Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 79(12): 1600-1607, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32963047

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recent advances in systemic sclerosis (SSc) show that it involves a T-helper type-2-oriented immune response with interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13. Romilkimab is an engineered, humanised, bispecific immunoglobulin-G4 antibody that binds and neutralises IL-4/IL-13 making it ideal for exploration in fibrosis. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and with or without immunosuppressive background therapy, were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous romilkimab 200 mg or placebo one time per week for 24 weeks in this double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase II study. The primary endpoint was change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were randomised to romilkimab (n=48) or placebo (n=49) for 24 weeks. Least-squares mean (SE) change in mRSS was -4.76 (0.86) for romilkimab versus -2.45 (0.85) for placebo yielding a mean (SE) (90% CI) difference of -2.31 (1.21) (-4.32 to -0.31; p=0.0291, one-sided). Treatment-emergent AEs were balanced between placebo (n=41; 84%) and romilkimab (n=40; 80%). Most were mild-to-moderate and discontinuations were low (three overall). There were two deaths (one scleroderma renal crisis (romilkimab) and one cardiomyopathy (placebo)), neither were considered treatment related. Two patients in the placebo group had a cardiovascular treatment-emergent SAE (one cardiac failure, one cardiomyopathy), but there were no cardiac safety signals with romilkimab. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant effects on skin changes with romilkimab in early dcSSc that require confirmation with a longer and more comprehensive phase III study to determine clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02921971.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-13/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Esclerodermia Difusa/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Chest ; 154(6): 1359-1370, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30526970

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease with 3 to 5 years' survival. Although FVC is used to assess disease progression and treatment response, identifying predictive circulating blood biomarkers could help identify specific biologic pathways for treatment. An international, prospective, noninterventional, case-controlled, 52-week study was therefore conducted to identify a clinical and biomarker baseline profile predictive of longitudinal disease behavior. METHODS: Patients with IPF and control subjects had lung function tests and blood sampling for biomarker quantification (control subjects at baseline only). The primary end point was disease progression rate (composite end point: decrease ≥ 10% from baseline in FVC % predicted, decrease ≥ 15% from baseline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted, lung transplantation, death) at week 52 and its relationship to selected biomarkers at baseline. RESULTS: Altogether, 211 subjects (154 patients with IPF and 57 control subjects) were enrolled; one-third of patients (n = 47) with IPF had progressed by week 52. Biomarkers CC-chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18), intercellular adhesion molecule 1, Krebs von den Lungen-6, surfactant protein (SP)-A, SP-D, matrix metallopeptidase 7, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, and two novel biomarkers, human epididymis protein-4 (HE4) and prostasin, discriminated patients with IPF vs control subjects. There was no difference in baseline CCL18 concentration between progressors and nonprogressors at week 52 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.62; corrected P = .161). No biomarkers were predictive for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Several biomarkers, including CCL18, were associated with IPF, but none predicted disease progression. Two novel biomarkers, HE4 and prostasin, were identified and warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Quimiocina CCL18/sangue , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática , Molécula 1 de Adesão Intercelular/sangue , Proteínas/análise , Receptores de Ativador de Plasminogênio Tipo Uroquinase/sangue , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Correlação de Dados , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/sangue , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/fisiopatologia , Cooperação Internacional , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Testes de Função Respiratória/métodos , Serina Endopeptidases/sangue , Proteína 2 do Domínio Central WAP de Quatro Dissulfetos
3.
Eur Respir J ; 52(6)2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337444

RESUMO

A phase 2b trial (NCT02345070) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels/regimens of SAR156597 (a bispecific IgG4 antibody that binds and neutralises both circulating interleukin-4 and interleukin-13), in comparison with placebo, administered to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) over 52 weeks.DRI11772 was a multinational randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Patients aged >40 years with a documented diagnosis of IPF received SAR156597 200 mg once every week (QW), SAR156597 200 mg once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo, over 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was absolute change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted at 52 weeks.Of 327 randomised patients, 325 received treatment with placebo (n=109), SAR156597 Q2W (n=108) or SAR156597 QW (n=108). The mean change from baseline in FVC % pred at 52 weeks was -5.8%, -5.2% and -6.3% for the placebo, Q2W and QW arms, respectively (Q2W versus placebo, p=0.59; QW versus placebo, p=0.63). The safety profile observed in the three treatment arms was generally similar, although serious adverse events were more common in the QW arm than in the other arms.The DRI11772 study failed to demonstrate benefit of SAR156597 in the treatment of IPF.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos/administração & dosagem , Fibrose Pulmonar Idiopática/terapia , Interleucina-13/antagonistas & inibidores , Interleucina-4/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Interleucina-13/imunologia , Interleucina-4/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Resultado do Tratamento , Capacidade Vital
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA