Immunoprofile of adenosquamous carcinoma in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenosquamous carcinoma (GASC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer. Research on GASC treatment is limited, and its outcome is usually poor. We investigated the clinical features, immunoprofile of GASC, and determined the optimal treatment modality for these patients. METHODS: Patients with GASC from Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Adequate samples were examined for surrogate biomarkers for immunotherapy by IHC staining. RESULTS: Total 14 (0.35%) GASC patients were found among 4034 gastric cancer patients. The median tumor size was 6.8 cm in 10 patients with stage III GASC, and all these patients underwent radical gastrectomy followed by adjuvant therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 and 11.5 months, respectively. Two patients with stage IV GASC received frontline immunotherapy. Their median PFS and OS were 9.0 and 12.5 months. In immunoprofiling, 25.0% (n = 3), 75.0% (n = 9), and 33.3% (n = 4) of the samples had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein, combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1, and CPS of ≥10, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed that programmed death-ligand 1 ≥5% (HR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01-0.97; p = 0.047) was significant associated with superior OS. One stage IV patient with CPS ≥10 and dMMR proteins received nivolumab monotherapy as frontline treatment that resulted 14-month PFS. CONCLUSION: Patients with GASC are more likely to yield positive results for CPS and dMMR. Biomarkers should be examined, and immunotherapy can be considered as frontline systemic treatment.

The clinicopathological and genetic differences among gastric cancer patients with no recurrence, early recurrence, and late recurrence after curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: To date, few reports have investigated the genetic alterations and clinicopathological features among gastric cancer (GC) patients with no tumor recurrence, early recurrence, and late recurrence following curative surgery. METHODS: A total of 473 GC patients undergoing curative surgery were included. The clinicopathological characteristics, patient prognosis, recurrence patterns, and genetic alterations were compared between GC patients with early recurrence and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among the 473 GC patients, 119 had early recurrence (<2 years) and 45 had late recurrence (≥2 years). Patients with early recurrence had tumor size larger than 5 cm, fewer superficial-type tumors, more lymphovascular invasion, more advanced pathological T and N categories and Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stages, and worse 5-year overall survival than patients with late recurrence and no recurrence. For intestinal-type GC, patients with no tumor recurrence had more Helicobacter pylori infection than patients with early recurrence and late recurrence; for diffuse-type GC patients, the frequency of PIK3CA amplification was the highest in early recurrence, followed by late recurrence and no recurrence. GC patients with single-site recurrence had more ARID1A mutations than those with multiple-site recurrence. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, tumor recurrence, and pathological N categories were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: PIK3CA amplifications were more common in diffuse-type GC with early recurrence, whereas ARID1A mutations were more common in patients with single-site recurrence. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy might be helpful for these patients.

Clinical significance of circulating plasma DNA in gastric cancer.

With the progression of molecular techniques, the detection of circulating plasma DNA (cpDNA) is clinically feasible. However, the role of the cpDNA levels in gastric cancer is not well understood. This study assessed the mutational profile in primary tumors and clarified the clinical utility of quantitative and qualitative cpDNA alterations in 277 patients with advanced gastric cancer. The concentrations of cpDNA were measured by TaqMan qPCR, and 68 mutations in 8 genes were studied for cpDNA mutations. The median cpDNA concentrations in patients with stages I, II, and III gastric cancer were 3979, 3390 and 4278 copies/mL, respectively, and increased to 11,380 copies/mL in patients with Stage IV gastric cancer (p < 0.001). Among the 35 patients harboring cpDNA mutations, Stage IV patients (100%) were more likely to display high cpDNA levels than were Stage I (33.3%), II (75%) and III patients (66.7%) (p = 0.037). Patients displaying high cpDNA levels were more likely to experience peritoneal recurrence and exhibited significantly lower 5-year overall survival rates (39.2% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.039) than did patients displaying low cpDNA levels. Only for late stage (Stages III or IV) gastric cancer, patients harboring cpDNA mutations were more likely to experience vascular invasion (20% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.036) and exhibited a lower 5-year overall survival rate than did those lacking cpDNA mutations (5.6% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.028). High cpDNA levels are associated with peritoneal recurrence and poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer; harboring cpDNA mutations is associated with poor prognosis among patients with late stage gastric cancer.

Activation of the Notch1/STAT3/Twist signaling axis promotes gastric cancer progression.

Gastric carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies and a lethal cancer in the world. Notch signaling and transcription factors STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) and Twist regulate tumor development and are critical regulators of gastric cancer progression. Herein, the relationship among Notch, STAT3 and Twist pathways in the control of gastric cancer progression was studied. We found that Twist and phosphorylated STAT3 levels were promoted by the activated Notch1 receptor in human stomach adenocarcinoma SC-M1, embryonic kidney HEK293 and erythroleukemia K562 cells. Notch1 signaling dramatically induced Twist promoter activity through a C promoter binding factor-1-independent manner and STAT3 phosphorylation. Overexpression of Notch1 receptor intracellular domain (N1IC) enhanced the interaction between nuclear STAT3 and Twist promoter in cells. Gastric cancer progression of SC-M1 cells was promoted by N1IC through STAT3 phosphorylation and Twist expression including colony formation, migration and invasion. STAT3 regulated gastric cancer progression of SC-M1 cells via Twist. N1IC also elevated the progression of other gastric cancer cells such as AGS and KATO III cells through STAT3 and Twist. The N1IC-promoted tumor growth and lung metastasis of SC-M1 cells in mice were suppressed by the STAT3 inhibitor JSI-124 and Twist knockdown. Furthermore, Notch1 and Notch ligand Jagged1 expressions were significantly associated with phosphorylated STAT3 and Twist levels in gastric cancer tissues of patients. Taken together, these results suggest that Notch1/STAT3/Twist signaling axis is involved in progression of human gastric cancer and modulation of this cascade has potential for the targeted combination therapy.

Head and neck large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma should be separated from atypical carcinoid on the basis of different clinical features, overall survival, and pathogenesis.

According to the 2005 World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors, neuroendocrine tumors can be subdivided into typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, and small cell carcinoma. Similar tumors diagnosed as large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) in the lung are diagnosed as atypical carcinoids in the head and neck region. We studied neuroendocrine tumors and analyzed whether LCNEC should be separated from atypical carcinoid in the head and neck region. Twenty-three cases of primary head and neck neuroendocrine tumors were included and subdivided into typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, and small cell carcinoma according to the 2005 World Health Organization guidelines, and then LCNECs were separated from atypical carcinoids according to modified criteria using the Ki-67-labeling index and mitotic count. Clinical information and survival data were obtained, and immunohistochemical studies for p53 were conducted. The 5-year survival rates for the 2 typical carcinoids, 7 atypical carcinoids, 7 LCNECs, and 7 small cell carcinomas were 100.0%, 83.3%, 21.4%, and 20.8%, respectively (P=0.032). The LCNEC patients were older (mean age, 61 vs. 41 y; P=0.038), more commonly in advanced stage (stages III and IV 100% vs. 28.6%, P=0.01), with a poorer prognosis (5-year survival 21.4% vs. 83.3%, P=0.03), and more commonly had tumors overexpressing p53 (85.7% vs. 0%, P=0.005) as compared with atypical carcinoid patients. LCNECs should be separated from atypical carcinoids as a new entity of neuroendocrine carcinoma in the head and neck region. The new classification may provide better risk stratification and useful information for proper treatment.