Variable task switching in the feeding network of Aplysia is a function of differential command input.

Command systems integrate sensory information and then activate the interneurons and motor neurons that mediate behavior. Much research has established that the higher-order projection neurons that constitute these systems can play a key role in specifying the nature of the motor activity induced, or determining its parametric features. To a large extent, these insights have been obtained by contrasting activity induced by stimulating one neuron (or set of neurons) to activity induced by stimulating a different neuron (or set of neurons). The focus of our work differs. We study one type of motor program, ingestive feeding in the mollusc Aplysia californica, which can either be triggered when a single projection neuron (CBI-2) is repeatedly stimulated or can be triggered by projection neuron coactivation (e.g., activation of CBI-2 and CBI-3). We ask why this might be an advantageous arrangement. The cellular/molecular mechanisms that configure motor activity are different in the two situations because the released neurotransmitters differ. We focus on an important consequence of this arrangement, the fact that a persistent state can be induced with repeated CBI-2 stimulation that is not necessarily induced by CBI-2/3 coactivation. We show that this difference can have consequences for the ability of the system to switch from one type of activity to another.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We study a type of motor program that can be induced either by stimulating a higher-order projection neuron that induces a persistent state, or by coactivating projection neurons that configure activity but do not produce a state change. We show that when an activity is configured without a state change, it is possible to immediately return to an intermediate state that subsequently can be converted to any type of motor program.

The Complement of Projection Neurons Activated Determines the Type of Feeding Motor Program in Aplysia.

Multiple projection neurons are often activated to initiate behavior. A question that then arises is, what is the unique functional role of each neuron activated? We address this issue in the feeding system of Aplysia. Previous experiments identified a projection neuron [cerebral buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2)] that can trigger ingestive motor programs but only after it is repeatedly stimulated, i.e., initial programs are poorly defined. As CBI-2 stimulation continues, programs become progressively more ingestive (repetition priming occurs). This priming results, at least in part, from persistent actions of peptide cotransmitters released from CBI-2. We now show that in some preparations repetition priming does not occur. There is no clear seasonal effect; priming and non-priming preparations are encountered throughout the year. CBI-2 is electrically coupled to a second projection neuron, cerebral buccal interneuron 3 (CBI-3). In preparations in which priming does not occur, we show that ingestive activity is generated when CBI-2 and CBI-3 are coactivated. Programs are immediately ingestive, i.e., priming is not necessary, and a persistent state is not induced. Our data suggest that dynamic changes in the configuration of activity can vary and be determined by the complement of projection neurons that trigger activity.

Activity-dependent increases in [Ca2+]i contribute to digital-analog plasticity at a molluscan synapse.

In a type of short-term plasticity that is observed in a number of systems, synaptic transmission is potentiated by depolarizing changes in the membrane potential of the presynaptic neuron before spike initiation. This digital-analog form of plasticity is graded. The more depolarized the neuron, the greater the increase in the efficacy of synaptic transmission. In a number of systems, including the system presently under investigation, this type of modulation is calcium dependent, and its graded nature is presumably a consequence of a direct relationship between the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and the effect on synaptic transmission. It is therefore of interest to identify factors that determine the magnitude of this type of calcium signal. We studied a synapse in Aplysia and demonstrate that there can be a contribution from currents activated during spiking. When neurons spike, there are localized increases in [Ca2+]i that directly trigger neurotransmitter release. Additionally, spiking can lead to global increases in [Ca2+]i that are reminiscent of those induced by subthreshold depolarization. We demonstrate that these spike-induced increases in [Ca2+]i result from the activation of a current not activated by subthreshold depolarization. Importantly, they decay with a relatively slow time constant. Consequently, with repeated spiking, even at a low frequency, they readily summate to become larger than increases in [Ca2+]i induced by subthreshold depolarization alone. When this occurs, global increases in [Ca2+]i induced by spiking play the predominant role in determining the efficacy of synaptic transmission.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that spiking can induce global increases in the intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) that decay with a relatively long time constant. Consequently, summation of the calcium signal occurs even at low firing frequencies. As a result there is significant, persistent potentiation of synaptic transmission.

Repetition priming-induced changes in sensorimotor transmission.

When a behavior is repeated performance often improves, i.e., repetition priming occurs. Although repetition priming is ubiquitous, mediating mechanisms are poorly understood. We address this issue in the feeding network ofAplysia Similar to the priming observed elsewhere, priming inAplysiais stimulus specific, i.e., it can be either "ingestive" or "egestive." Previous studies demonstrated that priming alters motor and premotor activity. Here we sought to determine whether sensorimotor transmission is also modified. We report that changes in sensorimotor transmission do occur. We ask how they are mediated and obtain data that strongly suggest a presynaptic mechanism that involves changes in the "background" intracellular Ca(2+)concentration ([Ca(2+)]i) in primary afferents themselves. This form of plasticity has previously been described and generated interest due to its potentially graded nature. Manipulations that alter the magnitude of the [Ca(2+)]iimpact the efficacy of synaptic transmission. It is, however, unclear how graded control is exerted under physiologically relevant conditions. In the feeding system changes in the background [Ca(2+)]iare mediated by the induction of a nifedipine-sensitive current. We demonstrate that the extent to which this current is induced is altered by peptides (i.e., increased by a peptide released during the repetition priming of ingestive activity and decreased by a peptide released during the repetition priming of egestive activity). We suggest that this constitutes a behaviorally relevant mechanism for the graded control of synaptic transmission via the regulation of the [Ca(2+)]iin a neuron.

Monitoring changes in the intracellular calcium concentration and synaptic efficacy in the mollusc Aplysia.

It has been suggested that changes in intracellular calcium mediate the induction of a number of important forms of synaptic plasticity (e.g., homosynaptic facilitation). These hypotheses can be tested by simultaneously monitoring changes in intracellular calcium and alterations in synaptic efficacy. We demonstrate how this can be accomplished by combining calcium imaging with intracellular recording techniques. Our experiments are conducted in a buccal ganglion of the mollusc Aplysia californica. This preparation has a number of experimentally advantageous features: Ganglia can be easily removed from Aplysia and experiments use adult neurons that make normal synaptic connections and have a normal ion channel distribution. Due to the low metabolic rate of the animal and the relatively low temperatures (14-16 °C) that are natural for Aplysia, preparations are stable for long periods of time. To detect changes in intracellular free calcium we will use the cell impermeant version of Calcium Orange which is easily 'loaded' into a neuron via iontophoresis. When this long wavelength fluorescent dye binds to calcium, fluorescence intensity increases. Calcium Orange has fast kinetic properties and, unlike ratiometric dyes (e.g., Fura 2), requires no filter wheel for imaging. It is fairly photo stable and less phototoxic than other dyes (e.g., fluo-3). Like all non-ratiometric dyes, Calcium Orange indicates relative changes in calcium concentration. But, because it is not possible to account for changes in dye concentration due to loading and diffusion, it can not be calibrated to provide absolute calcium concentrations. An upright, fixed stage, compound microscope was used to image neurons with a CCD camera capable of recording around 30 frames per second. In Aplysia this temporal resolution is more than adequate to detect even a single spike induced alteration in the intracellular calcium concentration. Sharp electrodes are simultaneously used to induce and record synaptic transmission in identified pre- and postsynaptic neurons. At the conclusion of each trial, a custom script combines electrophysiology and imaging data. To ensure proper synchronization we use a light pulse from a LED mounted in the camera port of the microscope. Manipulation of presynaptic calcium levels (e.g. via intracellular EGTA injection) allows us to test specific hypotheses, concerning the role of intracellular calcium in mediating various forms of plasticity.

Effect of holding potential on the dynamics of homosynaptic facilitation.

We study a form of short-term synaptic plasticity that was originally described as a graded potentiating effect of holding potential on spike-mediated synaptic transmission (Shimahara and Tauc, 1975). This form of plasticity has recently generated considerable interest, as it has become apparent that it is present in the mammalian brain (Clark and Häusser, 2006; Marder, 2006). It has been suggested that it adds a previously unappreciated analog component to spike-mediated synaptic transmission (Alle and Geiger, 2006, 2008). A limitation of most previous research in this area is that effects of holding potential have been studied in relative isolation. Presynaptic neurons are stimulated at low frequencies so that a second form of plasticity (homosynaptic facilitation) is not induced. Under physiological conditions, however, both forms of plasticity are likely to be coinduced. In this report, we study the two types of plasticity together in an experimentally advantageous preparation (the mollusk Aplysia californica). Somewhat surprisingly, we find that effects of holding potential can be relatively modest when presynaptic neurons are activated at low frequencies. Interestingly, however, changes in membrane potential are highly effective when homosynaptic facilitation is induced. In this situation, PSPs facilitate at an increased rate. To summarize, our research suggests a novel view of the effect of holding potential on synaptic transmission. We propose that, under physiological conditions, it modifies the dynamics of homosynaptic facilitation.

Effect of presynaptic membrane potential on electrical vs. chemical synaptic transmission.

The growing realization that electrical coupling is present in the mammalian brain has sparked renewed interest in determining its functional significance and contrasting it with chemical transmission. One question of interest is whether the two types of transmission can be selectively regulated, e.g., if a cell makes both types of connections can electrical transmission occur in the absence of chemical transmission? We explore this issue in an experimentally advantageous preparation. B21, the neuron we study, is an Aplysia sensory neuron involved in feeding that makes electrical and chemical connections with other identified cells. Previously we demonstrated that chemical synaptic transmission is membrane potential dependent. It occurs when B21 is centrally depolarized prior to and during peripheral activation, but does not occur if B21 is peripherally activated at its resting membrane potential. In this article we study effects of membrane potential on electrical transmission. We demonstrate that maximal potentiation occurs in different voltage ranges for the two types of transmission, with potentiation of electrical transmission occurring at more hyperpolarized potentials (i.e., requiring less central depolarization). Furthermore, we describe a physiologically relevant type of stimulus that induces both spiking and an envelope of depolarization in the somatic region of B21. This depolarization does not induce functional chemical synaptic transmission but is comparable to the depolarization needed to maximally potentiate electrical transmission. In this study we therefore characterize a situation in which electrical and chemical transmission can be selectively controlled by membrane potential.

Two distinct mechanisms mediate potentiating effects of depolarization on synaptic transmission.

Two distinct mechanisms mediate potentiating effects of depolarization on synaptic transmission. Recently there has been renewed interest in a type of plasticity in which a neuron's somatic membrane potential influences synaptic transmission. We study mechanisms that mediate this type of control at a synapse between a mechanoafferent, B21, and B8, a motor neuron that receives chemical synaptic input. Previously we demonstrated that the somatic membrane potential determines spike propagation within B21. Namely, B21 must be centrally depolarized if spikes are to propagate to an output process. We now demonstrate that this will occur with central depolarizations that are only a few millivolts. Depolarizations of this magnitude are not, however, sufficient to induce synaptic transmission to B8. B21-induced postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) are only observed if B21 is centrally depolarized by >or=10 mV. Larger depolarizations have a second impact on B21. They induce graded changes in the baseline intracellular calcium concentration that are virtually essential for the induction of chemical synaptic transmission. During motor programs, subthreshold depolarizations that increase calcium concentrations are observed during one of the two antagonistic phases of rhythmic activity. Chemical synaptic transmission from B21 to B8 is, therefore, likely to occur in a phase-dependent manner. Other neurons that receive mechanoafferent input are electrically coupled to B21. Differential control of spike propagation and chemical synaptic transmission may, therefore, represent a mechanism that permits selective control of afferent transmission to different types of neurons contacted by B21. Afferent transmission to neurons receiving chemical synaptic input will be phase specific, whereas transmission to electrically coupled followers will be phase independent.

Selective spike propagation in the central processes of an invertebrate neuron.

Within a neuron, spike propagation can occur in a complex manner, with spikes propagating into some processes but not others. We study this phenomenon in an experimentally advantageous mechanoafferent in Aplysia, neuron B21. B21 has two processes within the CNS. One is ipsilateral to the soma and is referred to as the lateral process. The second travels into the contralateral hemiganglion and is referred to as the contralateral process. Previously we characterized spike propagation to the lateral process, which is an output region that contacts follower motor neurons. Spikes fail to actively propagate to the lateral process when B21 is peripherally activated at its resting potential. This propagation failure can be relieved if the medial regions of B21 are centrally depolarized during peripheral activation. This study examines spike propagation to the contralateral process. We show that, unlike the lateral process, active spike propagation in the contralateral process occurs when B21 is peripherally activated at its resting membrane potential. Thus spike propagation occurs selectively, favoring the contralateral process. Interestingly, the contralateral process of one B21 is immediately adjacent to the medial region of the bilaterally symmetrical cell. The B21 neurons are electrically coupled, suggesting that spikes propagating in the contralateral process of one cell could modify propagation in the sister neuron. Consistent with this idea, we show that lateral process propagation failures observed when a single B21 is peripherally activated can be relieved by central coactivation of the contralateral cell. These results imply that stimuli that coactivate the B21 neurons bilaterally are more apt to generate afferent activity that is transmitted to followers than stimuli that activate one cell.

Mechanoafferent neuron with an inexcitable somatic region: consequences for the regulation of spike propagation and afferent transmission.

In the Aplysia mechanoafferent B21, afferent transmission is in part regulated via the control of active spike propagation. When B21 is peripherally activated at its resting membrane potential, spikes fail to propagate to an output process, and afferent transmission does not occur. In this report, we show that the propagation failure is in part a result of the fact that the somatic region of B21 is relatively inexcitable. We isolate this region and demonstrate that net currents evoked by depolarizing pulses are outward. Furthermore, we show that all-or-none spikes are not triggered when current is injected. Previous reports have, however shown that spiking is triggered when current is somatically injected and cells are intact. We demonstrate that spikes evoked under these circumstances do not originate in the soma. Instead they originate in an adjacent part of the neuron that is excitable (the medial process). In summary, we show that the mechanoafferent B21 consists of excitable input and output processes separated by a relatively inexcitable somatic region. A potential advantage of this arrangement is that somatic depolarization can be used to modify spike propagation from the input to the output processes without altering the encoding of peripherally generated activity.

Inhibition of afferent transmission in the feeding circuitry of aplysia: persistence can be as important as size.

We are studying afferent transmission from a mechanoafferent, B21, to a follower, B8. During motor programs, afferent transmission is regulated so that it does not always occur. Afferent transmission is eliminated when spike propagation in B21 fails, i.e., when spike initiation is inhibited in one output region-B21's lateral process. Spike initiation in the lateral process is inhibited by the B52 and B4/5 cells. Individual B52 and B4/5-induced inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in B21 differ. For example, the peak amplitude of a B4/5-induced IPSP is four times the amplitude of a B52 IPSP. Nevertheless, when interneurons fire in bursts at physiological (i.e., low) frequencies, afferent transmission is most effectively reduced by B52. Although individual B52-induced IPSPs are small, they have a long time constant and summate at low firing frequencies. Once IPSPs summate, they effectively block afferent transmission. In contrast, individual B4/5-induced IPSPs have a relatively short time constant and do not summate at low frequencies. B52 and B4/5 therefore differ in that once synaptic input from B52 becomes effective, afferent transmission is continuously inhibited. In contrast, periods of B4/5-induced inhibition are interspersed with relatively long intervals in which inhibition does not occur. Consequently, the probability that afferent transmission will be inhibited is low. In conclusion, it is widely recognized that afferent transmission can be regulated by synaptic input. Our experiments are, however, unusual in that they relate specific characteristics of postsynaptic potentials to functional inhibition. In particular we demonstrate the potential importance of the IPSP time constant.

Feeding neural networks in the mollusc Aplysia.

Aplysia feeding is striking in that it is executed with a great deal of plasticity. At least in part, this flexibility is a result of the organization of the feeding neural network. To illustrate this, we primarily discuss motor programs triggered via stimulation of the command-like cerebral-buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2). CBI-2 is interesting in that it can generate motor programs that serve opposing functions, i.e., programs can be ingestive or egestive. When programs are egestive, radula-closing motor neurons are activated during the protraction phase of the motor program. When programs are ingestive, radula-closing motor neurons are activated during retraction. When motor programs change in nature, activity in the radula-closing circuitry is altered. Thus, CBI-2 stimulation stereotypically activates the protraction and retraction circuitry, with protraction being generated first, and retraction immediately thereafter. In contrast, radula-closing motor neurons can be activated during either protraction or retraction. Which will occur is determined by whether other cerebral and buccal neurons are recruited, e.g. radula-closing motor neurons tend to be activated during retraction if a second CBI, CBI-3, is recruited. Fundamentally different motor programs are, therefore, generated because CBI-2 activates some interneurons in a stereotypic manner and other interneurons in a variable manner.

Frequency-dependent regulation of afferent transmission in the feeding circuitry of Aplysia.

During rhythmic behaviors, sensori-motor transmission is often regulated so that there are phasic changes in afferent input to follower neurons. We study this type of regulation in the feeding circuit of Aplysia. We characterize effects of the B4/5 interneurons on transmission from the mechanoafferent B21 to the radula closer motor neuron B8. In quiescent preparations, B4/5-induced postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) can block spike propagation in the lateral process of B21 and inhibit afferent transmission. B4/5 are, however, active during the retraction phase of motor programs, i.e., when mechanoafferent transmission to B8 presumably occurs. To determine whether mechanoafferent transmission is necessarily inhibited when B4/5 are active, we characterize the B4/5 firing frequency during retraction and show that, for the most part, it is low (below 15 Hz). There is, therefore, a low probability that spike propagation will be inhibited. The relative ineffectiveness of low frequency activity is not simply a consequence of insufficient PSP magnitude, because a single PSP can block spike propagation. Instead, it is related to the fact that PSPs have a short duration. When B4/5 fire at a low frequency, there is therefore a low probability that afferent transmission in the lateral process of B21 can be inhibited. In conclusion, we demonstrate that afferent transmission will not always be affected when a neuron that exerts inhibitory effects is active. Although a cell may be ineffective when it fires at a low frequency, ineffectiveness is not necessarily a consequence of spike frequency per se. Instead it may be due to spike timing.

Regulation of spike initiation and propagation in an Aplysia sensory neuron: gating-in via central depolarization.

Afferent transmission can be regulated (or gated) so that responses to peripheral stimuli are adjusted to make them appropriate for the ongoing phase of a motor program. Here, we characterize a gating mechanism that involves regulation of spike propagation in Aplysia mechanoafferent B21. B21 is striking in that afferent transmission to the motor neuron B8 does not occur when B21 is at resting membrane potential. Our data suggest that this results from the fact that spikes are not actively propagated to the lateral process of B21 (the primary contact with B8). When B21 is peripherally activated at its resting potential, electrotonic potentials in the lateral process are on average 11 mV. In contrast, mechanoafferent activity is transmitted to B8 when B21 is centrally depolarized via current injection. Our data suggest that central depolarization relieves propagation failure. Full-size spikes are recorded in the lateral process when B21 is depolarized and then peripherally activated. Moreover, changes in membrane potential in the lateral process affect spike amplitude, even when the somatic membrane potential is virtually unchanged. During motor programs, both the lateral process and the soma of B21 are phasically depolarized via synaptic input. These depolarizations are sufficient to convert subthreshold potentials to full-size spikes in the lateral process. Thus, our data strongly suggest that afferent transmission from B21 to B8 is, at least in part, regulated via synaptic control of spike initiation in the lateral process. Consequences of this control for compartmentalization in B21 are discussed, as are specific consequences for feeding behavior.