Post-Bariatric Body-Contouring Surgery: Fewer Procedures, Less Demand, and Lower Costs.

BACKGROUND: Paralleling the growth of bariatric surgery, the demand for post-bariatric body-contouring surgery is increasing and placing additional burdens on already strained health care systems. In Austria, medically necessary body contouring is covered by public health care. In a sample of 622 women, we assessed the proportion of patients that underwent post-bariatric surgery at least 2 years after gastric bypass. METHODS: Former bariatric patients were asked whether they had undergone post-bariatric surgery or were planning to do so by structured telephone interviews. For patients who had undergone body contouring, the degree of satisfaction with the results was inquired. Costs for bariatric and post-bariatric procedures were assessed. RESULTS: Of 622 patients, 93 (14.9 %) had undergone body contouring and 68 (10.9 %) considered a procedure, while 454 (73 %) definitely stated that they did not want plastic surgery. Cost coverage was declined in 7 patients (1.1 %). Plastic procedures (n = 101) included 65 abdominoplasties, 25 lower body lifts without thigh lifts, 7 brachioplasties, and 4 minor procedures. Forty-nine patients were very satisfied with the results, 28 were fairly satisfied, and 16 were not satisfied. Body contouring added about 6 % to the costs of surgical treatment for morbid obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer patients than in other studies expressed a desire for post-bariatric surgery, 15 % actually proceeded to this step. The low demand was neither due to denied coverage nor to unfavourable results of plastic surgery. Additional costs for body contouring were less than expected.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an isolated bariatric procedure: intermediate-term results from a large series in three Austrian centers.

BACKGROUND: Gastric sleeve resection was initially planned as the first step of bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch but it continues to emerge as a restrictive bariatric procedure on its own. We describe intermediate results in a series of 126 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG) compiled from three bariatric centers in eastern Austria. METHODS: The stomach was laparoscopically reduced to a "sleeve" along the lesser curvature over a 48-Fr bougie. Special attention was placed on complete resection of the gastric fundus. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, patients had lost between 2.3 and 27 kg/m(2) or between 6.7% and 130% of their excessive weight. Sixty four percent of the patients lost >50% of their excess weight within an average of 20 months. Seven percent of the patients had an excess weight loss <25% and were therefore considered as failures. The only major surgical complication was leakage of the staple-line needing revision (three times). There were no operative mortalities. CONCLUSION: The final place of LSG in bariatric surgery is still unclear, but our results and those of others show that LSG can be a viable alternative to established procedures.

Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity?

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy as the sole bariatric operation has been reported for high-risk super-obese patients or as first-step followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or duodenal switch (DS) in super-super obese patients. The efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbidly obese patients with a BMI of <50 kg/m2 and the incidence of gastric dilatation following LSG have not yet been investigated. METHODS: 23 patients (15 morbidly obese, 8 super-obese) were studied prospectively for weight loss following LSG. The incidence of sleeve dilatation was assessed by upper GI contrast studies in patients with a follow-up of >12 months. RESULTS: Patients who underwent LSG achieved a mean excess weight loss (EWL) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively of 46% and 56%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in %EWL comparing obese and super-obese patients. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, dilatation of the gastric sleeve was found in 1 patient and weight regain after initial successful weight loss in 3 of the 23 patients. CONCLUSION: LSG has been highly effective for weight reduction for morbid obesity even as the sole bariatric operation. Gastric dilatation was found in only 1 patient in this short-term follow-up. Weight regain following LSG may require conversion to RYGBP or DS. Follow-up will be necessary to evaluate long-term results.

[Pregnancy and labor after adjustable gastric banding for therapy of morbid obesity]. / Schwangerschaft und Geburt nach adjustierbarer Magenbandoperation zur Therapie der morbiden Adipositas.

Surgical placement of an adjustable gastric band has become a widely used method for treatment of morbid obesity. As a consequence, a higher number of pregnancies after weight loss is observed. Information is limited on pregnancy outcome after gastric banding, whereas metabolic and nutritional complications are reported after gastric bypass procedures. We report on two cases of pregnancy after laparoscopic gastric banding. Both patients had uncomplicated full-term pregnancies. In both cases, neither during nor after the pregnancy fluid removal from the gastric band was necessary. There seems to be a low probability for gestational and metabolic complications in pregnancy due to gastric banding. However, more specific information about pregnancies and fetal outcomes after gastric banding in a larger patient population would be desirable.