Single-port hidden incision endoscopic (HIdES) pediatric nephrectomy via pfannenstiel incision.

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and hidden incision endoscopic surgery techniques are increasingly used in pediatric urology. For pediatric nephrectomy, access through a single Pfannenstiel incision is novel and may offer cosmetic benefit. In this retrospective study, we describe this approach and assess operative outcomes associated with this technique. Patients who underwent LESS nephrectomy through a single Pfannenstiel incision had minimal blood loss, short length of stay, low risk of surgical complications, and satisfactory wound healing. The Pfannenstiel approach to LESS nephrectomy is feasible, versatile, and achieves excellent operative and cosmetic outcomes, although direct comparison to other approaches is warranted.

Medical management of neurogenic bladder in patients with spina bifida: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Neurogenic bladder is a common source of morbidity in patients with spina bifida and can cause renal damage. Medical management may include imaging, urodynamic studies (UDS), laboratory testing, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC), and medication. There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal management regimen. Approaches are described by two paradigms: proactive and expectant management. In a proactive approach, invasive interventions like CIC and UDS are initiated before the onset of renal abnormalities. In expectant management, UDS, CIC, and medications are started after abnormalities are identified. In this scoping review, we aim to comprehensively review existing literature on outcomes of proactive and expectant management of neurogenic bladder in patients with spina bifida. METHODS: We searched multiple databases and screened articles for inclusion using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included studies reported clinical outcomes of any aspect of proactive or expectant neurogenic bladder management in patients with spina bifida. RESULTS: Ultimately, 74 articles were included for review including 67 cohort studies, 4 cross-sectional studies, 2 sequential cohort studies, and 1 randomized control trial. Eleven studies directly compared management strategies. There was substantial heterogeneity in study designs, management protocols, and reported outcomes. Most studies addressed multiple simultaneous aspects of management without specifically analyzing individual aspects. However, some commented on individual aspects of management including UDS (13), CIC (32), imaging (7), and medication (5). Although there was no consensus about optimal management, all direct comparisons of paradigms supported a proactive approach. CONCLUSION: Our review identified a broad body of literature about optimal management of neurogenic bladder. Existing studies vary greatly in terms of treatment protocols, measured outcomes, and management recommendations. Overall, studies that directly compare management are scarce but favor proactive management. Given the implications on clinical outcomes, it is crucial to focus future work on directly comparing management strategies and isolating the effects of different individual management elements.

Framing the picture: Impact of radiographic imaging on parental vesicoureteral reflux management preferences.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Given the variety of treatment options for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), shared decision making between clinicians and parents is essential. Despite its importance, shared decision making is limited by the framing effect - people process the same information differently depending on how it is presented. Studies have also demonstrated that showing patients their radiology images can impact behaviors. In this pilot study, we sought to determine if showing parents radiographic images could serve as a framing tool that impacts the decision of whether to pursue surgery, endoscopic intervention, or conservative management for VUR. METHODS: We designed a survey instrument which provided background on VUR and a hypothetical scenario of a 2-year-old child with VUR who had a breakthrough febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). Guideline-concordant management options were presented: (1) change antibiotics, (2) endoscopic management, or (3) open or laparoscopic surgery. All options were similarly presented regarding risks, benefits, and length of stay. Respondents were randomized into a group with no image accompanying the clinical scenario or a group which had a labeled image of a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) demonstrating unilateral VUR. Respondents also answered demographic and health experience questions. The instrument was published on Amazon's Mechanical Turk online work interface which provides reliable and validated results in VUR experiments. Parents aged 18-60 years old were eligible. Responses with failed attention questions, duplicate internet addresses, or submission times <1 or >30 min were disqualified. Data were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, and multinomial logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed after excluding all responses submitted under 2, 3, and 5 min. RESULTS: There were a total of 914 responses, 426 met inclusion criteria. The presence or absence of a VCUG image did not result in a statically significant difference in the management decision (p = 0.081). Multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that prior UTI experience influenced the management decision (p = 0.027). Sensitivity analyses revealed a significant difference in the management decision when excluding responses <5 min (p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: In this analysis, there was no statistically significant framing effect by radiographic images on parental management decision for VUR. Multinomial analyses suggested that prior experience with UTI has an impact on VUR management decisions. These results need to be considered within the limitations of this pilot study - the respondents were given a hypothetical clinical scenario and the survey instrument cannot replace an in-office discussion. Further analyses on framing and its role in pre-operative counseling is warranted.

Financial toxicity among individuals with spina bifida and their families: A qualitative study and conceptual model.

INTRODUCTION: Spina bifida is the most common permanently disabling birth defect in the United States and requires lifelong, multi-specialty care. The cost of such care has the potential to result in financial toxicity - the 'objective financial burden' and 'subjective financial distress' which can negatively impact clinical outcomes. While this concept has been extensively studied in other areas of medicine, particularly oncology, financial toxicity has not yet been examined in pediatric urology or in individuals with spina bifida and their families/caregivers. OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively explore the presence of financial toxicity in individuals with spina bifida and their caregivers with the objective of identifying themes and creating a conceptual model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals with spina bifida and/or their caregivers with the aim of eliciting information regarding financial distress associated with spina bifida care. Interviews were transcribed and qualitative thematic analysis was performed to identify recurring themes. These insights were used to create a conceptual model of financial toxicity among individuals with spina bifida. RESULTS: A total of 14 interviews were conducted (total of 6 patients and 13 parents/caregivers). Average patient age was 17.9 years. Five dominant themes were identified: 1) resources (insurance type, community support, etc.), 2) direct costs (copays, deductibles, travel expenses, etc.), 3) indirect costs (lost work time, hindered career advancement, resource navigation burden, etc.), 4) coping (work adjustments, decreased spending, etc.), and 5) affect (lack of control, uncertainty, worry, etc.). These insights were used to create a conceptual model. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to explore financial toxicity in spina bifida and establish a conceptual model. Our findings are corroborated by prior spina bifida literature and are closely mirrored by studies in cancer patients. Given that financial toxicity is associated with negative outcomes in other medical domains, the impact of financial toxicity on health outcomes among individuals with spina bifida warrants further study, particularly in instrument development to better understand and quantify financial toxicity in this group. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is a concern among individuals with spina bifida and their caregivers. This concept will need to be investigated further in order to develop validated measurement tools, identify solutions, and provide optimal care; our conceptual model will help guide these future investigations.

Behavioral Economics in Urology: A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: Behavioral economics is the study of human behavior in the context of irrationality, self-control and self-interest. It has been leveraged in a variety of ways in health care, including efforts to decrease smoking, encourage weight loss and promote medication adherence. Concepts from this field can be used to help urologists better understand and improve behavior-dependent clinical outcomes. Our objective in this scoping review was to assess the current state of behavioral economics in the urological literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of behavioral economic research in urology by performing a broad search in MEDLINE®, Embase® and Scopus® databases from inception to August 30, 2021. Abstracts were screened, assessed for relevancy and selected for full-text review. A qualitative synthesis of selected manuscripts was then performed. RESULTS: A total of 1,855 articles were identified. Sixty-one articles were selected for full-text review. Of those, 13 were selected for qualitative synthesis. The selected articles included reports of prospective trials (6), ongoing prospective trial methods (1), abstracts without a published manuscript (4) and commentaries (2). A variety of topics were covered: prostate cancer (5), resident education (2), hematuria (1), incontinence (1), surgical costs (1), care pathways (1), nephrolithiasis (1) and bladder cancer (1). CONCLUSIONS: There is a very limited number of articles, and even fewer trials, in urology that leverage behavioral economic concepts. Given this, and the successful application of behavioral economics in other medical disciplines, there is a need for behavioral economic informed urological interventions and well-designed trials to evaluate behavioral economics outcomes in urology.