The LRRK2 p.L1795F variant causes Parkinson's disease in the European population.

Pathogenic variants in the LRRK2 gene represent the most common cause of autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) worldwide. We identified the LRRK2 p.L1795F variant in 14 White/European ancestry PD patients, including two families with multiple affected carriers and seven additional affected individuals with familial PD using genotyping and sequencing data from more than 50,000 individuals through GP2, AMP-PD, PDGENEration, and CENTOGENE. All variant carriers were of White/European ancestry, and those with available genotyping data shared a common haplotype. The clinical presentation of p.L1795F carriers resembles that of other LRRK2 pathogenic variant carriers. Combined with published functional evidence showing strongly enhanced LRRK2 kinase activity, our findings provide conclusive evidence that the LRRK2 p.L1795F variant is pathogenic. It represents a rare cause of PD in the European population but needs to be included in genetic testing efforts and considered for ongoing gene-specific clinical trials.

Genetic Risk Factors in Isolated Dystonia Escape Genome-Wide Association Studies.

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable heritability, previous smaller genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have not identified any robust genetic risk factors for isolated dystonia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to perform a large-scale GWAS in a well-characterized, multicenter sample of >6000 individuals to identify genetic risk factors for isolated dystonia. METHODS: Array-based GWASs were performed on autosomes for 4303 dystonia participants and 2362 healthy control subjects of European ancestry with subgroup analysis based on age at onset, affected body regions, and a newly developed clinical score. Another 736 individuals were used for validation. RESULTS: This GWAS identified no common genome-wide significant loci that could be replicated despite sufficient power to detect meaningful effects. Power analyses imply that the effects of individual variants are likely very small. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate single-nucleotide polymorphism-based heritability indicates that common variants do not contribute to isolated dystonia in this cohort. Sequence-based GWASs (eg, by whole-genome sequencing) might help to better understand the genetic basis. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Increases in amyloid-ß42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease trials.

Positive effects of new anti-amyloid-ß (Aß) monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been attributed to brain amyloid reduction. However, most anti-Aß antibodies also increase the CSF levels of the 42-amino acid isoform (Aß42). We evaluated the associations of changes in CSF Aß42 and brain Aß-PET with cognitive and clinical end points in randomized trials of anti-Aß drugs that lowered (ß- and γ-secretase inhibitors) or increased CSF Aß42 levels (anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies) to test the hypothesis that post-treatment increases in CSF Aß42 levels are independently associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes. From long-term (≥12 months) randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of anti-Aß drugs published until November 2023, we calculated the post-treatment versus baseline difference in ADAS-Cog (cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) and CDR-SB (Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes) and z-standardized changes in CSF Aß42 and Aß-PET Centiloids (CL). We estimated the effect size [regression coefficients (RCs) and confidence intervals (CIs)] and the heterogeneity (I2) of the associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive and clinical end points using random-effects meta-regression models. We included 25 966 subjects with AD from 24 trials. In random-effects analysis, increases in CSF Aß42 were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: -0.55; 95% CI: -0.89, -0.21, P = 0.003, I2 = 61.4%) and CDR-SB (RC: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.06, P = 0.002, I2 = 34.5%). Similarly, decreases in Aß-PET were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and CDR-SB (RC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.33, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Higher CSF Aß42 levels after exposure to anti-Aß drugs are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aß42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of anti-Aß monoclonal antibodies in AD.

Long-Term Dementia Risk in Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is widely cited that dementia occurs in up to 80% of patients with Parkinson disease (PD), but studies reporting such high rates were published over two decades ago, had relatively small samples, and had other limitations. We aimed to determine long-term dementia risk in PD using data from two large, ongoing, prospective, observational studies. METHODS: Participants from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), a multisite international study, and a long-standing PD research cohort at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn), a single site study at a tertiary movement disorders center, were recruited. PPMI enrolled de novo, untreated PD participants and Penn a convenience cohort from a large clinical center. For PPMI, a cognitive battery is administered annually, and a site investigator makes a cognitive diagnosis. At Penn, a comprehensive cognitive battery is administered either annually or biennially, and a cognitive diagnosis is made by expert consensus. Interval-censored survival curves were fit for time from PD diagnosis to stable dementia diagnosis for each cohort, using cognitive diagnosis of dementia as the primary end point and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score <21 and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part I cognition score ≥3 as secondary end points for PPMI. In addition, estimated dementia probability by PD disease duration was tabulated for each study and end point. RESULTS: For the PPMI cohort, 417 participants with PD (mean age 61.6 years, 65% male) were followed, with an estimated probability of dementia at year 10 disease duration of 9% (site investigator diagnosis), 15% (MoCA), or 12% (MDS-UPDRS Part I cognition). For the Penn cohort, 389 participants with PD (mean age 69.3 years, 67% male) were followed, with 184 participants (47% of cohort) eventually diagnosed with dementia. The interval-censored curve for the Penn cohort had a median time to dementia of 15 years (95% CI 13-15); the estimated probability of dementia was 27% at 10 years of disease duration, 50% at 15 years, and 74% at 20 years. DISCUSSION: Results from two large, prospective studies suggest that dementia in PD occurs less frequently, or later in the disease course, than previous research studies have reported.

Dysrhythmia as a prominent feature of Parkinson's disease: An app-based tapping test.

INTRODUCTION: Smartphone applications (apps) are instruments that assist with objective measurements during the clinical assessment of patients with movement disorders. We aim to test the hypothesis that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients will exhibit an increase in tapping variability and a decrease in tapping speed over a one-year period, compared to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Data was prospectively collected from participants enrolled in our Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program, in 2021-2023. Participants diagnosed with PD and age-matched HC were examined over a one-year-interval with a tapping test performed with customized smartphone app. Tapping speed (taps/s), inter-tap intervals and variability (movement regularity), and sequence effect were measured. RESULTS: We included 295 PD patients and 62 HC. At baseline, PD subjects showed higher inter-tap variability than HC (coefficient-of-variation-CV, 37 ms [22-64] vs 26 ms [8-51]) (p = 0.007). Conversely, there was no difference in inter-tap intervals (411 ms [199-593] in PD versus 478 ms [243-618] in HC) and tapping speed (3.42[2.70-4.76] taps/s in PD versus 3.21 taps/s [2.57-4.54] in HC) (p > 0.05). Only PD subjects (n = 135), at the one-year follow-up, showed a decreased tapping speed vs baseline (3.44 taps/s [2.86-4.81] versus 3.39 taps/s [2.58,4.30]) (p = 0.036), without significant changes in inter-tap variability (CV, 32 ms [18,55] baseline versus 34 ms [22,59] follow-up) (p = 0.142). No changes were found in HC at the one-year follow up (all p values>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-tap variability (dysrhythmia) but no inter-tap intervals or tapping speed are reliably distinctive feature of an app-based bradykinesia assessment in PD.

Gaps and Controversies in Catatonia as a Movement Disorder.

The term "catatonia" was introduced by German psychiatrist Karl Kahlbaum in 1874. Although historically tied to schizophrenia, catatonia exhibits a diverse range of phenotypes and has been observed in various medical and neuropsychiatric conditions. Its intrinsic movement characteristics and association with hypokinetic and hyperkinetic phenomenologies place catatonia within the purview of movement disorders. Despite the presence of catatonia in psychiatry literature for over 150 years, many gaps and controversies persist regarding its etiopathogenesis, phenomenology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment. The current versions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) require clinicians to identify any three signs of 15 (ICD-11) or 12 (DSM-5) for the diagnosis of catatonia. Catalepsy and waxy flexibility are the only motor features with high specificity for the diagnosis. We highlight the gaps and controversies in catatonia as a movement disorder, emphasize the lack of a clear definition, and discuss the inconsistencies in the description of various catatonic signs. We propose the exploration of a bi-axial classification framework similar to that used for dystonia and tremor to encourage the evaluation of underlying etiologies and to guide therapeutic decisions to improve the outcome of these patients. © 2024 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Recalibrating the Risk-Benefit Profiles of Lecanemab and Donanemab: Scales, Immunoreactivity, and Changes in Amyloid-ß42.

Three recent anti-amyloid-ß antibody trials for Alzheimer's disease reported similar effect sizes, used non-reactive saline as placebo, and showed large numbers of adverse events including imaging anomalies (ARIA) that correlate with cognitive changes. Conversely, all previous antibody trials were less reactive and pronounced ineffective. We argue that these observations point to unblinding bias, inflating apparent efficacy and thus altering the risk-benefit balance. Further, we highlight data demonstrating that beyond reducing amyloid, monoclonal antibodies increase monomeric amyloid-ß42 in cerebrospinal fluid, which may explain potential benefits. We should recalibrate the efficacy of these antibodies and devote more resources into strategies beyond removing amyloid.

Anticipating Tomorrow: Tailoring Parkinson's Symptomatic Therapy Using Predictors of Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Although research into Parkinson's disease (PD) subtypes and outcome predictions has continued to advance, recommendations for using outcome prediction to guide current treatment decisions remain sparse. OBJECTIVES: To provide expert opinion-based recommendations for individually tailored PD symptomatic treatment based on knowledge of risk prediction and subtypes. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi approach, members of the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) Task Force on PD subtypes generated a series of general recommendations around the question: "Using what you know about genetic/biological/clinical subtypes (or any individual-level predictors of outcome), what advice would you give for selecting symptomatic treatments for an individual patient now, based on what their subtype or individual characteristics predict about their future disease course?" After four iterations and revisions, those recommendations with over 75% endorsement were adopted. RESULTS: A total of 19 recommendations were endorsed by a group of 13 panelists. The recommendations primarily centered around two themes: (1) incorporating future risk of cognitive impairment into current treatment plans; and (2) identifying future symptom clusters that might be forestalled with a single medication. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide clinicians with a framework for integrating future outcomes into patient-specific treatment choices. They are not prescriptive guidelines, but adaptable suggestions, which should be tailored to each individual. They are to be considered as a first step of a process that will continue to evolve as additional stakeholders provide new insights and as new information becomes available. As individualized risk prediction advances, the path to better tailored treatment regimens will become clearer.

Abnormal Cerebrospinal Fluid Cytology in Functional Movement Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The role of inflammation and neuroimmune mechanisms, which have been documented in various neuropsychiatric disorders including the seizure subtype of functional neurological disorder, remains unclear in functional movement disorders (FMD). To explore these mechanisms, we analyzed selected inflammatory markers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with FMD. METHODS: We compared CSF markers in 26 patients with clinically established FMD (20 females; mean [SD] age = 43.3 [10.9], disease duration = 3.9 [3], range = 0.1-11 years; mean follow-up after lumbar puncture = 4.3 [2] years, range = 0.5-7 years) and 26 sex- and age-matched clinical controls with noninflammatory nonneurodegenerative neurological disorders, mostly sleep disorders. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of FMD patients versus 15% of controls showed cytological abnormalities (i.e., increased white blood cells [WBC] count, signs of WBC activation, or both; odds ratio [OR] = 9.85, 95% confidence interval = 2.37-52.00, p < .01, corrected), with a significantly higher frequency of an isolated lymphocytic activation, 35% versus 0% (OR = ∞, 95% confidence interval = 2.53-∞, p < .05, corrected). There were no differences in CSF protein and albumin levels, quotient albumin, IgG index, and oligoclonal bands. CSF abnormalities were not associated with more severe motor symptoms or a higher frequency of depression in FMD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a possible involvement of immune mechanisms in the pathophysiology of (at least a subtype of) FMD that deserves further investigation.

Safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous levodopa-carbidopa infusion (ND0612) for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations (BouNDless): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional oral levodopa therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease can be associated with variations in plasma concentrations. Levodopa infusion strategies might provide more consistent drug delivery and fewer motor fluctuations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 (a levodopa-carbidopa solution) compared with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicentre trial at 117 academic and community neurology sites in 16 countries, including in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Eligible participants were men and women aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 in the on state) who experienced at least 2·5 h/day of off time. Participants underwent an open-label run-in phase (<12 weeks), during which time optimal regimens were established for both oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa and for 24 h/day subcutaneous ND0612 infusion (levodopa-carbidopa 60·0/7·5 mg/mL), with supplemental oral levodopa-carbidopa if needed. Participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with their optimised regimen of either subcutaneous ND0612 or oral levodopa-carbidopa, with matching oral or subcutaneous placebo given as required to maintain blinding. Randomisation was done via an interactive web response system, stratified by region, using a permuted block schedule. Participants, study partners, treating investigators, study site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (ie, time of randomisation, when all patients were receiving an optimised open-label ND0612 regimen) to end of the double-blind phase in total daily on time without troublesome dyskinesia, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006210, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2019, and April 8, 2022, 381 participants were enrolled, of whom 259 (68%) were randomly assigned, 128 (49%) to subcutaneous ND0612 and 131 (51%) to oral levodopa-carbidopa. 243 (94%) participants completed the study. Treatment with subcutaneous ND0612 provided an additional 1·72 h (95% CI 1·08 to 2·36) of on time without troublesome dyskinesia compared with oral levodopa-carbidopa (change from baseline of -0·48 h [-0·94 to -0·02] with subcutaneous ND0612 vs -2·20 h [-2·65 to -1·74] with oral levodopa-carbidopa; p<0·0001). Significant treatment differences favouring subcutaneous ND0612 were also found in the first four of nine prespecified hierarchical outcomes of daily off time (-1·40 h [95% CI -1·99 to -0·80]), Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II scores (-3·05 [-4·28 to -1·81]), Patients Global Impression of Change (odds ratio [OR] 5·31 [2·67 to 10·58]), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (OR 7·23 [3·57 to 14·64]). Hierarchical testing ended after the fourth secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported by 287 (89%) of 322 participants during open-label ND0612 optimisation, and by 103 (80%) of 128 in the ND0612 group and 97 (74%) of 131 in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase. The most common adverse events were infusion-site reactions (266 [83%] participants during open-label ND0612, and 73 [57%] in the ND0612 group vs 56 [43%] in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase), most of which were mild. Serious adverse events in four participants in the ND0612 group were related to study treatment (infusion-site cellulitis [n=2], infusion-site abscess and infusion-site ulcer [n=1]; and paraesthesia and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy [n=1]). One participant in the ND0612 group died during the double-blind phase, but the death was not related to study treatment (fall leading to traumatic brain injury). INTERPRETATION: Results of this phase 3 study showed that subcutaneous ND0612 used in combination with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa increased on time without troublesome dyskinesia and reduced off time, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. ND0612 might offer a safe and efficacious subcutaneous levodopa infusion approach to managing motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. The ongoing open-label extension phase will provide further information on the long-term efficacy and safety of treatment. FUNDING: NeuroDerm.

Extended-release amantadine for OFF-related dystonia in Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Dystonia is a painful OFF-related complication in Parkinson's disease (PD) with limited treatment options. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis using pooled data from two extended-release amantadine pivotal trials and follow-on open-label extension. Dystonia was assessed using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) Part 2 and the Movement Disorder Society-Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) item 4.6. RESULTS: Of 196 participants, 119 (60.7%) reported OFF-related dystonia at baseline per UDysRS. Twelve-week treatment with extended-release amantadine improved OFF dystonia (treatment differences vs placebo: UDysRS Part 2, -1.0 [-1.9,-0.1]; p = 0.03 and MDS-UPDRS Item 4.6, -0.3 [-0.6,-0.05]; p = 0.02). There was no correlation between changes in OFF time and changes in OFF dystonia. Double-blind improvements in OFF dystonia were sustained throughout the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-release amantadine yielded a sustained reduction in OFF-related dystonia in PD patients that was independent from a reduction in OFF time. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Loss of monomeric alpha-synuclein (synucleinopenia) and the origin of Parkinson's disease.

These facts argue against the gain-of-function synucleinopathy hypothesis, which proposes that Lewy pathology causes Parkinson's disease: (1) most brains from people without neurological symptoms have multiple pathologies; (2) neither pathology type nor distribution correlate with disease severity or progression in Parkinson's disease; (3) aggregated α-synuclein in the form of Lewy bodies is not a space-occupying lesion but the insoluble fraction of its precursor, soluble monomeric α-synuclein; (4) pathology spread is passive, occurring by irreversible nucleation, not active replication; and (5) low cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein levels predict brain atrophy and clinical disease progression. The transformation of α-synuclein into Lewy pathology may occur as a response to biological, toxic, or infectious stressors whose persistence perpetuates the nucleation process, depleting normal α-synuclein and eventually leading to Parkinson's symptoms from neuronal death. We propose testing the loss-of-function synucleinopenia hypothesis by evaluating the clinical and neurodegenerative rescue effect of replenishing the levels of monomeric α-synuclein.

Recalibrating the Why and Whom of Animal Models in Parkinson Disease: A Clinician's Perspective.

Animal models have been used to gain pathophysiologic insights into Parkinson's disease (PD) and aid in the translational efforts of interventions with therapeutic potential in human clinical trials. However, no disease-modifying therapy for PD has successfully emerged from model predictions. These translational disappointments warrant a reappraisal of the types of preclinical questions asked of animal models. Besides the limitations of experimental designs, the one-size convergence and oversimplification yielded by a model cannot recapitulate the molecular diversity within and between PD patients. Here, we compare the strengths and pitfalls of different models, review the discrepancies between animal and human data on similar pathologic and molecular mechanisms, assess the potential of organoids as novel modeling tools, and evaluate the types of questions for which models can guide and misguide. We propose that animal models may be of greatest utility in the evaluation of molecular mechanisms, neural pathways, drug toxicity, and safety but can be unreliable or misleading when used to generate pathophysiologic hypotheses or predict therapeutic efficacy for compounds with potential neuroprotective effects in humans. To enhance the translational disease-modification potential, the modeling must reflect the biology not of a diseased population but of subtypes of diseased humans to distinguish What data are relevant and to Whom.

Current opinions and practices in post-stroke movement disorders: Survey of movement disorders society members.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke movement disorders (PSMD) encompass a wide array of presentations, which vary in mode of onset, phenomenology, response to treatment, and natural history. There are no evidence-based guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of PSMD. OBJECTIVES: To survey current opinions and practices on the diagnosis and treatment of PSMD. METHODS: A survey was developed by the PSMD Study Group, commissioned by the International Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Society (MDS). The survey, distributed to all members, yielded a total of 529 responses, 395 (74.7%) of which came from clinicians with experience with PSMD. RESULTS: Parkinsonism (68%), hemiballismus/hemichorea (61%), tremor (58%), and dystonia (54%) were by far the most commonly endorsed presentation of PSMD, although this varied by region. Basal ganglia stroke (76% of responders), symptoms contralateral to stroke (75%), and a temporal relationship (59%) were considered important factors for the diagnosis of PSMD. Oral medication use depended on the phenomenology of the PSMD. Almost 50% of respondents considered deep brain stimulation and ablative surgeries as options for treatment. The lack of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment was considered the most important gap to address. CONCLUSIONS: Regionally varying opinions and practices on PSMD highlight gaps in (and mistranslation of) epidemiologic and therapeutic knowledge. Multicenter registries and prospective community-based studies are needed for the creation of evidence-based guidelines to inform the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PSMD.