Retrospective analysis of medium-term outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery performed in a tertiary spinal surgical centre.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) can treat spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease and pseudoarthrosis. This approach facilitates complete discectomy, disc space distraction, indirect decompression of neural foramina and placement of large interbody devices. Several intra- and postoperative complications can be attributed to the anterior approach: vascular/visceral injury, hypogastric plexus injury and urogenital consequences. Spine-specific complications include implant migration, graft failure, pseudoarthrosis and persistent symptomology. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patient demographics, medium-term outcomes and complication rates following ALIF surgery performed over a 5-year period. A total of 110 consecutive patients had undergone ALIF surgery at a single tertiary spinal centre. The database was reviewed with a primary outcome of identifying postoperative 90-day complications and whether a revision anterior operation was required after primary ALIF. RESULTS: No patients required revision anterior operation after their primary ALIF surgery by final follow-up. Out of 110 patients, 11 (10%) recorded a complication attributed to the anterior stage of their operation within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our 90-day complication rate of 10% lies within the 2.6% acute complication and 40% overall complications rates described in previous literature. The risk of vascular/visceral injury is significant (3%) and we recommend that ALIF be performed as a dual surgeon procedure with a vascular-trained access surgeon accompanying the spinal surgeon. ALIF is a valid revision surgical option for failed posterior approaches leading to complications such as pseudoarthrosis. In our sample, 89% of patients were managed with posterior fixation to augment the anterior fusion as, biomechanically, this is a proven construct.

Does titanium cage subsidence affect clinical outcomes in ACDF surgery? A tertiary centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery has been well documented with rates of up to 40%. Cages fill the void after cervical discectomy and promote fusion. These materials have different biomechanical profiles with differing rates of subsidence. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine subsidence rates specifically associated with the novel Emerging Implant Technologies (EIT) titanium cage, identify risk factors associated with subsidence, and evaluate whether subsidence affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: ACDF with insertion of stand-alone EIT cage was performed in 39 patients (64 levels) between December 2016 and February 2019 with a median follow-up of 11 months. Patients were classified into two groups; subsidence and non-subsidence, and were compared in terms of the resultant clinical outcomes as well as presence of risk factors. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores. RESULTS: Cage subsidence (>3mm) was present in nine patients (23%), which corresponded to ten levels treated (16%). Development of subsidence was not associated with gender (p = 0.12), age (p = 0.27), smoking (p = 0.13), number of treatment levels (p = 0.10) or cage size used (p = 0.34). It had no effect on any of the HRQOL outcomes, namely VAS Neck (p = 0.07), VAS Arms (p = 0.08), EQ-5D-5L (p = 0.36), EQ VAS (p = 0.85) and NDI (p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: The EIT cage seems to be associated with lower rates of subsidence compared with other cage types. Cage subsidence was not associated with HRQOL outcomes or risk factors.

Is Preexisting Cervical Degeneration a Risk Factor for Poor Prognosis in Whiplash-Associated Disorder?

BACKGROUND: The term whiplash describes the acceleration-deceleration mechanism of injury to the cervical spine. Whiplash injuries present with a variety of clinical and psychological manifestations, collectively termed as whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). Although largely self-limiting, some patients may experience long-lasting symptoms. This review aimed to summarize the current literature regarding the predictive value of cervical degeneration in the prognosis of patients with WAD. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed. Nine studies were identified, including 894 patients, with an age range between 16 and 76 years. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between moderate facet joint degeneration and nonrecovery. Although no association was established between isolated disc degeneration and nonrecovery, total cervical degeneration (facet joint + disc degeneration) was shown to correlate with nonrecovery.All included studies demonstrated the lack of correlation between preexisting disc degeneration and clinical outcomes. Four studies showed a significant correlation between cervical degeneration and poor prognosis following whiplash injury. A significantly higher proportion of patients who remained symptomatic at 2 years following a whiplash injury had preexisting degenerative changes. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the presence of significant variability in the existing literature concerning WAD in terms of study methodology, definitions of cervical degeneration, and outcome measures. Degenerative changes of the facet joint lead to alterations in its biomechanics. Several cadaveric, biomechanical, and clinical studies have demonstrated facet joints as a source of pain in patients with chronic WAD. We present moderate evidence to suggest that preexisting facet joint degeneration is a negative prognostic indicator for long-lasting symptoms in WAD. Conversely, preexisting disc degeneration is not associated with chronicity of WAD symptoms. We propose facet joint instability due to facet joint capsule rupture as a potential mechanism for nonrecovery. Further studies are needed to inform our knowledge of the long-term sequelae of WAD among patients with preexisting cervicalspine degeneration.

Experience with vasal sperm aspiration.

PURPOSE: We describe our experience with vasal aspiration of sperm in patients with azoospermia secondary to neurogenic anejaculation or obstruction of the vas deferens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 15 vasal sperm aspirations on 11 patients with neurogenic anejaculation or vasal obstruction. RESULTS: Adequate sperm was obtained from all 15 aspirations with an average sperm count of 42 x 10[6] (range 0.5 to 252 x 10[6]) and an average motility of 73.4% (range 16 to 100%). Aspirations were performed for use with assisted reproductive techniques in 12 cases and for cryopreservation alone in 3. Following assisted reproductive techniques 6 of the 12 aspirations (50%) resulted in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Vasal aspiration of sperm should be considered when electroejaculation fails, is not available or is contraindicated. Although the overall sperm quality and pregnancy rate are higher with vasal aspiration and in vitro fertilization than electroejaculation and intrauterine insemination, vasal aspiration is a more technically demanding and costly approach to conception.