Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 100
Filtrar
1.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(5): 293-294, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39328380
2.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(6): 340-341, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39328890
3.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(4): 233-234, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39301098
4.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(3): 162-163, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39297065
5.
Blood Cancer J ; 14(1): 149, 2024 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39191731

RESUMO

Many studies have documented racial, socioeconomic, geographic, and other disparities for United States (US) patients with multiple myeloma pertaining to diagnosis and frontline management. In contrast, very little is known about disparities in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) despite a plethora of novel treatment options. In this review, we discuss the manifestations of disparities in RRMM and strategies to mitigate their impact. Immunomodulatory drugs can create disparities on many axes, for example inappropriately low dosing due to Duffy-null status as well as time toxicity and financial toxicity from logistical hurdles for socioeconomically vulnerable patients. Access to myeloma expertise at high-volume centers is a critical consideration given the disconnect between how drugs like carfilzomib and dexamethasone are prescribed in trials versus optimized in real-world practice to lower toxicities. Disparities in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibody therapy span across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic lines in large part due to their limited availability outside of high-volume centers. Another insidious source of disparities is supportive care in RRMM, ranging from inadequate pain control in Black patients to limited primary care provider access in rural settings. We discuss the rationales and evidence base for several solutions aimed at mitigating these disparities: for example, (1) bidirectional co-management with community-based oncologists, (2) screening for risk factors based on social determinants of health, (3) strategies to build patient trust with regard to clinical trials, and (4) longitudinal access to a primary care provider. As the treatment landscape for RRMM continues to expand, these types of efforts by the field will help ensure that this landscape is equally accessible and traversable for all US patients.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Mieloma Múltiplo , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Consenso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(2): 86-87, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132549
7.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 15(1): 13-14, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39055365
8.
Blood Cancer J ; 14(1): 90, 2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821914

RESUMO

The presence of extramedullary disease (EMD) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Herein, we report the outcomes of RRMM patients who were treated with standard-of-care (SOC) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and had active extraosseous EMD before the infusion. Data were retrospectively collected from patients at three US institutions with the intent to receive SOC CAR T. Responses were assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A total of 152 patients proceeded with infusion, of whom 47 (31%) had EMD (EMD group) and 105 (69%) did not (non-EMD group). Baseline patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The EMD group had a higher incidence of high-grade CRS, steroid and anakinra use, and thrombocytopenia on day +30 compared to the non-EMD group. In addition, the EMD group had an inferior overall response rate (58% vs 96%, p < 0.00001), median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs 12.4 months; p < 0.0001), and overall survival (OS) (12.2 vs 27.5 months; p = 0.00058) compared to the non-EMD group. We further subdivided the non-EMD patients into those with paramedullary disease (PMD-only group, n = 26 [17%]) and those with neither EMD nor PMD (bone marrow-contained group or BM-only group, n = 79 [52%]). Patients with PMD-only had similar median PFS (11.2 vs 13.6 months, p = 0.3798) and OS (not reached [NR] vs 27.5 months, p = 0.6446) compared to patients with BM-only disease. However, patients with EMD exhibited inferior median PFS (5.1 vs 13.6 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (12.2 vs 27.5, p = 0.0008) compared to patients in the BM-only group. Treatment with SOC CAR T yielded meaningful clinical outcomes in real-world RRMM patients with extraosseous EMD, though responses and survival outcomes were suboptimal compared to patients without EMD. The presence of only EMD but not PMD was associated with significantly worse survival outcomes following the CAR T infusion.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Padrão de Cuidado , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia
9.
Am J Hematol ; 99(6): 1205-1207, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602288

RESUMO

The findings of this study highlight a 95% accuracy rate in ChatGPT responses, as assessed by five myeloma specialists, underscoring its potential as a reliable educational tool.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino
10.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(6): 466-467, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37808074
11.
J Clin Med ; 12(17)2023 Aug 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37685606

RESUMO

Anti-B-cell maturation antigen therapies consisting of bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells have shown promising results in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the severe side effects include cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, cytopenia(s), infections, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and organ toxicity, which could sometimes be life-threatening. This review focuses on these most common complications post-BCMA therapy. We discussed the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical features associated with these complications, and how to prevent and treat them. We included four original studies for this focused review. All four agents (idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, teclistamab, belantamab mafodotin) have received FDA approval for adult RRMM patients. We went through the FDA access data packages of the approved agents to outline stepwise management of the complications for better patient outcomes.

12.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(5): 356-357, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37576367
13.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(4): 269-270, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37313281
14.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(3): 189-190, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197722

RESUMO

This special issue of JADPRO includes summaries of select educational sessions presented at JADPRO Live 2022.

15.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(3): 223-226, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197733

RESUMO

In the popular biomarker-focused session at JADPRO Live 2022, presenters paired biomarkers with tumor types for which their expression is most commonly used to determine targeted therapy, identified key assays used to measure common biomarkers, and reviewed recommendations and guidelines for biomarker testing.

16.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(7)2023 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37046821

RESUMO

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process.

17.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(2): 115-116, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37009410
19.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 14(1): 20-21, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36741210
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA