Measurement of recombinant porcine factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors in the presence of emicizumab.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) is a treatment option for break-through bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAwI) on emicizumab. However, there are limited data about the measurement of rpFVIII in the presence of emicizumab. AIM: To analyse whether rpFVIII can be measured with a chromogenic assay with bovine component (bCSA) in plasma from CHAwI on emicizumab treatment. METHODS: In the first part of the study, FVIII deficient plasma was spiked with rpFVIII, in the second part, commercial plasma from CHAwI was spiked with emicizumab and rpFVIII, and in the third part, plasma from CHAwI on emicizumab treatment was spiked with rpFVIII. FVIII was then measured with bCSA and a chromogenic assay with human component (hCSA). Thrombin generation (TG) and clot-waveform analysis (CWA) were also carried out. RESULTS: The recovery of rpFVIII measured with bCSA is approximately 80% and is further influenced by the presence of an anti-porcine inhibitor. rpFVIII assessed with hCSA was influenced by emicizumab. CWA and TG showed a weak correlation with baseline emicizumab concentration, but peak thrombin and CWA correlated well with increasing emicizumab concentrations and rpFVIII activities. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that rpFVIII can be measured in the presence of emicizumab with a bCSA. A calibration curve for the measurement of rpFVIII with bCSA should be established.

Real-world data in patients with congenital hemophilia and inhibitors: final data from the FEIBA Global Outcome (FEIBA GO) study.

Background: The bypassing agent, activated prothrombin complex concentrate [aPCC, FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity); Baxalta US Inc, a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA], is indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes, perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. In certain countries, aPCC is also indicated for the treatment of bleeding episodes and perioperative management in patients with acquired hemophilia A. Objectives: To describe long-term, real-world effectiveness, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with congenital hemophilia A or B and high-responding inhibitors receiving aPCC treatment in routine clinical practice. Design: FEIBA Global Outcome (FEIBA GO; EUPAS6691) was a prospective, observational study. Methods: Investigators determined the treatment regimen and clinical monitoring frequency. The planned patient observation period was 4 years. Data are from the safety analysis set (patients who received ⩾1 aPCC infusion). Results: Overall, 50 patients received either aPCC prophylaxis (n = 37) or on-demand therapy (n = 13) at screening [hemophilia A, n = 49; hemophilia B, n = 1; median (range) age, 16.5 [2-71] years). Mean ±â€„standard deviation overall annualized bleeding rate and annualized joint bleeding rate for patients receiving prophylaxis were 6.82 ± 11.52 and 3.77 ± 5.71, respectively, and for patients receiving on-demand therapy were 10.94 ± 11.27 and 6.94 ± 7.39, respectively. Overall, 177 and 31 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 28 of 40 and 10 of 13 patients receiving prophylaxis or on-demand therapy, respectively. Two serious AEs were considered possibly related to aPCC: acute myocardial infarction due to coronary artery embolism in one patient receiving prophylaxis. No thrombotic microangiopathy was reported. No AEs resulted in death. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the long-term, real-world effectiveness and consistent safety profile of aPCC as on-demand therapy and prophylactic treatment in patients with hemophilia and high-responding inhibitors. Trial registry: FEIBA Global Outcome Study; EUPAS6691 https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=32774.

octanate®: over 20 years of clinical experience in overcoming challenges in haemophilia A treatment.

Treatment of haemophilia A with FVIII replacement has evolved over the past decades to adapt to the needs of patients. octanate®, a plasma-derived, double virus-inactivated, von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing FVIII concentrate, has been used in clinics worldwide for over 20 years. First licensed in 1998 in Germany, octanate® is approved in over 80 countries for the prevention and treatment of bleeding and for surgical prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A, and in over 40 countries for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The manufacturing process for octanate® was developed to ensure high viral safety and effectively eliminates both enveloped and nonenveloped viruses. Over the past 20 years, the excellent safety and efficacy of octanate® have been demonstrated in pivotal clinical trials in adult and paediatric previously treated patients (PTPs) for on-demand treatment, prophylaxis and as surgical cover. Importantly, octanate® has displayed low immunogenicity in previously untreated patients (PUPs), with only 9.8% of PUPs developing FVIII inhibitors. octanate® has also shown to be highly effective in inhibitor elimination when used as ITI therapy. In a population of patients with high risk of ITI failure, success was achieved in 79.2% of patients (70.8% complete success), even when using exceptionally stringent success criteria. No relapses were observed. Here we present an overview of the clinical data with octanate® that support its use in a range of patient populations and clinical indications.

Inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A.

Inhibitor development is the most problematic and costly complication of haemophilia treatment. Inhibitor development depends on a complex multifactorial immune response that is influenced by patient- and treatment-related factors. Considerable research is focussed on inhibitor development as well as the mechanism of eradication through immune tolerance induction (ITI). Once an inhibitor develops, two general treatment options are available: to treat acute bleeds through bypassing agents, and to eradicate the inhibitor permanently through ITI. Previously untreated haemophilia A patients (PUPs) are at greatest risk of inhibitor development within the first 20 exposure days to factor VIII (FVIII). Inhibitor incidence in PUP studies ranges from 0% to as high as 52%. Plasma-derived FVIII concentrates have repeatedly been shown in cohort studies to be associated with a decreased inhibitor risk compared with recombinant FVIII concentrates, but results from randomized clinical trials are lacking; although one such trial is ongoing (SIPPET study). The occurrence of an inhibitor represents a major hardship for the patient and his family, and can result in high morbidity and a significant reduction in quality of life. Inhibitor eradication often requires the need for demanding and expensive treatment strategies aimed at inducing immune tolerance or bypassing the inhibitor. The role of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in immunoprotection is currently under review. The high-purity, pasteurized, plasma-derived FVIII concentrate, Beriate(®), contains sufficient amounts of VWF to not only bind all FVIII molecules but also provide additional FVIII binding sites, and may have additional beneficial effects that reduce the general immunogenicity of FVIII.

Influence of factor 5 rs6025 and factor 2 rs1799963 mutation on inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A--an Israeli-German multicenter database study.

OBJECTIVE: The present cohort study was performed to investigate the impact of the factor 5 rs6025 [F5] and the factor 2 rs1799963 [F2] mutations on high-titer inhibitor development [HRI] in patients with severe/moderate-severe hemophilia A [HA]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 216 patients with F8<2% born between 1980 and 2011 were followed after initial HA diagnosis over the first 200 exposure days. The first HA patient per family who presented for diagnosis was included in the present study. RESULTS: 32 of 216 children [14.8%] tested for F5/F2 carried either the F5 or the F2 variant. HRI occurred in 14 out of 32F5/F2-carriers compared with 40 of 184 without F5/F2. Multivariate analysis adjusted for F8 genotype, treatment intensity, first-line use of plasma derived FVIII versus recombinant FVIII concentrates revealed that the presence of F5/F2 independently increases the risk of HRI development to odds [OR] of 3.4. Large deletions in the F8 gene [OR: 5.10], patients from Israel [OR: 4.0], the increase of FVIII per one IU/kgbw [OR: 1.05] and birth year [OR: 1.12] were significantly associated with the risk to develop HRI. CONCLUSION: Data presented here suggest that HRI development is of multifactorial origin and that F5 and F2 mutations may contribute to this risk.

Effects of the factor V G1691A mutation and the factor II G20210A variant on the clinical expression of severe hemophilia A in children--results of a multicenter studys.

The present multicenter cohort study of 107 pediatric PUPs was performed to determine whether the concomitant inheritance of the factor (F) V G1691A or the F II G20210A mutation influences the clinical expression of severe hemophilia A (HA). Carriers of the FV and FII mutations had a significantly lower annual bleeding frequency (ABF) than non-carriers (p=0.012). Joint damage (Pettersson score) was significantly less severe in patients with thrombophilia (p=0.022). A protective effect of thrombophilic risk factors was shown for ABF (OR [CIs]: 0.7[0.5-0.9]; p=0.02) and the severity of the hemophilic arthropathy (OR [CIs]: 0.06[0.01-0.3]; p=0.0009).

Role of von Willebrand factor in immune tolerance induction.

Patients with hemophilia who develop inhibitors present a particular challenge in therapeutic management. Although such patients are at high risk for severe bleeding episodes, the optimal treatment approach--prophylaxis--is ineffective unless inhibitors are eliminated. Several protocols for immune tolerance induction have been used. Success rates may vary depending both on patient variables and on factors related to the therapeutic regimen, including concentrate purity and von Willebrand factor (VWF) content. Several in vitro studies testing inhibitor plasma samples against various factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates have shown lower FVIII inhibitor titer compared with concentrates with greater VWF content. Recent in vivo observations also support the importance of VWF content, based on evidence of reduced rates of success of immune tolerance induction with use of the high-purity FVIII products that became available in the early 1990s. Current data thus support use of FVIII concentrates containing VWF in immune tolerance induction; other variables may also contribute to the relative success of this treatment. Studies are needed to delineate these variables in order to improve management of this potentially devastating complication of hemophilia treatment.

Long-term aspects of hemophilia B treatment: part I-role for prophylaxis.

This paper reviews hemophilia prophylaxis in terms of patient selection for this approach, when to start treatment, and choosing therapy. Both primary and secondary prophylaxis have been shown to reduce the frequency of joint bleeds and improve physical and social functioning for children and adults with hemophilia, although only primary prophylaxis has been shown effective in preventing progression of arthropathy. Limited data are available on hemophilia B prophylaxis; target outcomes have been poorly defined and quality-of-life information is lacking in these patients, partly due to the need for standardized assessment tools.

Epidemiology of inhibitors and current treatment strategies.

The development of inhibitors is currently one of the most serious complications in the treatment of hemophilic children. Prospective studies of previously untreated patients (PUP) showed that up to 52% of patients with severe hemophilia A developed inhibitors during the first 50 exposure days (ED) (>100 for outliers). Inhibitor development is influenced by the type of hemophilia, the severity and the type of mutation. No significant differences in inhibitor incidence were found in prospective studies conducted with plasma-derived or recombinant products. However, no comparative study has been finished yet. A still ongoing prospective, multi-center PUP-study initiated by the German, Austrian and the Swiss Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH) foresees the direct comparison of different types of concentrates with regard to inhibitor development. Preliminary results (update February 2002) show a slightly higher inhibitor development (p=0.08) in severely affected hemophilia A patients treated with recombinant factor (F) VIII concentrates. However, the groups are very small and statistically reliable statements cannot be made at the moment. In case of inhibitor development rapid inhibitor elimination and immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the preferred way to reduce the high risk of bleeding episodes. In this respect, various therapeutic regimens, such as the administration of high doses of FVIII twice daily (Bonn protocol), or lower doses three times weekly (van Creveld protocol), have been attempted. Elimination of inhibitors from plasma by immune adsorption followed by immune suppression (Malmö protocol) has also been used. The influence of the type of concentrate used for ITI has never been investigated comparatively. A longitudinal study of ITI at our center showed a significantly decreased success rate since the introduction of high purity plasma derived and recombinant FVIII products using the Bonn protocol. In inhibitor patients who showed an unsatisfactory response to treatment with FVIII concentrates with very little or no VWF the change to concentrates containing high amounts of von Willebrand factor (VWF) increased success rates up to 90%. These observations raise the question of whether VWF plays an important role in the induction of immune tolerance.

Inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: a prospective long-term follow-up comparing plasma-derived and recombinant products.

In order to assess inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe (factor VIII [FVIII]<1%) and moderate (FVIII 1 to 5%) hemophilia A, a prospective study was initiated in 1976. During the 23-year study period, 72 hemophiliacs were frequently exposed prophylactically or on demand to plasma-derived (pd) (n = 51) or recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) (n = 21) concentrates (median 270 exposure days [ED]). Inhibitor testing was performed before the first exposure and at regular intervals thereafter. Of the 72 hemophilia A patients, 22 (32%) developed an inhibitor after 15 ED in median (range 4 to 195); 17 (77%) were high responders (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]), and the remaining 5 patients (23%) were low responders (>0.6 to 5 BU). The severely affected patients (n = 46) showed a significantly higher frequency of inhibitor formation (43%) than did the moderate ones (8%). Comparing the severely affected patients receiving pd products exclusively (n = 35) with those treated with recombinant concentrate (n = 11), 37% of the pd group developed a high-titer inhibitor (>5 BU, median 290 ED in noninhibitor patients) and 36% of the recombinant group (median 49 ED in the noninhibitor patients). However, the exposure status of the recombinant noninhibitor patients is rather low and therefore remains a high risk of developing further inhibitors in the future. The mutation type profile revealed no difference between the pd- and the recombinant-treated patients.