Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on COPD Patient Mortality: A Nationwide Study in France.

Objectives: We investigated the mortality patterns of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in France relative to a control population, comparing year 2020 to pre-pandemic years 2017-2019. Methods: COPD patient and sex, age and residence matched control cohorts were created from the French National Health Data System. Survival was analyzed using Cox regressions and standardized rates. Results: All-cause mortality increased in 2020 compared to 2019 in the COPD population (+4%), but to a lesser extent than in the control population (+10%). Non-COVID-19 mortality decreased to a greater extent in COPD patients (-5%) than in the controls (-2%). Death rate from COVID-19 was twice as high in the COPD population relative to the control population (547 vs. 279 per 100,000 person-years). Conclusion: The direct impact of the pandemic in terms of deaths from COVID-19 was much greater in the COPD population than in the control population. However, the larger decline in non-COVID-19 mortality in COPD patients could reflect a specific protective effect of the containment measures on this population, counterbalancing the direct impact they had been experiencing.

Direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of kidney transplant recipients: A national observational study in France.

During the pandemic period, health care systems were substantially reorganized for managing COVID-19 cases. Corresponding consequences on persons with chronic diseases remain insufficiently documented. This observational cohort study investigated the direct and indirect impact of the pandemic period on the survival of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Using the French National Health Data System, incident persons with end-stage kidney disease between 2015 and 2020, and who received a kidney transplant during this period were included and followed up from their transplantation date to December 31, 2021. The survival of KTR during the prepandemic and pandemic periods was investigated using Cox models with time-dependent covariates. There were 10 637 KTR included in the study, with 324 and 430 deaths observed during the prepandemic and pandemic periods, respectively. The adjusted risk of death during the pandemic period was similar to that observed during the prepandemic period (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval]: 0.92 [0.77-1.11]), COVID-19-related hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 10.62 [8.46-13.33]), and a third vaccine dose was associated with a lower risk of death (HR: 0.42 [0.30-0.57]). The pandemic period was not associated with an indirect higher risk of death in KTR with no COVID-19-related hospitalization.

Allocation aux adultes handicapés : pathologies et recours aux soins des bénéficiaires en 2017.

OBJECTIVE: We described the pathologies and health care utilization of beneficiaries of the general health insurance scheme via the Allocation Adulte Handicapé (AAH - Adult Disability Allowance) compared to the general population. METHOD: Mapping of pathologies and expenditures allowed the identification of 58 pathologies and chronic treatments in the SNDS, thanks to ICD-10 codes for long-term conditions or hospitalizations, specific drugs or medical procedures, among all beneficiaries of the general health insurance scheme aged 20 to 64 years with reimbursed care (>1€) in 2017. The prevalence and annual rates of care utilization among all beneficiaries of the general scheme via AAH (“AAH” group) and in the rest of the population (“non-AAH”) were standardized and described. RESULTS: Among the 793,934 (2.51% of the population) “AAH” persons, all the pathologies studied were more frequent than among the “non-AAH”, with 44% having psychiatric pathologies (compared with 3.2%), and 14% a neurological pathology (compared with 1%). AAH beneficiaries were more likely to use hospital care (63% versus 40%), but less likely to use specialist care (63% versus 68%) and dental care (37% versus 45%). CONCLUSION: The beneficiaries of the general scheme via the AAH had mainly psychiatric and neurological pathologies, but other pathologies were also much more frequent than in the general population. The lower use of dental and specialist care was probably related to a lack of access to care, potentially caused by the absence of 100% coverage of care.

Risk of pressure ulcers in tetraplegic people: a French survey crossing regional experience with a long-term follow-up.

Background: Pressure ulcer risk assessment provides an indicator of quality of care in French health establishments. The reliability and validity of assessment tools have been shown to be lower for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). We hypothesized that skin complications would be less frequent in people with traumatic SCI and tetraplegia (TSCIt), who were initially managed in French regions with a high level of specialized SCI rehabilitation experience. Methods: First, we used the most recent French territorial survey about SCI to determine a 'Level of Regional Experience (LRE) in Specialized Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation'. We then studied the individual variables reported in the Tetrafigap survey (which compiled a cohort of TSCIts people to assess their trajectory and life conditions following their return to community life by questionnaires) using univariate analysis according to these LREs (chi2 test using a significance threshold of P < 0.05). Finally, we performed a series of logistic regressions to determine the link between LREs and pressure ulcers. Results: Management in high-LRE regions was linked with a lower declaration of pressure ulcers during early treatment and in the long term (on average, 8 years post-trauma). Conclusions: Using pressure ulcers as a marker, our study showed the protective element of regional experience in the early management of TSCIts patients. A dilution effect between SCI specialized units and more polyvalent physical medicine and rehabilitation departments should be prevented within each region within the scope of a regional organization that would link referral centres and local health care networks.

Risk Analyses of Pressure Ulcer in Tetraplegic Spinal Cord-Injured Persons: A French Long-Term Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the long-term clinical, individual, and social risk factors for the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) in traumatic spinal cord-injured persons with tetraplegia (TSCIt). DESIGN: Cohort survey with self-applied questionnaires in 1995 and 2006. SETTING: Thirty-five French-speaking European physical medicine and rehabilitation centers participating in the Tetrafigap surveys. PARTICIPANTS: Tetraplegic adults (N=1641) were surveyed after an initial posttraumatic period of at least 2 years. Eleven years later, a follow-up was done for 1327 TSCIt, among whom 221 had died and 547 could be surveyed again. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of PUs documented at the various defined time points, relative to the medical and social situations of the TSCIt, by using univariate analyses followed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the participants, 73.4% presented with a PU during at least 1 period after their injury. Four factors had an effect on the occurrence of PUs in the long-term. Protective features for this population were incomplete motor impairment (odds ratio, 0.5) and the ability to walk (odds ratio, 0.2), whereas a strong predictive factor was the development of a PU during the initial posttrauma phase (odds ratio, 2.7). Finally, a significant situational factor was the lack of a social network (odds ratio, 3.1). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the highlighting of a motor incomplete feature of SCI (protective against the development of a PU) and of a medical risk factor, an early PU (which served as a definitive marker of the trajectory of TSCIt), together with a social situational factor, indicates the crucial role of initial management and long-term follow-up.