Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To report the first successful full-term delivery following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) performed during pregnancy. METHODS/BACKGROUND: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by dysphagia, regurgitation, reflux, recurrent vomiting, and weight loss. Achalasia in pregnancy can affect nutritional status of the mother, and subsequently, the child, increasing morbidity and creating potential pregnancy complications. POEM is a novel endoscopic procedure which involves cutting the lower esophageal sphincter to allow food to pass, and is considered a safe and effective management option for achalasia in non-pregnant individuals. RESULTS: We discuss the case of a patient with achalasia and a prior Heller myotomy who presented with recrudescence of severe symptoms prompting evaluation and treatment with POEM. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of successful full-term delivery following POEM performed during pregnancy, demonstrating its feasibility and safety in this patient population when approached with a multidisciplinary team.

Impact of telehealth implementation on diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 caused a rapid integration of telehealth into prenatal care. This raises questions about the ability to screen for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy when caring for patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effect of telehealth adaptation on the timing and severity of diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy who delivered from April 2019 to October 2019 (before the pandemic) and April 2020 to October 2020 (during the pandemic) at 1 urban tertiary care center. The primary outcome was mean gestational age at diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. The secondary outcomes included severity of diagnosis, both initially and at the time of delivery. The results were adjusted for baseline characteristic difference at P<.10, using multivariable logistic regression and analysis of covariance, as appropriate. The sample size was calculated based on a previous cohort study of patients who developed preeclampsia, with a mean gestational age at delivery of 36.3 weeks and a standard deviation of 2.8 weeks. A sample size of 124 patients would be needed per group to detect a gestational age difference of 1 week with 80% power and a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Overall, 498 patients were included, with 231 from 2019 and 267 from 2020. Of note, 17.1% of patients had preeclampsia with severe features initially, and 29.3% of patients met the criteria at delivery. In 2020, 80.5% of patients used telehealth (vs 0.9% of patients in 2019), doing so for a mean of 29.0% of prenatal appointments. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed no significant difference in gestational age at diagnosis or diagnosis severity between cohorts. In the adjusted analysis, cohort year was not significantly associated with severity of initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.39; P=.53) or severity of diagnosis at delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.46; P=.87). However, Black race was significantly associated with increased risk of having severe preeclampsia at initial diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.85; P=.046). In addition, Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-4.28; P<.001), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.82; P=.01), and initial body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06; P=.005) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of severe preeclampsia at delivery. CONCLUSION: The adaptation of telehealth was not associated with delays in the diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or with increased severity of diagnoses.

External cephalic version for a malpresenting first twin before labor: a prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: In twin pregnancies where the presenting twin is not cephalic, cesarean delivery is the standard of care. External cephalic version (ECV) has been used for malpresenting singleton pregnancies with low risk of complications. ECV in twin pregnancies is poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess feasibility and report any complications of ECV of a malpresenting twin before labor. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort of twin pregnancies with malpresenting first twin. Inclusion criteria included English or Spanish speaking women. Exclusions included cases where there was a contraindication to vaginal delivery. ECV was performed according to the institutional singleton protocol. Fetal testing of both twins was performed before and after procedure. A vaginal hand was used during ECV as needed. The primary outcome was success of the procedure. Secondary outcomes included delivery characteristics and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Five patients were enrolled in this study. Four patients underwent successful ECV and vaginal delivery occurred in 2 of the 4 patients. ECV procedure was performed at a mean gestational age of 36+0 weeks in the successful ECV group and 36+6/7 weeks for the unsuccessful group. Latency to delivery was 4.5 days in the successful ECV group and 1 day in the unsuccessful ECV group. No maternal or neonatal complications occurred in any participating women. CONCLUSION: ECV in twin pregnancies where the first twin is malpresenting was feasible in our cohort. More research is needed to better characterizer the safety and efficacy of this procedure in this patient population.

First-trimester uterine rupture: a case report and systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present a case of first-trimester uterine rupture and perform a systematic review to identify common presentations, risk factors, and management strategies. DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus using a combination of key words related to "uterine rupture," "first trimester," and "early pregnancy" from database inception to September 30, 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: English language descriptions of uterine rupture at ≤14 weeks of gestation were included, and cases involving pregnancy termination and ectopic pregnancy were excluded. METHODS: Outcomes for the systematic review included maternal demographics, description of uterine rupture, and specifics of uterine rupture diagnosis and management. Data were extracted to custom-made reporting forms. Median values were calculated for continuous variables, and percentages were calculated for categorical variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case reports and case series. RESULTS: Overall, 61 cases of first-trimester uterine rupture were identified, including our novel case. First-trimester uterine ruptures occurred at a median gestation of 11 weeks. Most patients (59/61 [97%]) had abdominal pain as a presenting symptom, and previous uterine surgery was prevalent (44/61 [62%]), usually low transverse cesarean delivery (32/61 [52%]). The diagnosis of uterine rupture was generally made after surgical exploration (37/61 [61%]), with rupture noted in the fundus in 26 of 61 cases (43%) and in the lower segment in 27 of 61 cases (44%). Primary repair of the defect was possible in 40 of 61 cases (66%), whereas hysterectomy was performed in 18 of 61 cases (30%). Continuing pregnancy was possible in 4 of 61 cases (7%). CONCLUSION: Uterine rupture is an uncommon occurrence but should be considered in patients with an acute abdomen in early pregnancy, especially in women with previous uterine surgery. Surgical exploration is typically needed to confirm the diagnosis and for management. Hysterectomy is not always necessary; primary uterine repair is sufficient in more than two-thirds of the cases to achieve hemostasis. Continuing pregnancy, although uncommon, is also possible.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol to Improve Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Postcesarean Pain Management.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and determine its effect on racial/ethnic disparities in postcesarean pain management. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study of scheduled cesarean deliveries before and after ERAS implementation at a single urban academic institution. Pre-ERAS, all analgesic medications were given postoperatively on patient request. The ERAS protocol included preoperative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Postoperatively, patients received scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen. Oral oxycodone was available as needed, and opioid patient-controlled analgesia was eliminated from the standard order set. The primary outcome was total opioid use in the first 48 hours after cesarean, pre- and post-ERAS, reported in total milliequivalents of intravenous morphine (MME). A secondary analysis of opioid use and pain scores by racial groups was also performed. Chi-square, independent t-tests, analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used depending on variable and data normality. RESULTS: Pre-ERAS and post-ERAS groups included 100 women each. Post-ERAS, total opioid use in 48 hours was less (40.8 vs. 8.6 MME, p < 0.001) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and 2 (POD2) (POD1 maximum at rest: 6.7 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001). Pre-ERAS pain scores differed by race with non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients reporting the highest mean and max VAS pain scores POD1 and POD2 (POD1, maximum VAS at rest: NHB-7.4, non-Hispanic White-6.6, Hispanic-5.8, Asian-4.4, p = 0.006). Post-ERAS, there were no differences in postoperative pain scores between groups with movement on POD1 and POD2. CONCLUSION: A standardized ERAS protocol for postcesarean pain decreases opioid use and may improve some racial disparities in postcesarean pain control. KEY POINTS: · ERAS protocols improve postoperative pain control and lower postoperative opioid use.. · Studies show that there are racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum pain control.. · Protocols standardize care and may decrease the effects of provider implicit bias..

External cephalic version of the non-cephalic presenting twin: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Decreasing the primary cesarean delivery rate and associated maternal and fetal complications is a priority for obstetric care providers. External cephalic version (ECV) is a procedure recommended for women with singleton pregnancies where the fetus is malpresenting to avoid vaginal breech delivery, which is inherently riskier than cesarean delivery. However, little is known about this procedure in the context of twin gestations. Scheduled cesarean delivery is instead recommended for women with twin gestations where the presenting twin is not cephalic. Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ECV in the setting of twin pregnancy where the presenting twin is not cephalic. We also present two patients with twin pregnancy at our institution that attempted ECV. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the following electronic databases was performed, searching from their inception until September 2019: Pubmed, Ovid, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All reported cases of ECV for a non-cephalic presenting twin were included. Studies were excluded if patients had contraindications to vaginal delivery and if they described ECV of the second twin only. Maternal demographics, procedure details, and outcomes data were collected. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary outcome was a successful version of the presenting twin to the cephalic presentation following ECV. Statistical analysis involved calculating means, standard deviations, frequencies and percentages as appropriate. RESULTS: Two case reports and one case series, totaling 22 patients, met inclusion criteria. Two additional patients attempted ECV at our institution. One completed ECV (for a total of 23 patients) while the other did not. This patient consented for ECV as Twin A was noted to be breeched upon presentation to labor and delivery but after receiving regional anesthesia, twin A was cephalic. No randomized controlled trials were identified. All were dichorionic pregnancies. Successful ECV of twin A occurred in 57% (13/23) of women and 48% (11/23) had a successful vaginal delivery. The majority were performed using regional anesthesia and a uterine relaxant (20/23). No serious adverse events occurred in any of the reports. CONCLUSIONS: ECV is insufficiently studied in twin pregnancy. Based on very limited data, it appears feasible to turn the non-cephalic presenting twin. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure for a non-cephalic presenting twin.

The association of skin incision placement during cesarean delivery with wound complications in obese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of wound complications by skin incision type in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.Data sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, and Ovid) were searched from their inception through August 2018.Methods of study selection: We included all randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting the placement of skin incision during cesarean section in obese women, defined as those with BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Studies were included if they compared one placement of skin incision with a different one as comparison group. The primary outcome was incidence of wound complications, while secondary outcomes included wound infection, hematoma, seroma, postpartum hemorrhage, and endometritis. Demographics and outcomes for each individual study identified were reported as part of the review. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce summary treatment effects in terms of mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sub-group analyses (vertical versus Pfannenstiel) were also reported.Tabulation, integration and results: Seventeen studies (including 3 RCTs; 8960 participants among the 15 non-overlapping studies) were included in the systematic review. Vertical incisions were associated with a relative risk of 2.07 (95% CI1.61-2.67) for wound complications compared to transverse incisions, however significant possible confounders were present. Studies were mildly-moderately heterogeneous (I2 44.81%, 95% CI 0.00-71.85%) with varying definitions of obesity and wound complications. High transverse incisions (3 studies, 218 participants) trend toward a lower risk of wound complications compared to low transverse incisions (RR 0.338, 95% CI 0.114-1.004). CONCLUSIONS: Vertical incisions may be associated with an increased risk for wound complications compared to transverse incisions for cesarean delivery in obese women. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate optimal cesarean skin incisions for these women.

Stepwise implementation of vaginal cleansing and azithromycin at cesarean: a quality improvement study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to decrease our surgical site infection (SSI) rate by 30% by sequential implementation of vaginal cleansing and azithromycin for women who underwent a cesarean delivery (CD) after having labored or experienced rupture of membranes. METHODS: This is a quality improvement project that assessed the stepwise implementation of two interventions within three time periods: (1) 12 months prior to implementation of either intervention; (2) 14 months of vaginal cleansing as infection prophylaxis; (3) 16 months of vaginal cleansing and azithromycin as infection prophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was the SSI as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and analyzed by control charts. The process measures were compliance rates of vaginal cleansing and azithromycin. Significance was detected by rules for determining a special cause variation. This study followed the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines for reporting on quality improvement. RESULTS: There were 1033 patients included from the three study periods. The total rate of SSI decreased from 22.8% to 15.2% after implementing vaginal cleansing. Special cause variation was detected with an 8-point shift starting 4 months after implementation of vaginal cleansing. This decrease was sustained during the following 26 months. Adding azithromycin did not significantly lower the SSI rate further. When examined separately, deep SSI (p = .009) and endometritis (p = .001) significantly decreased in the post-intervention periods. Pre-operative vaginal cleansing compliance rose to 74%, and then further increased to 85% 1 year after implementation. Azithromycin compliance rose to 75%. Total length of postpartum stay decreased over the study periods from 3.5 ± 1.4 days to 3.2 ± 0.8 days (p = .001). CONCLUSION: In this quality improvement study, implementation of vaginal cleansing decreased the SSI rate by 33%, from 22.8% to 15.2%. The addition of azithromycin did not result in any additional change in SSI rate.

Perioperative intravenous acetaminophen and postcesarean pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of perioperative (pre- or intraoperative) intravenous acetaminophen in improving postcesarean pain control in healthy women receiving regional anesthesia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus were searched from their inception to September 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all randomized placebo-controlled trials examining the effect of perioperative intravenous acetaminophen on postcesarean pain control and other postoperative outcomes. Included trials examined women who were healthy and received regional anesthesia before cesarean delivery at term. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative pain scores with movement as measured by the individual studies. Secondary outcomes included intravenous morphine milligram equivalents used postoperatively. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce summary treatment effects in terms of mean difference with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Notably, 4 randomized placebo-controlled trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 190 in the intervention arm vs 174 women in the control group. Patients in the intervention group received 1000 mg intravenous acetaminophen in 3 of the studies and 2000 mg intravenous acetaminophen in 1 study. All patients received regional anesthesia before surgery. The medication was given anywhere from 1 hour before surgery to intraoperatively immediately after delivery of the fetus. Pain scores 24 hours after surgery were only available in 1 study. The use of opioids as measured by morphine milligram equivalents after surgery was similar for patients receiving perioperative intravenous acetaminophen and those receiving placebo (38.7 vs 42.55; mean difference, -2.54; 95% confidence interval, -9.24 to 4.16). Only 1 study showed decreased postoperative pain scores when using perioperative intravenous acetaminophen, and this was limited to the first 4 hours after surgery. Importantly, these patients did not receive long-acting neuraxial opioids, which may account for the finding of improved pain control in the early postoperative period. CONCLUSION: There are limited data available on the use of perioperative intravenous acetaminophen for cesarean delivery performed at term with regional anesthesia. The use of long-acting neuraxial opioids may make perioperative (pre- or intracesarean) intravenous acetaminophen unnecessary, whereas intravenous (or oral) acetaminophen may become more effective as neuraxial opioid analgesia wears off. More level-1 data are needed.

Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: a United States cohort study.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has had an impact on healthcare systems around the world with 3 million people contracting the disease and 208,000 cases resulting in death as of this writing. Information regarding coronavirus infection in pregnancy is still limited. Objective: This study aimed to describe the clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnant women with positive laboratory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Study Design: This is a cohort study of pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized at 12 US institutions between March 5, 2020, and April 20, 2020. Severe disease was defined according to published criteria as patient-reported dyspnea, respiratory rate >30 per minute, blood oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen <300 mm Hg, or lung infiltrates >50% within 24-48 hours on chest imaging. Critical disease was defined as respiratory failure, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction or failure. Women were excluded from the study if they had presumed coronavirus disease 2019, but laboratory testing was negative. The primary outcome was median duration from hospital admission to discharge. Secondary outcomes included need for supplemental oxygen, intubation, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, death, and timing of delivery. The clinical courses are described by the median disease day on which these outcomes occurred after the onset of symptoms. Treatment and neonatal outcomes are also reported. Results: Of 64 hospitalized pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019, 44 (69%) had severe disease, and 20 (31%) had critical disease. The following preexisting comorbidities were observed: 25% had a pulmonary condition, 17% had cardiac disease, and the mean body mass index was 34 kg/m2. Gestational age was at a mean of 29±6 weeks at symptom onset and a mean of 30±6 weeks at hospital admission, with a median disease day 7 since first symptoms. Most women (81%) were treated with hydroxychloroquine; 7% of women with severe disease and 65% of women with critical disease received remdesivir. All women with critical disease received either prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation during their admission. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days (6 days [severe group] and 10.5 days [critical group]; P=.01). Intubation was usually performed around day 9 on patients who required it, and peak respiratory support for women with severe disease was performed on day 8. In women with critical disease, prone positioning was required in 20% of cases, the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome was 70%, and reintubation was necessary in 20%. There was 1 case of maternal cardiac arrest, but there were no cases of cardiomyopathy or maternal death. Thirty-two of 64 (50%) women with coronavirus disease 2019 in this cohort delivered during their hospitalization (34% [severe group] and 85% [critical group]). Furthermore, 15 of 17 (88%) pregnant women with critical coronavirus disease 2019 delivered preterm during their disease course, with 16 of 17 (94%) pregnant women giving birth through cesarean delivery; overall, 15 of 20 (75%) women with critical disease delivered preterm. There were no stillbirths or neonatal deaths or cases of vertical transmission. Conclusion: In pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019, admission into the hospital typically occurred about 7 days after symptom onset, and the duration of hospitalization was 6 days (6 [severe group] vs 12 [critical group]). Women with critical disease had a high rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and there was 1 case of cardiac arrest, but there were no cases of cardiomyopathy or maternal mortality. Hospitalization of pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 resulted in delivery during the clinical course of the disease in 50% of this cohort, usually in the third trimester. There were no perinatal deaths in this cohort.

Lysosomal storage disease spectrum in nonimmune hydrops fetalis: a retrospective case control study.

OBJECTIVES: Nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF) accounts for 90% of hydrops fetalis cases. About 15% to 29% of unexplained NIHF cases are caused by lysosomal storage diseases (LSD). We review the spectrum of LSD and associated clinical findings in NIHF in a cohort of patients referred to our institution. METHODS: We present a retrospective case-control study of cases with NIHF referred for LSD biochemical testing at a single center. Cases diagnosed with LSD were matched to controls with NIHF and negative LSD testing and analyzed according to the STROBE criteria to the extent the retrospective nature of this study allowed. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and December 2018, 28 patients with NIHF were diagnosed with a LSD. Eight types of LSD were diagnosed: galactosialidosis 8/28 (28.6%), sialic acid storage disease (SASD) 5/28 (17.9%), mucopolysaccharidosis VII 5/28 (17.9%), Gaucher 4/28 (14.3%), sialidosis 2/28 (7.1%), GM1 gangliosidosis 2/28 (7.1%), Niemann-Pick disease type C 1/28 (3.6%), and mucolipidosis II/III 1/28 (3.6%). Associated clinical features were hepatomegaly 16/21 (76.2%) vs 22/65 (33.8%), P < .05, splenomegaly 12/20 (60.0%) vs 14/58 (24.1%), P < .05, and hepatosplenomegaly 10/20 (50.0%) vs 13/58 (22.4%) P < .05. CONCLUSION: The most common LSD in NIHF were galactosialidosis, SASD, mucopolysaccharidosis VII, and Gaucher disease. LSD should be considered in unexplained NIHF cases, particularly if hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, or hepatosplenomegaly is visualized on prenatal ultrasound.

Pregnancy after Whipple procedure: a new case and review of the literature.

Background: Whipple procedure is a complex operation usually performed to treat periampullary neoplasms. There are only four case reports of five pregnancies after Whipple procedure, with limited evidence about how to manage pregnancy after this surgery.Case: A 28-year-old gravida 5 Para 2022 presented to our hospital at 20 weeks with worsening depression. She had a history of Whipple for a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas followed by two pregnancies. In the first, she underwent successful induction of labor at 38 weeks for pregestational diabetes. In her second pregnancy, she had multiple admissions for diabetic ketoacidosis. She was scheduled for induction of labor at 35 weeks but given unstable lie, underwent cesarean delivery.Conclusion: Women with a history of Whipple procedure generally have successful pregnancies with the most common antenatal complications including diabetes mellitus, abdominal pain and pancreatitis/cholangitis.

One-step versus two-step diagnostic testing for gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using the one-step as compared with the two-step approach.Study design: This was a parallel group nonblinded randomized trial conducted at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from June 2016 to December 2016. The primary outcome was GDM incidence in the one-step compared to the two-approach. Pregnant women without a history of pregestational diabetes were offered screening for GDM at gestational age 24-28 weeks. Obese women, defined as having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2, as well as those with a history of a pregnancy complicated by GDM, a history of a macrosomic baby (>4000 g), or with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), were offered early screening at their initial prenatal visit, and screening was repeated at 24-28 weeks if initially normal. Women were excluded if they had pre-existing diabetes or had a history of bariatric surgery. Women who were eligible were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the one-step or two-step approaches. A sample size of 142 women was planned per group. Women randomized to the one-step approach, after an overnight fast, were given a 2-h glucose tolerance test, which consisted of a 75-g glucose load. Blood glucose levels were measured fasting, at 1 h and 2 h after the glucose load. Diagnostic cutoffs for GDM diagnosis were one value of either fasting ≥92 mg/dL, 1 h ≥180 mg/dL, or 2 h ≥153 mg/dL, respectively. Women randomized to the two-step approach were given a nonfasting 50-g glucose load, and the blood glucose level was measured an hour after the glucose load. If that value was ≥135 mg/dL, the patient had a 3-h glucose tolerance test consisting of a 100-g glucose load. Diagnostic cutoffs for GDM diagnosis for this 3-h test were ≥2 abnormal values of fasting ≥95 mg/dL, 1 h ≥180 mg/dL, 2 h ≥155 mg/dL and 3 h ≥140 mg/dL, respectively. All analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the treatment group to which they were randomly allocated.Results: Two hundred eighty-four women agreed to take part in the study and underwent randomization from June 2015 to December 2015. Of them, 249 completed the screening and were followed up for the primary endpoint. Out of the 249 women who completed the screening, 123 were assigned to the one-step group and 126 to the two-step group. GDM occurred in 10 women (8.1%) in the one-step group, and 7 women (5.6%) in the two-step group (p = .42). Preeclampsia, preterm birth (PTB), induction of labor, mode of delivery and incidence of gestational age (OASIS) were not significantly different. Perinatal outcomes were similar as well.Conclusions: Screening for GDM with one-step, compared with the two-step approach, resulted in a similar incidence of GDM.

Implementation of vaginal cleansing prior to cesarean delivery to decrease endometritis rates.

BACKGROUND: Endometritis is a postpartum complication that is more common after cesarean delivery. It frequently requires intravenous antibiotic administration, prolonged hospital stays, and carries a risk of sepsis or abscess formation. Precesarean vaginal preparation has been shown to decrease the risk of endometritis in patients who have labored or have ruptured membranes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the practical implementation of a protocol for vaginal cleansing prior to cesarean delivery and the subsequent effect on endometritis rates in a clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: This is a before-after retrospective cohort study evaluating the first 6 months of implementation of a vaginal cleansing protocol at a single institution. The primary outcome was the rate of implementation. Secondary outcomes included endometritis and other postoperative complications. RESULTS: The rate of implementation after 6 months was 68.3% (p < .001) and postoperative endometritis rates decreased from 14.0% before implementation to 11.7% after implementation (p .49, OR 0.77, CI 0.36-1.62). Postoperative fever decreased from 22.3% to 18.3% (p .256, OR 0.70, CI 0.37-1.30) and infectious wound complications were 4.5% and 5.8%, respectively (p .76, OR 1.07, CI 0.69-3.64). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a protocol for vaginal cleansing prior to cesarean delivery in women with ruptured membranes or in labor has high uptake, but in almost a third of eligible women it was not performed. The implementation, has led to a clinical, although not statistical, decrease in postoperative endometritis. Continued research is needed to explore how to improve uptake of this quality improvement measure.

Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cesarean delivery occurs in roughly one third of pregnancies. Effective postoperative pain control is a goal for patients and physicians. Limiting opioid use in this period is important as some percentage of opioid naïve individuals will develop persistent use. Gabapentin is a non-opioid medication that has been used perioperatively to improve postoperative pain and limit opioid requirements. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of perioperative gabapentin in improving post cesarean delivery pain control. The following data sources were searched from their inception through October 2018: MEDLINE, Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, Sciencedirect, and the Cochrane Library at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review of the literature was performed to include all randomized trials examining the effect of perioperative gabapentin on post cesarean delivery pain control and other postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome was the analgesic effect of gabapentin on post cesarean delivery pain, measured by visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100) or Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) on movement 24 hours (h) postoperative. These scores were directly compared by multiplying all NRS scores by a factor of 10. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, to produce summary treatment effects in terms of mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Six placebo controlled trials (n = 645) were identified as relevant and included in the meta-analysis. All studies included only healthy pregnant women (American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II) undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery at term. Participants were randomized to either 600 mg oral gabapentin or placebo preoperatively and in one study the medications were also continued postoperatively. Pooled data showed that women who received gabapentin prior to cesarean delivery had significantly lower VAS pain scores at 24 h on movement (MD -11.58, 95% CI -23.04 to -0.12). VAS pain scores at other time points at rest or on movement were not significantly different for those who received gabapentin and placebo although there was a general trend toward lower pain scores for women receiving gabapentin. There was no significant between-group difference in use of additional pain medications, supplemental opioids, and maternal or neonatal side effects. There was higher pain control satisfaction at 12 and 24 h in the gabapentin versus placebo groups.

Vaginal Cleansing Before Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery in reducing postoperative endometritis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Ovid, EMBASE, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to January 2017. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Selection criteria included all randomized controlled trials comparing vaginal cleansing (ie, intervention group) with a control group (ie, either placebo or no intervention) in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Any method of vaginal cleansing with any type of antiseptic solution was included. The primary outcome was the incidence of endometritis. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to produce summary treatment effects in terms of relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Sixteen trials (4,837 women) on vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery were identified as relevant and included in the review. In most of the included studies, 10% povidone-iodine was used as an intervention. The most common way to perform the vaginal cleansing was the use of a sponge stick for approximately 30 seconds. Women who received vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery had a significantly lower incidence of endometritis (4.5% compared with 8.8%; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.72; 15 studies, 4,726 participants) and of postoperative fever (9.4% compared with 14.9%; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.86; 11 studies, 4,098 participants) compared with the control group. In the planned subgroup analyses, the reduction in the incidence of endometritis with vaginal cleansing was limited to women in labor before cesarean delivery (8.1% compared with 13.8%; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.97; four studies, 440 participants) or those with ruptured membranes (4.3% compared with 20.1%; RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.52; three studies, 272 participants). CONCLUSION: Vaginal cleansing immediately before cesarean delivery in women in labor and in women with ruptured membranes reduces the risk of postoperative endometritis. Because it is generally inexpensive and a simple intervention, we recommend preoperative vaginal preparation before cesarean delivery in these women with sponge stick preparation of povidone-iodine 10% for at least 30 seconds. More data are needed to assess whether this intervention may be also useful for cesarean deliveries performed in women not in labor and for those without ruptured membranes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42017054843.