Rare Genetic Variants in Young Adults Requiring Pacemaker Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Genetic disease has recently emerged as a cause of cardiac conduction disorders (CCDs), but the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the contribution of the different genes to CCD is still unsettled. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology requiring pacemaker implantation. We also studied the prevalence of rare protein-altering variants across individual genes and functional gene groups. METHODS: We performed whole exome sequencing in 150 patients with CCD of unknown etiology who had permanent pacemaker implanted at age ≤60 years at 14 Spanish hospitals. Prevalence of rare protein-altering variants in patients with CCD was compared with a reference population of 115,522 individuals from gnomAD database (control subjects). RESULTS: Among 39 prioritized genes, patients with CCD had more rare protein-altering variants than control subjects (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.75-3.33). Significant enrichment of rare variants in patients with CCD was observed in all functional gene groups except in the desmosomal genes group. Rare variants in the nuclear envelope genes group exhibited the strongest association with CCD (OR: 6.77; 95% CI: 3.71-13.87). Of note, rare variants in sarcomeric genes were also enriched (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.05-3.10). An actionable genetic variant was detected in 21 patients (14%), with LMNA being the most frequently involved gene (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Unrecognized rare genetic variants increase the risk of CCD in young adults with CCD of unknown etiology. Genetic testing should be performed in patients age ≤60 years with CCD of unknown etiology. The role of genetic variants in sarcomeric genes as a cause of CCD should be further investigated.

Sex Differences in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: Unraveling the Complexities in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is characterised by the deposition of transthyretin amyloid fibrils in the heart. ATTR-CA affects both men and women although there is evidence of sex differences in prevalence and clinical presentation. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review paper aims to comprehensively examine and synthesise the existing literature on sex differences in ATTR-CA. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of ATTR-CA is higher in males although the male predominance is more apparent in older patients in the wild type form and in TTR genetic variants that predominantly result in a cardiac phenotype in the hereditary variant. Women tend to have less left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and a higher ejection fraction at clinical presentation which may contribute to a later diagnosis although the prognosis appears to be similar in both sexes. Female sex is a predictor of a good response to tafamidis 20 mg in TTR polyneuropathy but otherwise there are no data on sex differences in the efficacy of other treatments for ATTR-CA. It is crucial to define specific sex differences in ATTR-CA. A lower cut-off value for LVH in women may be needed to improve diagnosis. It is necessary to increase female representation in clinical trials to better understand possible sex differences in therapeutic management.

Penetrance of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Genotype-Positive Relatives.

BACKGROUND: Disease penetrance in genotype-positive (G+) relatives of families with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and the characteristics associated with DCM onset in these individuals are unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the penetrance of new DCM diagnosis in G+ relatives and to identify factors associated with DCM development. METHODS: The authors evaluated 779 G+ patients (age 35.8 ± 17.3 years; 459 [59%] females; 367 [47%] with variants in TTN) without DCM followed at 25 Spanish centers. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 37.1 months (Q1-Q3: 16.3-63.8 months), 85 individuals (10.9%) developed DCM (incidence rate of 2.9 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 2.3-3.5 per 100 person-years). DCM penetrance and age at DCM onset was different according to underlying gene group (log-rank P = 0.015 and P <0.01, respectively). In a multivariable model excluding CMR parameters, independent predictors of DCM development were: older age (HR per 1-year increase: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.0-1.04), an abnormal electrocardiogram (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.38-3.29); presence of variants in motor sarcomeric genes (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.05-3.50); lower left ventricular ejection fraction (HR per 1% increase: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (HR per 1-mm increase: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06-1.13). Multivariable analysis in individuals with cardiac magnetic resonance and late gadolinium enhancement assessment (n = 360, 45%) identified late gadolinium enhancement as an additional independent predictor of DCM development (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.43-4.45). CONCLUSIONS: Following a first negative screening, approximately 11% of G+ relatives developed DCM during a median follow-up of 3 years. Older age, an abnormal electrocardiogram, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, motor sarcomeric genetic variants, and late gadolinium enhancement are associated with a higher risk of developing DCM.