Arthroscopic Posterior HAGL Repair Using a Direct Transaxillary Portal.

Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL lesion) is a challenging problem in surgery for shoulder instability. Open and arthroscopic approaches and techniques have been described to address this issue. Especially posterior HAGL lesions increase the surgical complexity, as open anterior approaches provide limited visibility and access for successful repair. This article describes an alternative technique using an arthroscopic transaxillary approach to deploy the suture anchor with a perpendicular angle to the humeral bone, thus, improving the ability to perfectly position the anchor at the anatomic insertion of the inferior humeral ligament.

[The shoulder and elbow register of the DVSE-trend monitoring or early warning system? : A literature-based analysis]. / Das Schulter- und Ellenbogenregister der DVSE ­ Trendbeobachtung oder Frühwarnsystem? : Eine literaturbasierte Analyse.

The endoprosthesis register (SEPR) of the D­A-CH Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery e. V. (DVSE) collects data on the implantation of shoulder and elbow endoprostheses. The question arises as to whether the data is only used to monitor trends in arthroplasty, or whether it can also be used as an early warning system for risks and possible complications. The existing literature on the SEPR was analyzed and compared with other national endoprosthesis registries. The SEPR of the DVSE enables the collection and analysis of epidemiological data on primary implantation, follow-up and revision in shoulder and elbow endoprosthetics. It is an instrument of quality control and contributes to ensuring the greatest possible patient safety. It is used for the early detection of risks and potential requirements associated with shoulder and elbow arthroplasty.

Morphology of the acromioclavicular-joint score (MAC).

INTRODUCTION: To date there is no generally accepted specific definition or classification of acromioclavicular (AC) joint osteoarthritis. The aim of this study is to analyze morphological parameters using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to develop a scoring system as a basis for decision making to perform an AC-joint resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective-monocentric matched pair study, healthy and affected subjects were investigated using T2 MRI scans in the transverse plane. There were two groups, group 1 (n = 151) included healthy asymptomatic adults with no history of trauma. In group 2, we included n = 99 patients with symptomatic AC joints, who underwent arthroscopic AC-joint resection. The central and posterior joint space width and the AC angle were measured. Morphological changes such as cartilage degeneration, cysts and bone edema were noted. Malalignment of the joint was defined as: posterior joint space width < 2 mm in conjunction with an AC angle > 12°. A scoring system consisting of the measured morphologic factors was developed. RESULTS: Symptomatic and asymptomatic patients showed significant differences in all measured items. We observed a significant difference in the MAC score for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (mean 10.4 vs. 20.6, p = 0.0001). The ROC (receiver operator characteristic) analysis showed an excellent AUC of 0.899 (p = 0.001). The sensitivity of the MAC score was 0.81 and the specificity 0.86. The MAC score shows a significant moderate correlation with age (r = 0.358; p = 0.001). The correlation of age and the development of symptoms was only weak (r = 0.22, p = 0.001). Symptomatic patients showed significantly more frequent malalignment compared to asymptomatic patients (p = 0.001), but the positive predictive value that a patient with malalignment is also symptomatic is only 55%. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic AC joints showed a typical pattern of morphological changes on axial MRI scans with early posterior contact of the joint surfaces, reduction of joint space and malalignment as the basis for the development of a scoring system. The MAC score shows excellent test characteristics, and therefore, proved to be both an appropriate guidance for clinical practice as well as an excellent tool for comparative studies and is superior to the assessment of malalignment alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective diagnostic study.