Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Electrophoresis ; 44(11-12): 947-955, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36409835

RESUMO

Microfluidic devices for dielectrophoretic cell separation are typically designed and constructed using microfabrication methods in a clean room, requiring time and expense. In this paper, we describe a novel alternative approach to microfluidic device manufacture, using chips cut from conductor-insulator laminates using a cutter plotter. This allows the manufacture of microchannel devices with micron-scale electrodes along every wall. Fabrication uses a conventional desktop cutter plotter, and requires no chemicals, masks or clean-room access; functional fluidic devices can be designed and constructed within a couple of hours at negligible cost. As an example, we demonstrate the construction of a continuous dielectrophoretic cell separator capable of enriching yeast cells to 80% purity at 10 000 cells/s.


Assuntos
Técnicas Analíticas Microfluídicas , Microfluídica , Separação Celular/métodos , Eletrodos , Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Dispositivos Lab-On-A-Chip , Eletroforese
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 114(18): 4591-4596, 2017 05 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408395

RESUMO

Currently, cell separation occurs almost exclusively by density gradient methods and by fluorescence- and magnetic-activated cell sorting (FACS/MACS). These variously suffer from lack of specificity, high cell loss, use of labels, and high capital/operating cost. We present a dielectrophoresis (DEP)-based cell-separation method, using 3D electrodes on a low-cost disposable chip; one cell type is allowed to pass through the chip whereas the other is retained and subsequently recovered. The method advances usability and throughput of DEP separation by orders of magnitude in throughput, efficiency, purity, recovery (cells arriving in the correct output fraction), cell losses (those which are unaccounted for at the end of the separation), and cost. The system was evaluated using three example separations: live and dead yeast; human cancer cells/red blood cells; and rodent fibroblasts/red blood cells. A single-pass protocol can enrich cells with cell recovery of up to 91.3% at over 300,000 cells per second with >3% cell loss. A two-pass protocol can process 300,000,000 cells in under 30 min, with cell recovery of up to 96.4% and cell losses below 5%, an effective processing rate >160,000 cells per second. A three-step protocol is shown to be effective for removal of 99.1% of RBCs spiked with 1% cancer cells while maintaining a processing rate of ∼170,000 cells per second. Furthermore, the self-contained and low-cost nature of the separator device means that it has potential application in low-contamination applications such as cell therapies, where good manufacturing practice compatibility is of paramount importance.


Assuntos
Separação Celular/métodos , Eletroforese/métodos , Fenômenos Eletrofisiológicos , Eritrócitos/citologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/citologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Separação Celular/economia , Eletroforese/economia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA