Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 47(3): 789-794, 2017 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28618723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) as first-line treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients aged 20-55 years who complained of regular heavy menstrual bleeding were enrolled in the study. The TAH group included 29 patients, the LNG-IUS group included 34, and the TLH group included 35. These groups were compared in terms of quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the selected methods. Quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), and cost-effectiveness was assessed according to the current cost of each approach. RESULTS: The quality of life parameters, with the exception of mental health, improved significantly in the LNG-IUS, TAH, and TLH groups. The mean costs of the LNG-IUS, TAH, and TLH procedures were $99.15 ± 4.90, $538.82 ± 193.00 and $1617.05 ± 258.44, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall, LNG-IUS was the most cost-effective treatment option. CONCLUSION: The outcome measures of the SF-36 revealed that after 6 months, these treatments were equal in terms of quality of life, except for mental health. LNG-IUS was the most cost-effective approach.


Assuntos
Histerectomia , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levanogestrel , Menorragia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efeitos adversos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/economia , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/estatística & dados numéricos , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Levanogestrel/economia , Levanogestrel/uso terapêutico , Menorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Menorragia/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 295(2): 303-311, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27770246

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: We investigated the effect of repeat cesarean sections (CSs) and intra-abdominal adhesions on neonatal and maternal morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed intra-abdominal adhesions of 672 patients. RESULTS: Among the patients, 173, 206, 151, and 142 underwent CS for the first, second, third, and fourth time or more, respectively. There were adhesions in 393 (58.5 %) patients. Among first CSs, there were no adhesions, the rate of maternal morbidity [Morales et al. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(5):461, 2007)] was 26 %, and the rate of neonatal morbidity (NM) was 35 %. Among women who have history of two CSs, the adhesion rate was 66.3 %, the adhesion score was 2.05, MM was 14 %, and NM was 21 %. Among third CSs, these values were 82.1, 2.82, 23, and 14 %, respectively. Among women who have history of four or more CSs, these values were 92.2, 4.72, 31.7, and 18 %, respectively. Adhesion sites and dense fibrous adhesions increased parallel to the number of subsequent CSs. Increased adhesion score was associated with 1.175-fold higher odds of NM and 1.29-fold higher odds of MM. The rate of NM was eightfold higher in emergency-delivered newborns (emergency: 39.4, 40 %; elective: 4.9 %). MM was 20 and 26 % for elective and emergency CSs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency operations and adhesions increased complications.


Assuntos
Recesariana/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA