Variations of the NodB Architecture Are Attuned to Functional Specificities into and beyond the Carbohydrate Esterase Family 4.

Enzymes of the carbohydrate esterase family 4 (CE4) deacetylate a broad range of substrates, including linear, branched and mesh-like polysaccharides. Although they are enzymes of variable amino acid sequence length, they all comprise the conserved catalytic domain NodB. NodB carries the metal binding and active site residues and is characterized by a set of conserved sequence motifs, which are linked to the deacetylation activity. Besides a non-structured, flexible peptide of variable length that precedes NodB, several members of the CE4 family contain additional domains whose function or contribution to substrate specificity are not efficiently characterized. Evidence suggests that CE4 family members comprising solely the NodB domain have developed features linked to a variety of substrate specificities. To understand the NodB-based substrate diversity within the CE4 family, we perform a comparative analysis of all NodB domains structurally characterized so far. We show that amino acid sequence variations, topology diversities and excursions away from the framework structure give rise to different NodB domain classes associated with different substrate specificities and particular functions within and beyond the CE4 family. Our work reveals a link between specific NodB domain characteristics and substrate recognition. Thus, the details of the fold are clarified, and the structural basis of its variations is deciphered and associated with function. The conclusions of this work are also used to make predictions and propose specific functions for biochemically/enzymatically uncharacterized NodB-containing proteins, which have generally been considered as putative CE4 deacetylases. We show that some of them probably belong to different enzymatic families.

Structural Evolution of Primate Glutamate Dehydrogenase 2 as Revealed by In Silico Predictions and Experimentally Determined Structures.

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) interconverts glutamate to a-ketoglutarate and ammonia, interconnecting amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism. In humans, two functional GDH genes, GLUD1 and GLUD2, encode for hGDH1 and hGDH2, respectively. GLUD2 evolved from retrotransposition of the GLUD1 gene in the common ancestor of modern apes. These two isoenzymes are involved in the pathophysiology of human metabolic, neoplastic, and neurodegenerative disorders. The 3D structures of hGDH1 and hGDH2 have been experimentally determined; however, no information is available about the path of GDH2 structure changes during primate evolution. Here, we compare the structures predicted by the AlphaFold Colab method for the GDH2 enzyme of modern apes and their extinct primate ancestors. Also, we analyze the individual effect of amino acid substitutions emerging during primate evolution. Our most important finding is that the predicted structure of GDH2 in the common ancestor of apes was the steppingstone for the structural evolution of primate GDH2s. Two changes with a strong functional impact occurring at the first evolutionary step, Arg443Ser and Gly456Ala, had a destabilizing and stabilizing effect, respectively, making this step the most important one. Subsequently, GDH2 underwent additional modifications that fine-tuned its enzymatic properties to adapt to the functional needs of modern-day primate tissues.