Modified Dental Anxiety Scale: validation of the Italian version.

AIM: Anxiety is a relevant problem in dental practice. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a brief, simple questionnaire consisting of five questions with a total score ranging from 5 to 25, the Italian version of which is not available yet. The aim of the study was to provide an Italian version of the MDAS and check its reliability in oral surgery, which is a major cause of dental anxiety due to the expected perception of pain and suffering. METHODS: The Italian version of the test was administered to 230 patients (98 male and 132 female patients, ages 14-88 years) undergoing oral surgery. Further recorded data were: American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA-PS), frequency of visiting the dentist and any previous distressing experiences in dental or medical setting. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the test was high, with a Cronbach's alpha=0.92. The MDAS score was significantly higher in females (P<0.0001) and in patients with previous distressing experiences in medical and/or dental settings (P<0.0001); the correlation with age (P=0.01) and frequency on visiting the dentist (P=0.02) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: The patients' selection (oral surgery only) may be a limit of the study, which might not provide an estimation of anxiety prevalence in the general dental population; however our result agree with those of studies performed in other Countries in the generic population, suggesting the absence of major differences with respect to the surgical setting and show the reliability and manageability of the Italian version of MDAS.

Modified dental anxiety scale: validation of the italian version.

AIM: Anxiety is a relevant problem in dental practice. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) is a brief, simple questionnaire consisting of five questions with a total score ranging from 5 to 25, the Italian version of which is not available yet. The aim of the study was to provide an Italian version of the MDAS and check its reliability in oral surgery, which is a major cause of dental anxiety due to the expected perception of pain and suffering. METHODS: The Italian version of the test was administered to 230 patients (98 male and 132 female patients, ages 14-88 years) undergoing oral surgery. Further recorded data were: American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA-PS), frequency of visiting the dentist and any previous distressing experiences in dental or medical setting. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the test was high, with a Cronbach's alpha=0.92. The MDAS score was significantly higher in females (p<0.0001) and in patients with previous distressing experiences in medical and/or dental settings (p<0.0001); the correlation with age (p=0.01) and frequency on visiting the dentist (p=0.02) were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: The patients' selection (oral surgery only) may be a limit of the study, which might not provide an estimation of anxiety prevalence in the general dental population; however our result agree with those of studies performed in other Countries in the generic population, suggesting the absence of major differences with respect to the surgical setting and show the reliability and manageability of the Italian version of MDAS.

Conscious sedation with diazepam and midazolam for dental patient: priority to diazepam.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to determine whether the use of midazolam is a better technique than the use of diazepam, in relation with the definition of conscious sedation in dentistry. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients undergoing oral surgery were divided into 2 groups in which the sedation was randomly achieved with equipotent cumulative doses of diazepam and midazolam, up to a maximum dose of 8 and 4 mg respectively. Patient's tranquillity was assessed after every dose, using a visual analogue score to ten points and the sedation was evaluated as mild, moderate or deep. Blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2 were also recorded. Psychomotor conditions, by Newman test, and the incidence of amnesia and the patient's satisfaction, by telephone interview, were both evaluated. RESULTS: The number of patients who reached maximum subjective tranquillity was greater already after the third dose of diazepam. The average scores of tranquillity were higher after diazepam. Patients treated with diazepam experienced a higher incidence of mild sedation, patients treated with midazolam a higher incidence of moderate and deep sedation. In patients treated with midazolam blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2 were lower. Postoperative recovery was similar in the 2 groups. After midazolam patients experienced greater amnesia for local anesthesia and drowsiness. Satisfaction was high with both treatments. CONCLUSION: The study shows that sedation with diazepam is more in line with the definition of conscious sedation in dentistry. Diazepam guarantees the persistence of consciousness and maximum subjective tranquillity levels. The recovery and satisfaction were comparable in the 2 groups.

Hypnosis as sole anaesthesia for skin tumour removal in a patient with multiple chemical sensitivity.

A female patient with multiple chemical sensitivity and previous anaphylactoid reactions to local anaesthetics was admitted for removal of a thigh skin tumour under hypnosis as sole anaesthesia. The hypnotic protocol included hypnotic focused analgesia and a pre-operative pain threshold test. After inducing hypnosis, a wide excision was performed, preserving the deep fascia, and the tumour was removed; the patient's heart rate and blood pressure did not increase during the procedure. When the patient was de-hypnotised, she reported no pain and was discharged immediately. Our case confirms the efficacy of hypnosis and demonstrates that it may be valuable as a sole anaesthetic method in selected cases. Hypnosis can prevent pain perception and surgical stress as a whole, comparing well with anaesthetic drugs.

Validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A) in preanesthesia evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety is a relevant but still underscored perioperative problem. The Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) seems to be effective, fast and manageable, but has not been fully validated yet. The aim of this study is to validate VAS-A comparing it to, Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) Spielberger's State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients (38 males and 62 females, median age 49 years) submitted to oral surgery filled out the VAS-A, CDAS, STAI forms Y1 and Y2, and BDI at preoperative examination; the order of administration of tests was randomized. RESULTS: VAS-A score was significantly correlated to CDAS (P<0.0001), STAI-Y1 (P<0.0001), STAI-Y2 (P<0.002) but not to BDI (P=0.18). ROC curve analysis suggested VAS-A equal to 46 mm as threshold for anxiety when using STAI Y1 equal to 40 as reference cutoff. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that VAS-A is a reliable indicator of preoperative anxiety and may detect patients with depressive symptoms also. Values of VAS-A around 50 mm are a reliable threshold for a clinically meaningful level of preoperative anxiety.

Acupuncture versus valproic acid in the prophylaxis of migraine without aura: a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacologic treatment of migraine still remains below the expectations. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of traditional acupuncture and valproic acid in migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A prospective, controlled study was performed in 100 patients affected by migraine without aura lasting for over one year. The patients were stratified for sex and randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients each. Patients belonging to Group A (acupuncture) were submitted to 20 sessions of acupuncture, while patients belonging to Group V valproate) were administered Valproic acid (Depakin Chrono®) at a dose of 600 mg/day; 10 mg Rizatriptan wafers were allowed as needed to treat the attacks. The Midas Index (MI) and pain intensity (PI, by VAS) were recorded before treatment (T0), at three (T1) and six (T2) months; a six-point scale Pain Relief score (PRS), the Rizatriptan intake and adverse events were recorded at T1 and T2. RESULTS: Eighty-two out of 100 patients completed the study (9 dropouts in each group). In both groups the MI improved at T1 and T2 (P<0.0001). Pain intensity was better at T1 in group V (P<0.0001), but PI and PRS (P=0.02) as well as rizatriptan intake (P=0.001) were better in group A at T2. The rate of adverse events was 47.8% in group V and 0% in group A. CONCLUSION: Our data show a lower pain intensity and lower Rizatriptan intake at six-months follow-up with no adverse events in acupuncture patients compared to those treated with valproic acid.

Comparison by means of bispectral index score, between anxiolysis induced by diazepam and sedation induced by midazolam.

AIM: Bispectral Index Score (BIS) is an objective tool to assess sedation depth. Benzodiazepines have different pharmacological profiles and diazepam may be safer than midazolam in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare BIS values observed during anxiolysis after diazepam versus sedation after midazolam. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups: group 1 was treated with i.v. diazepam, groups 2 and 3 with iv midazolam 1 and 3 mg, respectively. Sedation was monitored clinically and by means of BIS. BIS values were evaluated as area under the curve (AUC) and compared by variance analysis. The statistical comparison of other data was performed by variance analysis or, alternatively, the χ2 according to Yates. The statistical significance was indicated by P values <0.05. RESULTS: AUC values were significantly lower after midazolam when compared to AUC values registered in diazepam treated patients; 22.6% of the group 3 patients showed BIS values <80, versus 0.4% of group 1 patients. CONCLUSION: Diazepam has a safer profile, with BIS values and clinical conditions according to the definition of minimal and/or moderate sedation. Diazepam represents the safer drug for anxiety management in dentistry, because regularly produces a state of sedation during which verbal contact with the patient is maintained and carry a margin of safety wide enough to render loss of consciousness unlikely.

Toward the validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety.

Anxiety is a relevant problem in dental practice. The Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), introduced in dentistry in 1988, has not yet been validated in large series. The aim of this study is to check VAS-A effectiveness in more than 1000 patients submitted to implantology. The VAS-A and the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) were administered preoperatively to 1114 patients (459 males and 655 females, age 54.7 ± 13.1 years). Statistical analysis was conducted with Pearson correlation coefficient, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and McNemar tests. A close correlation between DAS and VAS-A was found (r  =  0.57, P < .0001); the VAS-A thresholds of dental anxiety and phobia were 5.1 and 7.0 cm, respectively. Despite a significant concordance of tests in 800 cases (72%), disagreement was found in the remaining 314 cases (28%), and low DAS was associated with high VAS-A (230 cases) or vice versa (84 cases). Our study confirms that VAS-A is a simple, sensitive, fast, and reliable tool in dental anxiety assessment. The rate of disagreement between VAS-A and DAS is probably due to different test sensitivities to different components of dental anxiety. VAS-A can be used effectively in the assessment of dental patients, using the values of 5.1 cm and 7.0 cm as cutoff values for anxiety and phobia, respectively.

Comparison between two regional anaesthesia techniques performed by inexperienced operators: the Gow-Gates block versus the Kenneth Reed block.

AIM: The aim was to compare the efficacy of Kenneth Reed and Gow-Gates inferior alveolar nerve blocks when performed by an inexperienced operator. METHODS: A group of 60 patients was randomised into two groups. One group had the Kenneth Reed technique used to administer an inferior alveolar nerve block whilst the other received the Gow-Gates technique. The efficacy of nerve block produced was evaluated both clinically and by electric pulp tester. MRI examination was undertaken to determine the spread of local anaesthetic. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in success rate of anaesthesia between groups. The failure rate for the Gow-Gates technique was 16.6%, whilst the failure rate for the Kenneth Reed technique was 23.3%. Time to onset was less with the Kenneth Reed technique. MRI examination showed the solution was more widely distributed after the Kenneth Reed block had been used. CONCLUSIONS: Our research has demonstrated that the Kenneth Reed technique is equally effective at producing anaesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve. Compared with conventional techniques there is a lower incidence of positive aspiration and potential for lower morbidity as the local anaesthetic is deposited further from the neurovascular bundle than when deposited near the mandibular foramen as in most conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block techniques.

Patients appreciation for information on anesthesia and anxiolysis in dentistry.

AIM: The research regards information on anesthesia to patients undergoing oral surgery. Every patient evaluated the information received at the end of the preoperative visit and in the postoperative period. METHODS: One hundred-fifty dental patients were asked about the most appreciated information received in the preoperative visit on the anxiolytic technique, local anesthesia and treatment of the perioperative pain. Afterwards the patients had to report on their reaction to the content of the preoperative visit and information quality. On a phone interview they had to evaluate their appreciation of the anxiolytic technique, their perception during loco-regional anesthesia and incidence of pain and edema. RESULTS: The most appreciated details were those on the intervention, pharmacologic treatment, postoperative complicances, postoperative pain and operative competence; less appreciated were those on loco-regional anesthesia, duration of the intervention, anxiolytic techniques, hospital reception and permanence in the hospital. Ninety-eight percent of the patients considered to have been adequately informed on a context judged to be extraordinary (99.3%), 96.6% indicated the information as necessary, 98.6% appreciated the treatment of the intraoperative and postoperative (99.3%) pain and 99.3% the anxiolytic treatment. On the telephone interview, 100% of patients expressed satisfaction for the experienced intraoperative tranquillity, 91.3% complained for not having received in the past a similar preoperative visit, 99.3% wished a diffused application of the information. The loco-regional anesthesia was associated to psychological detachment in 84% of the cases and the incidence of postoperative pain was of 36%. CONCLUSION: The information on the anxiolytic techniques, loco-regional anesthesia, treatment of perioperative pain and postoperative distress was enthusiastically accepted and albeit initially induced feelings of astonishment resulted to be appreciated and preferred in the whole of the patients.

Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG).

STUDY AIM: To provide a consensus of European leading authorities about the optimal use of clinical neurophysiological (CN) tests (electroencephalogram [EEG]; evoked potentials [EP]; electroneuromyography [ENMG]) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and, particularly, about the way to make these tests clinically useful for the management of individual patients. METHODS: This study gathered together several European clinical neurophysiologists and neurointensivists whose leading contributions in the adult or paediatric ICU and in continuous neuromonitoring had been peer-acknowledged. It was based on both a literature review and each participant's own experience. Given the methodological impossibility to gather studies fulfilling criteria of evidence-based medicine, this article essentially relies on expert opinions that were gained after several rounds, in which each expert was invited to communicate his own contribution to all other experts. A complete consensus has been reached when submitting the manuscript. RESULTS: What the group considered as the best classification systems for EEG and EP abnormalities in the ICU is first presented. CN tests are useful for diagnosis (epilepsy, brain death, and neuromuscular disorders), prognosis (anoxic ischemic encephalopathy, head trauma, and neurologic disturbances of metabolic and toxic origin), and follow-up, in the adult, paediatric, and neonatal ICU. Regarding prognosis, a clear distinction is made between these tests whose abnormalities are indicative of an ominous prognosis and those whose relative normalcy is indicative of a good prognosis. The prognostic significance of any test may vary as a function of coma etiology. CONCLUSION: CN provides quantitative functional assessment of the nervous system. It can be used in sedated or curarized patients. Therefore, it should play a major role in the individual assessment of ICU patients.

Isolated atrial fibrillation (IAF) after local anaesthesia with epinephrine in an anxious dental patient.

Cardiac arrhythmias are not uncommon in dental practice, depending on many factors, including patient features, dental treatment and drugs administered. We describe a case of isolated atrial fibrillation (IAF) developed, in a young patient, soon after a supraperiosteal injection. The patient was admitted to hospital and recovered spontaneously. Since stress is a possible cause of IAF, this may has been triggered by endogenous and/or exogenous epinephrine. We highlight the need for careful preoperative evaluation, including anxiety assessment and treatment in all dental patients.

Myotonia congenita and regional anaesthesia with peripheral nerve stimulation: a case report.

Myotonia congenita is a rare disorder caused by a defect in the skeletal muscle chloride channel function, which may cause sustained membrane depolarisation. We report a case regarding a 52-year-old man affected by this muscular pathology and scheduled for shoulder surgery that was performed under sedation and peripheral nerve block. The international literature does not elucidate clear preference toward a particular anaesthesia technique, but we believe that in this setting, regional anaesthesia and complete monitoring should be preferentially utilized when possible. In any case, the anaesthesia plan should be prudent and avoid exposure to known dangerous anaesthetics.

Electronic dental anaesthesia for third inferior molar surgery.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Electronic Dental Anaesthesia (EDA) for third molar surgery. METHODS: Third molar extraction under regional anaesthesia (inferior alveolar and buccal nerve blocks) was performed in 2 groups of 30 patients each: group 1 = controls, group 2 = EDA treatment. Anxiety and pain level were reported by means of Visual Analogue Scale, postoperative pain description with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. A postoperative phone interview to all patients was made. Computerized randomization was performed; values expressed as mean+/-SD, data comparison evaluated by means of ANOVA and chi squared, statistical significance indicated by P values <0.05. RESULTS: Features of the patients and surgical interventions were similar. EDA has determined lower pain level; moreover, the control patients has shown higher values of blood pressure and heart frequency. Phone interview has reported no amnesia about the perioperative events. A smaller number of EDA treated patients has reported pain during needle prick and/or intraoperatively; 80% of the EDA treated patients has reported a good opinion about the treatment, 93% of the patients would repeat the treatment, if needed. CONCLUSION: EDA is a complementary analgesic technique for dental surgery. Cardiovascular changes, frequently observed during third molar extraction, were not present in the EDA treated patients. These data confirm that EDA is able to modify the physiologic responses to stressful events, blunting the adrenergic upset, maybe by means of an analgesic action on A, fiber and an increase of endorphins' central level. These results underline that the complementary use of EDA in the third molar extraction may be better than regional anaesthesia alone.

Bispectral Index in the sedation with intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam in dental practice.

AIM: Aim of this study was to assess by clinical evaluation and by Bispectral Index (BIS) the tranquillizing properties of diazepam injected intravenously, and midazolam by intranasal route according to the body weight in dental patients. METHODS: A group of 34 patients undergoing implantology were divided at random into 2 groups of 17. They were evaluated physically, clinically and psychologically. The psychomotor activity was measured by the Newman's test. Preoperative anxiety was treated with chlordemethyldiazepam (CHDDZ) per os, administered before induction of conscious sedation. In the first group, conscious sedation was accomplished by induction with titrated doses of i.v. diazepam, and in the second group with 0.1 mg/kg of intranasal midazolam. BIS values were analysed as Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: The AUC BIS values after CHDDZ presedation were overlapping in both groups. AUC after midazolam decreased after induction of the conscious sedation (P<0.05), during anesthesia (P<0.01) and during intervention (P<0.01) compared to the diazepam treatment. In the midazolam group the BIS values were on average lower than 90, while in the diazepam group they were on average higher than 95 (P<0.01). The psychomotor recovery was more impaired after midazolam. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that nasal route ensures the quick absorption of midazolam as revealed during the first 3 min from drug administration. The depressant effect of midazolam increased as a function of time, reaching the highest levels during intervention. The results suggest that midazolam is endowed with sedative effects which may compromise the state of consciousness of the patient and be incompatible with the definition of conscious sedation in dentistry.

Spectral entropy assessment with auditory evoked potential in neuroanesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: The assessment of the level of anesthesia is a very hard task, since no gold standard has stood out in the past three decades. Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (MLAEP) is one of the most popular neurophysiological tools for anesthesia monitoring. Recently, Spectral Entropy (SpEn) has been introduced: it provides two different parameters, State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE). The aim of this prospective study is to check SpEn end-point, comparing it to MLAEPs in neurosurgical anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty patients submitted to elective supratentorial neurosurgery for removal of a temporal-parietal meningioma were included in the study. SpEn and MLAEPs were simultaneously monitored using the M-entropy module S/5 (GE Health Care, Helsinki, Finland) and Alaris Medical System AEP-ARX index monitor (AAI) (Kidemosevej, Denmark), respectively. RESULTS: Four thousand and sixty four data points of SE, RE and AAI were recorded and ROC curves comparing AAI to RE and SE showed a highly significant (p<0.0001) area under the curve. The RE and SE cut-off values (showing maximal sensitivity with maximal specificity) to discriminate anesthesia from awake or consciousness sedation were 61 and 58, respectively. However, in a group of data points, low AAI was associated to high SpEn (577 data points for RE and 770 for SE) and vice versa (31 data points for RE and 43 for SE). The prediction probability for SE was 0.977 and for RE was 0.968. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SpEn is as effective as AAI. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that SpEn is able to discriminate between the levels of wakefulness and surgical anesthesia. However, the meaning of data showing a discrepancy between AAI and SpEn is not yet clear and calls for further study.