Fistula of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa in a patient with bacterial endocarditis: a case report and systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: A fistulous tract in the mitro-aortic intervalvular fibrosa (MAIVF) is a rare entity, which presents as a complication of endocarditis or surgical trauma. Generally, it is associated to a pseudoaneurysm of the MAIVF (p-MAIVF) or aortic abscesses. MAIVF fistulas could potentially lead to devastating complications and a high mortality rate. This condition is managed surgically, either by a percutaneous closure or an open surgical approach. Herein we report the complex case of a patient with a MAIVF fistula secondary to bacterial endocarditis. Further clinical deterioration was caused by severe aortic valve insufficiency and hemodynamic compromise, requiring surgical intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old male patient was admitted to a primary care center with complaints of malaise, asthenia, adynamia, hyporexia, and lower limb edema over the past eight days. His past medical history is positive for arterial hypertension and being monorenal. A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed, exhibiting a 56% left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and complicated aortic valve endocarditis. Surgical management through an open approach included vegetation resection, valve replacement, and closure of the MAIVF fistula. After completing antibiotic therapy, the patient was discharged without complications. During postoperative follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, and the control echocardiogram showed no signs of MAIVF fistula.4. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical case of a patient with a MAIVF fistula secondary to endocarditis by Streptococcus Anginous was presented. The fistulous tract was not associated to p-MAIVF or aortic abscess, findings which further deteriorate the patient's condition and increase the likelihood of fatality. This case reinforces the importance of a prompt diagnosis through cardiac imaging and timely surgical closure of the defect.

Serious neurological adverse events following immunization against SARS-CoV-2: a narrative review of the literature.

Amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, massive immunization campaigns became the most promising public health measure. During clinical trials, certain neurological adverse effects following immunization (AEFIs) were observed; however, acceptable safety profiles lead to emergency authorization for the distribution and use of the vaccines. To contribute to pharmacovigilance and lessen the potential negative impact that vaccine hesitancy would have on immunization programs, we conducted a review of the scientific literature concerning the epidemiological data, clinical presentation, and potential mechanisms of these neurological AEFIs. There is some epidemiological evidence linking COVID-19 vaccines to cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, arterial ischemic stroke, convulsive disorder, Guillain-Barré syndrome, facial nerve palsy, and other neurological conditions. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis has been associated with a thrombotic thrombocytopenia induced by the vaccine, similar to that induced by heparin, which suggests similar pathogenic mechanisms (likely involving antibodies against platelet factor 4, a chemokine released from activated platelets). Arterial ischemic stroke is another thrombotic condition observed among some COVID-19 vaccine recipients. Vaccine-induced convulsive disorder might be the result of structural abnormalities potentially caused by the vaccine or autoimmune mechanisms. Guillain-Barré syndrome and facial nerve palsy may also be linked to the immunization event, possibly due to immune mechanisms such as uncontrolled cytokine release, autoantibody production, or bystander effect. However, these events are mostly uncommon and the evidence for the association with the vaccine is not conclusive. Furthermore, the potential pathophysiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, neurological AEFIs can be serious, life-threatening or even fatal. In sum, COVID-19 vaccines are generally safe and the risk of neurological AEFIs does not outweigh the benefits of immunization. However, early diagnosis and treatment of neurological AEFIs are of utmost importance, and both health professionals and the public should be aware of these conditions.

A review of undesired effects involving the nervous system following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines Among the range of complications that can occur after a vaccine, some of them can affect the nervous system and its vasculature. This narrative review aims to evaluate some serious neurological conditions following COVID-19 vaccination. We searched biomedical journal databases where physicians around the globe reported different complications after the administration of different COVID-19 vaccines. Besides reports of cases in individual patients or small groups, we reviewed studies that included bigger groups of patients (e.g. vaccinated versus non-vaccinated) and compared the occurrence of these events between them. We found that after the administration of a certain type of vaccine (e.g. ChAdOx1-S/Oxford, AstraZeneca vaccine), serious neurological complications were rare, with abnormal clot formation involving cerebral blood vessels being one of the most important among them. Nonetheless, other conditions have been observed after the administration of the vaccines; however, it is not certain yet if the vaccines are the actual cause of these complications. There are some hypotheses that could explain why these adverse reactions take place after a vaccine. For instance, an abnormal immune response to the vaccine leads to the production of antibodies (i.e. proteins made by the immune system in response to the presence of a foreign substance). These antibodies trigger a response that could eventually result in clot formation. Besides, the immune response can also produce other adverse effects, including convulsive disorder, Guillain­Barré syndrome, and facial nerve palsy. Scientific evidence suggests that vaccines are safe overall. While mild complications, such as pain at the site of injection or bruising might occur, more serious events remain rare. Furthermore, the complications derived from COVID-19 are far more likely in non-vaccinated individuals than the complications associated with the vaccine. Thus, vaccination continues to be the safest and most effective strategy to control the ongoing pandemic. However, both health professionals and the public should be aware of the possibility of serious neurological adverse reactions occurring after vaccination to allow early diagnosis and treatment.