Management Experiences of Post-Gastrectomy Severe Alkaline Reflux Esophagitis.

Alkaline reflux esophagitis is a recognized complication of procedures that compromise the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), including gastrectomy. Incidence of reflux is dependent on the reconstructive procedure, with Roux-en-Y (RY) esophagojejunostomy commonly accepted as the optimal method. The authors report their experience of 5 patients who underwent remedial intervention for severe alkaline reflux esophagitis following gastric cancer surgery, over a 6-year period (2014-2020). Primary diagnoses encompassed 4 gastric adenocarcinomas and 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor. Four patients previously underwent total gastrectomy and 1 subtotal gastrectomy with RY reconstruction. Onset of postoperative reflux symptoms ranged from 2 weeks to 3 years. Failing medical management, all patients underwent jejunojejunal anastomosis and Roux limb length revision with surgical jejunostomy. At follow-up, 4 out of 5 patients had some degree of symptom resolution and one with unresolved symptoms. The authors report our experience of managing this complication following gastrectomy with jejunojejunal anastomosis and Roux limb length revision.

Translating evidence in a priority setting partnership: knowledge gaps between healthcare providers and oesophageal cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the fact that health information is now more accessible than ever, knowledge gaps remain between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). To date, the patients' need for information following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer has not been adequately met. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify why knowledge gaps exist between oesophageal cancer patients and HCPs and how to address them. METHODS: Purposive sampling of a group of people living with and after oesophageal cancer who had participated in a priority-setting partnership where 45% of questions from patients had existing evidence-based answers. A 7-set question series was developed for use in a patient/HCP focus group in addition to 11 individual phone interviews with survivors of oesophageal cancer. Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted to explore oesophageal cancer patients' access to information. The data was analysed thematically, which involved coding all patient transcripts before identifying and reviewing key themes. RESULTS: The three primary themes that emerged were as follows: opportunity (HCP team factors and relationship development), ability (patient factors) and priority (pacing of information delivery). CONCLUSION: Effective communication between patients and HCPs was identified as an integral component of the enhancement of patient knowledge. HCPs should continue to refine and improve methods of information delivery and encourage conversations regarding information preferences.

Vitamin B12 supplementation post-gastrectomy: a service closed-loop audit at St. James's Hospital, Dublin.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin B12 (VB12) deficiency is a well-described complication post-gastrectomy. It is caused by the loss of parietal cell mass leading to megaloblastic anaemia. This closed-loop audit assesses patient understanding of and adherence with VB12 supplementation guidelines post-gastrectomy. METHODS: A closed-loop audit cycle was performed. After the first cycle, an educational intervention was actioned prior to re-audit. One hundred twenty-five patients who underwent gastrectomy between 2010 and 2020 were available for study (86 total gastrectomies (TG), 39 subtotal gastrectomies (STG)). Twenty-nine patients who had not been adherent with VB12 supplementation/surveillance were eligible for re-audit. RESULTS: 91.9% (79/86) of TG patients reported adherence in regular parenteral VB12 supplementation. Adherence was significantly lower for STG for checking (and/or replacing) their VB12, with only 53.8% (21/39) checking their VB12 levels. 67/125 (53.6%) of the patients stated that they knew it was important to supplement B12 post-gastrectomy. 37.8% (43/113) of participants could explain why this was important, and 14.4% (18/125) had any knowledge of the complications of VB12 deficiency. Following re-audit, 5/8 (57.5%) of TG patients who had not been adherent with VB12 supplementation in the first cycle were now adherent with VB12 supplementation following our educational intervention. 7/17 (41.2%) of the STG group had received VB12 or made arrangements to receive supplemental VB12 if it was indicated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates good adherence in those undergoing TG. Patient understanding correlates with adherence, suggesting that patient education and knowledge reinforcement may be key to adherence with VB12 supplementation. A simple educational intervention can improve adherence with VB12 supplementation in patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Early experience with a nutrition and survivorship clinic in esophageal cancer.

Improved cure rates in esophageal cancer care have increased focus on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in survivorship. To optimize recovery after esophagectomy, particularly nutritional well-being, a personalized multidisciplinary survivorship clinic was established at this center. Assessments at 6 and 12 months postoperatively include validated European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) symptom and health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires, functional status review, anthropometry, and biochemical screening for micronutrient deficiencies. 75 patients, at a mean age of 63 years, 84% male, 85% with adenocarcinoma, and 73% receiving multimodal therapy were included. Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 27.5 (4.3) kg m -2. 6- and 12-month assessments were completed by 66 (88%) and 37 (93%) recurrence-free patients, respectively. Mean body weight loss at 6 months was 8.5 ± 6.6% and at 12 months 8.8 ± 7.3%. Of the 12-month cohort, micronutrient deficiency was present in 27 (79.4%) preoperatively and 29 (80.6%) after 1 year (P = 0.727), most commonly iron deficiency (preoperative: 16 [43.2%] and postoperative: 17 [45.9%] patients, P = 0.100). 26 (70.3%) of these patients also had clinically significant dumping syndrome persisting to 12 months after surgery. We describe a novel follow-up support structure for esophageal cancer patients in the first year of survivorship. This may serve as an exemplar model with parallel application across oncological care.

Colonic interposition, a contemporary experience: technical aspects and outcomes.

Colonic interposition is rarely used as an oesophageal replacement after resection, as the preferred use of stomach involves less anastomoses and lower risks of major complications. The functional outcome from the colonic conduit is also unpredictable. This report documents the spectrum of experience of a high-volume oesophageal centre, highlighting indications, techniques and functional outcomes. A retrospective review was undertaken of a prospective database from 2012 to 2016. Four of 252 (1.5%) cases in this time period utilised colon interposition. Two cases were for gastric conduit necrosis following oesophageal cancer resections, one for caustic ingestion with both an oesophago-bronchial fistula and gastric injury, and one for a primary oesophageal malignancy in a patient whom previously had a total gastrectomy. All patients had either a retrosternal or posterior mediastinal isoperistaltic right colon conduit placed. Two of three cancer patients are alive and disease free at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Surviving patients are weight stable and tolerating a normal diet. Both report excellent quality of life using validated assessment tools. Colonic interposition is rarely required in modern oesophageal practice, but with this technique good long-term nutritional and functional outcomes can be obtained. It is required in the armamentarium of a specialist centre, and training given its rarity may require novel approaches such as simulation and cadaveric-based training.

Prospective Study of Malabsorption and Malnutrition After Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study malabsorption and malnutrition after curative resection of esophageal and gastric cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. BACKGROUND: Improved cure rates for esophageal and gastric cancer have increased focus on health-related quality of life (HR-QL) in survivorship. Although malnutrition is well described in long-term follow-up, and gastrointestinal symptoms are common, data on gut and pancreatic-related malabsorption are scant. METHODS: Disease-free patients at least 18 months after esophageal or gastric oncologic resections represented the study cohort. A modified Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale questionnaire was completed, and weight, fecal elastase (FE), albumin, vitamins, and micronutrients measured preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 18 to 24 months postoperatively. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and changes in body composition were also evaluated postoperatively. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 23 months, 45 of 66 patients in a consecutive series were disease-free. Mean weight (78 ±â€Š19 vs 67 ±â€Š16 kg), body mass index (27 ±â€Š5 vs 24 ±â€Š5 kg/m), Vitamin A (1.7 ±â€Š0.6 vs 1.2 ±â€Š0.4 umol/L), and Vitamin E (28 ±â€Š7 vs 20 ±â€Š7 umol/L) were significantly decreased (P < 0.01) at last follow-up compared with preoperatively. Malabsorption was evident in 73% of patients, of whom 44% had FE < 200 µg/g and 38% had evidence of SIBO. Total body fat-free mass (175 ±â€Š96 vs 84 ±â€Š71, P < 0.001) and skeletal muscle index (44 ±â€Š8 vs 39 ±â€Š8, P = 0.007) were significantly decreased at 18 to 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Malabsorption and malnutrition are prevalent in survivorship of esophageal and stomach cancer. This may be underappreciated, and both gut and pancreatic insufficiency represent modifiable targets in the interdisciplinary approach to recovery of HR-QL.