units and for interventional procedures. Both may compromise sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. The objective of this prospective, randomized study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with propofol on sinus node function and atrioventricular conduction. METHODS: In a tertiary care center in Switzerland we included from September 2019 to October 2020 160 patients (65 ± 11 years old; 32% female) undergoing first ablation for atrial fibrillation by cryoballoon ablation or by radiofrequency ablation. Patients were randomly assigned to deep sedation with dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group). A standard electrophysiological study was performed after pulmonary vein isolation with the patients still deeply sedated and hemodynamically stable. RESULTS: Eighty patients each were randomized to the DEX and PRO group. DEX group patients had higher baseline sinus cycle length (1022 vs. 1138 ms; p = 0.003) and longer sinus node recovery time (SNRT400; 1597 vs. 1412 ms; p = 0.042). However, both corrected SNRT and normalized SNRT did not differ. DEX group patients had longer PR interval (207 vs. 186 ms; p = 0.002) and AH interval (111 vs. 95 ms, p = 0.008), longer Wenckebach cycle length of the atrioventricular node (512 vs. 456 ms; p = 0.005), and longer atrioventricular node effective refractory period (390 vs. 344 ms; p = 0.009). QRS width and HV interval were not different. An arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation, was induced in 33 patients during the electrophysiological study, without differences among groups (20% vs. 15%, p = 0.533). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine has a more pronounced slowing effect on sinus rate and suprahissian AV conduction than propofol, but not on infrahissian AV conduction and ventricular repolarization. These differences need to be taken into account when using these sedatives. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03844841, 19/02/2019.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Sedação Profunda , Dexmedetomidina , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Propofol , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Propofol/farmacologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Idoso , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Nó Sinoatrial/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic brought about many changes in the delivery of healthcare, graduate medical education, and collaborative efforts across academic medicine. While there was a temporary disruption in the fluid delivery of services, longer-term benefits emerged with the leveraging of innovative technology and multicenter collaborations. These new opportunities led 14 centers in the United States and Europe to develop a novel, remote, and collaborative educational effort in cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiology, known as the Transatlantic Educational Network. This paper describes the initial pilot structure and preimplementation data and provides a rationale for the development and expansion of the pilot program in other areas of anesthesiology.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This survey aimed to explore the availability and accessibility of echocardiography during noncardiac surgery worldwide. METHODS: An internet-based 45-item survey was sent, followed by reminders from August 30, 2021, to August 20, 2022. RESULTS: 1189 responses were received from 62 countries. Nearly seventy-one percent of respondents had intraoperatively used transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography (TEE and TTE, respectively) for monitoring or examination. The unavailability of echocardiography machines (30.3%), lack of trained personnel (30.2%), and absence of clinical indications (22.6%) were the top 3 reasons for not using intraoperative echocardiography in noncardiac surgery. About 61.5% of participants had access to at least one echocardiography machine. About 41% had access to at least 1 TEE probe, and 62.2% had access to at least 1 TTE probe. Seventy-four percent of centers had a procedure to request intraoperative echocardiography if needed for noncardiac cases. Intraoperative echocardiography service was immediately available in 58% of centers. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography machines and skilled echocardiographers are still unavailable at many centers worldwide. National societies should aim to train a critical mass of certified TEE/TTE anesthesiologists and provide all anesthesiologists access to perioperative TEE/TTE machines in anesthesiology departments, considering the increasing number of older and sicker surgical patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This survey aimed to explore the availability and accessibility of echocardiography during noncardiac surgery worldwide. METHODS: An internet-based 45-item survey was sent, followed by reminders from August 30, 2021, to August 20, 2022. RESULTS: 1189 responses were received from 62 countries. Nearly seventy-one percent of respondents had intraoperatively used transesophageal or transthoracic echocardiography (TEE and TTE, respectively) for monitoring or examination. The unavailability of echocardiography machines (30.3%), lack of trained personnel (30.2%), and absence of clinical indications (22.6%) were the top 3 reasons for not using intraoperative echocardiography in noncardiac surgery. About 61.5% of participants had access to at least one echocardiography machine. About 41% had access to at least 1 TEE probe, and 62.2% had access to at least 1 TTE probe. Seventy-four percent of centers had a procedure to request intraoperative echocardiography if needed for noncardiac cases. Intraoperative echocardiography service was immediately available in 58% of centers. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography machines and skilled echocardiographers are still unavailable at many centers worldwide. National societies should aim to train a critical mass of certified TEE/TTE anesthesiologists and provide all anesthesiologists access to perioperative TEE/TTE machines in anesthesiology departments, considering the increasing number of older and sicker surgical patients scheduled for noncardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Assistência Perioperatória , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cuidados IntraoperatóriosRESUMO
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a treatment option for severe aortic valve stenosis. Pre-TAVR assessments, extending beyond anatomy, include evaluating frailty. Potential frailty parameters in pre-TAVR computed tomography (CT) scans are not fully explored but could contribute to a comprehensive frailty assessment. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of total muscle area (TMA) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as frailty parameters on 5-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. Methods: Between 01/2017 and 12/2018, consecutive TAVR patients undergoing CT scans enabling TMA and VAT measurements were included. Results: A total of 500 patients qualified for combined TMA and VAT analysis. Age was not associated with a higher risk of 5-year mortality (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.998-1.049; p = 0.069). Body surface area normalized TMA (nTMA) was significantly associated with 5-year, all-cause mortality (HR 0.927, 95% CI: 0.927-0.997; p = 0.033), while VAT had no effect (HR 1.002, 95% CI: 0.99-1.015; p = 0.7). The effect of nTMA on 5-year, all-cause mortality was gender dependent: the protective effect of higher nTMA was found in male patients (pinteraction: sex × nTMA = 0.007). Conclusions: Normalized total muscle area derived from a routine CT scan before transcatheter aortic valve replacement complements frailty assessment in patients undergoing TAVR.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Supplemental oxygen is used during every general anesthesia. However, for the maintenance phase of a general anesthesia, in most cases the longest part of anesthesia, only scarce evidence of dosing supplemental oxygen exists. Oxygen is a well-known coronary vasoconstrictor and thus may contribute to cardiovascular complications especially in vulnerable high-risk patients with coronary artery disease undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. Myocardial biomarkers are early indicators of myocardial injury. Oxygen supply demand mismatches due to coronary artery disease aggravated by hyperoxia might be displayed by changes from the biomarker's baseline-values. This study is designed to detect changes in myocardial biomarkers levels associated with perioperative hyperoxia. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled interventional trial investigates the impact of maintaining perioperative high oxygen supplementation in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular surgery on cardiac biomarkers, myocardial strain and outcome in 110 patients. Patients are allocated to be supplemented with either 0.3 (normal) or 0.8 (high) fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) perioperatively. Included is a short crossover phase during which transesophageal echocardiography is used to evaluate myocardial function at FiO2 0.3 and 0.8 by strain analysis in each patient. Patients will be followed up for complications at 30 days and 1 year. CONCLUSION: The trial is designed to evaluate perioperative changes from baseline myocardial biomarkers associated with perioperative FiO2. Furthermore, exploration and correlation of changes in biomarkers, acute early changes in myocardial function and clinical outcomes induced by different FiO2 may be possible.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Hiperóxia , Oxigenoterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Oxigenoterapia/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Induction of general anaesthesia has many potential triggers for peri-operative myocardial ischaemia including the acute disturbance of blood gases that frequently follows alterations in breathing and ventilation patterns. Free-breathing oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (OS-CMR) imaging may provide the opportunity to continuously quantify the impact of such triggers on myocardial oxygenation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of breathing patterns that simulate induction of general anaesthesia on myocardial oxygenation in awake healthy adults using continuous OS-CMR imaging. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Single-centre university hospital. Recruitment from August 2020 to January 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two healthy volunteers younger than 45 years old were recruited. Data were analysed from n â=â29 (69% male individuals). INTERVENTION: Participants performed a simulated induction breathing manoeuvre consisting of 2.5âmin paced breathing with a respiration rate of 14 breaths per minute, followed by 5 deep breaths, then apnoea for up to 60s inside a magnetic resonance imaging scanner (MRI). Cardiac images were acquired with the traditional OS-CMR sequence (OS bh-cine ), which requires apnoea for acquisition and with two free-breathing OS-CMR sequences: a high-resolution single-shot sequence (OS fb-ss ) and a real-time cine sequence (OS fb-rtcine ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial oxygenation response at the end of the paced breathing period and at the 30âs timepoint during the subsequent apnoea, reflecting the time of successful intubation in a clinical setting. RESULTS: The paced breathing followed by five deep breaths significantly reduced myocardial oxygenation, which was observed with all three techniques (OS bh-cine -6.0â±â2.6%, OS fb-ss -12.0â±â5.9%, OS fb-rtcine -5.4â±â7.0%, all P â<â0.05). The subsequent vasodilating stimulus of apnoea then significantly increased myocardial oxygenation (OS bh-cine 6.8â±â3.1%, OS fb-ss 8.4â±â5.6%, OS fb-rtcine 15.7â±â10.0%, all P â<â0.01). The free-breathing sequences were reproducible and were not inferior to the original sequence for any stage. CONCLUSION: Breathing manoeuvres simulating induction of general anaesthesia cause dynamic alterations of myocardial oxygenation in young volunteers, which can be quantified continuously with free-breathing OS-CMR. Introducing these new imaging techniques into peri-operative studies may throw new light into the mechanisms of peri-operative perturbations of myocardial tissue oxygenation and ischaemia. VISUAL ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/EJA/A922.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Respiração , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Oxigênio/sangue , Oxigênio/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodosRESUMO
The Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia (PCA) fellowship is a demanding training program in Europe and the United States. Successful completion of the program requires years of training in anesthesiology, a thorough understanding of cardiovascular anatomy and physiology, and extensive experience in the perioperative management of neonates and children with heart disease. In the context of the first candidate to successfully complete the PCA program in Europe, this article presents excerpts from the design and structure of the European PCA program. The PCA program is evaluated critically by both external and internal reviewers, and points are highlighted that could be included in the next version of the program.
Assuntos
Anestesia em Procedimentos Cardíacos , Anestesiologia , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos , Bolsas de Estudo , Anestesiologia/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Anestesia PediátricaRESUMO
Coagulopathy is common in patients undergoing thoracic aortic repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Non-critical administration of blood products may adversely affect the outcome. It is therefore important to be familiar with the pathologic conditions that lead to coagulopathy in complex cardiac surgery. Adequate care of these patients includes the collection of the medical history regarding the use of antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs, and a sophisticated diagnosis of the coagulopathy with viscoelastic testing and subsequently adapted coagulation therapy with labile and stable blood products. In addition to the above-mentioned measures, intraoperative blood conservation measures as well as good interdisciplinary coordination and communication contribute to a successful hemostatic management strategy.
RESUMO
This is an annual review to cover highlights in transfusion and coagulation in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. The goal of this article is to provide readers with a focused summary of the most important transfusion and coagulation topics published in 2022. This includes a discussion covering the management of anemia and red blood cell transfusion, the management of factor Xa inhibitors, updates in coagulation testing, updates in the use of factor concentrates, advances in platelet therapy, advances in anticoagulation management of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and other forms of mechanical circulatory support, and advances in the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Assuntos
Coagulação Sanguínea , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Transfusão de Sangue , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Trombocitopenia/diagnóstico , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Plaquetas , Heparina , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Background: There are no current recommendations for oxygen titration in patients with stable coronary artery disease. This study investigates the effect of iatrogenic hyperoxia on cardiac function in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing general anaesthesia. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were prospectively recruited into this randomised crossover clinical trial. All patients were exposed to inspired oxygen fractions of 0.3 (normoxaemia) and 0.8 (hyperoxia) in randomised order. A transoesophageal echocardiographic imaging protocol was performed during each exposure. Primary analysis investigated changes in 3D peak strain, whereas secondary analyses investigated other systolic and diastolic responses. Results: There was no statistical difference in systolic function between normoxaemia and hyperoxia. However, the response in systolic function to hyperoxia was dependent on ventricular function at normoxaemia. Patients with a normoxaemic left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) poorer than the derived cut-off (>-15.4%) improved with hyperoxia (P<0.01), whereas in patients with normoxaemic LV-GLS <-15.4%, LV-GLS worsened with transition to hyperoxia (P<0.01). The same was seen for right ventricular GLS with a cut-off at -24.1%. Diastolic function worsened during hyperoxia indicated by a significant increase of averaged E/e' (8.6 [2.6]. vs 8.2 [2.4], P=0.01) and E/A ratio (1.4 (0.4) vs 1.3 (0.4), P=0.01). Conclusions: Although the response of biventricular systolic variables is dependent on systolic function at normoxaemia, diastolic function consistently worsens under hyperoxia. In coronary artery disease, intraoperative strain analysis may offer guidance for oxygen titration. Clinical trial registration: NCT04424433.
RESUMO
Insight into the clinical potential of convalescent plasma in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is important given the severe clinical courses in unvaccinated and seronegative individuals. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there is a survival benefit of convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients. The authors independently assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified by the search strategy for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The binary primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Risk ratio (RR) of the convalescent plasma treatment (vs. best standard care) and its associated standard error (effect size) were calculated. A random-effects model was employed to statistically pool the effect sizes of the selected studies. We included 19 RCTs with 17,021 patients. The random-effects model resulted in an estimated pooled RR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.81-1.08, p = 0.33), showing no statistical evidence of the benefit of convalescent plasma therapy on all-cause mortality. Convalescent plasma therapy was not found to be effective in reducing all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. Further studies are needed to determine in which patients convalescent plasma therapy may lead to a reduction in mortality.