RESUMO
AIMS: Diabetes has been indicated to be a risk factor for suicide. We aim to estimate the prevalence of suicide in patients with diabetes. DESIGN: A meta-analysis using PRISMA methodology was adopted to examine the incidence of suicide in diabetic patients. DATA SOURCES: From inception to October 2022, three online databases (PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Web of Science) were used to search studies. REVIEW METHODS: We used random-effects model to analysis. And our primary outcome was the incidence of suicide death per 100 person-years, and other outcomes were prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. To explore the sources of heterogeneity in our study, we performed subgroup and meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: The suicide death rate in diabetic patients was 0.027 per 100 person-years, with a higher rate for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus compared to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The prevalence of suicidal ideation in diabetes patients was 0.175, with a higher prevalence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus compared to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The prevalence of suicide attempts in diabetes patients was 0.033, indicating a higher rate for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus compared to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a high rate of suicide among people with diabetes, and this study identifies populations and regions at high risk for suicide. Our review emphasizes interventions in mental health and the improvement of suicide prevention programmes. IMPACT: The study investigated suicide death, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in diabetic individuals. Suicide rates are elevated among diabetic patients, and various patient groups face distinct suicide risks. It is important to prioritize the mental well-being of diabetic individuals and enhance interventions, including personalized approaches, to inform public health efforts aimed at preventing and addressing suicide among diabetic patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of autofluorescence laryngoscope (AFL) in early laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. aWe also assess the value of AFL in diagnosis of early laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions in comparison with that of white light laryngoscope (WL). METHODS: The databases consisting of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science and CNKI were systematically searched to find pertinent literatures of AFL in diagnosing early laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. We made a quality evaluation of every study we included using the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The pooled sensitivities, specificities were calculated using Meta-Disc 1.4. And we estimated the summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) and area under the curves (AUC). RESULTS: We finally included 23 studies. The results of AFL in diagnosing early laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions showed higher sensitivity of 0.91 (95%CI: 0.89-0.93; χ²=43.78, p = 0.0025) and specificity of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.77-0.82; χ²=130.64, p = 0.000), and the weighted AUC of AFL was 0.948 ± 0.013 (95%CI: 0.921-0.974) and the diagnostic accuracy (Q*) was 0.887 ± 0.018. The sensitivity and specificity of WL were 0.74 (95%CI: 0.70-0.77; χ²=52.40, p = 0.000) and 0.89 (95%CI: 0.87-0.90; χ²=299.22, p = 0.000), and the weighted AUC of WL was 0.835 ± 0.029 (95%CI: 0.777-0.892) and the diagnostic accuracy (Q*) was 0.767 ± 0.027. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis and systematic review suggested that AFL had high diagnostic value in early laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions, and its diagnostic value was higher than that of WL. These results indicated that AFL can provide good guidance for the early detection of laryngeal carcinoma and precancerous lesions.