Vaginal Fluid Urea and Creatinine as Indicators of Premature Rupture of Membranes: a Systematic Review.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of vaginal urea and creatinine levels in the detection of premature rupture of membrane (PROM). The Cochrane (central), EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published from the inception of the databases up to January 2020. We included published observational full-text articles. The mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The significance level was set as 0.05. Eleven studies (n = 1324) were considered for meta-analysis. Using the bivariate model, the summary estimate of sensitivity and specificity for urea was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.97), respectively. The summary estimate of sensitivity and specificity for creatinine was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99), respectively. The overall mean of urea and creatinine in the case group was significantly higher than that in the control group (MD = 12.63, 95%, CI [12.01, 13.25]) and (MD = 0.31, 95%, CI [0.29, 0.32]), respectively. The results of this systematic review showed that the mean of urea and creatinine in the case group was significantly higher than that in the control group and the sensitivity and specificity of creatinine is higher than urea in the diagnosis of PROM.

The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of hyoscine n-butylbromide in labor progress. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to December 2019. Articles that published as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and full-text articles published in English or other languages were included and participants were primi or multigravida women who were in active phase of labor. The intervention included HBB compared to placebo (normal saline) that was used during active phase of labor. Pooled estimates were measured using the fixed or random effect model, while the overall effect was reported in a mean difference (MD). All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 3108 women were included in meta-analysis. Based on subgroup analysis by parity, use of HBB significantly reduced the duration of the first stage of labor in primigravida women (MD = - 57.73; 95% CI: [- 61.48, - 53.60]) and in multigravida women (MD = - 90.74; 95% CI: [- 97.24, - 84.24]). Administering HBB could reduce the second stages of labor in primigravidas and multigravidas about 6 min and 4 min respectively. Also, HBB reduced the duration of the third stage of labor in multigravidas about 3 min. APGAR score at one and 5 min after birth was not affected. The main maternal adverse effect was tachycardia and dry mouth. Labor duration in studies in which the participants were primi-and multigravida was not presented based on separate parities except for four papers, and the route of HBB administration was not the same across all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although, the effect of HBB was minimal when multigravidas and primigravidas women were considered together, the HBB was clinically effective in primigravida and multigravida women for shortening the first and the second stages of labor. Also, HBB could reduce the length of the third stage of labor in multigravidas.

Sex hormone binding globulin for prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in pre-conception and pregnancy: A systematic review.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationship of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science were searched for studies published from the inception of the databases up to February 2019. Our inclusion criteria were published observational full-text articles. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Of 208 papers reviewed, 26 studies (n = 6668) were considered for meta-analysis. RESULTS: The SHBG level was significantly lower in women with GDM compared to healthy women (MD = -11.86; 95% CI: [-13.02, -10.71]). Also, SHBG in women with PCOS and GDM and obesity was significantly lower than women with PCOS without GDM (MD = -38.14; 95% CI: [-56.79, -19.48]) and normal weight women (MD: -58.96; 95% CI: [-79.32, -38.59]). SHBG in the second trimester was lower than that in the first trimester and pre-conception. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that the level of SHBG is significantly lower in GDM pregnant women than that in healthy women. The results of this systematic review about the relationship of GDM and SHBG and suggestion to assess this marker in early pregnancy should be considered with caution.