Comparison of hematologic toxicity between 3DCRT and IMRT planning in cervical cancer patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a national multi-center study.

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence and severity of acute and chronic hematologic toxicity (HT) in patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for curative treatment of cervical cancer and to ascertain the dosimetric parameters of two techniques associated with acute and chronic HT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients with cervical cancer receiving concomitant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and cisplatin were evaluated. Pelvic bone marrow (BM) was contoured for each patient and divided into five sub-regions: lumbosacrum (LS), ilium (IL), lower pelvis (LP), pelvis (P), and whole pelvis (WP). The volume of each BM region receiving 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy was calculated (V10, -V20, -V30, and -V40). The lowest level of hemoglobin, leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts were obtained during chemoradiotherapy and six months after RT. The nadir values were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). RESULTS: Grade 2 or greater acute anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia was observed in 2%, 41.5%, 12% ,and 0% in 3DCRT group and in 27%, 53%, 24.5%, and 4.5% in IMRT group, respectively. Grade 2 or greater chronic anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was observed in 11%, 10%, 6%, and 0% in 3DCRT group and in 11%, 9%, 4.5%, and 0% in IMRT group, respectively. LS-V30, 40; IL-V10, 20, 30, 40; LP-V10, 20 ,40; P-V10, 20, 30, 40, and TP-V10, 20, 30, 40 were significantly reduced with IMRT planning compared to 3DCRT planning. Logistic regression analysis of potential predictors showed that none of the dosimetric parameters were significant for predicting acute and chronic HT. CONCLUSION: The present findings showed that IMRT planning reduced irradiated BM volumes compared to 3DCRT planning. However, no difference between the two techniques was observed in terms of acute and chronic HT. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Hypoxia-related molecules HIF-1α, CA9, and osteopontin : predictors of survival in patients with high-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: A high expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF)-1α, carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), and osteopontin appears to be a strong prognostic indicator in many malignancies; however, their role is unclear in high-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HIF-1α, CA9, and osteopontin levels in tissue specimens of 92 patients with high-grade glioma were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Patients with a high expression of cytoplasmic and nuclear HIF-1α, CA9, and osteopontin had significantly shorter overall survival. The expression results of these markers were combined to form a hypoxic profile, and high hypoxic scores (expression of two or three markers) were significantly correlated to poorer overall survival. In multivariate analysis, high hypoxic score-1 (cytoplasmic HIF-1α, CA9, and osteopontin) was the only independent negative prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that a combination of hypoxic markers is more robust than a single marker for predicting survival in high-grade glioma. It may be necessary to utilize the hypoxic score in selecting patients for targeted therapy in the future.

High expression of nuclear survivin and Aurora B predicts poor overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Survivin is one of the apoptosis inhibitor proteins. Together with Aurora B, it also plays a role in regulating several aspects of mitosis. High expression of these markers is correlated with malignant behavior of various cancers and resistance to therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic role of these markers in head and neck cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the expression of Aurora B and survivin in tissue specimens of 58 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Patients who showed high expression of cytoplasmic and nuclear survivin and Aurora B had significantly shorter overall survival (p = 0.036, p < 0.000, p = 0.032, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high expression of nuclear survivin was the only independent negative prognostic factor (p = 0.024). Moreover, it was found that high co-expression of nuclear survivin and Aurora B had a negative effect on survival in univariate (p < 0.000) and multivariate (p < 0.000) analyses. CONCLUSION: The negative prognostic values of high expression of Aurora B and high co-expression of nuclear survivin and Aurora B on survival were shown. These findings suggest that co-expression of nuclear survivin and Aurora B can be useful diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, further studies with a larger number of patients in a more homogeneous disease group are needed to confirm the conclusion.