A Comparison of Rapid Rule-Learning Strategies in Humans and Monkeys.

Interspecies comparisons are key to deriving an understanding of the behavioral and neural correlates of human cognition from animal models. We perform a detailed comparison of the strategies of female macaque monkeys to male and female humans on a variant of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), a widely studied and applied task that provides a multiattribute measure of cognitive function and depends on the frontal lobe. WCST performance requires the inference of a rule change given ambiguous feedback. We found that well-trained monkeys infer new rules three times more slowly than minimally instructed humans. Input-dependent hidden Markov model-generalized linear models were fit to their choices, revealing hidden states akin to feature-based attention in both species. Decision processes resembled a win-stay, lose-shift strategy with interspecies similarities as well as key differences. Monkeys and humans both test multiple rule hypotheses over a series of rule-search trials and perform inference-like computations to exclude candidate choice options. We quantitatively show that perseveration, random exploration, and poor sensitivity to negative feedback account for the slower task-switching performance in monkeys.

Unsupervised restoration of a complex learned behavior after large-scale neuronal perturbation.

Reliable execution of precise behaviors requires that brain circuits are resilient to variations in neuronal dynamics. Genetic perturbation of the majority of excitatory neurons in HVC, a brain region involved in song production, in adult songbirds with stereotypical songs triggered severe degradation of the song. The song fully recovered within 2 weeks, and substantial improvement occurred even when animals were prevented from singing during the recovery period, indicating that offline mechanisms enable recovery in an unsupervised manner. Song restoration was accompanied by increased excitatory synaptic input to neighboring, unmanipulated neurons in the same brain region. A model inspired by the behavioral and electrophysiological findings suggests that unsupervised single-cell and population-level homeostatic plasticity rules can support the functional restoration after large-scale disruption of networks that implement sequential dynamics. These observations suggest the existence of cellular and systems-level restorative mechanisms that ensure behavioral resilience.

Emergence of co-tuning in inhibitory neurons as a network phenomenon mediated by randomness, correlations, and homeostatic plasticity.

Cortical excitatory neurons show clear tuning to stimulus features, but the tuning properties of inhibitory interneurons are ambiguous. While inhibitory neurons have been considered to be largely untuned, some studies show that some parvalbumin-expressing (PV) neurons do show feature selectivity and participate in co-tuned subnetworks with pyramidal neurons. In this study, we first use mean-field theory to demonstrate that a combination of homeostatic plasticity governing the synaptic dynamics of the connections from PV to excitatory neurons, heterogeneity in the excitatory postsynaptic potentials that impinge on PV neurons, and shared correlated input from layer 4 results in the functional and structural self-organization of PV subnetworks. Second, we show that structural and functional feature tuning of PV neurons emerges more clearly at the network level, i.e., that population-level measures identify functional and structural co-tuning of PV neurons that are not evident in pairwise individual-level measures. Finally, we show that such co-tuning can enhance network stability at the cost of reduced feature selectivity.