Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma, and Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Programmatic Proof of Concept.

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising, non-invasive diagnostic and surveillance biomarker in solid organ malignancy. However, its utility before and after liver transplant (LT) for patients with primary and secondary liver cancers is still underexplored. METHODS: Patients undergoing LT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with ctDNA testing were included. CtDNA testing was conducted pre-transplant, post-transplant, or both (sequential) from 11/2019 to 09/2023 using Guardant360, Guardant Reveal, and Guardant360 CDx. RESULTS: 21 patients with HCC (n = 9, 43%), CRLM (n = 8, 38%), CCA (n = 3, 14%), and mixed HCC/CCA (n = 1, 5%) were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 15 months (range: 1-124). The median time from pre-operative testing to surgery was 3 months (IQR: 1-4; range: 0-5), and from surgery to post-operative testing, it was 9 months (IQR: 2-22; range: 0.4-112). A total of 13 (62%) patients had pre-transplant testing, with 8 (62%) having ctDNA detected (ctDNA+) and 5 (32%) not having ctDNA detected (ctDNA-). A total of 18 (86%) patients had post-transplant testing, 11 (61%) of whom were ctDNA+ and 7 (33%) of whom were ctDNA-. The absolute recurrence rates were 50% (n = 5) in those who were ctDNA+ vs. 25% (n = 1) in those who were ctDNA- in the post-transplant setting, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.367). Six (29%) patients (HCC = 3, CCA = 1, CRLM = 2) experienced recurrence with a median recurrence-free survival of 14 (IQR: 6-40) months. Four of these patients had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected following diagnosis of recurrence, while one patient had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected preceding recurrence. A total of 10 (48%) patients had sequential ctDNA testing, of whom n = 5 (50%) achieved ctDNA clearance (+/-). The remainder were ctDNA+/+ (n = 3, 30%), ctDNA-/- (n = 1, 10%), and ctDNA-/+ (n = 1, 11%). Three (30%) patients showed the acquisition of new genomic alterations following transplant, all without recurrence. Overall, the median tumor mutation burden (TMB) decreased from 1.23 mut/Mb pre-transplant to 0.00 mut/Mb post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ctDNA positivity experienced recurrence at a higher rate than the ctDNA- patients, indicating the potential role of ctDNA in predicting recurrence after curative-intent transplant. Based on sequential testing, LT has the potential to clear ctDNA, demonstrating the capability of LT in the treatment of systemic disease. Transplant providers should be aware of the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA and improved approaches are necessary to address such concerns.

Neutrophil extracellular traps induced by chemotherapy inhibit tumor growth in murine models of colorectal cancer.

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), a web-like structure of cytosolic and granule proteins assembled on decondensed chromatin, kill pathogens and cause tissue damage in diseases. Whether NETs can kill cancer cells is unexplored. Here, we report that a combination of glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 and 5-FU inhibited the growth of PIK3CA-mutant colorectal cancers (CRCs) in xenograft, syngeneic, and genetically engineered mouse models in part through NETs. Disruption of NETs by either DNase I treatment or depletion of neutrophils in CRCs attenuated the efficacy of the drug combination. Moreover, NETs were present in tumor biopsies from patients treated with the drug combination in a phase II clinical trial. Increased NET levels in tumors were associated with longer progression-free survival. Mechanistically, the drug combination induced the expression of IL-8 preferentially in PIK3CA-mutant CRCs to attract neutrophils into the tumors. Further, the drug combination increased the levels of ROS in neutrophils, thereby inducing NETs. Cathepsin G (CTSG), a serine protease localized in NETs, entered CRC cells through the RAGE cell surface protein. The internalized CTSG cleaved 14-3-3 proteins, released BAX, and triggered apoptosis in CRC cells. Thus, our studies illuminate a previously unrecognized mechanism by which chemotherapy-induced NETs kill cancer cells.

Genomic Predictors Associated With Exceptional Response to Systemic Therapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Exceptional response to therapy is rare in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This study explored potential genomic differences between typical and exceptional responses that could confer more favorable biology. METHODS: We included exceptional responders and controls with advanced pancreatic cancer from Cleveland Clinic from April 2013 to August 2017. Exceptional responders were defined as patients with an overall survival of more than 18 months for metastatic disease and more than 24 months for locally advanced disease. Clinical data were obtained, and next-generation sequencing was performed. Statistical analyses comparing the 2 groups were performed using descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The study comprised 4 exceptional responders and 6 controls. Both groups were well balanced in age, sex, race, and treatment regimens. Exceptional responders had significantly fewer nonsynonymous mutations than controls (2.25 vs 5.17; P = .014). A mutation count of less than 3 was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (17.2 vs 2.3 months; P = .002) and overall survival (29.4 vs 4.6 months; P = .013). Tumor mutational burden did not differ between exceptional responders and controls (4.88 vs 5.70 mut/Mb; P = .39). CONCLUSION: A lower number of nonsynonymous mutations may correlate with exceptional outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. These findings should encourage future studies into genomic signatures of exceptional response.

Immunotherapy Plus Locoregional Therapy Leading to Curative-Intent Hepatectomy in HCC: Proof of Concept Producing Durable Survival Benefits Detectable with Liquid Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has emerged as an improved systemic treatment for select patients with advanced unresectable HCC. Objective response is reported in 30% of patients, yet complete response (pCR) allowing for curative-intent resection is rare. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) seem to show synergistic effects with immunotherapy, though this effect has not been scientifically reported. We report a cohort of patients showing pCR to immunotherapy + LRT as a proof of concept for the proposed treatment approach for locally unresectable HCC. METHODS: Patients with unresectable HCC treated with immunotherapy as an intended destination therapy from 2016 to 2023 were included. The electronic health record was queried for oncologic information, locoregional therapies, surgical interventions, and long-term outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing was obtained using Guardant360, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) was defined as the number of somatic mutations per megabase. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with advanced HCC received immunotherapy + LRT as a destination therapy. In total, 11 of 96 patients showed a complete response according to mRECIST criteria. Four of these (36.4%) ultimately underwent curative-intent resection. The median follow-up was 24.9 (IQR 15.6-38.3) months. Overall survival rates in those with complete response at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100%, 91%, and 81.8%, respectively, which were significantly improved compared to those of the cohort not achieving pCR (p < 0.001). All four patients undergoing immunotherapy + LRT followed by curative-intent hepatectomy have no evidence of disease (NED). Of those undergoing surgery, ctDNA was cleared in 75% (n = 3), providing an additional objective measurement of complete response. All four patients were TMB+ before beginning this treatment course, with three being TMB-, indicating stable and complete disease response. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy + locoregional therapy can help downstage a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable HCC, allowing for curative-intent surgery. The survival benefit associated with complete response seems durable up to 3 years after achieving this response. ctDNA measurement was converted from positive to negative in this cohort, providing additional indication of response.

Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: Analysis of Patients Receiving Liver Resection and Transplant.

PURPOSE: Liver metastases occur in about 50% of colorectal cancer cases and drive patient outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a diagnostic, surveillance, and tumor mutational information tool. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CCLM) seen in a multidisciplinary liver tumor clinic from January to August 2022 received ctDNA testing on each visit. ctDNA was obtained using the Guardant360 platform. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is defined as the number of identified mutations per megabase of genome analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients had available ctDNA, with 34 (65%) tested preoperatively and 18 (35%) postoperatively; nine patients had sequential pre- and postoperative testing. The median time to test result was 12 days (IQR, 10-13.5). There were a greater number of somatic mutations identified preoperatively (n = 29 v n = 11) and a greater genomic heterogeneity (P = .0069). The mean TMB score was 12.77 in those without pathologic response to cytotoxic therapy and 6.0 in those with pathologic response (P = .10). All nine patients with sequential testing were positive preoperatively, compared with just three (33.3%) postoperatively (P = .0090). Positive postoperative ctDNA was associated with the increased likelihood of disease recurrence after resection (57%) versus negative ctDNA (0%, P = .0419). CONCLUSION: Routine ctDNA screening in patients with CCLM is logistically feasible. Liver resection and/or transplant may be associated with clearance of detectable ctDNA and a reduction in TMB or genomic heterogeneity. Persistence of ctDNA alterations postresection appears predictive of disease recurrence. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings, and longitudinal ctDNA testing is needed to monitor changing tumor biology.

Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma-a Large Tertiary Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonist has become the first line systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, two-thirds of patients do not respond to ICI-based treatments and biomarkers for response remain elusive. METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC who received Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab combination or Nivolumab during 2016-2022 were identified in our Liver Cancer Database. Retrospective review of their clinical data was performed to investigate parameters that could be predictive of immunotherapy response. RESULTS: 96 patients received Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab (n=60) or Nivolumab (n=36). Median age at diagnosis was 67.1 years. 70 patients had received treatment and 26 patients were treatment naïve before starting immunotherapy. Mean pre-treatment AFP was 9780.7 (±32035) ng/mL. Confirmed objective response (complete or partial) was seen in 29% of the population (n=27). Disease remained stable in 12% (n=11) and progressed in 60% (n=56). On univariate analysis, pre-treatment AFP>400 ng/mL was associated with objective response (OR=4.5, 95% CI:1.7-11.9, p=0.0015), while white race (OR=0.35, 95% CI:0.13-0.92, p=0.030) and prior radiotherapy (OR=0.14, 95% CI:0.01-1.1, p=0.033) or systemic therapy with TKIs (OR=0.25, 95% CI:0.08-0.81, p=0.017) were associated with poor response. On multivariate analysis only AFP>400 ng/mL remained associated with response (OR=3.7, 95% CI:1.3-10.5, p=0.014). Overall survival (OS) at one and three years was 86% and 43% in responders, and 45% and 29% in non-responders, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our institutional experience, treatment naivety and pre-treatment AFP>400 ng/mL were associated with objective response. Prospective studies aimed at identifying factors associated with response to immunotherapy will aide patient selection.

Liquid Biopsy by ctDNA in Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Metastatic liver disease develops in 50% of cases and drives patient outcomes. Although the ideal treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) is resection, only a third of patients are suitable for this approach. Reports of liver transplantation in selected patients with unresectable CRLM have shown encouraging results compared to conventional forms of therapy. No study to date has examined the utility of liquid biopsy circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for evaluation of residual disease in this cohort of patients. We report a small series of liver transplantation in patients with CRLM in whom ctDNA was assessed peri-operatively. METHODS: Five patients underwent liver transplantation for unresectable CRLM or liver failure following CRLM treatment from 2018 to 2022. Clinical data, cross-sectional imaging, and serum biomarkers including peri-operative ctDNA were reviewed from electronic medical records. RESULTS: All patients are alive without radiologic evidence of disease at time of this publication. Median time of follow-up was 32 months (IQR 6.6-40 months). ctDNA was assessed before (4 patients) and after transplant (6 patients). One patient experienced a pulmonary recurrence that was resected, for whom pre-recurrence ctDNA was not available; the remaining patients have not experienced recurrence. Four patients are without evidence of ctDNA following transplant, and two demonstrate persistent ctDNA positivity post-transplant. Three of four patients with positive pre-transplant ctDNA remain ctDNA-negative post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation for liver-confined unresectable CRLM is emerging as a valid surgical option in selected patients. The significance of liquid biopsy in this population remains elusive due to lack of data. The clearance of ctDNA after transplant in these patients with metastatic disease and despite their immunosuppression is notable. The significance and usefulness of liquid biopsy in patient selection, surveillance, and as an indication for treatment warrant further investigation.

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of young-onset versus average onset pancreatico-biliary adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Young-onset gastrointestinal malignancies appear to be increasing in incidence. There are limited data on young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). METHODS: The study comprised patients with PBA (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, intra-, and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2017. YO-PBA was defined as a diagnosis at age less than 50 years. Logistic regression to assess factors associated with YO-PBA status, and cox proportional hazards modeling to associate relevant factors with overall survival was performed. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 360,764 patients, with 20,822 (5.8%) YO-PBA. YO-PBA was associated with (p-values<0.0001 for all): male sex (6.3% YO-male out of all male patients vs. 5.2% YO-female, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33), Black race (7.9% YO-Black vs. 5.0% YO-White, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.64-1.80), lower income (6.4% YO-lowest household income based group vs. 5.5% highest, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13). YO-PBA were more likely to present with stage-IV disease (6.4% YO-Stage IV of all stage IV vs. 5.4% YO-Stage I-III, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.21-1.29 p-value < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) in non-operable patients included-sex - male vs. female, HR 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.15); race - Black vs. White, HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.42); income group - lowest vs. highest, HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.27-1.39), and treatment center type - academic vs. nonacademic center, HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic factors significantly impact incidence and outcomes for young-onset pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma (YO-PBA). More work is needed to help understand the mechanisms involved while addressing the disparities.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated smooth muscle tumors in immunocompromised patients: Six case reports.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus associated smooth muscle tumor (EBV-SMT) is a rare oncological entity. However, there is an increasing incidence of EBV-SMTs, as the frequency of organ transplantation and immunosuppression grows. EBV-SMT diagnosis relies on histopathology and immunochemical staining to distinguish it from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). There is no clear consensus on the treatment of EBV-SMTs. However, surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunosuppression reduction have been explored with varying degrees of success. CASE SUMMARY: Our case series includes six cases of EBV-SMTs across different age groups, with different treatment modalities, adding to the limited existing literature on this rare tumor. The median latency time between immunosuppression and disease diagnosis is four years. EBV-SMTs present with variable degrees of aggressiveness and seem to have worse clinical outcomes in patients with tumor multiplicity and worse immunocompetency. CONCLUSION: It is imperative to continue building on this knowledge and keeping EBV-SMTs on the differential in immunocompromised individuals.

Recipient and Donor Outcomes After Living-Donor Liver Transplant for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Importance: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and nearly 70% of patients with this cancer have unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs). Compared with chemotherapy, liver transplant has been reported to improve survival in patients with CRLMs, but in North America, liver allograft shortages make the use of deceased-donor allografts for this indication problematic. Objective: To examine survival outcomes of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) for unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included patients at 3 North American liver transplant centers with established LDLT programs, 2 in the US and 1 in Canada. Patients with liver-confined, unresectable CRLMs who had demonstrated sustained disease control on oncologic therapy met the inclusion criteria for LDLT. Patients included in this study underwent an LDLT between July 2017 and October 2020 and were followed up until May 1, 2021. Exposures: Living-donor liver transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Perioperative morbidity and mortality of treated patients and donors, assessed by univariate statistics, and 1.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival for transplant recipients. Results: Of 91 evaluated patients, 10 (11%) underwent LDLT (6 [60%] male; median age, 45 years [range, 35-58 years]). Among the 10 living donors, 7 (70%) were male, and the median age was 40.5 years (range, 27-50 years). Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free and overall survival at 1.5 years after LDLT were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients was consistent with established standards (Clavien-Dindo complications among recipients: 3 [10%] had none, 3 [30%] had grade II, and 4 [40%] had grade III; donors: 5 [50%] had none, 4 [40%] had grade I, and 1 had grade III). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings of recurrence-free and overall survival rates suggest that select patients with unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs may benefit from total hepatectomy and LDLT.

AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver cancer, remains a deadly cancer, with an incidence that has tripled in the United States since 1980. In recent years, new systemic therapies for HCC have been approved and a critical assessment of the existing data is necessary to balance benefits and harms and inform the development of evidence-based guidelines. METHODS: The American Gastroenterological Association formed a multidisciplinary group consisting of a Technical Review Panel and a Guideline Panel. The Technical Review Panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and conducted an evidence review of systemic therapies in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence. The Guideline Panel reviewed the evidence and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations. RESULTS: The Panel reviewed the evidence, summarized in the Technical Review, for the following medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for HCC: first-line therapies: bevacizumab+atezolizumab, sorafenib, and lenvatinib; second-line therapies: cabozantinib, pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, and regorafenib; and other agents: bevacizumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab+ipilimumab. CONCLUSIONS: The Panel agreed on 11 recommendations focused on systemic therapy for HCC in patients who are not eligible for locoregional therapy or resection, those with metastatic disease and preserved liver function, those with poor liver function, and those on systemic therapy as adjuvant therapy.

Genetic Counseling and Germline Testing in the Era of Tumor Sequencing: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of addressing potential germline alterations from tumor-only next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not well characterized. Current guidelines for cancer genetic testing may miss clinically actionable germline changes, which may have important implications for cancer screening, treatment, and prevention. We examined whether increasing involvement of the clinical genetics service during somatic tumor-only NGS review at Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) increases the detection of germline findings. METHODS: In a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent tumor-only NGS and were reviewed at MTB, we quantified genetic counseling (GC) referrals as well as germline testing uptake and results across three cohorts: before (C1) and after (C2) the addition of tumor-only NGS review and after (C3) instituting a formal process to coordinate NGS-based genetics referrals to preexisting oncology appointments. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2017, 907 tumor-only NGS reports were reviewed at MTB (nC1 = 281, nC2 = 493, nC3 = 133); gastrointestinal (22.5%), lung (19.7%), genitourinary (14.8%), and breast (14.1%) were the most common index cancers. GC visits due to MTB increased with each successive cohort (C1 = 1.1%, C2 = 6.9%, C3 = 13.5%; P for trend [P trend] < .001), as did germline testing (C1 = 0.7%, C2 = 3.2%, C3 = 11.3%; P trend < .001). Diagnosis of germline pathogenic variants increased with each successive cohort (C1 = 1.4%, C2 = 2.0%, C3 = 7.5%; P trend = .003) and with germline pathogenic variants found by MTB review (C1 = 0.4%, C2 = 0.4%, C3 = 2.3%; P trend = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Both review of tumor-only NGS by genetics and the institution of a process coordinating GC with oncology appointments increased the discovery of germline pathogenic variants from tumor-only NGS testing. Furthermore, this process identified germline pathogenic variant carriers who would not have otherwise met standard criteria for germline testing.

Epidemiology of Cholangiocarcinoma; United States Incidence and Mortality Trends.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with few available studies assessing incidence and mortality. In this study, we aim to investigate trends of incidence and mortality in a large nation-wide epidemiologic study. METHODS: We used SEER 18 database to study cholangiocarcinoma cases in the US during 2000-2015. Incidence and mortality rates of cholangiocarcinoma were calculated by race and were expressed by 1,000,000 person-years. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated using joinpoint regression software. RESULTS: We reviewed 16,189 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, of which 64.4% were intrahepatic. Most patients were whites (78.4%), males (51.3%), and older than 65 years (63%). A total of 13,121 patients died of cholangiocarcinoma during the study period. Cholangiocarcinoma incidence and mortality were 11.977 and 10.295 and were both higher among Asians, males, and individuals older than 65 years. Incidence rates have significantly increased over the study period (APC=5.063%, P<.001), while mortality increased significantly over the study period (APC=5.964%, P<.001), but decreased after 2013 (APC=-25.029, P<.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of cholangiocarcinoma were increasing in the study period with significant observed disparities based on race and gender.

A multicentre phase 1b/2 study of tivozanib in patients with advanced inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related death. It is a highly vascular tumour with multiple angiogenic factors, most importantly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), involved in HCC progression. Tivozanib is an oral inhibitor of VEGFR-1/2/3 with promising activity against HCC in vivo. METHODS: We conducted a phase 1b/2 study of tivozanib in patients with advanced HCC. The safety, dosing, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antineoplastic efficacy of tivozanib were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received at least one dose of tivozanib. Using a 3+3 design, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of tivozanib was determined to be 1 mg per os once daily, 21 days on-7 days off. The median progression-free and overall survival were 24 weeks and 9 months, respectively, for patients treated at RP2D. The overall response rate was 21%. Treatment was well tolerated. A significant decrease in soluble plasma VEGFR-2 was noted, assuring adequate target engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not proceed to stage 2, there was an early efficacy signal with a very favourable toxicity profile. A phase 1/2 trial of tivozanib in combination with durvalumab is currently underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01835223, registered on 15 April 2013.

Clinical significance of weight changes at diagnosis in solid tumours.

PURPOSE: Weight changes occur throughout the cancer trajectory. Most research has focused on changes during or after treatment, so clinical significance of change at diagnosis remains unclear. This study aimed to determine prevalence, predictors and prognostic significance of weight changes at diagnosis in outpatients with solid tumours presenting to a tertiary academic medical centre. METHODS: A retrospective study of the electronic medical record was conducted (n = 6477). Those with weight recorded within 6 months of cancer diagnosis (pre-diagnosis, T0) and 2 subsequent weights (diagnosis, T1; final visit, T2) were identified (n = 4258). Percentage weight change was categorised into four bands (0.1-2.4%; 2.5-5%; 5.01-9.9%; ≥ 10%) for gain and loss. A stable category was also included. RESULTS: Mean age is 61 ± 12.5 years. Common tumour sites: breast (17%; n = 725), prostate (16%; n = 664), lung (14%; n = 599). 15% (n = 652) had metastatic disease at T1. 98% (n = 4159) had weight change at T1. Head & neck and upper gastrointestinal cancers were significantly associated with weight loss (p < 0.001). Worst survival occurred with ≥ 10% weight gain or ≥ 10% weight loss. Overweight or obese body mass index with any percentage weight change band was associated with better overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Most had evidence of clinically significant weight changes at diagnosis. Weight loss at diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of further weight loss. A detailed weight history at cancer diagnosis is essential to identify and intervene for those most at risk of weight change-related early mortality.

Serum C-reactive protein is an important and powerful prognostic biomarker in most adult solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Prognostication in cancer is challenging and inaccurate. C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a cheap and sensitive marker of inflammation may help. This study investigated the relationship between CRP and prognosis in a large cohort of solid tumors with mixed cancer diagnoses and stages. METHODS: Electronic medical records of 4931 adults with solid tumors who attended the Taussig Cancer Institute from 2006-2012 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Maximum CRP (mCRP) was identified for each individual. CRP was analysed as a time-dependent, continuous and categorical variable for association with survival. RESULTS: Two thirds of patients had a high mCRP. This was consistently associated with shorter survival, even after correction for time from diagnosis, and when analysed as a continuous or a categorical variable. When mCRP values above 10 mg/L were subcategorized, a higher mCRP was always worse. Even among those with normal values, statistically and clinically significant shorter survival was noted at mCRP levels >5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: In a large representative cohort of consecutive solid tumor patients the risk of death was clinically and statistically significantly greater with a high mCRP. This was independent of other variables and regardless of statistical method from both dates of diagnosis and test. CRP appeared to be underutilized. Our results support the routine use of CRP as a universal cost-effective independent prognostic indicator in most solid tumors.

Precision Oncology in Solid Tumors: A Longitudinal Tertiary Care Center Experience.

PURPOSE: Precision oncology is widely discussed, but cohort studies are limited. We previously reported our prospective experience of precision oncology in solid tumors, and here we report our longitudinal experience, focusing on therapeutic impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 600 consecutive patients seen at Cleveland Clinic from 2013 to 2016 for treatment of incurable solid tumor malignancies for whom tumor genomic profiling was ordered using FoundationOne (Cambridge, MA). Results were discussed at our multidisciplinary genomics tumor board. Data analyzed included subsequent therapy and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median age was 59 years (range, 18 to 94 years), 308 (51.3%) were female, and 533 (88.8%) were white. Targeted therapy was recommended in 310 patients (51.7%). After results, 313 patients (52.2%) started any subsequent therapy; of these, 95 (30%; 15.8% overall) received genomics-driven therapy (G), and 218 (70%) received non-genomics-driven treatment (NG). For the G versus NG group, the on-label, off-label, and clinical trial therapy breakdowns were 23% versus 88%, 47% versus 3%, and 30% versus 9%, respectively. Median OS for patients receiving no therapy after tumor genomic profiling was 5.5 months; for the G and NG groups, it was 18 (P < .001) and 14.4 (P < .001) months, respectively (P = NS for G v NG). The use of G increased from 10% in the first 250-patient cohort (reported earlier) to 20% in the subsequent 350-patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Tumor genomic profiling influenced treatment in 15.8% of patients. More patients received treatment via clinical trials in the G cohort, and although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward increased OS in the G (v NG) group. These data can further guide real-world applications of precision oncology.

Single-Center Comparison of Overall Survival and Toxicities in Patients with Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Yttrium-90 Radioembolization or Drug-Eluting Embolic Transarterial Chemoembolization.

PURPOSE: To compare overall survival and toxicities after yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization and chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolics (DEE) in patients with infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 50 patients with infiltrative HCC without main portal vein invasion who were treated with 90Y radioembolization (n = 26) or DEE chemoembolization (n = 24) between March 2007 and August 2012 was completed. Infiltrative tumors were defined by cross-sectional imaging as masses that lacked well-demarcated boundaries, and treatment allocations were made by a multidisciplinary tumor board. Median age was 63 years; median tumor diameter was 9.0 cm; and there were no significant differences between groups in performance status, severity of liver disease, or HCC stage. Toxicities were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Overall survival from treatment was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, with analysis of potential predictors of survival with log-rank test. RESULTS: There was no difference in the average number of procedures performed in each treatment group (DEE, 1.5 ± 1.1; 90Y, 1.6 ± 0.5; P = .97), and technical success was achieved in all cases. Abdominal pain (73% vs 33%; P = .004) and fever (38% vs 8%; P = .01) were more frequent after DEE chemoembolization. There was no significant difference in median overall survival between treatment groups after treatment (DEE, 9.9 months; 90Y, 8.1 months; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: 90Y radioembolization and DEE chemoembolization provided similar overall survival in the treatment of infiltrative HCC without main portal vein invasion. Abdominal pain and fever were more frequent after DEE chemoembolization.

Analysis of Origins of Admission for Solid Tumor Oncology Inpatients: Disease Severity and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Hospital transfers may affect clinical outcomes. Evaluation of admission by source of transfer, time of admission, and provider type may identify opportunities to improve inpatient outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients admitted to the solid tumor oncology service between July and December 2014 from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF) Main Campus emergency department (ED), CCF Regional EDs, outside hospital (OSH) ED, OSH inpatient services, and CCF outpatient clinics. Data collected included time of admission, mortality and severity risk scores, and provider type. Risk factors were assessed for clinical outcomes, including activations of the Adult Medical Emergency Team, intensive care unit transfers, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Five hundred admissions were included. OSH inpatient transfers had significantly higher disease severity compared with all other origins of admission. OSH inpatient transfers demonstrated significantly longer LOS compared with all other origins of admission, and higher mortality rates compared with the outpatient direct admits and CCF Main Campus ED admits. After adjusting for disease severity and risk of mortality, OSH ED patients remained at higher risk for Adult Medical Emergency Team activation, OSH inpatient transfers had the longest LOS, and CCF Main Campus ED patients had the lowest risk of mortality. Time of admission and provider type were not associated with any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Oncology inpatients transferred from an outside health care facility are at higher risk for adverse outcomes. The magnitude of difference is lessened, but still significant, after adjustment for disease severity and risk of mortality.