Occlusal Evaluation Using Modified Huddart and Bodenham Scoring System Following 2-Stage Palatoplasty With Hotz Plate: A Comparison Among 3 Different Surgical Protocols.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if the change in technique of soft palate closure or timing of hard palatal repair induced occlusal changes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTINGS: A medical and dental hospital in Japan. SUBJECTS: A total of 96 patients with CUCLP treated with 2-stage palatoplasty were included in the study and categorized into 3 groups (G1, G2, and G3) according to the protocol used. INTERVENTIONS: G1 underwent soft palate repair using Perko method at 1.5 years of age and hard palate repair using vomer flap procedure at 5.5 years of age. Furlow method was used for soft palate repair in G2 at 1.5 years of age and hard palate repair using vomer flap procedure at 5.5 years of age. The Furlow method was used to repair the soft palate in G3 at 1.5 years of age and vomer flap procedure was used to repair the hard palate at 4 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two evaluators assessed the dental arch relationship using the modified Huddart/Bodenham (mHB) index on 2 separate occasions. RESULTS: Intra- (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.962) and inter-examiner (ICC: 0.950) reliability showed very good agreement. The frequency of crossbite present in the major and minor segments gradually decreased with each change in protocol. Mean segmental scores showed no significant difference between 3 protocols (P > .05). Good inter-arch alignment occurred with all 3 surgical protocols (G1:82.6%, G2:89.8%, and G3:91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the dental arch relationship outcomes between the 3 surgical protocols. The dentition status was comparable with all surgical protocols, even after the changes.

Comparison between the prophylactic effects of amoxicillin 24 and 48 hours pre-operatively on surgical site infections in Japanese patients with impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: According to the guidelines, the dosage for mandibular wisdom tooth extraction (MWTE) varies within the administration period. There is a 24-fold difference between the minimum and maximum doses. If an appropriate antimicrobial can be administered without increasing incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), it may lead to a global action plan on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, we prospectively surveyed incidence of SSI post-operatively and use of oral antibiotics (OA) for MWTE. METHODS: Subjects were patients who underwent MWTE in our dental outpatient clinic from May 2019 to April 2020. Two groups were formed depending on type of administration period they received: 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The following information was collected: (1) patient factors (age, gender, body mass index, presence/absence of preoperative medication, diagnosis, impacted wisdom tooth status; (2) surgical factors (operative time, presence/absence of closure, presence/absence of hemostat, doctor career, type and frequency of painkiller); (3) relationship between administration period of OA and SSI occurrence; and (4) details of SSI. RESULTS: Three hundred forty subjects were analyzed, all of which used amoxicillin. There were 106 cases in 24 h group and 234 cases in 48 h group. The total incidence of SSI was 1.1% (4/340 cases), with 0.9% (1/106 cases) in 24 h group and 1.3% (3/234 cases) in 48 h group; there was no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that amoxicillin (250 mg/dose every 8 h x 3 doses beginning 1 h before surgery) might be sufficient in preventing SSI in Japanese dental patients without SSI risk factors.

Clinico-statistical survey of oral antimicrobial prophylaxis and surgical site infection regarding ordinary tooth extraction and mandibular wisdom tooth extraction in the dental outpatient clinic.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the use of oral antibiotics (OA) and surgical site infection (SSI) related to extractions of ordinary teeth and mandibular wisdom teeth in a dental outpatient clinic from January 2015 to December 2019. METHODS: The following information were surveyed: (1) presence/absence of OA, (2) timing, (3) type, (4) administration period, and (5) SSI rates. RESULTS: The use of OA during ordinary tooth extraction decreased from 68.3% to 41.3%, but SSI rate did not change during this period of time. Total SSI rate was 0.8% (122/14,832) on average. For mandibular wisdom tooth extraction, preoperative administration of third-generation cephalosporins decreased from 70.4% to 0.3% while that of penicillin (AMPC) increased from 0% to 98%. SSI rate was not changed after these improvements. Total SSI rate was 3.5% (180/5106) on average. The duration of OA was slightly decreased to two days in 2018 and 2019, and it was found that there was no significant difference in SSI rates between 2- and 3-day durations. Preoperative administration had 0.37 odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.22-0.63) of SSI compared with postoperative administration. AMPC had 0.76 OR (95% CI: 0.55-1.04) of SSI compared with Third-generation cephalosporins and others. Timing of OA was P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: SSI rates did not change over time, administration period of OA decreased and the use of AMPC increased. Therefore, it seems necessary to continue to investigate the effects of SSI risk factors proactively in the future and to make efforts in the advocacy of appropriate antimicrobial use.