Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
ASAIO J ; 68(11): 1332-1338, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35184090

RESUMO

As patients on long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) face a substantial risk for open cardiac reoperation, interventional treatment approaches are becoming increasingly important in this population. We evaluated data of 871 patients who were on LVAD support between January 1, 2016 and December 1, 2020. Interventional treatments for LVAD-associated complications were performed in 76 patients. Seventeen patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR) and 61 patients underwent outflow graft interventions (OGI). TAVR improved symptoms in patients with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation. Postinterventional complications included aggravation of preexisting right heart failure (RHF), third-degree atrioventricular block, and intrapump thrombosis (in 3 [16.7%], 2 [11.1%], and 1 [5.6%] patients, respectively). In outflow graft obstructions, OGI led to recovery of LVAD flow ( p < 0.001), unloading of the left ventricle ( p = 0.004), decrease of aortic valve opening time ( p = 0.010), and improvement of right heart function ( p < 0.001). Complications included bleeding, RHF, and others (in 9 [10.8%], 5 [6.0%], and 5 [6.0%] patients, respectively). Eight (9.6%) patients died within the hospital stay after OGI, including mortality secondary to prolonged cardiogenic shock. In conclusion, interventional procedures are a feasible and safe treatment modality for LVAD-associated complications.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Humanos , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/etiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Valva Aórtica , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 33(4): 628-630, 2021 10 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021333

RESUMO

Only few patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction undergo durable mechanical circulatory support implantation. We identified three patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction who needed durable mechanical circulatory support as bridge-to-transplant therapy. In two patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the hypertrophic papillary muscles and myocardium were resected to allow for subsequent left ventricular assist device implantation. In one patient, all visible parts of the mitral valve were additionally resected. The third patient with restrictive cardiomyopathy underwent Berlin Heart Excor BVAD implantation with left atrial cannulation.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/complicações , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiomiopatia Hipertrófica/cirurgia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Miocárdio , Volume Sistólico , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(10): 1078-1085, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32696523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac cachexia and frailty are major complications of advanced heart failure (AHF). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may provide valuable information regarding fluid balance, muscle mass and prognosis. The main concerns regarding the use of BIA in AHF patients remain arrhythmias and electromagnetic interferences with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Reliable data regarding patients on continuous-flow ventricular assist device (cf-VAD) remain scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of BIA in AHF patients on pro-arrhythmogenic therapy with an implanted CIED and/or with a cf-VAD. METHODS: We prospectively performed 217 BIA measurements in 143 AHF patients at risk of severe arrhythmias due to inotropic support/a history of ventricular arrhythmias and/or treated with CIED, including 104 patients with an ICD, CRT or pacemaker and 95 patients with a cf-VAD. All patients were under continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and clinical surveillance for 24 hours. RESULTS: No adverse events were observed during the 217 BIA measurements: No rhythm disturbances were documented in the telemetric monitoring during or within 30 minutes after the measurement. CIEDs showed no malfunction, regardless of the location measured or the device manufacturer. In particular, no inappropriate shocks were observed. No alarms, flow disturbances, or malfunctions of the cf-VAD occurred during or after the measurements. CONCLUSION: We consider BIA a safe measurement with major clinical relevance in our cohort of AHF patients, despite an increased arrhythmic potential on inotropic support or the presence of implanted electronic devices (ICD, CRT, pacemaker and cf-VAD).


Assuntos
Impedância Elétrica , Eletrodos Implantados , Segurança de Equipamentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Caquexia/etiologia , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Fragilidade/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sarcopenia/etiologia , Telemetria
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA