Contemporary Management of Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: There were gaps between guidelines and practice when surgery was the only treatment for aortic stenosis (AS). OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the decision to intervene in patients with severe AS in the EORP VHD (EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease) II survey. METHODS: Among 2,152 patients with severe AS, 1,271 patients with high-gradient AS who were symptomatic fulfilled a Class I recommendation for intervention according to the 2012 European Society of Cardiology guidelines; the primary end point was the decision for intervention. RESULTS: A decision not to intervene was taken in 262 patients (20.6%). In multivariate analysis, the decision not to intervene was associated with older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34 per 10-year increase; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.61; P = 0.002), New York Heart Association functional classes I and II versus III (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.30; P = 0.005), higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR: 1.09 per 1-point increase; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.17; P = 0.03), and a lower transaortic mean gradient (OR: 0.81 per 10-mm Hg decrease; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.92; P < 0.001). During the study period, 346 patients (40.2%, median age 84 years, median EuroSCORE II [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II] 3.1%) underwent transcatheter intervention and 515 (59.8%, median age 69 years, median EuroSCORE II 1.5%) underwent surgery. A decision not to intervene versus intervention was associated with lower 6-month survival (87.4%; 95% CI: 82.0 to 91.3 vs 94.6%; 95% CI: 92.8 to 95.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A decision not to intervene was taken in 1 in 5 patients with severe symptomatic AS despite a Class I recommendation for intervention and the decision was particularly associated with older age and combined comorbidities. Transcatheter intervention was extensively used in octogenarians.

Prognostic Value of Peak Exercise Systolic Pulmonary Arterial Pressure in Asymptomatic Primary Mitral Valve Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of exercise echocardiography in primary asymptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) remains debated. The aim of this study was to gain evidence regarding its usefulness in this setting and to investigate the prognostic value of peak exercise systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP). METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven patients (mean age, 56 ± 13 years; 69% men) with moderate to severe (grade 3+) or severe (grade 4+) degenerative MR and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, in sinus rhythm, referred for clinically indicated exercise echocardiography were identified. The end point, MR-related events, was a composite of all-cause death or occurrence of symptoms, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction < 60%, left ventricular end-systolic diameter ≥ 45 mm, or resting SPAP > 50 mm Hg. RESULTS: At rest, effective regurgitant orifice area was 48 ± 16 mm2, regurgitant volume 74 ± 26 mL, and SPAP 32 ± 7 mm Hg, and MR was severe in 138 patients (78%). Peak exercise SPAP was 55 ± 10 mm Hg. Positive results on exercise testing motivated surgery in 26 patients, 11 underwent prophylactic surgery, 10 were lost to follow-up, and 130 were included in the outcome analysis. During a follow-up period of 19 ± 7 months, 31 MR-related events (24%) were reported. Peak exercise SPAP was predictive of outcomes in univariate analysis (P = .01) and after adjustment for age, gender, MR severity, and resting SPAP (P < .05). Peak exercise SPAP ≥ 50 mm Hg was associated with worse event-free survival (hazard ratio, 5.24; 95% CI, 1.77-15.53; P = .003), but not the threshold of ≥60 mm Hg proposed in previous guidelines (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.71-4.03; P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings support the use of exercise echocardiography for risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic primary MR and suggest a lower peak exercise SPAP threshold (50 mm Hg) than previously recommended to define the timing of intervention. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Effectiveness of Rescue Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Acute Heart Failure.

The prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or refractory pulmonary edema because of severe aortic stenosis remains poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of rescue percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (PBAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era. Patients were consecutively included between 2008 and 2016. CS was defined as ≥1 sign of systemic hypoperfusion and need of catecholamines. Refractory pulmonary edema was defined as not controlled by optimal medical treatment. A total of 40 patients, 22 men (55%), aged 79 ± 9 years, were included: 17 with CS (42.5%), 23 with refractory pulmonary edema (57.5%). After PBAV, mean transaortic gradient decreased from 47 ± 16 mm Hg to 32 ± 10 mm Hg (p < 0.001), aortic valve area increased from 0.60 ± 0.18 cm2 to 0.88 ± 0.22 cm2 (p < 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 35 ± 15 to 37 ± 14% (p = 0.02), and systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 61 ± 15 to 48 ± 12 mm Hg (p = 0.002). There was no procedural death. Early death occurred in 12 patients (30%). After PBAV, 16 of the 28 survivors (57%) were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR; n = 7) or TAVI (n = 9), and 12 (43%) were denied definitive therapy. The 2-year estimated survival rate was 71 ± 17% after SAVR, 36 ± 19% after TAVI, and 8 ± 8% after PBAV alone. In conclusion, rescue PBAV is safe in patients with CS and high-risk aortic stenosis or refractory pulmonary edema and may improve their dismal prognosis when followed by TAVI or SAVR.