Application of propofol-remifentanil intravenous general anesthesia combined with regional block in pediatric ophthalmic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to observe the anesthetic effect and safety of intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxant with propofol-remifentanil combined with regional block under laryngeal mask airway in pediatric ophthalmologic surgery. METHODS: A total of 90 undergoing ophthalmic surgery were anesthetized with general anesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway without muscle relaxant. They were randomly divided into two groups: 45 children who received propofol-remifentanil intravenous anesthesia combined with regional block (LG group), and 45 children who received total intravenous anesthesia (G group). The peri-operative circulatory indicators, awakening time after general anesthesia, postoperative analgesic effect and the incidence of anesthesia-related adverse events were respectively compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All the children successfully underwent the surgical procedure. The awakening time after general anesthesia and removal time of laryngeal mask were significantly shorter in the LG group than in the G group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the heart rates in the perioperative period between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative physical response, respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and emergence agitation (EA) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The pain score at the postoperative hour 2 was lower in the LG group than in the G group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propofol-remifentanil intravenous anesthesia combined with long-acting local anesthetic regional block anesthesia, combined with laryngeal mask ventilation technology without muscle relaxants, can be safely used in pediatric eye surgery to achieve rapid and smooth recovery from general anesthesia and better postoperative analgesia. This anesthesia scheme can improve the comfort and safety of children in perioperative period, and has a certain clinical popularization value.

[Comparison of Two Methods With a Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube for Endobronchial Intubation].

Objective To compare the success rates of two methods for endobronchial intubation:the left-sided double-lumen tube(DLT) rotated 90° counter-clockwise with the patient head at the mid positon and the tube rotated 180° counter-clockwise with the patient head turned to the right. Methods Six hundred and forty-eight patients were enrolled in this study,who were to undergo elective thoracic surgery by left-sided DLT intubation in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from December 2021 to June 2022.They were randomized into a 90° group and a 180° group,with 324 patients in each group.In the 90° group,with the patient head kept at the mid position,the left-sided DLT was advanced until the bronchial cuff passed the vocal cords and then rotated 90° counter-clockwise.In the 180°group,with the left mandible angle of each patient in the straight line with the sternum,the tube was advanced until the bronchial cuff passed the vocal cords and then rotated 180° counter-clockwise.The intubation success rate and the intubation-related complications such as carina mucosal injuries were compared between the two groups. Results The 648 patients included 336 males and 312 females,with the age ranging from 39.0 to 75.0 years old and the average age of(54.6±9.0) years old.The success rate of first intubation was 80.3% in the 90° group and 75.0% in the 180° group,which showed no significant difference(P=0.109).The success rate of second intubation was higher in the 180° group than in the 90° group(P<0.001).The rate of carina mucosal injuries was 23.8% in the 90° group and 25.6% in the 180° group,which showed no significant difference(P=0.585). Conclusions Compared with the conventional method(90°),the intubation of the left-sided DLT rotated 180° counter-clockwise with the patient head turned to the right cannot improve the success rate of the first intubation.However,it could improve the success rate of reintubation as a remedy.