On the relationship between various anticoagulants and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-surgeon serial analysis.

Prostate cancer patients often have other health conditions and take anticoagulants. It was believed that surgery under anticoagulants could worsen surgical results. This study aims to explore the safety of robot-assisted prostatectomy in anticoagulated patients, without any exclusion criteria. The study included 500 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon between April 2019 and August 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 376 men (75.2%), did not receive any anticoagulation, while Group 2, with 124 patients (24.8%), received different forms of anticoagulation. Then, the anticoagulation group was divided into 4 subgroups according to their definite anticoagulation: the aspirin 15.6%, new oral anticoagulants (NOAC) 5.4%, Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) 2%, and dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) 1.8% subgroup. Postoperative complications and readmission rates were compared between the two study groups and subgroups. Patients in the combined group 2 were older and they also carried more comorbidities compared to men in group 1 (p = 0.03, p = 0.001).The study groups had similar oncological results, with 40.4% of patients having locally advanced cancers. Catheter days were longer in the anticoagulation group (4.5 vs 4 days, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between study groups for overall, minor, and major complications (p = 0.160, 0.100, and 0.915, respectively). In addition, readmissions were low (5.6%) and similar between the study groups (p = 0.635). Under cautious management, RARP under diverse anticoagulation regimes is safe and has comparable results to men with no medications. Further prospective studies must be conducted to confirm our findings.

How Might the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed during RARP Impact the Postoperative Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic lymphocele remains a relevant complication after pelvic tumor surgery. This study aims to investigate how the number of lymph nodes removed may influence postoperative outcomes and if it increases the probability of detecting lymph node metastasis. METHODS: The study included 500 patients who underwent RARP including lymphadenectomy performed by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 308 patients with 20 or fewer lymph nodes removed (mean 15), while group 2 had 192 patients with over 20 nodes removed (mean 27). Perioperative data were analyzed, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, lymph node metastasis was detected in 17.8% of men. In detail, out of 19.6 lymph nodes removed, an average of 3.14 lymph nodes per patient showed metastasis, with a slightly higher incidence of 19.7% in group 2 compared to 16.5% in group 1, though not statistically significant (p = 0.175). The number of lymph node metastases was significantly higher in group 2 patients (3.47) versus group 1 (2.37) (p = 0.048). All complications except symptomatic lymphoceles (p = 0.004) were not significantly different between groups. Univariate linear regression analysis revealed no correlation between the number of removed lymph nodes and symptomatic lymphocele. However, it did correlate with catheter days and readmissions. CONCLUSION: A correlation may exist between the number of lymph nodes removed during RARP and an increased incidence of complications, particularly symptomatic lymphocele. A more extensive PLND may result in prolonged catheter days and increased readmissions. With the increased extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy, the probability of detecting lymphogenic metastasis rises. The diagnostic value of PLND is well established. Further randomized trials are needed to weigh its necessity and extent.