Academic productivity and NIH funding for anesthesiology departmental chairs: A 15-year comparison.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether there were improvements in the number of departmental National Institutes of Health (NIH) training grants and the academic productivity of departmental chairs in terms of NIH research funding and PubMed-cited publications when compared to chairs of the same departments in 2006. DESIGN: Each chair was identified from the Society of Academic Associations of Academic Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine's Association of Academic Anesthesiology Chairs and entered into the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORTER), PubMed, SCOPUS, and the National Provider Identifier Registry. MEASUREMENTS: The number and funding amounts of training grants awarded to the department in 2010, 2015, and 2020 were obtained as well as the department's national ranking and total dollar amount for NIH funding in 2020. For the current chair cohort, total publications and m-quotient (h-index corrected for active research years) were recorded along with each chair's history of NIH grant funding. These data were compared to a previous study of anesthesiology chairs that reviewed funding and publications through 2006. MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed data from 100 academic departments of anesthesiology and compared their scholarly activity relative to data gathered in 2006. In 2020, 52 of 100 departments of anesthesiology had evidence of NIH funding. There were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences in grants funding obtained by chairs between 2006 and 2020 with the exception that more chairs in 2006 had program or center grants. Median publications for chairs significantly increased from 35 in 2006 to 55 in 2021 (IRR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2-2.0, P = 0.003). Nineteen percent of chairs were female, which did not significantly differ from the proportion of women in the 2006 paper (15%, χ2 = 0.57, df = 1, P = 0.452). Of the male chairs, 90% were professors whereas 63% of female chairs were professors (χ2 = 8.8, df = 1, P = 0.003). Female chairs had fewer publications than male chairs (IRR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2-1.8, P = 0.002); however, m-quotients were not significantly different between men and women (P = 0.602). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to 2006, department of anesthesiology chairs had more publications in 2021; however, NIH funding rates remained unchanged. The specialty had 19% female chairs, and those chairs had fewer publications than their male counterparts, though sex differences were attenuated using metrics that account for disparities in career length.

Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management for Adult Patients with Burns.

Patients with burns suffer from excruciating pain, thus presenting unique challenges to the hospital staff involved in their care. Any hospital system may be involved in managing smaller and less serious burns, but patients with more complicated issues are often transferred to a burn center. This article will review the pathophysiological evolution of pain immediately after burn injury to emphasize the role of complex inflammatory pathways involved in the progression of burn pain. This review also focuses on managing acute pain using a combined multimodal and regional pain management approach. Finally, we attempt to address the continuum from acute to chronic pain management and the strategies used to minimize and manage the progression to chronic pain. Chronic pain remains a debilitating outcome of burn injury, and this article discusses efforts to mitigate this complication. Available options for pain treatment are important to discuss, as current drug shortages may limit medications that can be used.

Patients Undergoing Elective Inpatient Major Therapeutic Procedures in Florida Had No Significant Change in Hospital Mortality or Mortality-Related Comorbidities Between 2007 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: In a recent study, rapid response team implementation at 1 hospital was associated with only a 0.1% reduction in inpatient mortality from 2005 to 2018, characterized in the accompanying editorial as a "tepid" improvement. The editorialist postulated that an increase in the degree of illness of hospitalized patients might have masked a larger reduction that otherwise might have occurred. Impressions of greater patient acuity during the studied period might have been an artifact of efforts to document more comorbidities and complications, possibly facilitated by the change in diagnosis coding from the International Classification of Diseases , Ninth Revision ( ICD-9 ) to the Tenth Revision ( ICD-10 ). METHODS: We used inpatient data from every nonfederal hospital in Florida from the last quarter of 2007 through 2019. We studied hospitalizations for major therapeutic surgical procedures with lengths of stay ≥2 days. Using logistic regression with clustering by the Clinical Classification Software (CCS) code of the primary surgical procedure, we evaluated the trends for decreased mortality, changes in the prevalence of Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG) with complications or comorbidities (CC) or major complications or major comorbidities (MCC), and changes in the van Walraven index (vWI), a measure of patient comorbidities associated with increased inpatient mortality. Also incorporated in the modeling was the change from ICD-9 to ICD-10 . RESULTS: There were 3,151,107 hospitalizations comprising 130 distinct CCS codes and 453 MS-DRG groups among 213 hospitals. Despite a progressive increase of 4.1% per year in the odds of a CC or MCC ( P = .001), there were no significant changes in the marginal estimates of in-house mortality over time (net estimated decrease, 0.036%; 99% confidence interval [CI], -0.168% to 0.097%; P = .49). There was also absence of a significantly greater fraction of discharges with vWI >0 attributable to the year of the study (odds ratio, 1.017 per year; 99% CI, 0.995-1.041). The changes in MS-DRG to those with CC or MCC were not increased significantly from either the ICD-10 coding change or the number of years after the change. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the previous study, there was at most a small decrease in the mortality rate over a 12-year period. We found no reliable evidence that patients undergoing elective inpatient surgical procedures were any sicker in 2019 than in 2007. There were substantively more comorbidities and complications documented over time, but this was unrelated to the change to ICD-10 coding.

Association of surgeons' gender with elective surgical lists in the State of Florida is explained by differences in mean operative caseloads.

BACKGROUND: A recent publication reported that at three hospitals within one academic health system, female surgeons received less surgical block time than male surgeons, suggesting potential gender-based bias in operating room scheduling. We examined this observation's generalizability. METHODS: Our cross-sectional retrospective cohort study of State of Florida administrative data included all 4,176,551 ambulatory procedural encounters and inpatient elective surgical cases performed January 2017 through December 2019 by 8875 surgeons (1830 female) at all 609 non-federal hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers. There were 1,509,190 lists of cases (i.e., combinations of the same surgeon, facility, and date). Logistic regression adjusted for covariables of decile of surgeon's quarterly cases, surgeon's specialty, quarter, and facility. RESULTS: Selecting randomly a male and a female surgeons' quarter, for 66% of selections, the male surgeon performed more cases (P < .0001). Without adjustment for quarterly caseloads, lists comprised one case for 44.2% of male and 54.6% of female surgeons (difference 10.4%, P < .0001). A similar result held for lists with one or two cases (difference 9.1%, P < .0001). However, incorporating quarterly operative caseloads, the direction of the observed difference between male and female surgeons was reversed both for case lists with one (-2.1%, P = .03) or one or two cases (-1.8%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the aforementioned single university health system results but show that the differences between male and female surgeons in their lists were not due to systematic bias in operating room scheduling (e.g., completing three brief elective cases in a week on three different workdays) but in their total case numbers. The finding that surgeons performing lists comprising a single case were more often female than male provides a previously unrecognized reason why operating room managers should help facilitate the workload of surgeons performing only one case on operative (anesthesia) workdays.

Staying proper with your personal protective equipment: How to don and doff.

INTRODUCTION: The global COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of protecting frontline healthcare workers from novel respiratory infections while also exposing the limited instruction that medical students receive on proper donning of personal protective equipment (PPE) and more importantly the safe doffing of contaminated PPE to minimize their risk of nosocomial infection. The best methods of providing this kind of instruction have not yet been determined. METHODS: Anesthesiology interns and CA-1 residents were trained on proper PPE donning and doffing for AGPs using a methodology based on Miller's pyramid and following a "knows-knows how-shows-does" progression. Participants donned PPE without instruction and were sprayed with Glo Germ® to identify areas of contamination, after which they received both video and in-person instruction on best practices for donning and doffing PPE for AGPs. Following instruction, they again donned PPE and were sprayed with Glo Germ® to identify areas of contamination. RESULTS: 54 participants completed the study. Before training, overall donning compliance was 60% and overall doffing compliance was 48%. Overall, 70% were contaminated after PPE doffing, with 46% having multiple sites of contamination. After training, donning compliance increased by nearly 30% (P < 0.001), doffing compliance increased by over 20% (P < 0.001), and overall contamination decreased by nearly 30% (P = 0.029), with multiple-site contamination decreasing to only 6% (P = 0.013). DISCUSSION: While best methods for providing instruction regarding topics such as PPE donning and doffing have not yet been determined, we have demonstrated that the underlying knowledge base from medical school regarding proper donning and doffing for respiratory isolation is insufficient for preventing self-contamination, and that Miller's pyramid-based training using both video and in-person instruction combined with task execution by learners can improve compliance with PPE donning and doffing protocols and more importantly decrease skin contamination among a group of early training anesthesiology residents.

The BUDDYS System: A Unique Peer Support Strategy Among Anaesthesiology Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic stressed healthcare organizations. Initial efforts focused on supplies with a minimal empha- sis on frontline healthcare workers' wellbeing. Anaesthesiology residents represent vulnerable frontline healthcare workers because airway pro- cedures increase nosocomial infection risks. Peer support can promote healthcare workers' wellbeing during crises; its application to graduate medical trainees is underrepresented in the literature. We implemented a quality improvement project to improve wellbeing among anaesthesiol- ogy residents via a peer support system called BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support. METHODS: BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support consists of pairing 2 anaesthesiology residents with instructions to support each other in anticipation of a coronavirus disease 2019 case surge. A lecture presentation introduced this system to the residents and described frequent check-ins with another resident. We evaluated the initiative with a survey 2-4 weeks postimplementation. RESULTS: BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support began in April 2020 and involved 88 residents. Survey respondents (n = 58) indicated that BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support had a positive impact on their wellbeing. BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support implementation had no additional costs, requiring minimal resource dedication. CONCLUSIONS: BUilding Dynamic Duos for Your Support promoted wellbeing among anaesthesiology trainees. This quality improvement project highlights the positive impact of a peer support system on anaesthesiology residents' wellbeing with a potential broader application to graduate medical education.

Benchmarking Surgeons' Gender and Year of Medical School Graduation Associated With Monthly Operative Workdays for Multispecialty Groups.

Background Female surgeons reportedly receive less surgical block time and fewer procedural referrals than male surgeons. In this study, we compared operative days between female and male surgeons throughout Florida. Our objective was to facilitate benchmarking by multispecialty groups, both the endpoint to use for statistically reliable results and expected differences. Methodology The historical cohort study included all 4,060,070 ambulatory procedural encounters and inpatient elective surgical states performed between January 2017 and December 2019 by 8,472 surgeons at 609 facilities. Surgeons' gender, year of medical school graduation, and surgical specialty were obtained from their National Provider Identifiers. Results Female surgeons operated an average of 1.0 fewer days per month than matched male surgeons (99% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.2 fewer days, P < 0.0001). The mean differences were 0.8 to 1.4 fewer days per month among each of the five quintiles of years of graduation from medical school (all P ≤ 0.0050). Results were comparable when repeated using the number of monthly cases the surgeons performed. Conclusions An average difference of ≤1.4 days per month is a conservative estimate for the current status quo of the workload difference in Florida. Suppose that a group's female surgeons average more than two fewer operative days per month than the group's male surgeons of the same specialty. Such a large average difference would call for investigation of what might reflect systematic bias. While such a difference may reflect good flexibility of the organization, it may show a lack of responsiveness (e.g., fewer referrals of procedural patients to female surgeons or bias when apportioning allocated operating room time).

Impact of Simulation on Critical Care Fellows' Electroencephalography Learning.

Introduction Continuous electroencephalography (EEG) is an important monitoring modality in the intensive care unit and a key skill for critical care fellows (CCFs) to learn. Our objective was to evaluate with CCFs an EEG educational curriculum on a web-based simulator. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted at a major academic medical center in Florida. After Institutional Review Board approval, 13 CCFs from anesthesiology, surgery, and pulmonary medicine consented to take an EEG curriculum. A 25-item EEG assessment was completed at baseline, after 10 EEG interpretations with a neurophysiologist, and after 10 clinically relevant EEG-based simulations providing clinical EEG interpretation hints. A 50-minute tutorial podcast was viewed after the baseline assessment. Main assessment outcomes included multiple outcomes related to web-based simulator performance: percent of hints used, percent of first words on EEG interpretation correct, and percent hint-based EEG interpretation score correct, with higher scores indicating more correct answers. Participants completed a 25-item EEG assessment before (baseline) and after the web-based simulator. Results All 13 CCFs completed the curriculum. Between scenarios, there were differences in percent of hints used (F9,108 = 11.7, p < 0.001), percent of first words correct (F9,108 = 13.6, p < 0.001), and overall percent hint-based score (F9,108 = 14.0, p < 0.001). Nonconvulsive status epilepticus had the lowest percent of hints used (15%) and the highest hint-based score (87%). Overall percent hint-based score (mean across all scenarios) was positively correlated with change in performance as the number of correct answers on the 25-item EEG assessment from before to after the web-based simulator activity (Spearman's rho = 0.67, p = 0.023). Conclusions A self-paced EEG interpretation curriculum involving a flipped classroom and screen-based simulation each requiring less than an hour to complete significantly improved CCF scores on the EEG assessment compared to baseline.

More surgery in December among US patients with commercial insurance is offset by unrelated but lesser surgery among patients with Medicare insurance.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether there is more surgery (in the US State of Florida) at the end of the year, specifically among patients with commercial insurance. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: The 712 facilities in Florida that performed inpatient or outpatient elective surgery from January 2010 through December 2019. RESULTS: Among patients with commercial insurance, December had more cases than November (1.108 [1.092-1.125]) or January (1.257 [1.229-1.286]). In contrast, among patients with Medicare insurance (traditional or managed care), December had fewer cases than November (ratio 0.917 [99% confidence interval 0.904-0.930]) or January (0.823 [0.807-0.839]) of the same year. Summing among all cases, December did not have more cases than November (ratio 1.003 [0.992-1.014]) or January (0.998 [0.984-1.013]). Comparing December versus November (January) ratios for cases among patients with commercial insurance to the corresponding ratios for cases among patients with Medicare, years with more commercial insurance cases had more Medicare cases (Spearman rank correlation +0.36 [+0.25], both p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the US State of Florida, although some surgeons' procedural workloads may have seasonal variation if they care mostly for patients with one category of insurance, surgical facilities with patients undergoing many procedures will have less variability. Importantly, more commercial insurance cases were not causing Medicare cases to be postponed or vice-versa, providing mechanistic explanation for why forecasts of surgical demand can reasonably be treated as the sum of the independent workloads among many surgeons.

Similarities Between Pediatric and General Hospitals Based on Fundamental Attributes of Surgery Including Cases Per Surgeon Per Workday.

Introduction Operating room (OR) management decision-making at both pediatric and adult hospitals is determined, in large part, by the same fundamental attributes of surgery and other considerations related to case duration prediction. These include the non-preemptive nature of surgeries, wide prediction limits for case duration, and constraints to moving or resequencing cases on the day of surgery. Another attribute fundamentally affecting OR management is the median number of cases a surgeon performs on their OR days. Most adult surgeons have short lists of cases (i.e., one or two cases per day). Similarly, at adult hospitals, growth in caseloads is mostly due to the subset of those surgeons who also operate just once or twice per week. It is unknown if these characteristics of surgery apply to pediatric surgeons and pediatric hospitals as well. Methods Our retrospective cohort study included all elective surgical cases performed at the six pediatric hospitals in Florida during 2018 and 2019 (n = 71,340 cases). We calculated the percentages of combinations of surgeon, date, and hospital (lists) comprising one or two cases, or just one case, and determined if the values were statistically >50% (i.e., indicative of "most"). We determined if most of the growth in caseload and intraoperative work relative value units (wRVUs) at the pediatric hospitals between 2018 and 2019 accrued from low-caseload surgeons. Results are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean. Results Averaging among the six pediatric hospitals, the non-holiday weekday lists of most surgeons at each facility had just one or two elective cases, inpatient and/or ambulatory (68.1%; p = 0.016 vs. 50%, n = 27,557 lists). Growth in surgical caseloads from 2018 to 2019 was mostly attributable to surgeons who in 2018 averaged ≤2.0 cases per week (76.3% ± 5.4%, p = 0.0085 vs. 50%). Similarly, growth in wRVUs was mostly attributable to these low-caseload surgeons (73.8% ± 5.4%, p = 0.017 vs. 50%). Conclusions Like adult hospitals, most pediatric surgeons' lists of cases consist of only one or two cases per day, with many lists containing a single case. Similarly, growth at pediatric hospitals accrued from low-caseload surgeons who performed one or two cases per week in the preceding year. These findings indicate that hospitals desiring to increase their surgical caseload should ensure that low-caseload surgeons are provided access to the OR schedule. Additionally, since percent-adjusted utilization and raw utilization cannot be accurately measured for low-caseload surgeons, neither metric should be used to allocate OR time to individual surgeons. Since most adult and pediatric surgeons have low caseloads, this is a fundamental attribute of surgery.

Elective surgery growth at Florida hospitals accrues mostly from surgeons averaging 2 or fewer cases per week: A retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hospital administrators often seek to increase operating room (OR) elective caseload. Previous studies from Iowa demonstrated that surgical growth is mostly from low-caseload surgeons (ie, ≤2 cases per week). We repeated that study using data from Florida, a much more populous state, to confirm the generalizability of the findings. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All hospitals in the state of Florida. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing elective surgery during 2018 and 2019. MEASUREMENTS: We determined growth between 2018 and 2019 in regular-workday elective surgical caseload and intraoperative work relative value units (wRVU) at hospitals. Using the two-sided, one group Student t-test, we compared the fractions of those increases attributable to low-caseload surgeons vs. 50% to assess if they accounted for most surgical growth. We used the exact binomial test to compare the fraction of hospitals where most growth (>50%) occurred from low-caseload surgeons to half (50%). MAIN RESULTS: We studied the 1,629,879 elective cases from 202 hospitals. Surgeons averaging ≤2.0 cases per week accounted for 73.3% (P < 0.0001 compared to 50%) of caseload growth and 68.7% (P < 0.0001 compared to 50%) of wRVU growth. The corresponding overall pooled growth estimates among hospitals were 70.8% for caseload and 65.0% for wRVU. There were 76.2% of the N = 202 hospitals with more than half their growth in cases from surgeons performing, on average, ≤2.0 cases per week (P < 0.0001 compared to 50% of hospitals). The vast majority of surgical growth at hospitals accrued from the contributions of low-caseload surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical growth in elective surgery at Florida hospitals accrued mostly from the increased activity of low-caseload surgeons averaging ≤2.0 cases per week during the preceding year, confirming the generalizability of the previous Iowa study. If growth in caseload is desired, surgical governance committees should ensure that low-caseload surgeons have access to the OR schedule.