Ultrasound assessment of short peripheral catheter failure.

INTRODUCTION: Short peripheral catheters (SPCs) are affected by a high complication rate that leads to catheter failure. Currently, the Visual Infusion Phlebitis score (VIP) is the most used tool to verify the presence of inflammatory complications (phlebitis and thrombophlebitis). However, ultrasound signs (US) may be an attractive alternative. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of US and VIP score = 1 in identifying and recognizing early signs of SPC failure. The time to positivity for US and VIP scores was assessed as a secondary outcome. METHODS: An observational prospective study was conducted. In each patient, US (subcutaneous edema; fibroblastic sleeve; thrombophlebitis) and VIP of the exit site were performed every 24 h until 96 h after insertion. Compared to catheter failure, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive values in both US and VIP were calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled. The presence of ultrasonic pattern suggestive of edema at 72 h (p = 0.018), fibroblastic sleeve at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h (p < 0.001), thrombosis at 48 (p < 0.001) and 72 h (p = 0.005), and at least one of an abovementioned US at all checkpoints (p < 0.001) were highly significant predictors of complications. Both US and VIP effectively detect inflammatory events; however, the US showed better sensitivity in overall checkpoints and earlier predictive ability than VIP (1.9 vs 0.47 days). CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound inflammatory pattern is correlated with SPC failure. An ultrasound protocol-requiring minimal training-is more effective than VIP in recognizing early signs of device failure.

Venous Thromboembolism Management throughout the COVID-19 Era: Addressing Acute and Long-Term Challenges.

Background: COVID-19 increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) through a complex interplay of mechanisms collectively referred to as immunothrombosis. Limited data exist on VTE challenges in the acute setting throughout a dynamic long-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients. The aim of the study was to investigate acute and long-term management and complications in VTE patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on VTE patients followed from the acute care stage until 24 months post-diagnosis. Results: 157 patients, 30 with COVID-19-associated VTE and 127 unrelated to COVID-19, were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 10.8 (±8.9) months. COVID-19 patients had fewer comorbidities (1.3 ± 1.29 vs. 2.26 ± 1.68, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of pulmonary embolism at baseline (96.7% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.01), and had a lower probability of remaining on anticoagulant therapy after three months (p < 0.003). The most used initial therapy was low-molecular-weight heparin in 130/157 cases, followed by long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants in 123/157. Two (6.7%) COVID-19 vs. three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients (p = 0.243) had major hemorrhagic events, all of them within the first three months. Four (3.1%) non-COVID-19 patients had VTE recurrence after six months. Three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients developed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. There were no fatalities among patients with COVID-19, compared to a mortality of 12/127 (9.4%) in the non-COVID-19 subgroup (p = 0.027). Discussion: Our study offers a comprehensive overview of the evolving nature of VTE management, emphasizing the importance of personalized risk-based approaches, including a limited course of anticoagulation for most COVID-19-associated VTE cases and reduced-dose extended therapy for high-risk subsets.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of clinical worsening in severe non-critically ill COVID-19 patients: a joint analysis of two randomized controlled trials.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries a high risk of vascular thrombosis. However, whether a specific anticoagulation intensity strategy may prevent clinical worsening in severe COVID-19 patients is still debated. We conducted a joint analysis of two randomized controlled trials, COVID-19 HD (NCT044082359) and EMOS-COVID (NCT04646655), to assess the efficacy and safety of two anticoagulant regimens in hospitalized severe COVID-19 patients. Subjects with COVID-19-associated respiratory compromise and/or coagulopathy were randomly assigned to low (4000 IU qd) or high (70 IU Kg-1 every 12 h) enoxaparin dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical worsening within 30 days, defined as the occurrence of at least one of the following events, whichever came first: in-hospital death, evidence of arterial or venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, need for either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients receiving standard oxygen therapy or none at randomization, and need for mechanical ventilation in any patient. The safety endpoint was major bleeding. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcomes. Among 283 patients included in the study (144 in the low-dose and 139 in the high-dose group), 118 (41.7%) were on NIV or CPAP at randomization. 23/139 (16.5%) patients in the high-dose group reached the primary endpoint compared to 33/144 (22.9%) in the low-dose group (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-1.17). No major bleeding was observed. No significant differences were found in the clinical worsening of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with high versus low doses of enoxaparin.

Clinical-radiological correlations in COVID-19-related venous thromboembolism: Preliminary results from a multidisciplinary study.

INTRODUCTION: Among the multiple complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying COVID-19 pneumonia, immunothrombosis has been shown to play a key role. One of the most dangerous consequences of the prothrombotic imbalance is the increased incidence of micro- and macrothrombotic phenomena, especially deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We investigated the correlation between radiological and clinical-biochemical characteristics in a cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: PE was confirmed in 14/61 (23%) patients, five (35.7%) had DVT. The radiographic findings, quantified by Qanadli score calculated on CT angiography, correlated with the clinical score and biochemical markers. The ratio between the right and left ventricle diameter measured at CT angiography correlated with the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In our cohort radiological parameters showed a significant correlation with clinical prognostic indices and scores, thus suggesting that a multidisciplinary approach is advisable in the evaluation of PE in COVID-19 patients.