Transcultural validation of a French version of the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS-F).

PURPOSE: We sought to validate a French translation of the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS), a tool to assess the patient's satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care for surgery. The ISAS tool is particularly pertinent as surgery with monitored anesthesia care is increasingly used in ambulatory surgery settings. METHODS: We studied content validity, internal consistency, convergent validity (vs physician-estimated satisfaction), and test-retest reliability of the French version of the ISAS (ISAS-F) in 122 adult patients undergoing a brief outpatient invasive procedure under conscious sedation. The ISAS-F was answered twice by the patient, once in the postanesthesia care unit and once before discharge from the ambulatory care unit. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time of completion at the first assessment was 2 [2-4] min. The total median [IQR] ISAS-F score was 2.3 [1.8-2.7]. Internal consistency of the ISAS-F was found to be good (Cronbach's α = 0.68). Test-retest reliability was significant, with an intra-class correlation coefficient at 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.85). The ISAS-F score correlated with the physician-estimated satisfaction score, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.44; P = 0.01). DISCUSSION: This validated version of the ISAS can now be used by French-speaking researchers and physicians to assess patient satisfaction with the anesthesia technique.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons voulu valider une traduction française de l'échelle de satisfaction par rapport à l'anesthésie de l'Iowa (ISAS), un outil d'évaluation de la satisfaction du patient par rapport aux soins sous surveillance anesthésique lors de chirurgies. L'outil ISAS est particulièrement pertinent étant donné que les chirurgies réalisées sous surveillance anesthésique sont de plus en plus fréquemment utilisées dans le contexte de chirurgie ambulatoire. MéTHODE: Nous avons étudié la validité de contenu, la cohérence interne, la validité convergente (vs la satisfaction estimée par le médecin) et la fiabilité de test-retest de la version française de l'ISAS (ISAS-F) auprès de 122 patients adultes subissant une courte intervention ambulatoire sous sédation légère. Les patients ont répondu deux fois au ISAS-F, soit une fois en salle de réveil et une seconde fois avant de recevoir leur congé de l'unité de soins ambulatoires. RéSULTATS: Le temps médian [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)] pour compléter le test lors de la première évaluation était de 2 [2­4] min. Le score total médian [ÉIQ] sur l'ISAS-F était de 2,3 [1,8­2,7]. La cohérence interne de l'ISAS-F était bonne (α de Cronbach = 0,68). La fiabilité de test-retest était appréciable, avec un coefficient de corrélation intraclasse de 0,74 (intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 0,63 à 0,85). Le score sur l'ISAS-F était corrélé au score de satisfaction tel qu'estimé par le médecin, avec un coefficient de corrélation intraclasse de 0,28 (IC 95 %, 0,12 à 0,44; P = 0,01). DISCUSSION: Cette version validée de l'ISAS peut désormais être utilisée par les chercheurs et médecins francophones afin d'évaluer la satisfaction des patients avec la technique anesthésique employée.

Investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial comparing intubating conditions in 25° head-up position and supine: the InSize25 study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Difficult airway management during tracheal intubation can lead to severe hypoxic sequelae. Routine intubation practice is to use a strict supine position, whereas a 25° head-up or reverse Trendelenburg position increases efficacy of preoxygenation, seems more comfortable for the anaesthetist and may also provide better intubation conditions in direct laryngoscopy. The 25° head-up position could be used for the whole population rather than only for obese patients, but there is no prospective randomised controlled trial with a robust design and large number of patients comparing strict supine against 25° intubation in operating room. The objective of the InSize25 study is to test the effect of these two patient positions on intubation conditions during laryngoscopy in scheduled surgery on non-obese patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: InSize25 is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. The InSize25 study will randomise 1000 adult patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring intubation with neuromuscular-blocking drugs, candidates for direct laryngoscopy. The primary outcome variable is the view obtained during the first laryngoscopy without any external manipulation assessed using percentage of glottic opening. Important secondary outcomes are: Cormack-Lehane classification, number of attempts at laryngoscopy and at tracheal intubation, use of ancillary equipment (eg, bougies, alternative laryngoscope blades, videolaryngoscope) and manoeuvres (eg, laryngeal manipulation), comfort score for the anaesthetist, episodes of postinduction hypotension or desaturation and mechanical complications of intubation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial received appropriate approval from the 'CPP Sud-Est II' ethical review board. Informed consent is required. If the 25° head-up position proves superior for tracheal intubation without more complications, it may become the routine-standard intubation position rather than only for use with obese patients. The final results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier (NCT03339141).