Analysing the efficacy of the I-gel supraglottic airway device in the supine and lateral decubitus positions.

BACKGROUND: The advantages of the I-gel supraglottic airway device include ease and speed of insertion, reduced trauma incidence, an integral bite block, gastric access, a non-inflatable cuff and superior seal pressure. The primary goal of this study was to compare airway leak pressures and the fibreoptic view in the supine and lateral positions. Our secondary aim was to analyse the effects of I-gel insertion on haemodynamic parameters. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing saturation biopsy due to prostatic hyperplasia were recruited to this prospective randomised study. An I-gel device was inserted in the supine position. Taking of measurements, patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, peripheral O2 saturation and end-tidal CO2 were recorded before and after insertion. We recorded the number of attempts and insertion time for the I-gel device. Oropharyngeal leak pressures and I-gel device positioning were scored in the lateral decubitus and supine positions. RESULTS: It was possible to insert the I-gel device in 88 patients on the first attempt. The median time for insertion was 7.97 ± 2.18 sec. The mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased 1 and 2 min after insertion. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was similar in the supine (27.45 ± 5.37 mm Hg) and lateral decubitus positions (26.04 ± 4.92 mm Hg) (P > 0.05). On fibreoptic examination through the I-gel device, the scores of patients were comparable in different positions (P = 0.542). CONCLUSION: As there was no significant difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic view, we concluded that the I-gel device may be used safely in both the supine and lateral positions.

Does hyperthermic preconditioning affect the rate of surgical site infection rate and inflammatory reaction in colorectal cancer patients? A prospective randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperthermic preconditioning has been shown to protect against different insults in experimental studies. However, clinical studies assessing its effects remain limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of hyperthermic preconditioning on the rate of surgical site infection and inflammatory reaction in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer, scheduled to undergo elective surgery were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the hyperthermic preconditioning group or control group. Postoperative superficial and deep surgical site infection were recorded. Blood samples were collected from all the patients in the hyperthermic preconditioning group prior to the application of hyperthermia 12 h before surgery, immediately prior to surgery, and 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. For the control group, blood samples were obtained within the same periods without the application of hyperthermia. Levels of interleukin-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α were measured from blood samples. RESULTS: Twenty patients were randomized to the hyperthermic preconditioning group and 21 to the control group. No significant difference was found in deep or superficial surgical site infection between the groups. No significant difference in the tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, and IL-6 levels was found in serum samples collected before hyperthermia, during the operation, and postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that hyperthermic preconditioning has no effect on the surgical site infection and cytokine response in patients undergoing elective surgical intervention for colorectal cancer.

Perioperative Effects of Different Narcotic Analgesics Used to Improve Effectiveness of Total Intravenous Anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the depth of anaesthesia, perioperative haemodynamics, postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption in patients receiving remifentanil- or alfentanil-based total intravenous anaesthesia for single-level lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing discectomy were enrolled in the study. Patients were intravenously administered an initial bolus dose of 2 mg kg(-1) propofol and 10 mcg kg(-1) alfentanil or 1 mcg kg(-1) remifentanil, followed by 6 mg kg(-1) h(-1) propofol and either 1 mcg kg(-1) min(-1) alfentanil or 0.25 mcg kg(-1) min(-1) remifentanil infusion. Bispectral index (BIS) values, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen saturation were recorded. Postoperative pain scores at 0, 30 and 60 min were measured and recorded with additional opioid requirements. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores at 0 and 30 min, total analgesic consumption and requirement for additional analgesics were significantly high in the remifentanil group. After the first hour, the pain scores were not significantly different. Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly low at 45 and 60 min preoperatively in the remifentanil group. In the remifentanil group, heart rate at 15, 30, 45, 60 min were significantly lower than those in the alfentanil group. BIS values of the two groups were not significantly different at any measurement time point. BIS values of remifentanil group at 30, 45, 60, 90 and 180 min significantly increased compared with those at 15 min. CONCLUSION: Alfentanil provided more stable BIS and haemodynamic values preoperatively and less opioid consumption, along with lower pain scores, during the early postoperative period compared with remifentanil in patients undergoing single-level discectomy.

Comparison of neostigmine and sugammadex for hemodynamic parameters in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of neostigmine-atropine combination and sugammadex in patients with cardiac problems undergoing noncardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: In the operating room. PATIENTS: Ninety patients with a class 2 or 3 cardiovascular disease according to the New York Heart Association classification and aged between 18 and 75 years undergoing noncardiac surgery were randomized. INTERVENTIONS: Group N (n = 45) received 0.03 mg/kg IV neostigmine when T2 appeared as measured with a nerve muscle stimulator. When heart rate was 5 beats/min (±10 beats/min) lower than the heart rate before administration of the medication, 0.5 mg IV atropine sulfate was given. Group S (n = 45) received 3 mg/kg IV sugammadex when T2 appeared as measured with a nerve muscle stimulator. MEASUREMENTS: Heart rate, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and electrocardiographic alterations including the QTc (QT Fredericia and QT Bazett) were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences between and within the groups in terms of QTc values. Sugammadex group had a significant decrease on heart rate 1 minute after the medication when compared to the measurement before the medication (P < .05). Heart rate and systolic blood pressure increased in neostigmine group 3 minutes after the medication and during postoperative measurements (P < .05). Sugammadex group had lower systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures and heart rate when compared to neostigmine group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that sugammadex might be preferred as it provides more hemodynamic stability compared to neostigmine-atropine combination to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockage in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

The effects of preoperative oral pregabalin and perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative morphine requirement in patients undergoing laparatomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the effects of preoperative oral pregabalin and perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative morphine requirement, adverse effects, patients' satisfaction, mobilization, time to first defecation and time to discharge in patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS: Eighty patients (18 to 65 years of age) undergoing elective laparotomy were randomly divided into four groups (n=20 in each group): group C, placebo capsules and normal saline infusion perioperatively (control); group L, placebo capsules and lidocaine 1 mg/kg intravenous bolus dose followed by 2 mg/kg/h infusion until skin closure; group P, 150 mg oral pregabalin and normal saline infusion perioperatively; and group PL, 150 mg oral pregabalin and lidocaine 2 mg/kg/h infusion until skin closure. Hemodynamic parameters, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, analgesic consumption, side effects, time to mobilization, time to first defecation, time to discharge and patients' satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: VAS scores of group L, group P and group PL were lower than group C (P<0.05). Morphine consumption of group P and group PL was lower than group C (P<0.05). Incidence of nausea in group C was higher than group L and group PL. Time to first defecation and mobilization were shorter in group L and group PL compared with group C (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative oral pregabalin and perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion decreased postoperative VAS scores. Preoperative oral pregabalin decreased morphine requirement and perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion hastened gastrointestinal motility and mobilization, and decreased the incidence of nausea in patients undergoing laparotomy. Therefore, preoperative pregabalin with or without lidocaine provides superior pain relief in patients undergoing laparatomy.

Does perioperative opioid infusion increase postoperative opioid requirement?

OBJECTIVES: Opioids are the cornerstone therapy for the optimal pain management. Perioperative opioid infusion is accused of causing acute opioid tolerance, especially as the postoperative opioid requirement increases in time to provide efficient analgesia. It is debatable whether there is a difference between opioid agents regarding tolerance development. We aim to compare the effects of morphine, remifentanil and alfentanil when infused intravenously during the perioperative period. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomized into four groups. The four groups obtained the following treatments: saline 5 cc iv bolus and 10 cc/h infusion for induction and maintenance in Group C, remifentanil infusion 0.25 µg/kg/min following 1 µg/kg iv bolus in Group R, alfentanil infusion 0.50 µg/kg/min following 10 µg/kg iv bolus in Group A, and morphine infusion 0.02 mg/kg/h after 0.1 mg/kg iv bolus in Group M. Meperidine 10 mg/cc iv patient-controlled analgesia was used postoperatively, and total meperidine consumptions were recorded. VAS scores and side effects were recorded during postoperative 48 hours. RESULTS: VAS scores in Group M were found to be significantly lower than in Group C at the 1st postoperative hour. Twenty-four hour total meperidine consumption in Group R and Group M were significantly lower than in Group C. No statistical difference was found between groups regarding the incidence of nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that infusions of morphine, alfentanil and remifentanil administered to patients undergoing major abdominal surgery did not cause acute opioid tolerance. In contrast, infusion of morphine and remifentanil reduced postoperative opioid requirement.

The Effects of Desflurane and Propofol on the Release of Thyroid Hormones in Euthyroid Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Discectomy.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of desflurane and propofol on the release of thyroid hormones in euthyroid patients undergoing single-level lumbar discectomy. METHODS: The study group included 21-65-year-old American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I-II euthyroid 40 patients undergoing elective single-level lumbar discectomy. They were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20). In the maintenance of anaesthesia, Group D received desflurane inhalational anaesthesia and remifentanil infusion, and Group P received propofol and remifentanil IV infusions. Four blood samples for the determination of plasma levels of free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyrotropin (TSH) were collected 5 min before and 60 min after the induction of anaesthesia and 60 min and 24 h after the surgery. RESULTS: Plasma TSH levels in both groups reached the highest levels at the first postoperative hour and returned to the preoperative levels 24 hours after the surgery. Regarding plasma FT3 levels, there were no significant differences within and between groups. There were no significant differences in plasma FT4 levels within the patients of Group P, but in Group D, FT4 levels reached its peak in the first hour of anaesthesia induction and returned back to preoperative levels 24 hours postoperatively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate patients with thyroid gland pathologies.

Effects of Esmolol on the Prevention of Haemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Extubation after Craniotomy Operations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of esmolol infusion on the prevention of haemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. METHODS: With approval from the Medical School Ethics Committee at Marmara University and the patients' written consent, 30 patients between 20-65 years of age undergoing elective craniotomy were randomly placed in either the Group Esmolol (n=15) or the Group Control (n=15). Anaesthesia was induced with 5-7 mg kg(-1) thiopental sodium, 1 µg kg(-1) remifentanil, and 0.1 mg kg(-1) vecuronium bromide iv, and was maintained with 1 MAC sevoflurane in oxygen-air mixture (50:50) and 0.25 µg kg(-1) min(-1) remifentanil infusion. At the end of the operation, patients inhaled 100% oxygen after the discontinuation of the anaesthetic agents. For Group Esmolol, 5 min before extubation 2 mg kg(-1) esmolol in 50 mL was infused over 10 min (0.2 µg kg(-1) min(-1)), while for Group Control, 50 mL saline was infused over 10 min. The quality of extubation was evaluated with a 5 point scale, recording heat rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures before infusion, 1 min after infusion, during extubation, and at 1, 3, 5, and 10 min after extubation. RESULTS: In the esmolol group, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, as well as heart rate, decreased significantly after esmolol infusion and were significantly lower than in the control group after extubation (p<0.05). The ratio of patients with an extubation score of one was significantly higher in the esmolol group than in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We concluded that 2 mg kg(-1) esmolol infusion before extubation can prevent hypertension and tachycardia caused by extubation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy.

Does the Method and Timing of Intravenous Ketamine Administration Affect Postoperative Morphine Requirement After Major Abdominal Surgery?

OBJECTIVE: Single intravenous bolus administration and postoperative or perioperative infusions are the most preferred methods of ketamine. Nevertheless, there is no clear explanation on the ideal ketamine administration method. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of the most common ketamine administration methods and administration time on postoperative opioid consumption. METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing colectomy for colon cancer were randomly assigned into four groups. Group 1 was the control group. Group 2 received only a single intravenous bolus dose of 0.5 mg kg(-1) ketamine at induction. Group 3 received 0.5 mg kg(-1) intravenous ketamine bolus at induction and perioperative ketamine infusion at a rate of 0.25 mg kg(-1) h(-1). Group 4 received a bolus of 0.5 mg kg(-1) intravenous ketamine at induction and perioperative and postoperative ketamine infusion at a rate of 0.25 mg kg(-1) h(-1). Postoperatively, visual analogue scale pain scores, side effects, and morphine consumption were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain scores. Total morphine consumption was found to be significantly lower in Group 4 compared to the other groups (p=0.03, p=0.004, p=0.03, respectively). During the 1(st), 2(nd), and 4(th) hours in the postoperative period, patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption was significantly lower in Group 4 compared to the control group (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Preoperative single-bolus dose or intraoperative low-dose ketamine infusion does not decrease postoperative morphine consumption; however, per- and postoperative 48-hour ketamine infusion has a significant effect in decreasing morphine consumption without decreasing the incidence of side effects in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation.

BACKGROUND: It is still controversial which laryngoscope may be a better option in unanticipated difficult airway in pediatric patients. The aim of the present study was to compare two direct and two video-assisted laryngoscope devices for the management of difficult pediatric airway. METHODS: Forty-five anesthesiology residents and nurse anesthetists participated in the study. Macintosh, Miller, Storz Miller, and McGrath Mac curved laryngoscopes were used for tracheal intubation of 3-6-month Airsim Pierre Robin manikin. We compared the duration of successful intubation, number of attempts, glottic view grades, severity of dental trauma, the use of optimization maneuvers, and the difficulty of use of the devices with straight and curved laryngoscope blades. RESULTS: Successful intubation duration was significantly lower in Storz Miller device, and the number of intubation attempts was significantly higher in the Macintosh laryngoscope (P < 0.01). According to the Cormack and Lehane classification, Grades 1 and 2 glottic view was 20% for Macintosh and 40% for Miller laryngoscope, while it was 100% for Storz Miller and 80% for McGrath (P < 0.001). Difficulty VAS scores of Storz Miller device were significantly lower than the scores of Macintosh, Miller, and McGrath laryngoscopes (15.7 ± 14.89, 34.7 ± 26.44, 31.5 ± 26.74, 33.4 ± 26.67 mm, respectively; P < 0.01). The severity of dental trauma was significantly lower in Storz Miller compared with Macintosh, Miller, and McGrath laryngoscopes (0.96 ± 1.04, 1.67 ± 1.15, 1.38 ± 1.05, 1.42 ± 1.27, respectively; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Storz Miller laryngoscope was found to have advantages over the other laryngoscopes in regard to glottic view, duration of successful intubation, number of attempts, dental trauma severity, need for additional maneuvers, and ease of use.

Airtraq optical laryngoscope: advantages and disadvantages.

Difficult or unsuccesful tracheal intubation is one of the important causes for morbidity and mortality in susceptible patients. Almost 30% of the anesthesia-related deaths are induced by the complications of difficult airway management and more than 85% of all respiratory related complications cause brain injury or death. Nowadays, due to the advances in technology, new videolaryngoscopic devices became available. Airtraq is a novel single-use laryngoscope which provides glottis display without any deviation in the normal position of the oral, pharyngeal or the tracheal axes. With the help of the display lens glottis and the surrounding structures are visualised and under direct view of its tip the tracheal tube is introduced between the vocal cords. In patients having restricted neck motion or limited mouth opening (provided that it is greater than 3 cm) Airtraq offers the advantage of a better display. Moreover the video image can be transfered to an external monitor thus an experienced specialist can provide assistance and an educational course can be conducted simultaneously. On the other hand the Airtraq videolaryngoscopic devices possess certain disadvantages including the need of experience and the time demand for the operator to learn how to use them properly, the rapid deterioration of their display in the presence of a swelling or a secretion and the fact that they are rather complicated and expensive devices. The Airtraq device has already documented benefits in the management of difficult airways, however serial utilization obviously necessitates experience.

Neuraxial block versus general anaesthesia for cesarean section: post-operative pain scores and analgesic requirements.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the suitability of spinal and general anaesthesia for cesarean section. METHODS: The prospective, double-blinded study, done between March and December 2009, at Central Education and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey, involved 60 patients undergoing elective cesarean surgery. They were grouped according to the kind of anaesthesia, with each group having 30 patients each. Postoperative pain scores, opioid requirement, side effects and patient satisfaction were compared through statistical analysis using SPSS version 10. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in both groups. Patients in the general anaesthesia group consumed 638.4 +/- 179.10 microg fentanyl, while patients in the spinal anaesthesia group consumed 356.3 +/- 87.1 microg. The number of patients requiring opioid via Patient Controlled Analgesia in the first 24 hours was significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the spinal anaesthesia group. CONCLUSION: Type of anaesthesia for elective cesarean section is important to provide sufficient post-operative analgesia and patient satisfaction.

Comparative study of fentanyl and morphine in addition to hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine in combined spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to compare the effects of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with morphine or fentanyl in patients undergoing caesarean section. We assessed quality and spread of analgesia and anaesthesia, postoperative analgesic requirement and side effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hundred patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-II, age 18 to 40 years, were randomized to 4 groups. The intrathecal solutions were isobaric bupivacaine + morphine (group A), isobaric bupivacaine + fentanyl (group B), heavy bupivacaine + + morphine (group C) and heavy bupivacaine + fentanyl (group D). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, ephedrine consumption, analgesic requirement time and additional analgesic needs were recorded. RESULTS: The 1(st) min value of mean arterial pressure was the lowest one in all groups. Heart rate decreased significantly in group A at the 10(th) min but not in the other groups. The decrease of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores began in the groups after the 4(th) postoperative h (p < 0.05) and the VAS value of group B at the 8(th) h was significantly higher than the other groups. The first analgesic requirement time in the postoperative period was longer in patients who had intrathecal morphine than those who had fentanyl. The duration of analgesia with isobaric bupivacaine and morphine was the longest one. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that intrathecal morphine provides a long duration of postoperative analgesia but the duration gets longer when it is combined with plain bupivacaine instead of heavy bupivacaine.

Factors related to post-treatment chronic pain in breast cancer survivors: the interference of pain with life functions.

The frequency and the intensity of chronic pain, as well as the related factors, were assessed in a cohort of breast cancer patients. The life functions were also questioned in patients who have post-treatment chronic pain. The scope of this retrospective study was a cohort of surgically-treated breast cancer patients with unilateral early stage disease who were under regular follow-up. Patients were eligible if they completed their treatments at least 6 months before and were free of disease. Patients who had a previous history of chronic pain syndrome, chronic debilitating disease, psychiatric diagnosis, and other cancers were excluded. All data regarding their demographics and treatments were recorded. Chronic pain was defined as the pain at treatment-related regions for a duration of at least three months after completion of treatment. Turkish version of "Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)" was given to the patients with chronic pain in order to assess their pain intensity and life functions. The factors related to chronic pain were compared between patients with and without chronic pain. Eighty-five eligible female patients were included in the study. Thirty-nine (46%) patients declared that they had chronic pain. The mean VAS scale score was 4.1 +/- 2.4 cm in these patients. The mean age of patients with chronic pain (54.3 +/- 12.6 years) was significantly less than that of the ones without pain (60.4 +/- 13.6 years; p = 0.035). Radiotherapy was found to be significantly related to chronic pain (p=0.049; OR: 2.60; 95% CI 1.07-6.30). The VAS scores were 1.5 +/- 2.7 cm, 1.9 +/- 3.2 cm, 1.3 +/- 2.7 cm, 0.9 +/- 2.5 cm for general activity, mood, relations with other people, and sleep, respectively. Although almost half of the early stage breast cancer patients experienced post-treatment chronic pain, they rated the intensity of their pain as mild to moderate. Younger age and receiving radiotherapy were found to be significant contributing factors. The interference of post-treatment chronic pain with life functions was small. Overall, mood was found to be the most affected life function among all.

Does bilateral superficial cervical plexus block decrease analgesic requirement after thyroid surgery?

In this randomized, double-blind and controlled study we evaluated and compared the analgesic efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus block and local anesthetic wound infiltration after thyroid surgery. Forty-five patients were assigned to 3 groups. After general anesthesia induction, bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with 0.25% bupivacaine 15 mL in each side was performed in Group I, and local anesthetic wound infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL was performed in Group II. In Group III (control) no regional block was administered. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia was used to evaluate postoperative analgesic requirement. Neither visual analog scale scores nor total patient-controlled analgesia doses were different among groups. We concluded that bilateral superficial cervical plexus block or local anesthetic wound infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine did not decrease analgesic requirement after thyroid surgery.

[The comparison of the effects and side effects of local anesthetic and opioid combinations in epidural patient controlled analgesia]. / Epidural hasta kontrollü analjezi yönteminde lokal anestezik -- opioid birlikteliginin etkinlik ve yan etkilerinin arastirilmasi.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and side effects of local anesthetic and opioid combinations in 457 patients who have received epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA). Hemodynamic parameters, numeric rating scale, sedation scores, the degree of motor and sensory blockage, the presence of side effects, the parameters of PCA device were recorded from the postoperative pain records. 253 patients received 0.1 % bupivacaine + 3 microg/ml fentanyl (Group B1F3), 80 patients received 0.125 % bupivacaine + 3 microg/ml fentanyl (Group B12F3), 43 patients received 0.125 % bupivacaine + 4 microg/ml fentanyl (Group B12F4), 46 patients received 0.1 % bupivacaine + 0.1 mg/ml morphine (Group B1M1) and 35 patients received 0.125 % bupivacaine + 0.1 mg/ml morphine (Group B12M1). Nausea was significantly higher in group B1M1 compared to B12F3, in group B12M1 compared to B1F3 and B12F3 (p<0.05), vomiting was significantly higher in group B1M1 and B12M1 (p<0.05) compared to B12F3, pruritus was significantly higher in group B12F4 compared to B12F3 and B1F3, in group B1M1 compared to B1F3 and B12F3 and in group B12M1 compared to B1F3 and B12F3 (p<0.05). As a result, in EPCA, the combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl provides as effective analgesia as the combination of bupivacaine and morphine and 3 mg/ml fentanyl admixture may be preferred with less side effects such as nausea, vomiting and pruritus.

The analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of subcutaneous bupivacaine, morphine and tramadol in rats.

The analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of subcutaneously administered bupivacaine, morphine and tramadol on formalin-induced inflammation were compared. 0.25 % bupivacaine in Group B, 20 mg/kg tramadol in Group T, 1 mg/kg morphine in Group M and 0.9 % NaCl in Group S in a volume of 200 micro l were injected into the right hind paw of the rats (n: 40) 15 minutes before injection of 50 micro l 5 % formalin. Sedation and pain behaviour scores, number of flinches and licking-time were recorded. The degree of dermal edema, intraneural edema, vasodilation, erythrodiapedesis, infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocyte/lymphocyte and mast cell counts were analyzed histopathologically. In Group T and B, circumferential changes were lower than in Group M and S. The pain behaviour scores were significantly lower in Group T and B. The number of flinches in Group T was lower than Group B and S. The vasodilation was significant only in Group M. The dermal edema was limited to deep dermis only in Group T. Preinflammational subcutaneous tramadol infiltration can provide effective analgesia and may have anti-inflammatory effects.

Analgesia for adenotonsillectomy in children: a comparison of morphine, ketamine and tramadol.

BACKGROUND: Establishment of good analgesia is of major concern in the postoperative period following adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine, morphine and tramadol on postoperative pain after adenotonsillectomy in children. METHODS: Sixty children (age 5-12 years) scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomized into four groups to receive intravenously (i.v.) either 0.5 mg.kg(-1) ketamine hydrochloride (K), 0.1 mg x kg(-1) morphine hydrochloride (M), 1.5 mg x kg(-1) tramadol hydrochloride (T) or normal saline (S) in a volume of 4 ml during induction. After tracheal intubation 10 microg x kg(-1).min(-1) ketamine hydrochloride in group K and 0.6 ml x kg(-1) x h(-1) saline i.v. in groups M, K and S were infused peroperatively. Postoperative analgesic requirements and side-effects were recorded. Pain was assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) scores. RESULTS: Heart rate increased significantly peroperatively only in group K. NRS at first and fifth minute in group M and at first minute in group T and K and CHEOPS score at first, fifth, 15th and 60th min in group M were found to be significantly lower than in the control group. The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group M compared with ketamine and the control group. Six children in group M, nine in group T, 11 in group K and 15 in group S needed additional analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Morphine hydrochloride 0.1 mg x kg(-1) i.v. administered during induction of anaesthesia provides efficient pain relief in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

Histopathologic effects of lipid content of enteral solutions after pulmonary aspiration in rats.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the pulmonary histopathologic effects of different enteral formulas with various lipid contents during the subacute period of aspiration in rats. METHODS: Fifty Wistar albino rats, weighing 180 to 300 g, were randomly assigned to one of five groups (n = 10). Anesthesia was induced with an intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride, rats were intubated endotracheally with a 16-gauge angiocatheter, and 0.9% saline (group 1, control), Impact (group 2), Jevity (group 3), Biosorb Energy Plus (group 4), or Pulmocare (group 5) with a lipid content of 0, 28, 39.3, 58, or 93.3 g/L, respectively, was injected into the lungs in a volume of 3 mL/kg. Seven days later, rats were killed, and lungs with trachea were removed en bloc for histopathologic examination. For histopathologic assessment, slides were examined for the presence of peribronchial inflammatory cell infiltration, alveolar septal infiltration, alveolar edema, alveolar exudate, alveolar histiocytes, interstitial fibrosis, granuloma, and necrosis formation. The degree of severity was assessed by using a 4-point scale. One-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Peribronchial inflammatory cell infiltration was present in all groups but was significantly more severe in group 2 than in groups 1, 4, and 5 (P < 0.05). Alveolar edema was statistically higher in group 2 than in group 1 (P < 0.05). Alveolar septal infiltration was statistically higher in group 4 than in group 1. Alveolar histiocytes were statistically higher in groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.01) and groups 4 and 5 (P < 0.05) than in group 1. Alveolar exudate, interstitial fibrosis, granuloma, and necrosis formation were absent in all groups. CONCLUSION: The pulmonary histopathologic effects of aspiration of Impact were severe peribronchial inflammatory cell infiltration (greater than aspiration of Biosorb and Pulmocare), abundant alveolar histiocytes, and alveolar edema in comparison with aspiration of saline, even though Impact had the lowest lipid content of all studied formulas. We concluded that the tissue damage occurring after pulmonary aspiration of Impact is more severe than after aspiration of Pulmocare.