Do bony pelvis parameters affect perioperative outcomes in open radical prostatectomy?

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of bony pelvic parameters measured by computerized tomography (CT) for use in the estimation of the likely technical difficulties that may be encountered when performing open radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. Material and methods: One hundred patients, undergoing open RP for localized prostate cancer, were evaluated between October 2016 to November 2018. All operations were performed by the same experienced surgeon. Pelvic parameters were measured using spiral CT images. Data were retrospectively collected from medical, operative, radiology, and pathology records and analyzed. Positive surgical margin (PSM), presence of vesicourethral anastomosis stricture (VUAS) and urine leakage, operative time, urethral catheterization time, and estimated blood loss were used as indicators of operative difficulty. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the significance of these variables. Results: There was no significant correlation between the pelvic parameters of the patients and the presence of PSM, VUAS, and urine leakage. Only PSA levels and pathological tumor stage were higher in patients with PSM (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001). On univariate and multivariate analyses, none of the individual pelvic parameters assessed showed a significant relationship with the operation time, estimated blood loss, and urethral catheterization time. In univariate analysis, there was a significant relationship between PSA levels and pathological tumor stage and operation time (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Bony pelvic parameters may not be a significant factor in influencing the perioperative outcomes of open RP. Higher PSA levels and pathological tumor stage may lead to surgical margin positivity and longer operative time.

Endovascular Treatment of a Giant Renal Vein Aneurysm Arising from a High-Flow Arteriovenous Fistula.

Background: Renal vein aneurysms (RVAs) are considered rare clinical entities. RVAs can be secondary to thrombosis, venous hypertension, or renal arteriovenous fistula (RAVF). RVAs secondary to RAVF are rare. Patients with RVA may present with hypertension, abdominal pain, hematuria, or may even be asymptomatic. However, there may be life-threatening emergencies including aneurysm rupture, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. The treatment of RVAs includes reconstruction of the renal vein, nephrectomy, and endovascular treatment. Purpose: In this technical note, we report the endovascular treatment of a giant RVA that developed secondary to an acquired RAVF by the placement of multiple vascular plugs. Conclusion: Endovascular occlusion of the RAVF with vascular plugs is effective to prevent a life-threatening rupture of RVA. Clinical follow-up is crucial to detect leakage or migration of the vascular plugs.